Montana GEAR UP1 2012-13 Montana GEAR UP Evaluation Resutls January 15, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why Take PLAN? PLAN shows your strengths and weaknesses in English, mathematics, reading, and science. PLAN lets you know if you’re on target for college.
Advertisements

Jurupa Unified Parent/ Community Meeting Our Children, Our Schools, Our future!
GEAR UP Idaho  GEAR UP Idaho is a federal grant program that provides comprehensive, early intervention college access programming to selected Idaho.
Overview and Findings from Summer /17/10. A Powerful Network 773 students served in 22 distinct summer transition programs 6 school districts actively.
State Council of Higher Education for Virginia January 2006State Council of Higher Education for Virginia GEAR UP Summer Programs.
Freshman Connection Counselor Articulation Meeting January 28, 2011 Presented by Kirstyn Fields, OCCP Strategy and Planning.
Readiness Matters The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and Degree Completion April Hansen ACT Client Relations
Engagement By Design: Focus on Developmental Education Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Findings.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
New and Emerging GEAR UP Evaluators
EPAS: Elevating the Postsecondary Aspirations of Students! Using ACTs EPAS Data Effectively Glenn Beer Louisiana Tech University
New English Language Development and Common Core State Standards Institute Two District’s Best-Practices in Supporting Secondary LTELs June 28 th, 2013.
EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE OVERVIEW Founded in 1889 as a settlement house on the Lower East Side of Manhattan 1951: First NYC-subsidized child care for low income.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve.
Research Study The career maturity of college freshmen as impacted by career counseling received in grades K-12: A reflective study.
Effective Outreach Strategies to IT Students Lessons Learned by BATEC National Career Pathways Network Louisville, Kentucky October 10 –
Math and Science Teacher’s Workshop September 21, 2011 Luke Dowell - Presenter.
Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
School Leadership Teams Collaborating for Effectiveness Begin to answer Questions #1-2 on the Handout: School Leadership Teams for Continuous Improvement.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
BOLD’S WORLD’S BEST WORK FORCE, MISSION TO SUCCESS.
WBCSD District Strategic Goals Update August 10, 2015.
English Learner PLC Workshop Grossmont union high school district English Learner Programs September 23, 2009.
COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS EVALUATION CONSORTIUM ED Affinity Webinar March 20, 2014 Presented by Members and Partners of the College & Career Readiness.
APRIL 2014 Nevada Advanced Placement 2014 Report 1.
C. “Changing the conversation…” Instructional Change –  Align to standards  Set higher expectations  Rigorous coursework  Assess  Data driven intervention.
ONEONTA HIGH SCHOOL 8 TH GRADE - OCTOBER 2010 PRESENTED ON DEC. 14, 2010 ACT EXPLORE RESULTS.
WELCOME EPAS Reports: Maximizing the Impact on Student Achievement in Mathematics.
ACT EXPLORE Understanding Your Results. Why the EXPLORE? Research shows that monitoring student progress in middle school, raising parent and student.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS EARLY ADOPTERS’ SURVEY Interpretive Summary Highlights of EWS Early Adopters Learning and Sharing Summit Survey, George W. Bush Institute,
PREPARING [DISTRICT NAME] STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER Setting a New Baseline for Success.
The Work of the Coach Identify target students and populations Maintain data on each interaction with students and families | Contact Summary Provide.
EDUCATIONAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT NCCEP CAPACITY BUILDING, FEBRUARY 2013.
LESSONS LEARNED IN PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEADERSHIP for CHSI 2 ND National High School Leadership Summit Archived Information.
Georgia’s Changing Assessment Landscape Melissa Fincher, Ph.D. Associate Superintendent for Assessment and Accountability Georgia Department for Education.
The inspection of local area responsibilities for disabled children and young people and those who have special educational needs Mary Rayner HMI Lesley.
Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation May 14, 2012 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent District Leadership Team 1.
ACT College-Readiness Measures: Explore, Plan and the ACT Hal L. Sanderson, Ph.D. Director of Institutional Research & Assessment Evidence-Based Learning.
TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PLANNING MEETING GRAVES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JULY 2015.
DSHS IMPROVING COLLEGE READINESS. COLLEGE READINESS ACROSS THE NATION Source: ACT, 2010, The Condition of College and Career Readiness : National.
Evidence for Impact on Student Learning Tony Norman Associate Dean, CEBS In P. R. Denner (Chair), Evidence for Impact on Student Learning from the Renaissance.
College and Career Readiness ?. DEFINITION  College Readiness Standards Detailed, research-based descriptions of skills and knowledge associated with.
Smarter Balanced & Higher Education Cheryl Blanco Smarter Balanced Colorado Remedial Education Policy Review Task Force August 24, 2012.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
KHS PARCC/SCIENCE RESULTS Using the results to improve achievement Families can use the results to engage their child in conversations about.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Operationalizing the General Assembly’s School Performance Grades (Senate Bill 795, Excellent Public Schools Act) October 2012 Superintendents’ Feedback.
Measuring Student Growth Using the Ohio ACT Profile Report Graduating Class 2016 Diana Rogers, Regional Coordinator HSTW NE Ohio Region September 21, 2016.
A Long and Winding Road: Long-Term Implementation of a Rural College Access Program AEA Annual Conference, Denver, CO October 15-18, 2014.
How Can High School Counseling Shape Students’ Postsecondary Attendance? Exploring the Relationship between High School Counseling and Students’ Subsequent.
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
UMCP Student Loan Default Study & Financial Literacy Initiatives
Mesa Union School District “A Day in the Life of Data”
Create a Strong Start ACT® Aspire ®.
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Sharpening Your Counseling and CTAE Tools
Title 1 Annual parent Meeting
North Carolina Positive Behavior Support Initiative
WHAT IS GEAR UP? GEAR UP New Mexico is a federal college-access grant whose goals are to increase the number of students graduating high school and pursuing.
Finding Support on Campus
NCLB “No Child Left Behind”.
WHAT IS GEAR UP Kentucky?
Two District’s Best-Practices in Supporting Secondary LTELs
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Presentation transcript:

Montana GEAR UP Montana GEAR UP Evaluation Resutls January 15, 2013

Research Question 1: What services do GEAR UP schools implement with program funds? 1. Montana GEAR UP offers a full range of services that address all three GEAR UP goals. The average hours for students receiving GEAR UP services ranged from two hours (financial aid counseling) to over 80 hours (rigorous academic curriculum). 2. There is a core group of five key services on which schools spend the majority of funds, spend the majority of time implementing, and reach the largest numbers of students. These services are: College Visits Tutoring and homework assistance Academic enrichment activities or STEM activities Summer programs Counseling, advising and academic planning

And what is the level of implementation of those services? 1. There is wide range in the quality of implementation of GEAR UP Services, from fair to very good. Overall, based on student and parent survey ratings and evaluator site visits, data suggest that most services had an average level of implementation. 2. The service that appears to have the overall strongest implementation is college visits, which is best described as having an above average implementation.

Research Question 2. To what extent do GEAR UP schools implement college & career readiness best practices? 1. Based on the educator survey, GEAR UP schools appear to have a fairly high level of college and career readiness best practices in all three practice areas of academic preparation, college aspirations and expectations, and (for high schools) college knowledge and taking action. On a seven point scale, most items and subscales had average ratings in the 5.0 to 6.0 range…somewhat agree to agree. 2. But there are some areas, where there is room for growth in the implementation. For example, many schools struggle with finding role models and mentors to help GEAR UP students, particularly our American Indian students, navigate the road to college access and success. 3. Together, the data suggest that the real value of the educator survey results is for state program leaders and individual school leaders to look at the relative results, targeting those practice areas and individual practices for improvement that are rated lower than others.

Research Question 3. Do GEAR UP activities achieve the following program goals and the Montana state performance indicators under each goal? Montana GEAR UP established three goals and a total of 21 indicators to measure the success of the program. Currently data are available 11 of these measures to assess progress from one year to the next. The available results are mixed at this early stage in program implementation. For every annual benchmark that Montana GEAR UP met for an indicator, Montana GEAR UP did not meet the annual benchmark for a similar indicator. On the positive side, Montana GEAR UP has already achieved the final benchmarks for two indicators regarding the percent of students who take the PLAN and EXPLORE.

School Indicator Flags: Examines selected state performance indicators and their relationship MTGU & PRA developed a few School Indicator Flags to more accurately gauge student performance by identifying consistencies and discrepancies of student performance on different indicators. Based on a series of School Indicator Flags, Montana GEAR UP students seem to perform better on indicators that measure local standards, such as course completion, than on indicators that measure state and national standards, such as performance on state CRT and national ACT testing. For example, Montana GEAR UP students increasingly are taking courses that align with the Montana University System college preparatory curriculum, but they are also outperformed on state and national assessments, such as the ACT, that can point to college readiness and success.

Research Question 4. Are GEAR UP services related to achievement of program goals and outcomes for all students and student subgroups, particularly Native American students? The evaluation examined the relationships between the amount of time that students and parents participated in GEAR UP services with predicted student performance on short-term outcomes. The results found positive associations between the set of Goal 1 services—such as academic tutoring and homework assistance, summer credit recovery, and academic enrichment activities—with Goal 1 outcomes—student completion of pre-Algebra in grade 8 and of Algebra I in grade 9. The evaluation also found other positive associations between increased hours of participation in Goal 2 services— counseling/advising/academic planning, college visits, and student workshops—and Goal 2 outcomes, such as being on track to meet MUS college preparation requirements.

Research Question 4 (Cont) The evaluation found fewer relationships between Goal 3 associated services—such as financial aid advising, parent workshops on college preparation, and family events—with Goal 3 associated outcomes, such as expectations about student enrollment in college, knowledge about financial aid, and FAFSA completion. The key finding for Goal 3 was the number of hours that parents spent in Goal 3 services was positively related to FAFSA completion. For the most part, all of the positive results across the three goals held equally true regardless of student gender or ethnicity. However, the positive results were not consistent across all grade levels measured.