California Department of Fish and Game Klamath-Trinity Project Techniques Used To Monitor Naturally Spawning Chinook Salmon Escapement Levels In the Klamath.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tim Copeland and June Johnson Idaho Department of Fish & Game Idaho Natural Production Monitoring & Evaluation Project
Advertisements

Evaluate recreational and commercial mark-selective fisheries. (35018) Geraldine Vander Haegen, WDFW Charmane Ashbrook, WDFW Chris Peery, U. Idaho Annette.
Workshop: Monitoring and Evaluation of Harvest on Columbia River Salmonids July 31- August 1, 2007.
Annual Stock Assessment – Coded Wire Tag Program (ODFW & WDFW) BPA Project Numbers: and
Chinook Salmon Adult Abundance Monitoring Paul Kucera and Dave Faurot Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management BPA Project
Fish and Wildlife Losses and Hydroelectric System Responsibility January 2004.
Phase I Okanogan River Spring Chinook Production Proposal #29050 Sponsored By: Colville Confederated Tribes Presented By: Stephen Smith.
Restore Lawyer Creek Habitat: Targeting Steelhead and Chinook Salmon.
Bull Trout Population and Habitat Surveys in the McKenzie and Middle Fork Willamette Presented by: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife February 22,
Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
Evaluation of Juvenile Salmonid Outmigration and Survival in the Lower Umatilla River Project No Tara White, Shannon Jewett, Josh Hanson,
Chinook Salmon Adult Abundance Monitoring Project Dave Faurot Nez Perce Tribe Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Monitoring and Evaluation of Yearling Fall Chinook Salmon Released Upstream of Lower Granite Dam Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Fluvial Bull Trout Migration and Life History Investigations, Upper Salmon River Subbasin New Project Proposal, No Sponsored by: Shoshone-Bannock.
Evaluate Spawning of Fall Chinook and Chum Salmon Just Below the Four Lowermost Columbia River Mainstem Dams Project PNNL.
Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Hatchery Evaluations – Salmon River Project No Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Assessment of Bull Trout Populations in the Yakima River Watershed.
Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.
This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use PowerPoint to keep track of these action items during.
Spatial scales of homing and the efficacy of hatchery supplementation of wild populations Northwest Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries.
WRIA 8 Fish in/Fish out Monitoring Summary
Frank Leonetti, Snohomish County
LOWER YUBA RIVER ACCORD Monitoring and Evaluation Program Redd Surveys Casey Campos PSMFC.
Iron Gate Hatchery California Department of Fish and Game Anadromous Fish Hatcheries.
Salmon Life Cycle Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
Summary of Recommendations: Peer Review of FY 13 Science Workplan Trinity River Restoration Program Preliminary Fiscal Year 2013 Science Workplan.
CSMEP Goal: Improve the quality and consistency of fish monitoring data, and the methods used to evaluate these data, to answer key questions relevant.
Twelve Years of Migratory Fish Counting: Evolving Information Strategies for Citizen Science Robert D. Stevenson University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston,
Overview of Current Production Programs Across the Columbia River Basin.
NWHA- Panel Discussion “Spawning Better Ideas for Fish Passage”
Adult Steelhead Monitoring Challenges in Cedar Creek, WA Josua Holowatz & Dan Rawding.
Precision of Redd Based Escapement Estimates for Steelhead
Coordination of Tag and Mark Recovery Programs Dan Rawding WDFW.
Tagging  Fish are captured via angling & implanted with a VEMCO acoustic transmitter (V13, V9, or V7) – (Figure 4).  Specific age classes are targeted.
California Department of Fish and Game Input to the CVPIA (b)(2) Decision Process Russell J. Bellmer Fisheries Branch California Department of Fish and.
California Steelhead – End of The Rainbow Katie Perry Steelhead Restoration & Management Program.
Temperature and Flow Dynamics of the Klamath River Technical Memorandum 7 Leon Basdekas Mike Deas Watercourse Engineering, Inc nd Street, Suite B.
SALMONIDS, (3) There is evidence of runs of Chinook and Steelhead in tributaries above Upper Klamath Lake Evidence of salmon from personal accounts, photos,
History of Dam Building in the Klamath Basin Originating in Southern Oregon and extending through Northern California, the Klamath River Basin represents.
Variation in Straying Patterns and Rates of Snake River Hatchery Steelhead Stocks in the Deschutes River Basin, Oregon Richard W. Carmichael and Tim Hoffnagle.
Stock Status of Steelhead In California Katie Perry, California Department of Fish and Game.
Integrated Status & Trend (ISTM) Project: An overview of establishing, evaluating and modifying monitoring priorities for LCR Steelhead Jeff Rodgers (ODFW)
Proposed Approach for Developing Columbia Basin Salmon and Steelhead Goals June 3, 2015.
Chris Bare, Jim Latshaw, Ian Tattam, Jim Ruzycki, and Rich Carmichael Estimating Chinook escapement to the John Day River basin using a mark-recapture.
Watershed assessment, management and restoration of Little Kern golden trout in the Little Kern River, California Acknowledgements Assess the current status.
Pacific Fishery Management Council Jurisdiction –3 miles to 200 miles –4 states (includes Idaho) Members -- appointed –State governments –Federal Agencies.
By: Scott Rakes February 18, 2010 Endangered Species.
Monitor and Evaluate Salmonid Production in the Asotin Creek Subbasin - LSRCP (ID #200116)
Steelhead Stock Status Review and ESA Oregon Rhine Messmer ODFW District Staff Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Pacific Coast Steelhead Management.
Adult Entry to Summer Juvenile Rearing of Klamath River Coho Randolph Ericksen Steven Cramer Ian Courter Kathryn Arendt Funded by.
Lewis River Fish Passage Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (draft)
RMIS Overview & Infomap Service PSMFC Regional Mark Processing Center (RMPC) Overview of RMPC & CWT Database Since 1977 the RMPC has provided essential.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
The Columbia River Basin Where we’ve been. Where we’re going. October 18, 2005.
Management & Recovery Implications Of Wild/Hatchery Steelhead Interactions Within A Large, Complex Watershed Research Partners: WDFW Skagit River System.
Effectiveness of alternative broodstock, rearing and release practices at Winthrop NFH William Gale and Matt Cooper -USFWS, Mid-Columbia River Fishery.
Chinook Salmon Supplementation in the Imnaha River Basin- A Comparative Look at Changes in Abundance and Productivity Chinook Salmon Supplementation in.
Adult steelhead evaluations in Imnaha River tributaries William Young, Jocelyn Hatch Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Population - 44,301 18% - Aged 65+ Household Median Income- $29,530 Jan.-March 2004 unemployment 14 % Demographics.
Watershed Restoration Overview for the Klamath Basin.
Summary ADF&G is implementing a radio telemetry study on Yukon summer chum salmon Use drift gillnets to catch and tag 1200 chum salmon near Russian Mission.
November 3-5, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Upper Columbia Sub-Region 2 Listed ESU/DPS Steelhead-
Parr and smolt yield, migration timing, and age structure in a wild steelhead population, Fish Creek, Idaho Alan Byrne Idaho Department of Fish and Game.
Technical Memo #1 Estimation of Returns of Naturally Produced Coho to the Klamath River Cramer Fish Sciences Nicklaus K. Ackerman Brian Pyper Ian Courter.
California Department of Fish and Game Klamath-Trinity Project Klamath Basin Chinook Salmon Spawning Escapement, Harvest and Age Composition Fish and Game.
1 Lisa Hutchinson-Scarbrough Division of Subsistence Alaska Department of Fish and Game Chignik Management Area Subsistence Salmon Fisheries Overview Chignik.
Klamath Fish Health Assessment Team Presentation to the Northwest Power & Conservation Council Regional Coordination Forum - May 12, 2016 Sara Borok &
1 Yurok Tribal Fisheries Program Overview Michael Belchik, Yurok Tribal Fisheries Program.
Northwest Fisheries Science Center Technical Management Team
Presentation transcript:

