1 Speed up ALICE simulation with TFluka Ernesto Lopez Torres.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of DHCAL Slice Test Data Analysis Lei Xia ANL-HEP All results preliminary.
Advertisements

Parameterized Shower Simulation in Lelaps: a Comparison with Geant4 Daniel Birt, Amy Nicholson.
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab.  Cited from March collaboration Meeting EC group Internal Communication Jin Huang 2 Preshower ID power drop significantly.
Test with cosmic rays at LNGS - final results - S. Bastianelli, L. Degli Esposti, R.Diotallevi, G. Mandrioli, P. Righini, G. Rosa, M. Sioli OPERA meeting,
M. Sullivan Mini-workshop on the MEIC design Nov 2, 2012.
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
Status of the Tagger Hall Background Simulation Simulation A. Somov, Jefferson Lab Hall-D Collaboration Meeting, University of Regina September
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.
ALICE EMCal Physics and Functional Requirements Overview.
Status of calorimeter simulations Mikhail Prokudin, ITEP.
17-19 Oct, 2007Geant4 Japan Oct, 2007Geant4 Japan Oct, 2007Geant4 Japan 2007 Geant4 Japan.
Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin.
Dec 2000 GEANT4 Workshop - David Bailey Hadronic Interactions 1 Checking Basic Characteristics of Hadronic Shower Parameterizations in GHEISHA / GEANT4.
Roberto GemmeIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati, 12-14/11/2007 Reaction plane determination with the neutron Zero Degree Calorimeters.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
NEUTRON OPTICS & SHIELDING GROUP NATALIIA CHERKASHYNA TAP MEETING 23 RD OF JANUARY, 2014 Latest Developments on Shielding and Backgrounds.
15-16 Oct 2005 Alice-USA meetingAleksei Pavlinov GEANT EMCAL geometry for ALICE current status Aleksei Pavlinov WSU.
Modeling Production, Interactions and Transport Fermilab November 14, 2005 Fermilab ILC-CAL Nikolai Mokhov, Fermilab.
17-19 Oct, 2007Geant4 Japan Oct, 2007Geant4 Japan Oct, 2007Geant4 Japan 2007 Geant4 Collaboration.
Geant4 in production: status and developments John Apostolakis (CERN) Makoto Asai (SLAC) for the Geant4 collaboration.
C. Oppedisano for the ALICE Collaboration. 5 Jun 2012 C. Oppedisano 2/10 Centrality in p-A interactions can be defined through the number of collisions.
Anders Kirleis Stony Brook University The Design Of A Detector For The Electron Ion Collider.
Status of ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Simulations With GEANT4 G. Azuelos , A. Chekhtman , J. Dodd , A. Kiryunin , M. Leltchouk , R. Mazini , G.
CBM ECAL simulation status Prokudin Mikhail ITEP.
13 July 2005 ACFA8 Gamma Finding procedure for Realistic PFA T.Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.), M-C. Chang(Tohoku Univ.), K.Fujii(KEK), A.Miyamoto(KEK), S.Yamashita(ICEPP),
Towards comparisons between TFluka and TGeant3 ( within CbmRoot Framework) Denis Bertini (IT-GSI) Antonin Maire (IPHC Strasbourg)
SIGNAL AND BACKGROUND SIMULATION AT THE RECOMBINATION CHAMBER Vadim TALANOV CERN and IHEP, Protvino Joint LHC Machine-Experiments Workshop on Very Forward.
Roberto Barbera (Alberto Pulvirenti) University of Catania and INFN ACAT 2003 – Tsukuba – Combined tracking in the ALICE detector.
2000/9/23 JPS meeting in Niigata1 Measurement of single gamma and  0 with PHENIX EMCal (I) H.Torii Kyoto Univ./RIKEN for the PHENIX Collaboration. Sep/23/2000,
1 Hadronic calorimeter simulation S.Itoh, T.Takeshita ( Shinshu Univ.) GLC calorimeter group Contents - Comparison between Scintillator and Gas - Digital.
ICE Vs SALT GeV Electron Showers Shahid Hussain Shahid Hussain University of Kansas.
1 S, Fedele, Student Presentations, 2004/08/04S Amazing Title Slide Reworking the CES Cluster Reconstruction Algorithm By: Steve Fedele Advisor: Pavel.
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
Know How at LLR Ultra-granular calorimetry AFTER vs CHIC 1F. Fleuret - LLR11/05/ LPSC.
OUTGOING NEUTRONS IN CALET CALET AIMS AT DETECTING UHE CR ELECTRONS HIGH REJECTION FACTOR FOR PROTONS/NUCLEI NEEDED POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENT RESPECT ‘STANDARD’
LumiCal background and systematics at CLIC energy I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences.
13/03/2007Gustavo Conesa Frascati EMCAL meeting 1/24 Gamma jet/hadron correlations Gustavo Conesa Balbastre.
2005/07/12 (Tue)8th ACFA Full simulator study of muon detector and calorimeter 8th ACFA Workshop at Daegu, Korea 2005/07/12 (Tue) Hiroaki.
Physics whit ACORDE (ALICE Cosmic ray detector) Arturo Fernández for ACORDE-ALICE group.
E.B. Holzer BLM Meeting: Q & A March 20, Questions and Answers.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
J-Parc Neutrino Facility Primary Proton Beam Design A. K. Ichikawa(KEK), Y.Iwamoto(KEK) and K.Tanabe(Tokyo) et.al. 7 th Nov. 2003,
DIS 2011, Newport News, April 2011Joakim Nystrand, University of Bergen 1 Small-x and forward measurements in ALICE Joakim Nystrand University of.
Performance Evaluation for Open Charm and Beauty Measurement at LHC ALICE PID capability from λ and K s 0 measurement at LHC ALICE 筑波大学数理物質科学研究科 Kengo.
PPAC Jonathan Olson University of Iowa HCAL November 11-13, 2004.
Heating and radiological
The ALICE Cosmic Ray Physics Program
Performance of jets algorithms in ATLAS
Forward Tagger Simulations
An Innovative Approach to Compact Calorimetry in Space, NEUCAL
Geant3 Simulation of Shielding for “sheet of flame” Background
CMS requirements for G4 TF on
Monte Carlo studies of the configuration of the charge identifier
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab
Physics Validation of LHC Simulations
STAR Geometry and Detectors
Status of Compton Analysis
Comparison between Geant4, Fluka and the TileCal test-beam data
The Hadrontherapy Geant4 advanced example
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Beam Loss Simulations LHC
Summary of dE/dx studies in silicon and MS in muon system
J/Y Simulations for Trigger
Based on a presentation of M.Verderi
An Innovative Approach to Compact Calorimetry in Space, NEUCAL
Physics event timing Use Pythia to generate hadronic decays at 125 GeV
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Electron PID & trigger using EMCal
Presentation transcript:

