Team Members David Haas Yun Tang Robert Njoroge Tom Kerwin Clients Facilities Management Don Anderson Rick Klein

Introduction of the System The purpose of our project is to develop web-based interfaces to access records in a Microsoft Access database The interfaces will be used for adding, editing and deleting records in the database tables. Specific queries of multiple tables will also be created The system’s main purpose is to keep track of the usage of rooms at all four SIUE campuses

Database Tables User Campus Non-Assignable Structure Assignable Structure Usable-Area Rooms Floor SFC Cross Ref Department Class Room Equipment Multi-Use Classroom Ownership Status Hourly Lease Owner Tenant

Queries Department Ownership of a Usable Area Square Footage of a Usable Area Total Square Footage of Usable Areas Used by a Department Times of Use of a Multi-Use Class Room Square Footage of an assignable Structure Interior and Exterior Square Footage of a Floor

Life Cycle Model Saw Tooth Model

Process Plan -Understanding the customer and the customer’s needs -Choosing the most appropriate project tools -Clarifying requirements with the customer -Plan the design of the system -Prepare for testing -Prepare for programmer training

Basic Organization Organization Plan David Haas Project Manager Don Anderson Main client contact Tom Kerwin Lead Analyst/Designer Yun Tang Lead Tester Robert Njoroge Lead Programmer Project Manager – Organizes most aspects of the project Lead Analyst – Proper definition of the system from the client Lead Designer – Leads the design phase of the project Lead Programmer – Assigns programming assignment to others Lead Tester – Coordinates the testing of the entire system Erin Harris Upper Management

Change Management Plan Baselines -Requirements Analysis Document -System Design Document Proposing a Change -Team Members -Clients Proposed Changes Will Be Investigated Change Management Board Implementing a Change

Schedule CS425 Timeline

CS499 Timeline

Testing Plan Unit Testing – Tries to find faults in participating component (i.e. objects and /or subsystems) Testing on the individual module to make sure it performs its function correctly before they are integrated with other modules Unit testing should be done on chunks that are as small as possible Those small chunks are most of the time implementation-specific Integration Testing – To make sure that the tested components work properly together Use either top-down or bottom-up or some combination to combine the tested modules into groupings Using black box and white box testing, each module will be tested with the modules with which they interface

Testing Plan (cont.) System Testing – Testing all the components together; Testing the entire system as a whole, with all modules included, and insure it functions work properly; Testing through a combination of black box and white box testing. This will be done in an environment as close as possible to that of the client’s. Acceptance Testing & installation testing – Testing the system under the condition, which are agreed by the client To check the requirements against the project agreement It should be done by client, if necessary with support by the developers

Testing Plan (cont.) Testing Tools Microsoft Visual Studio. NET Microsoft Access Microsoft ASP.NET Responsibility David Haas, Tom Kerwin, Robert Njoroge, Yun Tang

Internal Reviews Definition Process Preliminary Design Design Process Programming Process System Test Process Postmortem Review and Reporting Plan External Reviews Preliminary Design Design Acceptance

Manager Reports Status Reports Meeting Agenda Non-Manager Reports Progress Individual Status Meeting Minutes

Installation and Operation Plan The application (Space Allocation) will be installed on the Facilities Management servers on or before April 22, 2004 Client is responsible for all aspects of operating the software. The administrator will assign users and permissions as needed The client is responsible for all maintenance of the software upon its installation

Risks RISK DESCRIPTIONPROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE DELAY IN DAYS POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS Loss of team member5%10 daysOther members will take on the responsibilities of the gone team member Learning Curve for ASP.NET20%15 daysReading literature and programming manuals about ASP.NET Feature Creeps15%10 daysOnly add appropriate changes that will fit into our schedule and not effect the development of the rest of the system. Personnel Problems10%5 daysIf disagreement arises between group members the project manager will make the final decision.

Reviewed RAD and SDD with the clients Contract complete and ready for client’s final approval Developed preliminary ASP web interfaces Current Status of Project

?

Prototype Testing Login screen –Correct username and password Assignable Structure Interface –Edit and update Valid input Updated datagrid correctly – Adding a record Valid input Record added to database and datagrid Query –Information from the correct record is displayed