California Department of Fish and Game Klamath-Trinity Project Techniques Used To Monitor Naturally Spawning Chinook Salmon Escapement Levels In the Klamath Basin

Klamath-Trinity Project Klamath-Trinity Project Introduction and Background: 1. 1.Fall Chinook have been monitored basin wide since Three tribes, the Hoopa, Yurok and Karuk, reside along the Klamath and Trinity Rivers. The Hoopa and Yurok tribes have federally recognized and protected fishing rights The basin supports a large sport fishery estimated to be worth millions of dollars to local economies annually Fall Chinook run-sizes have ranged from 34,425 to 239,559 and have averaged 125,795.

Trinity River Hatchery Iron Gate Hatchery Klamath River Basin Yurok Tribe Hoopa Valley Tribe Karuk Tribe Trinity Lake

Klamath-Trinity Project The need for conducting annual fall Chinook run-size estimates The need for conducting annual fall Chinook run-size estimates: 1. 1.Forecast annual returns of adult fall chinook within the basin Provide equitable harvest between tribal fisheries and ocean sport and commercial fisheries and in-river sport fisheries. The adult harvest allocation provides 50% to tribes and 50% to other users Meet minimum basin floor escapement objectives of 35,000 natural fall Chinook adult spawners. 4. Determine cohort specific age structure, maturation rates, and survival estimates.

