Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome!. Guiding Questions “Alberta Education has set the direction – each district must now set the course…..” (Special Education Conference, 2010)
Advertisements

Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
MSDE Alternative Governance Plan Development School: James Madison Middle School January 2012.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: ADDRESSING STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES AND ENGLISH LEARNERS January 11, 2012.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
The Head Start Child Development and Early Learning Framework A Focus on School Readiness for Infant and Toddler Children August 19, 2014 RGV Pre-Service.
Schoolwide Planning, Part III: Strategic Action Planning
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
Speakers Dr. Blanca Enriquez, Director, Office of Head Start
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Improve Achievement for EACH PreK-12 Student Areas of Focus Preview GREENWICH PUBLIC SCHOOLS October 11, 2007.
0 1 1 TDOE’s accountability system has two overarching objectives and Growth for all students, every year Faster growth for those students who are furthest.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
OFFICE OF FIELD SERVICES SPRING PLANNING WORKSHOP 2012.
Division Liaison Update Division Liaison Meeting The College of William and Mary January 7, 2013.
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
Angilee M. Downing, M.Ed. Vision: Educational Excellence For All Students.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
ESEA Renewal What does it Mean for Title I? Program Improvement and Family Support Branch Title I Administrative Meeting September 17, 2015.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
Instructional Support Team (IST) By Kelli Reisinger Unit 13 Presentation.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
CURRICULUM RENEWAL EDD 7913 CRN BY JAMIE LEEDER, GENEVIEVE LEYDIG, KEITH MABE NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY APRIL 4, 2013.
Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G Principals Meeting.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
The Michigan Department of Education Program Evaluation Tool (PET) Lessons Learned & Support Documents.
Our Theory of Action and Multi-Tiered Framework are anchored in the Vision and Mission for the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Office of Student.
Interrelationships: Plans + Funding = Student Proficiency Ingham ISD Curriculum Director’s Meeting November 4, 2015.
Focus on Professional Learning Communities State Personnel Development Grant D. Ahrens 5/10/2013.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Office of Service Quality
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MARCH 3, 2016.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
The Day in the Life of OFPSI staff By: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell Director of Federal Programs & School Improvement (OFPSI) Petersburg City Public Schools.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Lessons from Virginia: Growing a System of Support for
Division Liaison Update
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Joann Hooper Patty Rooks Paulette Richmond Gary Wenzel
Studio School Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Presentation transcript:

Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program Improvement and Family Support Branch Division of Student, Family and School Support Maryland State Department of Education

Background Focus Schools 2.4% - Ethnic Group 2.4% - Racial Group 2.4% - EL 92.8% - Special Education

The Past – Title I 1003(a) Funds to Focus Schools  $50,000 base + $50/child

The Past – Sample Strategies Provide a full-day extended year program targeted to the students who are performing at Basic level on the Maryland State Achievement Test. Special education teachers and selected classroom teachers will participate in twice weekly after-school planning designed to focus additional support on effective instruction for all special education students. The school will contract with an organization to obtain technical assistance and modeling for teaching math through movement.

The Right People The Right Time The Right Services

The Past – Developed around the following beliefs: People are a school’s greatest asset. Schools and their communities are unique. What works for one will not necessarily work for another. There is a sequence to improvement. A lot needs to happen, but not all at once.

The Past – Breakthrough Center MSDE’s Focus Schools Network Staff  Title I  Title II  Special Education  Academic Policy and Innovation  Breakthrough Center

The Past – Focus School Network – Shift towards an integrated system of collaborative state and local support  1 st Focus Network Meeting - Title I Central Office staff and representatives from each Focus School Breakthrough Center

The Past – Title I 1003(a) Funds to Focus Schools  $50,000 base + $50/child

The Past – Changes to Focus Grant Application  Uses of Funds Guidance  Required schools to list: Strategies that were implemented in the prior year and describe whether the strategies were effective Staff who would monitor and evaluate the implementation the strategies

The Past – Focus School Network Activities  Fall and Spring convenings Central Office – Title I, Title III and Special Education, and school staff Setting the Foundation for a System’s Focus on Closing the Gaps Identifying Evidenced- Based Strategies that are Aligned with Root Causes Selecting and Implementing Strategies that will Assist in Closing the Gaps Stories from Three Focus Schools High Performing Schools

The Past – Focus School Network Activities  Virtual Book Study Students with Disabilities Can Meet Accountability Standards by John L. O’Connor

The Past – Title I 1003(a) Funds to Focus Schools  $50,000 base + $50/child

The Past – Sample Strategies Collaborative planning sessions involving the general education teacher, special education resource teacher, and paraprofessional in order to identify instructional implications of specific strategies used to address specific needs of students with varying abilities and/or students with IEPs. Building capacity of staff around addressing the needs of the lowest performing students by exploring equitable instructional practices (small group, differentiated instruction, rigor) through book studies and professional development sessions.

