@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama1 The Scientific Case Against Evolution Dr. Heinz Lycklama Frog + time (instantaneous) -> Prince.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REFUTING EVOLUTION Evolutionary theory doesnt follow scientific method. It is metascientific. Evolution, if true, would violate established scientific.
Advertisements

Chapter 10: Principles of Evolution
Evolution.
Creation vs. Evolution Which one?.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. CHAPTER 1.
A view of life Chapter 1. Properties of Life Living organisms: – are composed of cells – are complex and ordered – respond to their environment – can.
Unit 7: Evolution.
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama1 The Scientific Case Against Evolution Dr. Heinz Lycklama Frog + time (instantaneous) -> Prince = Fairy.
Evolution Ch 13.
EVOLUTION. EVOLUTION The first living organisms were simple, single celled organisms. Through time more complex simple- celled creatures were created.
Evolution Ch 13. Historical Theories Anaximander (~2500 yrs ago) Aristotle Georges Buffon (1700’s) Jean Baptist Lemark (late 1700’s - early1800’s) Erasmus.
EVOLUTION vs. SCIENCE & THE BIBLE
Fossils, Anatomy, and DNA. Evidence for Evolution Three types of evidence: –Fossils –Anatomical –Molecular.
Animals Unit 3 – Different Kinds of Bodies. Content Learning Goal Students will learn how different animals breathe, eat and survive.
The Theory of Evolution Evolution: The most famous scientist that studied and discussed evolution is Charles Darwin. In 1831 Charles Darwin undertook.
Darwin’s Theory of Evolution as a Mechanistic Process Darwin’s Idea of Common Descent Darwin’s Idea of Common Descent Darwin’s Idea of Gradualism Darwin’s.
Chapter 15 Table of Contents Section 1 History of Evolutionary Thought
The Scientific Case For Creation Dr. Heinz Lycklama “If I have seen further than others, it is by standing on the.
EVOLUTION: A History and a Process Chapter 14. Voyage of the Beagle  During his travels, Darwin made numerous observations and collected evidence that.
5.4: Evolution Topic 5: Ecology & Evolution Miss Friedman.
Evolution: A theory that life changes over time. Charles Darwin His five year voyage on the HMS Beagle led him to eventually develop the theory of evolution.
AP Biology Discussion Notes Friday 11/07/2014. Goals for the Chapter 1.Learn about the Theory of Evolution and evidence that is used to support this theory.
Uncertainty in Biology. At least we can be certain that evolution is true. These two have told us.
Objectives  Summarize Darwin’s theory of natural selection  Describe the evidence for evolution  SCS: B-5.
Evolution. Evolution processes earliest forms diversityThe processes that have transformed life on earth from it’s earliest forms to the vast diversity.
Pp Define evolution. Evolution is the cumulative change in the heritable characteristics of a population over time. Not only does species evolve.
Evolution Evolution – populations change over time Current theory – life forms have descended from previous forms through changes in structure/function.
Time Big Bang B-yrs ago 4.6 B yrs ago Earth is formed First life 3.7 B yrs 10-50,000 yrs ago Homo Sapiens 1.Big Bang – the beginning 2.Formation.
Evidence for Evolution ORGANIZE YOUR THOUGHTS! EVIDENCE FOR EVOLUTION  The Fossil Record  Radiometric Dating  Morphology  Homology  Molecular Biology.
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama1 The Scientific Case Against Evolution Dr. Heinz Lycklama Frog + time (instantaneous) -> Prince.
Chapter 10 Principles of Evolution
1 Caring for the whole Person Copyright 2010, Clarion Word Publishing You Spirit (Spiritual) Spirit (Spiritual)