5. 5.Provide trend monitoring for agency/tribal management and ESA evaluations. 6. Estimate hatchery contribution rates. 7. Develop harvest management recommendations including potential annual regulation adjustments. Klamath-Trinity Project The need for conducting annual fall Chinook run-size estimates The need for conducting annual fall Chinook run-size estimates:

Klamath-Trinity Project 1. 1.Carcass Surveys: Salmon River, Scott River, Shasta River, Bogus Ck., Upper Klamath, and Upper Trinity 2. 2.Redd Surveys: Miscellaneous Tributary Streams, Mid Klamath and Trinity Rivers 3. 3.Video Fish Counting Facilities: Shasta River and Bogus Creek 4. 4.Fish Marking Facilities: Trinity River Methods Used to Determine Natural Chinook Salmon Escapement Levels :

1. Carcass Surveys Cooperative Spawning Ground Surveys using mark-recapture techniques are conducted on the Scott and Salmon Rivers. These surveys are conducted in cooperation with several agencies, tribes, and organizations. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service conducts a mark-recapture carcass survey on the upper Klamath River between Iron Gate Dam and the confluence of the Shasta River. Carcass surveys are conducted on the Shasta River and Bogus Creek in conjunction with the operation video fish counting facilities. A carcass survey is conducted on the upper Trinity River to recover tagged fish from the Willow Ck. Weir, ad-clipped fish, and gather biological data for management purposes. Klamath-Trinity Project

Trinity River Hatchery Iron Gate Hatchery Klamath River Basin Trinity Lake Cooperative Spawning Ground Surveys Cooperative Spawning Ground Survey

u u California Department of Fish and Game u u U.S. Forest Service, Klamath & Six Rivers Forests u u Yurok and Karuk Tribal Fisheries Departments u u Salmon River Restoration Council u u Siskiyou Resource Conservation District u u AmeriCorps Watershed Stewards Project u u Local County Schools u u Local Landowners u u Volunteers Cooperative Spawning Ground Survey Scott and Salmon Rivers Klamath River Project

Annual Training Workshop:   Gain an understanding of the importance of fishery from presentations given by basin stakeholders including the various tribes, fisherman and agricultural community.   Receive training on how to identify species, measure fork length, collect scales, recover heads from ad-clipped fish, apply jaw tags and properly record data.   Receive safety training on the use of equipment and working in swift water.   Learn how to conduct simple Petersen Estimates Cooperative Spawning Ground Survey

Survey crews are organized during a staging session held every morning prior to each survey. Surveys are conducted twice weekly throughout the Chinook salmon spawning season Survey Reaches are generally about 4 miles in length

For Mark-Recapture purposes each carcass is categorized into one of four potential Pathways : Cooperative Spawning Ground Survey Path 1: Fresh carcass, clear eyes & firm flesh, collect data, apply jaw tag. Path 2: Decayed carcass, cloudy eyes and mushy flesh, collect data, cut in half. Path 3: Recaptured Path 1, retrieve tag, record data, cut in half. Path 4: Carcass that could not be retrieved.

Cooperative Spawning Ground Survey Run Size Estimate Calculations: The Petersen Equation is used to calculate the preliminary run size at the end of the season because of its simplicity. Tends to over estimate run size and yields wider confidence intervals. The Schafer Equation is used to calculate the final run size after all of the data is edited and prior to start of Klamath River Technical Advisory Team’s age comp meeting in late January. The Schafer estimate provides a more accurate estimate with tighter confidence intervals.

2. Spawning Ground Redd Surveys Redd Surveys are conducted on smaller tributary streams and in portions of the main stem Klamath and Trinity Rivers to describe distribution and estimate run size in areas that receive less use. All redds are counted and mapped using either topography maps or GPS. All live chinook are counted during each survey. The run size estimate for each location is derived by expanding the number of redds observed by 2 and adding the number of live chinook salmon observed during the last survey.

