Presentation to the Oversight Board Santa Clara County Auditor-Controller 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
W. Tyler Michael, CPA Assistant Director of Audit Services.
Advertisements

2013 Public Law Changes House Enrolled Act 1276 Public Law 6 Amends IC and Township Board Meetings Effective.
Educational Facilities Developer Fee Information October /5/2015.
1 Assembly Bill x Dissolution Act Thomas P. Clark, Jr., Special Counsel to the City of Santa Ana Acting and Serving as Successor Agency to the Community.
Redevelopment Dissolution: Key Finance Issues California Society of Municipal Finance Officers 2012 Annual Conference Anaheim, California March 1, 2012.
Chapter 8 Accounting for General Long-Term Liabilities.
Chapter 43 An Act Relative to Improving Accountability and Oversight of Education Collaboratives Presentation to Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Florida Redevelopment Association
Sustainable Energy Systems Overview of contractual obligations, procedures and practical matters KICK-OFF MEETING.
Bradley J. Berg | Rev Introduction to the Interlocal Cooperation Act AWPHD Annual Membership Meeting October 10, 2012.
Rail Freight Assistance Program (RFAP) S ETTING THE S TAGE FOR THE F UTURE Rail Transportation Assistance Program (Rail TAP) RFAC Meeting April 28, 2010.
SCO REPORTING Roberta McNiel Year-End Legal Training May 2010.
CSU Operating Fund Revenue Legal Basis Reporting Workshop March 19, 2008.
The Camp Audit “Keep your friends close and your auditor closer”
Assessor Budgeting Assessors Annual School of Instruction October 8, 2007 Jim Nervig, Iowa Department of Management
1 California State Association of County Auditors Property Tax Managers’ Subcommittee May 2015 Division of Audits Update.
Preparing an AELR Meghan Hieger and Megan Smith Office of the Auditor General Accounting Services Division.
The Virginia Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). FOIA Topics of Discussion Public Meetings Closed Meetings Meeting Notices & Agendas Electronic Communication.
Reinsurance Supervision The US Perspective ASSAL XIV Annual Meeting Alessandro Iuppa, Superintendent Maine Bureau of Insurance, USA.
Winter Conference February 2, Dealing with the Ugly Face of Fraud Holly Frook Graham, CPA, CFE Arizona Office of the Auditor General.
State Board of Corrections An Overview of Public Law 2008 Chapter 653.
California Society of Municipal Finance Officers OVERVIEW of ABx1 26 and ABx1 27 Changes to Redevelopment Law August 4, 2011 Presented by Stephanie Downs.
Budget Integration to Governmental Accounting Reports.
Govt. Reporting - 1 GOVERNMENTAL REPORTING City Council Budgetary Hearing.
Latest Developments With Respect To Redevelopment Successor Agencies As of July 2013 Department of Finance Local Government Unit.
“Keeping your money in your pocket, where it belongs.” Chart of Accounts Update Florida Court Clerks & Comptrollers - New Clerk Academy March 13, 2014.
New Charter School Training April 24, 2012 Presented by Iona Martin, Financial Specialist Financial Accounting / OCAS & Auditing.
Monitoring Schedule David Chappell, or
The Auditors are Coming (Part I) Prepare for Federal Program Fiscal Monitoring Visits July 26, 2006.
School Budget (Draft)
Fiscal Monitoring and Oversight Tecumseh Local School District January 8, 2013 Roger Hardin, Assistant Director Finance Program Services (614)
Mock State Aid Project County Highway Accountant’s Conference 2015.
Board of Supervisors Meeting September 13, 2011 Finance Committee Recommendations on Options for County Redevelopment Program.
Training Module 7. What You’ll Learn In This Module In what areas may Conservation Districts enter into a contractual agreement with Michigan Department.
Basic Legal Requirements for the Budget and Audit Bill Longley TML Legal Counsel.
MARCH 9, 2006 Boating Safety and Enforcement Grant Program Regulations Stakeholder Workshop Proposed Conceptual Regulations Department of Boating and Waterways.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
D EPARTMENT OF F INANCE L OCAL G OVERNMENT U NIT R EDEVELOPMENT A GENCY D ISSOLUTION.
Latest Developments With Respect To Redevelopment Successor Agencies Department of Finance Local Government Unit.
Simplifying the Dissolution Process California Department of Finance February 2015.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Charter Schools in Florida Friday, February 13, 2015 Mid-Year Transportation.
1 Convention Center Authority Republican Policy Group Presentation March 23 rd 2015.
Great Lakes Region Treasurer Preparation Treasurer Office Duties and Responsibilities.
Financial Report Financial Report January 28, 2014 Berkeley County School District FY Financial Report As of December 31, 2013 Ideal Remaining.
County of Riverside ■ Office of the Auditor-Controller FY 2008 CAFR/Audit Highlights Robert E. Byrd, CGFM County Auditor-Controller.
1 Service Center FY2006 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation.
Economic Development Division Successor Agency Actions Pursuant to AB X1 26 City Council February 6, 2012.
© 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved Chapter 15 Estates And Trusts.
Budget Preparation Requirements, Practices and Tips Elections Directors Conference December 5, 2005 Jack Vogt School of Government.
Debt Overview August 19, 2011 Finance Department: G. Michael Miller, CFO Ronnie Belton, CFO Designate Michael R. Givens, Treasurer.
Exhibit A to Staff Report Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Fort Bragg Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2015 Plan of Refunding.
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
Department of Child Support Services OFFICE OF AUDITS AND COMPLIANCE.
PREPARING FOR A FISCAL AUDIT OF THE DYS SUBSIDY GRANT PRESENTED BY: GREG STEPHENS ADMINISTRATOR OFFICE OF AUDITS AND FISCAL COMPLIANCE.
Orange County Government Adoption Public Hearing May 10, 2016 Board of County Commissioners School Impact Fee Update.
1 GUKEYEH GUK’EH GU’SANI Kaska Dena Government Finance Act Prepared for Presentation to Annual General Assembly August 12, 13 and 14, 2008.
SUCCESSOR AGENCY UPDATES Community/Economic Development Department Presented by: Kymberly Horner, Economic Development Director October 18, 2016.
NJDOE Testing for Lead in School Drinking Water
FY2007 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation (Part I)
County Highway Accountant’s Conference 2015
Budget policy and Deficit discussion
Successor Agency to the PCDC FY 2017 Recommended Budget
Kentucky County Treasurer’s
State Board of Finance Bonding Overview
UNIFORM CHART OF ACCOUNTS
POST-ISSUANCE COMPLIANCE
UNIFORM CHART OF ACCOUNTS
A Presentation to: Wisconsin Government Finance Officers Association
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) Certification Process
Presentation transcript:

Presentation to the Oversight Board Santa Clara County Auditor-Controller 1

Overview The Audit Process Overview of Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) Certification Certified ROPS Approval 2

The Audit Process H&S Code section 34182(a)(1): “The county auditor- controller shall conduct or cause to be conducted an agreed upon procedures audit of each redevelopment agency....” Four Parts(§ 34182(a)(2)): Establish each RDA’s assets and liabilities Document and determine each RDA’s passthrough obligations Document and determine the amount and terms of any indebtedness Certify the initial ROPS Final deadline: July 1,

What are ROPS? Six-month schedules of “enforceable obligation” payments. (§ 34171(h)) Beginning May 1, 2012, “only those payments listed in the [ROPS] may be made by the successor agency....” (§ 34177(a)(3)) 4

What are ROPS? (Cont’d) The ROPS must identify the source of funds, and monies from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund are to be used “only to the extent no other funding source is available or when payment from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation or by the provisions of this part.” (§ 34177(l)(1)) Property tax money will flow from the trust funds maintained by the County Auditor-Controller to trust funds maintained by the successor agencies every six months to pay only those items on ROPS; this is the second priority distribution from the trust fund. (§ 34183(a)(2)) 5

What are ROPS? (Cont’d) The initial certified and approved ROPS is due April 15, (§ 34177(l)(3)) The initial ROPS is certified only for payments between January 1, 2012 and June 30, Amounts will be “trued up” based on actual payments and final, approved ROPS with every ROPS period. (§ 34186) Future ROPS must still be certified, based on the final audit establishment of assets and liabilities and determination of indebtedness. 6

Mandatory Conditions for a Valid ROPS - § 34177(l)(2): A [ROPS] shall not be deemed valid unless all of the following conditions have been met: (A)A draft [ROPS] is prepared by the successor agency for the enforceable obligations of the former [RDA].... [T]he initial draft of that schedule... shall be reviewed and certified, as to its accuracy, by an external auditor designated pursuant to Section (B) The certified [ROPS] is submitted to and duly approved by the oversight board. (C) A copy of the approved [ROPS] is submitted to the county auditor-controller and both the Controller’s office and Department of Finance and must be posted on the successor agency’s Internet Web site. 7

