Magnetic structure of the disk corona Slava Titov, Zoran Mikic, Alexei Pankin, Dalton Schnack SAIC, San Diego Jeremy Goodman, Dmitri Uzdensky Princeton.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Magnetic Fields Due to Currents
Advertisements

Helical MagnetoRotational Instability and Issues in Astrophysical Jets Jeremy Goodman 1,3 Hantao Ji 2,3 Wei Liu 2,3 CMSO General Meeting 5-7 October 2005.
Progress and Plans on Magnetic Reconnection for CMSO For NSF Site-Visit for CMSO May1-2, Experimental progress [M. Yamada] -Findings on two-fluid.
Dynamo and Magnetic Helicity Flux Hantao Ji CMSO & PPPL CMSO General Meeting Princeton, October 5-7, 2005 Contributors: Eric Blackman (Rochester) Stewart.
Reconnection: Theory and Computation Programs and Plans C. C. Hegna Presented for E. Zweibel University of Wisconsin CMSO Meeting Madison, WI August 4,
Van Tend & Kuperus (1978) Three-Dimensional Configuration of Titov & Démoulin (1999) 3. line-current 1. flux rope 2. magnetic charges 3.
Seminario UT FUSIONE Aula Brunelli, Centro Ricerche Frascati 8 Febbraio 2010 Ideal MHD Stability Boundaries of the PROTO-SPHERA Configuration F. Alladio,
Analytical and numerical models of field line behaviour in 3D reconnection David Pontin Solar MHD Theory Group, University of St. Andrews Collaborators:
Methods of solving problems in electrostatics Section 3.
The 3D picture of a flare Loukas Vlahos. Points for discussion  When cartoons drive the analysis of the data and the simulations….life becomes very complicated.
The Relationship Between CMEs and Post-eruption Arcades Peter T. Gallagher, Chia-Hsien Lin, Claire Raftery, Ryan O. Milligan.
Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
Global Distribution of Slow Solar Wind N. U. Crooker, S. W. Antiochos, X. Zhao, Yi-M. Wang, and M. Neugebauer.
Observations –Morphology –Quantitative properties Underlying Physics –Aly-Sturrock limit Present Theories/Models Coronal Mass Ejections (CME) S. K. Antiochos,
Current sheets formation along magnetic separators in 3d Dana Longcope Montana State University Thanks: I Klapper, A.A. Van Ballegooijen NSF-ATM.
Modeling the Magnetic Field Evolution of the December Eruptive Flare Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Integrating Global MHD Models with SECCHI Observations Pete Riley, Zoran Mikic, Jon Linker, Roberto Lionello, and Slava Titov SAIC, San Diego, California.
Magnetic Helicity • Magnetic helicity measures
Solar-B XRT XRT-1 The Science and Capability of the Solar-B / X-Ray Telescope Solar-B XRT Presenter: Ed DeLuca Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.
Magnetic Topology and the Corona- Heliosphere Connection Background: –Frozen-in flux (τ D ~ L 2 / η >> τ L ) implies that magnetic topology constrains.
Magnetic Flux Emergence Zhang & Low Paper II. used “field flipping” trick to study “current sheet” (CS) and “relaxed” (RX) fields, w/J = 0: “pot’l w/in.
Kathy Reeves Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Terry Forbes University of New Hampshire Partitioning of energy in a loss-of-equilibrium CME model.
Chapter 1 Vector analysis
Helicity as a Component of Filament Formation D.H. Mackay University of St. Andrews Solar Theory Group.
Free Magnetic Energy in Solar Active Regions above the Minimum-Energy Relaxed State (Regnier, S., Priest, E.R ApJ) Use magnetic field extrapolations.
SDO/AIA science plan: prioritization and implementation: Five Objectives in 10 steps [C1]1 I: C1/M8/C10 Transients: Drivers & Destabilization Chair(s):
Can the coronal field’s susceptibility to emergence-induced eruption be estimated? SSPVSE Discussion Group B, Wed., 19 Oct B. Welsch, Space Sciences.
MA Day 46 – March 19, 2013 Section 9.7: Spherical Coordinates Section 12.8: Triple Integrals in Spherical Coordinates.
Definite Integration and Areas 01 It can be used to find an area bounded, in part, by a curve e.g. gives the area shaded on the graph The limits of integration...
Data-Driven MHD Modeling of CME Events
Twist & writhe of kink-unstable magnetic flux ropes I flux rope: helicity sum of twist and writhe: kink instability: twist  and writhe  (sum is constant)
Magnetic configurations responsible for the coronal heating and the solar wind Hwanhee Lee 1, Tetsuya Magara 1 1 School of Space research, Kyung Hee University.
MA Day 45 – March 18, 2013 Section 9.7: Cylindrical Coordinates Section 12.8: Triple Integrals in Cylindrical Coordinates.
A topological view of 3D global magnetic field reversal in the solar corona Rhona Maclean Armagh Observatory 5 th December 2006.
MAGNETOSTATIC FIELD (STEADY MAGNETIC)
Some new formulae for magnetic and current helicities Jean-Jacques Aly DSM/IRFU/SAp, CE Saclay, France.
MA Day 39 – March 1, 2013 Section 12.4: Double Integrals in Polar Coordinates.
Coronal Mass Ejection As a Result of Magnetic Helicity Accumulation
Will it Fit? A Comparison of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Models and Observations Drake Ranquist Brigham Young University Advisors: Mari Paz Miralles.
Chapter 4 Axial Load. Saint -Venant's Principle Saint-Venant's Principle claims that localized effects caused by any load acting on a body will dissipate.
Chapter 24 Review on Chapter 23 From Coulomb's Law to Gauss’s Law
I. INTRODUCTION Gas Pressure Magnetic Tension Coronal loops are thin and bright structure of hot plasma emitting intense radiation in X-ray and EUV. (1)
II. MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS (Space Climate School, Lapland, March, 2009) Eric Priest (St Andrews)
Chapter 6 A four-node quadrilateral element is shown in the figure. 1.Write the (x,y) coordinates in the elements in terms of (s,t) of the reference element.
Structure, Equilibrium and Pinching of Coronal Magnetic Fields Slava Titov SAIC, San Diego, USA Seminar at the workshop „Magnetic reconnection theory“
1 Chapter 6 Flow Analysis Using Differential Methods ( Differential Analysis of Fluid Flow)
Simulation Study of Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetotail and Solar Corona Zhi-Wei Ma Zhejiang University & Institute of Plasma Physics Beijing,
SHINE Formation and Eruption of Filament Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen 1 & D. H. Mackay 2 1 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge,
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Prentice Hall Areas in the Plane Section 7.2.
CDS 301 Fall, 2008 Image Visualization Chap. 9 November 11, 2008 Jie Zhang Copyright ©
Definite Integration and Areas 01 It can be used to find an area bounded, in part, by a curve e.g. gives the area shaded on the graph The limits of integration...
18th International Spherical Torus Workshop, Princeton, November 2015 Magnetic Configurations  Three comparative configurations:  Standard Divertor (+QF)
Magnetic Helicity and Solar Eruptions Alexander Nindos Section of Astrogeophysics Physics Department University of Ioannina Ioannina GR Greece.
A Topological Analysis of the Magnetic Breakout Model by Rhona Maclean University of St Andrews 10 th August 2004 Collaborators: Colin Beveridge, Dana.
What we can learn from active region flux emergence David Alexander Rice University Collaborators: Lirong Tian (Rice) Yuhong Fan (HAO)
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
1 Variational and Weighted Residual Methods. 2 Introduction The Finite Element method can be used to solve various problems, including: Steady-state field.
Coronal Mass Ejection: Initiation, Magnetic Helicity, and Flux Ropes. L. Boundary Motion-Driven Evolution Amari, T., Luciani, J. F., Aly, J. J., Mikic,
Unstructured Meshing Tools for Fusion Plasma Simulations
Definite integration results in a value.
Adaptive Grid Generation for Magnetically Confined Plasmas
Abstract We simulate the twisting of an initially potential coronal flux tube by photospheric vortex motions. The flux tube starts to evolve slowly(quasi-statically)
§1.3 Integrals Flux, Flow, Subst
Karl Schindler, Bochum, Germany
AP Calculus Honors Ms. Olifer
Takashi Sakurai National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
Preflare State Rust et al. (1994) 太陽雑誌会.
Mechanics of Materials Engr Lecture 10 Axial Deformation #1
Sakai, J. I., Nishi, K., and Sokolov, I. V. ApJ, 2002, 576, 1018
Chapter 30 Examples 4,8.
Presentation transcript:

Magnetic structure of the disk corona Slava Titov, Zoran Mikic, Alexei Pankin, Dalton Schnack SAIC, San Diego Jeremy Goodman, Dmitri Uzdensky Princeton University CMSO General Meeting, October 5-7, 2005 Princeton

1 2D case: field line connectivity and topology normal field line NP separtrix field line BP separtrix field line Flux tubes enclosing separatrices split at null points or "bald-patch" points. They are topological features, because splitting cannot be removed by a continous deformation of the configuration. Current sheets are formed at the separatrices due to footpoint displacements or instabilities. All these 2D issues can be generalized to 3D!

2 Differences compared to nulls and BPs: squashing may be removed by a continuous deformation, => QSL is not topological but geometrical object, metric is needed to describe QSL quantitatively, => topological arguments for the current sheet formation at QSLs are not applicable; other approach is required. Extra opportunity in 3D: squashing instead of splitting Nevertheless, thin QSLs are as important as genuine separatrices for this process.

3 Definition of Q in coordinates: where a, b, c and d are the elements of the Jacobian matrix D and then Q can be determined by integrating field line equations. Geometrical definition: Infinitezimal flux tube such that a cross-section at one foot is curcular, then circle ==> ellipse: Q = aspect ratio of the ellipse ; Q is invariant to direction of mapping. Squashing factor Q (Titov, Hornig & Démoulin, 2002)

4 Geometrical definition: Infinitezimal flux tube such that a cross-section at one foot is curcular, then circle ==> ellipse: K = lg(ellipse area / circle area); K is invariant (up to the sign) to the direction of mapping. Expansion-contraction factor K Definition of K in coordinates: where a, b, c and d are the elements of the Jacobian matrix D and then Q can be determined by integrating field line equations.

5 What can we obtain with the help of Q and K? 1.Identify the regions subject to boundary effects. 2.Understand the effect of resistivity. 3.Identify the reconnecting magnetic flux tubes.

6 Example (t=238) Exact ideal MHDNumerical MHD log Q From the initial B(r) and v dsk (r dsk,t) only! From the computed B(r,t).

7 Example (t=238) Exact ideal MHDNumerical MHD K

8 Example (t=238) Exact ideal MHDNumerical MHD log Q K

9 Helical QSL (t=238) Magnetic field linesLaunch footpoints

10 Conclusions Evolving Q and K distributions make possible: 1.to identify the regions subject to boundary effects, 2.to understand the effect of resistivity, 3.to identify the reconnecting magnetic flux tubes (helical QSL).