3. Video Fish Counting Facilities Shasta River Fish Counting Facility & Bogus Creek Fish Counting Facility

Klamath River Basin Video Fish Counting Weirs Video Fish Counting Facilities

An Alaskan style weir is used to direct migrating salmon through the counting flume. Shasta River Fish Counting Facility Underwater Video Counting Weirs

View of counting flume and underwater camera housing Underwater Video Counting Weirs

Camera image is recorded on a time lapse SVHS recorder set to record over a 12 hour period. Tapes are changed twice daily at 0600 and 1800 hours. Each tape has a date, time, and record speed stamp. Tapes are reviewed in our video lab and data is entered on data sheets and computer files for analysis. Data recorded includes species, date, time, presence of an ad- clip, lamprey, and any other marks or tags that may be visible. Underwater Video Counting Weirs

Coho Salmon Chinook Salmon

Underwater Video Counting Weirs Run Size Estimate Calculations: Shasta River: The run size is determined from a direct count of all fish that pass through the Shasta River Fish Counting Facility. Bogus Creek: The run size is determined from a direct count of all fish that pass through the Bogus Creek Fish Counting Facility plus the number of carcasses observed during spawning ground surveys conducted in the 0.25 miles of creek below the weir. Carcass surveys are still required to collect biological data and recover heads from any ad-clipped fish.

4. Fish Marking Weirs Willow Creek Fish Marking Weir Lower Trinity River

Trinity River Hatchery Iron Gate Hatchery Klamath River Basin Yurok Tribe Hoopa Valley Tribe Karuk Tribe Trinity Lake Willow Creek Fish Marking Weir

4. Fish Marking Weirs: Trinity River 1. 1.Fished Sunday night through Friday afternoon and opened every afternoon for 3 to 4 hours to reduce delays in migration All Chinook of good condition are tagged, 1/3 with a $10 reward tag and 2/3 with non reward tags All adult steelhead (>42cm) are tagged, ½ with reward tags and ½ with non reward tags All coho are tagged with non reward tags Run size estimate, hatchery contribution rates, and harvest rates are derived from various tag return rates collected during recovery at Trinity Hatchery, during carcass surveys, and from reward tag returns provided by sport fisherman.

Cooperative Spawning Ground Surveys Scott and Salmon Rivers  Marking weirs were used from 1982 to Negative public reactions to the use of marking weirs and potential impacts they have on fish mainly focused on handling stress and potential migration delays. Periodic high flows and remote locations hampered effectiveness of weir operations. Carcass Surveys were also conducted to recapture tags applied at the weirs.  Participation by multiple groups of stakeholders increased efficiency and allows for complete coverage of all major spawning areas and made extensive mark recapture surveys a reality in  Channel characteristics, flow patterns, and good visibility provide favorable conditions to conduct pedestrian surveys using waders.  Experience has shown that recovery rates range between 50% and 75%. High recovery rates provide a fairly accurate run size estimate. Why We Do What We Do Where!

Redd Surveys  Cooperative effort by multiple agencies and tribes allows for basin wide coverage of these smaller tributary streams that would otherwise be missed (Indian, Red Cap, Grider, Elk, etc.).  Provides some information for tracking population trends and distribution of Chinook salmon in these smaller tributaries.  In terms of the overall fall Chinook run size for the Basin, Chinook use of these smaller streams is a minor component and on average only accounts for about 2.6% of the entire run since  Redd surveys tend to underestimate run size, and therefore, only provide a conservative estimate of run size in those areas. Why We Do What We Do Where!

Operation of Video Fish Counting Facilities  Stable flow patterns, which exist in the Shasta River and Bogus Creek, provide favorable conditions for operation of video counting facilities. Both of these streams are spring fed and are located on the east side of the Salmon and Scott Mountains which greatly reduces the frequency and magnitude of high flows during the sampling period.  The majority of the lands in both the Shasta River and Bogus Creek are owned by private individuals which complicates our ability to access the major spawning areas to conduct extensive spawning ground surveys.  Eliminates handling stress during migration however, spawning ground surveys are still required to obtain a sub-sample of biological data necessary for fishery management process.

Why We Do What We Do Where! Operation of Fish Marking Weirs, Trinity River  Operation of the fish marking weir provides a cost effective way to gather data for estimating several parameters at one location.  Information provided by the operation of the fish marking weir includes, run timing, in river harvest rates, age determination, gender, fork lengths, run size, and provides for an independent estimate of hatchery contribution rates simplified by constant fractional marking at TRH.  Carcass surveys are conducted to retrieve tags, describe distribution, collect additional hatchery contribution rate data, and collect biological data from naturally spawning populations.  Recovery of all chinook salmon at TRH provides the terminal point for tag recoveries and determination of hatchery contribution rates.

Page 1 of 2 What Do We Get From All Of This!

Page 2 of 2

That’s All Folks and Remember Fish are Friends, not Food!