The secret of evolution What makes populations change?
The Theory of Evolution Makes the argument that all living organisms arose from one simple organism which originally arose from non-living matter.
Standard 8—Evolution Speciation. Standard 8 Vocabulary Diversity Speciation Gradualism Punctuated Equilibrium Adaptive Radiation Divergent Evolution Polyploidy.
Evolution Intro change over time. descent with modification. populations evolve, not individuals. It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
ORIGINS Confronting Evolution What is evolution? Six arenas' of evolution study Great questions for evolutionists.
Five Major Misconceptions about Evolution. Evolution has never been observed. Evolution violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics. There are no transitional.
Faith-Based Attacks Common Misconceptions. All organisms created by God during 6 days of creation Genesis 1:1-2:4 “ Ideal types ” as progenitors of all.
Chapter 15 and 16 Evolution - Change through time.
There is sometimes a misconception that a theory is a theory until it is somehow finally proven and then it “graduates” to a law. It is incorrect that.
Why Evolution Doesn’t Work. And Why Creation Does Work.
INTRODUCTION TO EVOLUTION
Chapter 6: Evolution Charles Darwin. Georgia Performance Standards S7CS8 Students will investigate the characteristics of scientific knowledge and how.
EVOLUTION A SCIENTIFIC THEORY. I. The History Carl Linneaus (18 th century)– The father of taxonomy. Used binomial nomenclature, came up with the hierarchical.
EVOLUTION Review Scientists who contributed to the theory of evolution Mechanisms for evolution.
Evolution and the Diversity of Life. Theory Theories embody the highest level of certainty for comprehensive ideas in science. Thus, when someone claims.
Phylogeny.
Slide 1 of 41 Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall 15-3 Darwin Presents His Case.
Evolution’s Four Fatal Flaws
End Show Slide 1 of 41 Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall 15-3 Darwin Presents His Case.
Bio 7: General Biology II Evolutionary, Organismal, & Ecological Biology Dr. Diane Livio myetudes.org/portal MW 2:30-4:30 (CMS 229)
Ms. Hughes.  Evolution is the process by which a species changes over time.  In 1859, Charles Darwin pulled together these missing pieces. He was an.
End Show Slide 1 of 41 Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall Biology.
Evolution.  Darwin:  HMS Beagle  Galapagos Islands  Artificial Selection -breeding to produce offspring with desired traits-He inferred that if humans.
EVOLUTION and DIVERSITY A process of change over time Existing - Genetic diversity – Evidence Geologic fossil record shows -
@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama1 Five Challenges to the Theory of Evolution Dr. Heinz Lycklama Frog + time (instantaneous) ->
From Last Week… When the Big Bang theory was first proposed, it was met with much theological backlash—from atheists. Why do you think this happened?
Evolution and Biodiversity G. Tyler Miller’s Living in the Environment 14 th Edition Chapter 5 Part 1 G. Tyler Miller’s Living in the Environment 14 th.
Challenges to the Theory of Evolution
Questions About The Theory of Evolution
Evolution and Biodiversity: Origins, Niches, and Adaptations
Five Challenges to the Theory of Evolution
Adaptations and Evolution
Evolution Is Incompatible With the Bible AND Science
Five Challenges to the Theory of Evolution
Darwin & Natural Selection
The Scientific Case Against Evolution
The Theory of Evolution
First, let’s talk about the word THEORY…
Presentation transcript:

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama1 The Scientific Case Against Evolution Dr. Heinz Lycklama Frog + time (instantaneous) -> Prince = Fairy Tale Frog + time (300 million yrs.) -> Prince = Science Dr. Gish, ICR

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 2 Overview What is Evolution? Challenges to Evolutionism Evolution has never been observed Evolution violates the 2 nd Law of Thermodynamics There are no credible transitional fossils Life can/did not originate from non-life by chance Evolution is only a (unproven) theory Evolutionism Found Wanting

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 3

4 Challenges to Evolutionism 1. Evolution has never been observed 2. Evolution violates the 2 nd Law of Thermodynamics 3. There are NO credible transitional fossils 4. Life did not originate from non-life by random chance 5. Evolution is only a theory – it has not been proved

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 5 1. Macro-Evolution NOT Observed What is macro-evolution? Molecules-to-man Common descent Emergence of new “advanced” features via mutations and natural selection Simple to complex living organism with increase of genetic information Macro-Evolution has not been, and is not being, observed “Goo-to-you” (macro) evolution requires an increase in information

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 6 Micro-Evolution IS Observed What is micro-evolution? Genetic variation, e.g (dis)appearance of existing/potential genetic traits through recombination of existing genetic code Adaptive variations arising from existing genetic potential already in population’s existing pool Examples of micro-evolution: Darwin’s finches Industrial melanism in peppered moths Insects developing resistance to pesticides All observed change involves sorting and loss of genetic information

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 7 Dobzhansky’s Fruit Flies Fruit flies experiment in the lab Radiation-induced mutation of fruit flies Involves deliberate action, not natural Results Fruit flies with extra wings, no wings, huge wings, tiny wings Changes detrimental to survival No advantages over other fruit flies Still fruit flies! No progressive beneficial changes from simple to complex No increase in quantity/quality of genetic info

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 8 Mutations and Information DNA/RNA mutations Can’t provide significant new levels of information Produce degradation of the information in the genome Counter to the predictions of neoDarwinism Research shows: No good example of a beneficial information- gaining mutation Very few mutations are beneficial (< 0.01%) Thousands of deleterious mutations exist

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 9 Quote by Lewin (Evolutionist) “The central question of the Chicago conference was whether the mechanisms underlying microevolution can be extrapolated to explain the phenomena of macroevolution. At the risk of doing violence to the positions of some of the people at the meeting, the answer can be given as a clear No.” Reported by Roger Lewin, “Evolutionary theory under fire,” Science, vol. 210 (4472), 21 November 1980, p. 883]

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama Evolution & 2 nd Law of Thermodynamics The Second Law of Thermodynamics Increasing entropy (unavailable energy) Order -> disorder (systems left to themselves) Evolution requires Disorder -> order Simple -> complex What do we observe in nature? Order -> disorder (deterioration) Less available energy over time Increased randomness over time

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 11 Open vs. Closed Systems Evolutionists argue 2 nd Law only applies to a closed system Living systems are exceptions because they represent open systems Solar energy is added to the earth But 2 nd Law applies to the whole universe Entropy is increasing Things become less organized, less complex, more random in the universe Raw solar energy increases entropy, e.g. heat

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 12 Quote by Dr. John Ross “...there are no known violations of the second law of thermodynamics. Ordinarily the second law is stated for isolated systems, but the second law applies equally well to open systems... there is somehow associated with the field of far-from equilibrium phenomena the notion that the second law of thermodynamics fails for such systems. It is important to make sure that this error does not perpetuate itself.” [Dr. John Ross, Harvard scientist (evolutionist), Chemical and Engineering News, vol. 58, July 7, 1980, p. 40]

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 13 Add “Open” + “Energy” Apparent increase in organized complexity in living matter requires more than just an open system and an available energy supply: A “program” (information) to direct growth in organized complexity A mechanism for storing and converting the incoming energy Examples: Plant photosynthesis, sun’s energy -> proteins Seed -> plant Animal metabolism, energy -> compose diet

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 14 Living Systems & 2 nd Law Living systems have a “program” Living organism’s DNA contains the code (DNA, information) to direct process of building organism Process continues throughout life of organism faster than natural processes (via 2 nd Law) can break it down Living systems have “storage/conversion” Built-in mechanism to convert and store incoming energy Photosynthesis converts sun’s energy into usable/storable forms, e. g. proteins Animals use metabolism to convert and use stored, usable, energy from organisms in their diets

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama NO Transitional Fossils The “Cambrian Explosion” “Inverted” fossil orders Lack of empirical evidence for transitions The archaeopteryx was a bird, not a transitional fossil between reptile and bird Whale “evolution” debunked Horse “evolution debunked “Living fossils”, e.g. coelacanth fish Polystrate fossils No credible ape-to-human fossil identified

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 16 “Hominid” Fossils Neanderthal Man – accepted as homo sapiens Java Man – artificial construct Piltdown Man – proven to be a hoax Nebraska Man – an extinct pig Ramapithecus – an orangutan Lucy – make-believe creature NO credible “ape ->human” fossil found!