The Past – Sample Strategies Regular education and special education teachers will participate in monthly professional development designed to focus additional support on effective classroom instruction for the lowest-performing students. Dual certified lead teacher to work collaboratively with special education and general education staff to model instruction, analyze data, and assist teachers to select appropriate strategies for the lowest-performing students.

The Past – Because this school year was a pilot year for the PARCC Test, and all children were not given the same assessment, Maryland was given a “Pause” by the US Department of Education from exiting Focus Schools for this year and the school year as well.

The Past – Title I 1003(a) Funds to Focus Schools  $50,000 base + $50/child

The Past – Changes to Focus Grant Application  Required LEAs to: List those other central offices that would be involved in providing specific, focused technical assistance to Focus Schools Indicate types of guidance and technical assistance that would be provided to assist Focus Schools in identifying and implementing strategies that would assist in closing the achievement gap

The Past – Additional Support to Focus Schools  Monthly Focus Newsletters

The Past – Sample Strategies Weekly guided collaborative planning sessions for al staff. During these sessions, teachers will receive coaching support from the reading specialist, math curriculum coach, ESOL teacher, and special education resource teacher. Data coach will work in conjunction with the professional development teacher, the special education teacher, and classroom teachers to identify student needs and match appropriate instructional strategies.

The Past – Sample Strategies Monthly learning walks to provide opportunities for administration and staff members to observe current instructional practices, students’ response to learning, and strategy instruction used to address specific needs of students with varying learning abilities.

The Past – During the school year, Maryland developed, submitted and had its ESEA Flex Renewal Request approved

The Present – Title I 1003(a) funds are being provided to Focus Schools  Because the allocation in prior years was based on enrollment rather than need, many schools and LEAs articulated that they had more funds than they actually needed to support their focus schools. In response to this feedback, beginning in , Maryland will allocate 1003(a) funds based on individual school needs. Grant funding will range from $30,000 to $120,000 per school per year.

The Present – Changes to Focus Grant Application  Revised Needs Assessment Identify the data Identify who is affected by the problem including the grade level(s) Provide information as to how the achievement of the identified subgroup compares to the achievement of “all students” and other subgroups  Root Cause(s) What are the main factors that have impacted achievement for this subgroup

The Present – Changes to Focus Grant Application  Justification for Continuing Strategies from

The Present – Sample Strategy Teachers will participate in vertical and grade-level articulation planning to develop effective lesson plans that integrate the necessary supports and scaffolding to meet the needs of all learners.

The Present – January, 2016  Which Focus Schools will exit Focus status  Which will remain in Focus status At that same time, Maryland will identify new Focus Schools that bring its total number of Focus Schools to 42

The Present – Supports for Focus Schools  “ Priority access” to the State’s general options of support including: state developed newsletters, webinars, online and in-person professional learning and professional training opportunities, and early childhood resources  Continued support from the Breakthrough Center  Training on Implementation Science to assist Focus Schools implement, sustain, and scale-up evidence-based strategies

The Future – and Beyond Supports for Focus Schools  “ Priority access” to the State’s general options of support including: state developed newsletters, webinars, online and in- person professional learning and professional training opportunities, and early childhood resources  Continued support from the Breakthrough Center  Training on Implementation Science to assist Focus Schools implement, sustain, and scale-up evidence-based strategies  $30,000 to $120,000 per year from Title I 1003(a) funds

The Future – and Beyond Requirements of LEAs With Continuing Focus Schools  Convene a Focus School Support Team (FSST) that oversees the implementation of selected interventions and LEA level support Ensure technical assistance is provided Coordinate the support, monitor and assess the progress Assist in the facilitation and coordination of differentiated supports for principals and teachers Meet periodically with MSDE to discuss progress, school data and the coordinated and differentiated support provided

Maryland’s Journey – Focus Schools

Questions?