National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee December 8, 2006 Overview of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Defining Reading Proficiency for Accessible Large Scale Assessments Principles and Issues Paper American.
Advertisements

Designing Accessible Reading Assessments National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee December 7, 2007 Overview of DARA Project.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Goals of Project NARAP Collaboration General Advisory Committee Project Details (ETS and PARA) Plans for.
Technology Assisted Reading Assessment National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee December 7, 2007 Overview of TARA project.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Project General Advisory Committee October Meeting Review.
PARA Project Overview, Results, Next Steps Martha Thurlow and Deborah Dillon National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects.
Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Analysis of Current Characteristics of State Reading Assessments Christopher Johnstone National Center on.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects (NARAP)
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects (NARAP)
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment (PARA) Martha Thurlow.
Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment (PARA) Research Martha Thurlow National Center on Educational.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Principles and Guidelines NARAP Goal 3.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee December 7, 2007 Introduction.
Principal Investigators: Martha Thurlow & Deborah Dillon Introduction Assumptions & Research Questions Acknowledgments 1. What characteristics of current.
Overview of the Advisory Commission on Accessible Instructional Materials in Postsecondary Education for Students with Disabilities David Berthiaume Executive.
What’s New with PARCC for ELA? January 30, 2014 Vincent Segalini.
Shelly Mitchell Professional Development Workshop.
Participation and Supported Independence (P/SI) v1.5 English Language Arts OEAA 2006 Conference Session 37.
Using the CAASPP Individual Student Assessment Accessibility Profile (ISAAP) Tool Using the CAASPP Individual Student Assessment Accessibility Profile.
Audio: Dial Conference ID Navigating Your Way to AIM in the IEP: Who Needs AIM and Where Does AIM Fit? Joy.
Designing Accessible Reading Assessments Reading Aloud Tests of Reading Review of Research from the Designing Accessible Reading Assessments Projects Cara.
SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENT CONSORTIUM, GROWTH AND STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES WENDY ST. MICHELL ASSESSMENT DIRECTOR.
Virginia Department of Education Summer The VGLA is an alternative to Standards of Learning (SOL) testing for eligible students in grades 3 through.
Smarter Balanced Accessibility and Accommodations Policies and Guidelines Chief Instructional Officers Update March 12, 2013.
PARCC Accommodation: Text-to-Speech, Screen Reader Version, ASL Video, Human Reader/Human Signer For the ELA/Literacy Assessment December 2014.
National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) Accessible Reading Approaches for Students with Disabilities Christopher Johnstone Ann Clapper.
Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)
N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Accommodation Decisions: Policy, Training, and Monitoring as Critical Aspects of an Objective Approach.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2014 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting Smarter.
Accessibility for Michigan’s Assessments Region IV Assistive Technology Consortium Fall Conference November 14, 2014.
Kristy Green Debbie Wilson Joan Mattson. Higher Expectations 3 ELA/Literacy Read sufficiently complex texts independently Write effectively to sources.
N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes 2003 State Special Education Outcomes: Marching On Results of NCEO’s Survey of State Directors of Special.
Designing Accessible Reading Assessments Research on Making Large Scale Assessments More Accessible for Students with Disabilities Institute of Education.
Los Angeles Unified School District
State Testing Accommodations For Students with Disabilities August, 2009 By Mitzi Delker EXED Supervisor Secondary Education.
Donna McNear 1 Welcome to… Essential Supports for Beginning Readers in the 21st Century: Examining the Teacher’s Role Presented at:
Introducing the PALM Initiative. The Shift from Print to Digital
Nancy Lister Grant Administrator, Career, Standards, and Assessment Services Kansas State Department of Education Julia Shaftel, Ph.D. Principal Investigator,
Working Together for Student Success 8/15/
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California High School Exit Examination Program Update Bilingual.
Work Sample Seminar1 Work Sample Seminar Screening Assessments, File Review, & Context Part 1 Portland State University.
Junior High Literacy Assessment May 26-28, 2008.
Challenges of Administering MI-Access To Students with Visual and Hearing Impairments Presenters: COLLETTE BAUMAN Supervisor, Michigan Department of Education-Low.
Applying Principles of Universal Design to Assessment Item Modification Peter A. Beddow III Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN June 2008.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Research on Making Large-Scale Reading Assessments More Accessible for Students with Disabilities June.
Information for Parents Digital Reading 5/27/2014 Debbie Hebert, PT, ATP.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction National Center and State Collaborative California Activities Kristen Brown, Ph.D. Common Core.
Florida Science Standards Assessment Presentation to Florida Association of Science Supervisors, May 2008.
Accommodations in Oregon Oregon Department of Education Fall Conference 2009 Staff and Panel Presentation Dianna Carrizales ODE Mike Boyles Pam Prosise.
Tangipahoa Parish’s Implementation of Common Core State Standards Implementation Update Presented by: LADOE and Tangipahoa Parish School System Fall 2011.
Quick Facts for Parents of Humble ISD Students Debbie Hebert, PT, ATP May, 2014 Accessible Instructional Materials.
Alternate Assessment Transitions in West Virginia Melissa Gholson Office of Assessment.
Measured Progress ©2011 DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER-BASED TESTING ACCOMMODATIONS FOR STUDENTS WITH VISUAL DISABILITIES JUNE 27, 2012 MINNEAPOLIS, MN.
GradeLiteracyInformational 450% 845%55% 1230%70%
VISUALLY IMPAIRED. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA VISUALLY IMPAIRED 1.A medical eye report documenting a visual acuity of 20/70 or less in the better eye after.
Technology Assisted Reading Assessment Cara Cahalan Laitusis Educational Testing Service Martha Thurlow NCEO.
Developing NAEP Frameworks: A Look Inside the Process Mary Crovo Deputy Executive Director National Assessment Governing Board November 17, 2007.
Alternate Proficiency Assessment Erin Lichtenwalner.
Description Enhanced Assessment for Students with Visual and Print Disabilities NSCA June 2012.
PARCC Accessibility Features and Accommodations Manual Training for Parents Presented on November 20, 2014 Presented by the: Office of Special Education.
Accessible Educational Materials and the IEP. Introduction to the National Center for Accessible Educational Materials for Learning October 2014 to October.
So What is Going to be Happening with State Assessment for Students with Disabilities for 2007/2008? Peggy Dutcher Fall 2007 Assessment and Accountability.
Special Ed. New Direction - Kathy Airhart and Joey Hassel  focus on embedded PD model combining sped and general PD  shifting towards performance based.
DECISION-MAKING FOR RESULTS HSES- Data Team Training.
Technology Assisted Reading Assessment “Accessible Reading Assessment” and HTML Cara Laitusis Teresa King Elizabeth Ayad Markku Hakkinen.
Ashanti A. Blue Ashford University UDL Guidelines Examples and Resources EDU 620: Meeting Individual Student Needs with Technology Professor Gina Conner.
PARCC Math Options Stephanie Boyd, PARCC Consultant
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP)
Presentation transcript:

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee December 8, 2006 Overview of TARA project Cara Cahalan-Laitusis

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Technology Assisted Reading Assessment Focus on improving state reading assessments for students with visual impairments Jointly directed by Cara Cahalan-Laitusis (ETS) and Martha Thurlow (NCEO) Subcontract to Center for Applied Special Technology (CAST)

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects TARA Technical Advisory Committee Dr. Karen Barton, Research Scientist, CTB/McGraw Hill Ms. Paula Bress, Teacher, Boston Public Schools Dr. David Edyburn, Associate Professor, University of Wisconsin Dr. Kay Ferrell, Executive Director, National Center on Low-Incidence Disabilities Dr. Richard Jackson, Professor, Boston College Dr. Dorothy Strickland, Professor of Education, Rutgers University Dr. Brian Touchette, Delaware Department of Education Dr. Scott Trimble (USED/OSEP)

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Project Tasks Examining the performance of operational ELA tests for students with visual impairments (Goal 2) Development of prototype Technology Assisted Reading Assessment (Goals 2 and 4) Contribute research findings to NARAP Principles and Guidelines (Goal 3) NARAP/TARA Field Test with VI students (Goal 4)

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Timeline Year 1 Goal 2 (Research) –Psychometric Research –Survey of AT Users Year 2 Test Development –Contribute research findings to Goal 3 –Develop test blueprint for TARA –Item development for TARA

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Timeline Continued Year 3 –Pre-testing of TARA –Revision of TARA Year 4 –Test Development for Goal 4 –Goal 4 Field Testing Year 5 –Analysis of Field Test data –Dissemination

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Examining the performance of operational ELA tests Differential Item Functioning: comparison of item difficulty across ability matched students with and without VI Descriptive and trend statistics for students with visual impairments on state ELA assessment Develop recommendations based on research findings

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Technology Assisted Reading Assessment Overview of Frequently Asked Questions Timeline for 2007

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects What is the Technology Assisted Reading Assessment? A prototype assessment of a students ability to independently access text using technology Modified assessment of reading for NCLB accountability purposes

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Who will take the TARA? 8 th grade students with visual impairments who use technology to access text May expand to surrounding grades (6-10) to achieve adequate sample sizes

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects What state standards will the TARA measure? Word Recognition Reading Fluency Basic Comprehension

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects How will higher level comprehension be measured? Standard reading comprehension measure with accommodations: –Braille –Large Print –Assistive Technology Screen Reader Refreshable Braille Text Reader Screen Magnification –Audio CD or Audiocassette Human Reader

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Why are reading comprehension and text access skills separated? Isolation of skills can provide teachers with information on each skill. Isolation of skills will allow students who are struggling on one standard to demonstrate their skill on another standard (e.g., read aloud of comprehension if decoding is not part of comprehension). Allows the TARA to serve alternate purposes (in addition to modified NCLB assessment): –Accountability measure for AT instruction –Screening test before recommending AT (for reading) as an accommodation on other assessments.

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects What types of questions and format will be on the TARA? Specific questions will be informed by research but test format will most likely be an on-demand performance assessment which may include the following types of tasks: –Open an electronic textbook –Navigate to particular section –Scan paper document and open resulting file

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects How will the TARA be scored? No decision has been made but the following scoring formulas are under consideration –Scoring rubric –Degree of success –Degree of success within specific number of attempts –Degree of success within specific period of time

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects What scores will be provided? We are considering providing two sets of scores –Access: score based on the extent to which the tasks are accomplished –Fluency: score based on whether the tasks are accomplished in a reasonable period of time and whether the basic comprehension questions are answered correctly

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Development Tasks for 2007 –Survey of students and teachers –Observational interviews –Develop test specification (i.e., test blueprint) based on survey and interview data –Develop test items for pilot testing

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects More information