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 17 “For example, no scientist could logically dispute the proposition that man, without having been involved in any act of divine creation, evolved from some ape-like creature in a very short space of time – speaking in geological terms – without leaving any fossil traces of the steps of the transformation.” Zuckerman, Solly Beyond the ivory tower: The frontiers of public and private science. New York: Taplinger Publishing Company. p. 64. Lord Zuckerman Chimes In

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 18 Evolution: The Fossils Still Say No! “In the preceding chapters, we have cited example after example of failure to find transitional forms where evolutionary theory predicts such forms should have been found. … The examples cited in this book are in no way exceptions, but serve to illustrate what is characteristic of the fossil record.” [Duane T. Gish (Creationist), Evolution: The Fossils Still Say NO!, page 333.]

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 19 The Fossil Record Darwin admitted in 1859: “Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain.” Paul Moody wrote in a standard textbook: “So far as we can judge from the geologic record, large changes seem usually to have arisen suddenly.... fossil forms, intermediate between large subdivisions of classification, such as orders and classes, are seldom [read never] found.”

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama Life Did Not Originate From Non-Life by Random Chance Spontaneous generation (chemical evolution) has never been observed or shown to be possible Redi in 1688, Spallanzani in 1780 Pasteur in 1860, Virchow in 1858 Law of biogenesis has never been falsified Non-complex life form is impossible Mycoplasma, simplest self-reproducing organism, has 482 genes with 580,000 ‘letters’ (base pairs) Requires parasitizing a more complex organism Parasitism resulted from loss of genetic information

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 21 Mutations & Information “Not By Chance”, Dr. Lee Spetner “But in all the reading I’ve done in the life-sciences literature, I’ve never found a mutation that added information … All point mutations that have been studied on the molecular level turn out to reduce the genetic information and not to increase it.” Random (chance) mutation and natural selection are opposites!

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 22 How Simple Can Life Be? Cell structure unknown by Darwin Smallest bacteria 482 genes 600 types of proteins 600,000 DNA base pairs Probability of chance formation is zero! Human genome 3,000,000,000 base pairs

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 23 Spontaneous Formation of Life? “The likelihood of the spontaneous formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with 40,000 noughts after it. It is big enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution. There was no primeval soup, neither on this planet nor on any other, and if the beginnings of life were not random, they must therefore have been the product of purposeful intelligence.” Wickramasinghe, professor of applied mathematics and astronomy, UK

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama Evolution is Only a Theory; It Has Not Been Proved Working general biological meaning of “evolution” to most evolutionists is: “a continuous naturalistic, mechanistic process by which all living things have arisen from a single living source which itself arose by a similar process from a non-living, inanimate world.” A theory implies: Self-consistency Agreement with observations Usefulness

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 25 Evolutionism is Not Self-consistent By requiring multiple “definitions”, depending on the need of the moment In the varied, and contradictory camps connected with thermodynamics, phylogeny, proposed mechanisms, and various sub-theories, etc.

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 26 Evolutionism Does Not Agree With Observations The fossil record Geology Genetics Molecular biology Thermodynamics Various dating methods – radiometric and geological/geophysical Probability mathematics

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 27 Evolutionism Has Not Proved Useful No new advancements in scientific knowledge or technology, i.e. science does not require belief in Evolution No advancements in medicine (hindered in some cases because of false claims (now discarded) re: “vestigal” organs) No positive contribution to society through evolution-based social “sciences”, e.g. justification for racism, nazism, communism, other societal/ideological ills

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 28 Evolutionism Found Wanting Evolution has never been observed Evolution violates 2 nd Law of Thermodynamics There are NO credible transitional fossils Life can/did not originate from non-life by chance Evolution is only a (unproven) theory

@ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 29 Thank you for your attention! Dr. Heinz Lycklama