Audit Phase 1: ROPS Certification Timeline: County CPRA Request for Underlying Documents – January 11th Fieldwork Started – Early March Fieldwork Completed – March 29th Exit Conference/Draft Report – Early April Certified ROPS to Oversight Boards – Starting April 5th Approved, Certified ROPS Submitted to State Dept. of Finance et al. – April 15th 8

Item Review – Overview ROPS may only include “enforceable obligations” of the former RDA. “Enforceable obligation” is specifically defined by law in ABX1 26. Legal review by the Office of the County Counsel examined underlying documentation using a multi- step process. An identical, consistent process was used countywide to examine every item listed on the draft ROPS by successor agencies to ensure that the statutory criteria were met. 9

Item Review Steps Step 1: Does item meet threshold qualification as an “enforceable obligation” under section 34171(d)(1)? Step 2: Is the item excluded by the statute? 10

Item Review – Step 1 Does the item meet the threshold qualification under section 34171(d)(1)? The most common problems included: Successor agency was unable to provide documentation to support the existence of the obligation. Documentation provided shows that the obligation was a city obligation, not an RDA obligation. Documentation describes an item that is not a current or future obligation of the agency (e.g., the obligation ended). 11

Item Review – Step 2 Is the item excluded by the statute? Most activity initiated after June 28, 2011 violates the “freeze” provisions. (Part 1.8) After June 28, 2011, ABX1 26 prohibited RDAs from entering into new enforceable obligations or expanding any existing obligations. This issue did not arise often as most jurisdictions complied with the freeze and the California Supreme Court’s order keeping the freeze in place while the statute was under review. 12

Item Review – Step 2 (Cont’d) Is the item excluded by the statute? “[A]greements, contracts, or arrangements between the [City] that created the redevelopment agency and the redevelopment agency are invalid and shall not be binding on the successor agency....” (§ 34178(a); see also § 34171(d)(2)) There are limited exceptions for loans entered into within two years of the RDA’s formation and for certain agreements related to “indebtedness obligations.” Section 34178(a) allows successor agencies to enter or reenter into agreements with the host city, but only with oversight board approval. Certain indebtedness-related obligations did not meet the narrow exception but are likely strong candidates for certification if the oversight board approves reentering into the relevant agreements. 13

Item Review – Step 2 (Cont’d) Is the item excluded by the statute? Certain agreements or contracts with other public agencies are invalid. (§ 34171(d)(3)) These agreements concern services or funding for governmental or private services or capital projects outside of RDA project areas. These agreements rarely arose during the review. 14

Payment Review – Overview Documentation was examined to ensure that obligation dollar amounts for the six month period covered by the ROPS were accurate. Adjustments were made: To account for reserves; To match the underlying documentation; To ensure that estimates and other amounts were based on reasonable data; and, Where obligations were only partially certifiable (e.g., only part of the amount was an agency obligation). Total obligation amounts, beyond the six month period, have not yet been certified – they will be reviewed in the audit as part of the establishment of assets and liabilities and determination of indebtedness. 15

Reclassifications Certain items listed on draft ROPS were reclassified: Passthrough payments are not ROPS items and are now the responsibility of the County Auditor-Controller. They are not part of the certified ROPS and are subject to a separate phase of the audit. Amounts not currently payable are excluded in the certified ROPS for this time period but will be subject to the final audit determination of liabilities. Administrative costs are listed separately, because they are paid out pursuant to the administrative cost allowance, as a lower priority, and only upon oversight board approval of the administrative budget. 16

Administrative Costs The oversight board must approve the administrative budget. (§§ 34171(b), 34177(j)) Administrative costs are subject to a 5% cap on the ROPS amount in this fiscal year, and 3% thereafter, with a minimum of $250,000 each fiscal year subject to oversight board approval. (§ 34171(b)) Administrative cost items cannot be certified until the oversight board approves the administrative budget and approves entering into appropriate agreements for staffing. 17

18

Certified ROPS Approval Process Oversight boards are asked to approve the certified ROPS. Notwithstanding certification, oversight boards can remove any item that is terminable or renegotiable. (§ 34181(d), (e)) Oversight boards cannot approve an item that is not an “enforceable obligation.” (§ 34181(b)) Consistent with its fiduciary obligations, an oversight board can approve entering or reentering agreements between the successor agency and the host city; the county auditor-controller can subsequently certify the item and it may be added to this or a subsequent ROPS. (§ 34178(a)) If there is a disputed item, we recommend that the board discuss it and provide specific direction to the successor agency staff to work with the county auditor-controller to review the item for potential certification, if appropriate. 19

Questions? The County Auditor-Controller’s financial, legal, and internal and external audit staff are available to answer questions related to ROPS certification. 20