1 Speed up ALICE simulation with TFluka Ernesto Lopez Torres

2 Problem HIJING Central event takes ~ 60 h with TFluka ~ 4 h with Geant3

3 Why TFluka takes so long time? First ideas: Energy transport cuts on region basics is not allow for hadrons, so we have 1MeV cut for all volumes There is not cut on number of track steps (for GEANT we have set max steps) More detail physics?

4 Where is Fluka spending time? Some primary particle create a lot secondaries ( ) 1.Small bug on HMPID: by error someone comment the initialization of the array with the quantum efficiency properties. QEff = instead of = 1 T0 HMPID Fix on the CVS

5 Where is Fluka spending time? # Primaries with (transp. time > 30s): 657 (1.1%) with a total time: s = h (63.8%) Transp. time(seg.)Volume name (37.3h) ALIC ZNST ZNSL ZPST QB QF ZPSL ZDC QBPM QS ZNG ZNG ZNG ZNG HUWA TFluka HIJING Pb-Pb 5.5TeV central event particles (Laptop Centrino 2GHz 1Gb RAM) Total transport time: s (65.6 h)

6 Where is Fluka spending time? Small hadronic cut (1MeV) on ZDC calorimeter (PIPE, etc) allow the develop of detail hadronic showers. Those hadrons escape the volume and develop the EM part also in ALIC from AliZDCv2::CreateMaterials() // Thresholds for showering in the ZDCs i = 1; //tantalum gMC->Gstpar(idtmed[i], "CUTGAM",.001); gMC->Gstpar(idtmed[i], "CUTELE",.001); gMC->Gstpar(idtmed[i], "CUTNEU",.01); gMC->Gstpar(idtmed[i], "CUTHAD",.01); …… i = 5; //lead gMC->Gstpar(idtmed[i], "CUTGAM",.001); gMC->Gstpar(idtmed[i], "CUTELE",.001); gMC->Gstpar(idtmed[i], "CUTNEU",.01); gMC->Gstpar(idtmed[i], "CUTHAD",.01); …. // Avoid too detailed showering along the beam line i = 7; //iron with energy loss (ZIRON) gMC->Gstpar(idtmed[i], "CUTGAM",.1); gMC->Gstpar(idtmed[i], "CUTELE",.1); gMC->Gstpar(idtmed[i], "CUTNEU", 1.); gMC->Gstpar(idtmed[i], "CUTHAD", 1.);

7 Where is Fluka spending time? ZDC (ZEM), PIPE, Compensator DIPO =>ALIC AliMC::Stepping() timer.Stop() TH3F->Fill(x,y,z,timer.CpuTime());... timer.Start() } T0 ZEM

8 Where is Fluka spending time? (ZDC (ZEM), PIPE, Compensator DIPO) ->ALIC 1100 cm ALIC pi- P=92Gev #secondaries=17626 transport time=134s (2.3 min)

9 Where is Fluka spending time? ZDC and PIPE => ALIC TH3F->Fill(x,y,z,timer.CpuTime()); ZDC ZNST ZNSL ZPST

10 Where is Fluka spending time? ZDC and PIPE -> ALIC

11 To reduce the transport time in ALIC we introduced new volumes with high Energy cuts for gammas an electrons (0.1GeV) ALIC ALIZ Shielding around dipole compensator DCAR PIAR

12 We change from to

13 Final Results CVSWith new volumes TFluka65 h9 h Geant34 h2 h # Primaries with (transp. time > 30s): 33 (0.05%) with a total time: 8497 s = 2.3 h (25.5%) Transp. time(seg.) Volume name ZNST ZPST ZNSL ALIZ ZPSL ZDC ZNG ZNG ZNG ZNG ZNF ZNF ZNF ZNF ZNST

14 TODO Check how the changes could affect the ZDC performance.

15 END

16 Where is Fluka spending time? ALIC ZDC

17 Final FLUKA GEANT