NETWORK LEVEL EXAMPLES OF PMS İNŞ.YÜK. MÜH. VEYSEL ARLI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing a Statewide Network An overview of the CDOT Pavement Management Program Eric Chavez Stephen Henry
Advertisements

A Data-Driven Method for Prioritizing Projects in Central Idaho Prepared for the 2012 ITE Western District Meeting Santa Barbara, California Prepared by.
Pavement Management Engineer
Comparative Analysis of Emulsion and Hot Asphalt Cement Chip Seal Performance Douglas D. Gransberg, P.E., C.C.E. University of Oklahoma.
Selecting the Right Maintenance Treatment Sponsored by: Minnesota LTAP Center Presented by: Michael Marti, P.E. SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Dan Wegman,
EVOLVING DEMANDS Highway Usage Increased 29% in the 1990’s Truck Traffic Increased 40% in the 1990’s Truck Traffic Will Increase 3% per year in next 20.
“Practical Pavement Management with Micro PAVER”
Pavement Management Program Overview February 10, 2015 Presented By: Christopher J. Ott, E.I.
To Pave or Not to Pave? Making Informed Decisions on When to Upgrade a Gravel Road.
Lecture 12 Lecture 1L PAVEMENT CONDITION INDICES.
FDOT Aviation Pavement Inspection Training Module 2 – Pavement Fundamentals – Overview Florida Department of Transportation Statewide Pavement Management.
5 August :40 a.m.SIST Final Presentation1 The Development of a Pavement Management System at Fermilab Through the Implementation of Micro PAVER 5.1.
Introduction Surface Engineering & Aggregates and Pavement Management 1.
GASB#34 Asset Management TEAM Transportation Fair Presentation by: Charles J. Nemmers, P.E. Charles J. Nemmers, P.E. October 8, 2004St. Louis, Missouri.
FAA PAVEAIR Workshop.
OPTIMIZATION Lecture 24. Optimization Uses sophisticated mathematical modeling techniques for the analysis Multi-step process Provides improved benefit.
Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Seventh Edition by Frank K. Reilly & Keith C. Brown Chapter.
Developing an Intelligent Decision Support System for the Proactive Implementation of Traffic Safety Strategies Hongyi Chen, Ph.D. Assistant Professor.
CE577_Spring 2007 Pavement Management and Rehabilitation Dr. Fouad Bayomy, PE Professor of Civil Engineering
Life Cycle Cost Analysis
COST–EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS AND COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS
PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS Lecture 4. Instructional Objectives n Need for condition surveys n Collection methodologies n Four basic types of condition.
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.
Development of GIS integrated Pavement Management System (PMS) for small cities. Golam Mohammad Moinuddin.
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDICES. n Historic development of pavement condition indices n The basic functions of condition indices in PMS n Different types of.
PRIORITIZATION.
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX
HDM-4 Applications. 2 Project Appraisal Project Formulation Maintenance Policy Optimization Road Works Programming Network Strategic Analysis Standards.
456/556 Introduction to Operations Research Optimization with the Excel 2007 Solver.
Pavement Preservation Protecting the Investment and the Environment R. Gary Hicks CP2 Center, Chico, CA Prepared for CEAC 2014 Conference March 26-28,
Portfolio Management-Learning Objective
Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Seventh Edition by Frank K. Reilly & Keith C. Brown Chapter 7.
AT Benefit Cost Analysis Model Highway Design, Project Management and Training Section Technical Standards Branch Presented by Bill Kenny, Director: Design,
Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Chapter 7.
Rich Quinley California Department of Transportation.
Evaluation of Alternative Methods for Identifying High Collision Concentration Locations Raghavan Srinivasan 1 Craig Lyon 2 Bhagwant Persaud 2 Carol Martell.
Introduction A GENERAL MODEL OF SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION.
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies Lecture 5.
Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management First Canadian Edition By Reilly, Brown, Hedges, Chang 6.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 1: Part 1: Pavement Preservation Idaho Roads Scholar Program.
9-1 Using SafetyAnalyst Module 4 Countermeasure Evaluation.
BUSINESS SENSITIVE 1 Pavement Health Track Analysis Tool for Determining the Health of Pavement Networks Sponsored by FHWA Contractor: Battelle/ARA Team.
Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh April 19, 2005 April 19, 2005 Pavement Preservation Sub-Group on Strategy Selection & Evaluation.
Road Network Evaluation Tools (RONET) Version 2.00 January, 2009 Rodrigo Archondo-Callao.
Prioritization Techniques to Evaluate Sites for Improving Winter Safety in Iowa Mohammad Shaheed Zach Hans Konstantina Gkritza Inya Nlenanya Neal Hawkins.
A Bandwidth Scheduling Algorithm Based on Minimum Interference Traffic in Mesh Mode Xu-Yajing, Li-ZhiTao, Zhong-XiuFang and Xu-HuiMin International Conference.
2011 S URFACE T REATMENT R EPORT FOR THE T RANSPORTATION C OMMISSION W ORKSHOP Presented by: Stephen Henry Pavement Management Program September
1 The HDM Approach to Multi- Year Programming Christopher R. Bennett University of Auckland Highway and Traffic Consultants Ltd.
Chip Seal Best Practices by: Larry Galehouse, P.E., P.S., Director National Center for Pavement Preservation.
Russian Engineers Training March 2011
FUZZY APPROACH FOR ESTABLISHING THE PAVEMENT CONDITION QUALITY INDEX Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng Institute of Technology Management and Institute of Traffic and.
Road Investment Decision Framework
PROJECT SELECTION RIGHT TOOLS, RIGHT TIME, RIGHT PROJECT Presented by Joe Ririe, PE PAVEMENT ENGINEERING INC. September 9, 2015.
Overview of dTIMS Input, Analysis and Reporting HTC INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT LTD.
2012 Pavement Management Update June 12, 2012 BoCC Work Session.
Transportation Asset Management PM Peer Exchange Performance Reporting and Target Setting (Section 2): VDOT’s Experience Connie Sorrell Chief of System.
Roadway Pavement Management Plan
AN-Najah National University AN-Najah National University
City of Abilene Pavement Condition Survey 2017 Results and Discussion
Multi-Year Programming and Predictive Modelling
Mixed Costs Chapter 2: Managerial Accounting and Cost Concepts. In this chapter we explain how managers need to rely on different cost classifications.
Pavement condition index calculation
Consequences of Delayed Maintenance of Pavement Networks
Introduction and Applications
“Everybody arrives smoothly - the green and safe way”
PASER Ratings for TwinCATS Planning Area
NRRA Pavement Workshop 2019
AGED 570: Teaching H.S. Agricultural Economics
Presentation transcript:

NETWORK LEVEL EXAMPLES OF PMS İNŞ.YÜK. MÜH. VEYSEL ARLI

MINNESOTA DOT NETWORK LEVEL PMS MNDOT desired to develop and implement a pavement management system (PMS) specifically geared to the state’s requirements, resources, and conditions. It operates on two primary data files, segment data and segment surface defect data. The major outputs –Status and Needs Reports and Plots, –Optimization Reports and Plots

Status Reports

Needs Reports The trigger year occurs when the preticted performance for any particular index or parameter reaches a minimum acceptable level, as specified by the user.

Rehabilitation Alternatives Analysis There are three basic decision trees, one for concrete, one bituminous, and one for bituminous over concrete. The decision tree is applied to each possible implementation year because the conditions used in the decision tree can change from year to year. The present worth of costs is calculated for rehabilitation for each implementation year, ongoing maintenance, and user costs. Also, cost-effectiveness for each alternative- implementation year combination is calculated.

Optimization is based on marginal cost-effectiveness calculations. The optimization analysis can be performed for these objectives: –effectiveness maximization, where the primary constraints are specified budget limits for each year of the program period –cost minimization, where the constraints are minimum average netwok performance or maximum percent of mileage below the minimum acceptable or trigger level. Optimization Analysis

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PMS The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) PMS is a simple and efficient system designed for network level pavement management. It is a tool well suited to quickly and efficiently assess the condition of a road network, define and adjust maintenance treatments and costs, and examine the effects on road condition of specific maintenance budget allocation strategies.

Description of the System Necessary data from the pavement must be collected in terms of construction, traffic, date of last maintenance, etc., and entered in the PMS data base. Then, the entire pavement network is divided ito uniform manageable sections for record and analysis purposes. The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is computed based on the observed distress types, severity, and extent. A decision tree was developed which assigns the most cost-effective maintenance or rehabilitation strategy, depending on the PCI information, functional class, and cost information.

Seven major types of surface distress that occur predominatly in the Bay Area are considered by the condition assessment. These are: –alligator cracking –distortion –patching and utility cut patch –rutting/depression –longitudional and transverse cracking –block cracking –raveling and weathering Distress is measured in square feet, except for longitudional and transverse cracking which are measured in linear feet.

Five pavement condition categories are defined based on a PCI scale with values ranging from 100 to 0 (excellent to failed) and depending on the load or non-load related distress. The five category condition definition provides for a realistic maintenance and rehabilitation assignment.

A weighted effectiveness ratio is used to rank and prioritize projects. The program selects projects identified for rehabilitation from highest-weighted effectiveness ratio to lowest until the funds allocated for rehabilitation are assigned. The MTC PMS has been widely applied in California and has also been used by local agencies in other states.