Mike Cummens, MD Semantic Interoperability - 15 August, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building a National Medication Reference Terminology:
Advertisements

Tung Nguyen BHIM/BHS (LaTrobe) BOSSnet Victorian Account Manager
HITSC Clinical Quality Workgroup Jim Walker March 27, 2012.
LAKESIDE WELLNESS PROGRAM - PBHCI LEARNING COMMUNITY REGION #3 ORLANDO, FLORIDA, RUTH CRUZ- DIAZ, BSN EXT
Actionable Barriers and Gaps: Nursing Initiatives Bonnie L. Westra, PhD, RN, FAAN Associate Professor, University of Minnesota School of Nursing Director,
Amy Sheide Clinical Informaticist 3M Health Information Systems USA Achieving Data Standardization in Health Information Exchange and Quality Measurement.
“Medically Ready Force…Ready Medical Force” Use of the LOINC Document Ontology with the DoD Military Health System Ms. Nancy OrvisMHS Director Business.
National Health Policy Forum William Winkenwerder, Jr., M.D. Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) January 28, 2004.
DoD/VA Clinical Data Repository/Health Data Repository Project Lois Kellett Cliff Freeman 2007 Joint Venture Conference March 7, 2007 Draft.
FEBRUARY 5, 2015 STANLEY M. HUFF, MD CHIEF MEDICAL INFORMATICS OFFICER INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE HSPC Meeting Introduction.
Companion Guide to HL7 Consolidated CDA for Meaningful Use Stage 2
1 Consolidated Health Informatics “CHI” HIPAA Summit March 9, 2004.
The Role of Standard Terminologies in Facilitating Integration James J. Cimino, M.D. Departments of Biomedical Informatics and Medicine Columbia University.
Webinar: Publishing for the EHR 101 James J. Cimino Chief, Laboratory for Informatics Development National Institutes of Health Clinical Center May 20,
The NIH Biomedical Translational Research Information System (BTRIS) Town Hall Meeting - Information Session February 26, 2008 Lipsett Auditorium.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
AUGUST 21, 2014 STANLEY M. HUFF, MD CHIEF MEDICAL INFORMATICS OFFICER INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE HSPC Meeting Introduction.
Development Principles PHIN advances the use of standard vocabularies by working with Standards Development Organizations to ensure that public health.
Community Information Technology Engagement (CITE): Program Overview
Update on Newborn Screening Use Case Advisory Committee on Heritable Diseases in Newborns and Children - Advisory Committee on Heritable Diseases in Newborns.
© 2010 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T, the AT&T logo and all other AT&T marks contained herein are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual.
Challenges of Interoperability Using HL7 v3 in Czech Healthcare Miroslav NAGY, Petra PRECKOVA, Libor SEIDL and Jana ZVAROVA Center of Biomedical Informatics.
IHE Profile – SOA Analysis: In Progress Update Brian McIndoe December 6, 2010.
Exit Presentation University of Miami School of Medicine Industrial Engineering’s Role in Health Care.
Department of Veterans Affairs 1 Title: Digital writing for data capture Title (721) Initial Idea Submitted by: Jorge A. Ferrer M.D., M.B.A., LSA
Betsy L. Humphreys, MLS National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Standards (including Vocabulary):
The Challenge and the Goal: Regaining the Custody/Control of Outpatient Medical Records.
Public Health Vocabulary Services (a) Gautam Kesarinath – CDC NCPHI Associate Director of Technology, (b) Nikolay Lipskiy – CDC SDO & Interoperability.
UNIT 5 SEMINAR.  According to your text, in an acute care setting, an electronic health record integrates electronic data from multiple clinical systems.
Group Presentation Bobby Hamilton (CHCS System) – Naval Hospital Camp Lejeune Caitlin Barnum (Intercom Plus) – Pharmacy, Walgreens, Swansborro Karlene.
More and Better Data for Research: U.S. Health Data Content Standards Betsy L. Humphreys Assistant Director for Health Services Research Information National.
Survey of Medical Informatics CS 493 – Fall 2004 September 27, 2004.
IHE CDA Templates HL7 UK 2007 Keith W. Boone Interoperability Architect, GE Healthcare Co-chair, IHE Patient Care Coordination TC Co-chair, HL7 Structured.
Chapter 2 Standards for Electronic Health Records McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Chapter 6 – Data Handling and EPR. Electronic Health Record Systems: Government Initiatives and Public/Private Partnerships EHR is systematic collection.
Examples of the EHR BDK10-4
IT Application in Health Care
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report Jamie Ferguson, Chair Kaiser Permanente John Halamka, Co-chair Harvard Medical School 20 August,
DoD and Veterans Affairs: Health Information Interoperability Joint Venture Conference February 2006.
1 Consolidated Health Informatics Public Health Data Standards Consortium March 17, 2004.
Lecture (1) Introduction to Health Informatics Dr.Fatimah Ali Al-Rowibah.
Panel: Problems with Existing EHR Paradigms and How Ontology Can Solve Them Roberto A. Rocha, MD, PhD, FACMI Sr. Corporate Manager Clinical Knowledge Management.
1 Incorporating Data Mining Applications into Clinical Guidelines Reza Sherafat Dr. Kamran Sartipi Department of Computing and Software McMaster University,
Clinical Collaboration Platform Overview ST Electronics (Training & Simulation Systems) 8 September 2009 Research Enablers  Consulting  Open Standards.
West Virginia Information Technology Summit November 4, 2009.
Terminology in Health Care and Public Health Settings Unit 14 What is Health Information Management and Technology?
El Paso IT Demo Site Briefing JV conference 2007 WBAMC ELPVAHCS.
Open Source & Interoperability Profit Proprietary Closed Free Collaborative Open.
VA-DoD Health IT Sharing: Collaboration Among Agencies Mr. Fred McLain (VA) April 18, 2006.
© 2005 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION 2 11 Jan 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Terminology Service Bureau Vision Processes  Procedures.
SAGE Nick Beard Vice President, IDX Systems Corp..
Tung Tran, Ph.D. What is the EMR? Computerized legal medical record created by healthcare organizations Enables storage and retrieval of patient information.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY for the Health Professions CHAPTER Information Technology for the Health Professions, Fourth Edition Lillian Burke Barbara Weill.
Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 2 Clinical Information Standards – Unit 3 seminar Electronic.
3M Health Information Systems 1© 3M All Rights Reserved. 3M Health Information Systems Data Standardization Interoperability.
Enhancing interoperation: an i2b2 ETL schema for Epic EHRs
Clinical Terminology and One Touch Coding for EPIC or Other EHR
Functional EHR Systems
Clinical Data Warehousing
Enhancing interoperation: an i2b2 ETL schema for Epic EHRs
Terminology Service Bureau Vision
WorldVistA EHR (VOE) CCHIT Certified EHR.
Interoperable Social Determinants of Health: LOINCing the PCAM
6th Annual PHIN Conference August 25-28, 2008
LOCAL EXPERIENCES Innovation practices and experiences related to FIC development and implementation Ariadna Rius Clinical Dictionary for iSalut.
Electronic Health Information Systems
Electronic Health Records
Functional EHR Systems
Health Information Exchange Interoperability
Presentation transcript:

Mike Cummens, MD Semantic Interoperability - 15 August, 2006

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION 2 17 Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Agenda  AHLTA Goals  Terminology Interoperability  Future Directions

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION 3 17 Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I AHLTA Scope  9.2 Million beneficiaries  129,000 Staff  411 clinics  104 Military Treatment Facilities  70 hospitals  Theater (partial list)  Iraq  Afghanistan

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION 4 17 Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I AHLTA Weekly Volume  2.1 million prescriptions  1.8 million outpatient encounters  2,000 births for Uniformed Services members, retirees and their families

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION 5 17 Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I What Did the MHS Set Out to Do?  Make patient record available at point of care  Complete  Timely  Accurate  Noise free  Legally acceptable  Capture computable data to support business of healthcare  Achieve Gartner level 5 system  Quality  Granular  Structured  Coded

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION 6 17 Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Functionality First Generation: The Collector Second Generation: The Document Fourth Generation: The Partner Fifth Generation: The Mentor Minimal Full AHLTA Release 1 Requirements Predicted Marketplace Maturity Data Acquired Through Feeder Systems Document Care in Free Text Structured Documentation Spanning Episodes of Care Clinical Workflow Intervention Screening Decision Support Automated Generation Of Pathways and Workflow; Use by Consumers The CPR in US Industry: Gartner Group (1999) Now Third Generation: The Helper CHCS II development accelerated predicted timeline Care Innovation Commercially Available

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION 7 17 Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Systems to be integrated  Outpatient encounter documentation  Medicomp MEDCIN  PKC  Inpatient encounter documentation  CliniComp  Others  Clinical decision support  Medicomp MEDCIN  PKC  Local treatment facilities laboratory systems  Local treatment facilities pharmacy systems  Clinical data repository

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION 8 17 Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I MHS Terminologies (partial)  SNOMED CT  Medicomp MEDCIN  PKC  3M HDD NCID  MTF Laboratory IEN  MTF Allergy AIEN  NDC  CliniComp

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION 9 17 Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Healthcare Standards  Consolidated Health Informatics  Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) eGov initiative  Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense are committed to use of CHI standards for data mediation of terminologies with external agencies  Twenty federal agencies/departments are active in CHI governance

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Healthcare Standards  Consolidated Health Informatics Standards(partial)  Diagnosis, Problem List, Non Laboratory Tests, laboratory Result Contents  SNOMED CT  Medications  Semantic Clinical Drug Name of RXNORM  Drug Product  NDC  Laboratory Test Order  LOINC  Messages  HL7  Text Based Reports  HL7 CDA Release 1.0

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I COTS Application Terminology Challenges  Non Standard  Task oriented  “Ontology lite” at best  Decentralized usage  Context dependent terms  Propositional terms  Proprietary restrictions

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Clinical Data Repository/Health Data Repository (CHDR)  Real Time Interoperability mediation between Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense  Drug Allergies Text(VISTA)IEN(CHCS)

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Clinical Data Repository/Health Data Repository (CHDR)  Interoperability mediation between Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense  Drug Allergies Text(VISTA)UMLS CUIIEN(CHCS)

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Clinical Data Repository/Health Data Repository (CHDR)  Interoperability mediation between Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense  Allergic Reactions Text(VISTA)IEN or Text(CHCS)

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Clinical Data Repository/Health Data Repository (CHDR)  Interoperability mediation between Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense  Allergic Reactions Text(VISTA)SNOMED CT Concept ID IEN or Text(CHCS)

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Clinical Data Repository/Health Data Repository (CHDR)  Interoperability mediation between Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense  Medications NDRFT (VISTA) 3M NCID(DoD)

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Clinical Data Repository/Health Data Repository (CHDR)  Interoperability mediation between Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense  Medications NDRFT (VISTA) UMLS RXNORM 3M NCID(DoD)

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Clinical Data Repository/Health Data Repository (CHDR)  Interoperability mediation between Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense  Medications NDRFT (VISTA) UMLS RXNORM NDC3M NCID(DoD)

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Clinical Data Repository/Health Data Repository (CHDR)  Translation table of Drug Allergies, Allergic Reactions and Medications in Real Time

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Terminology Services Bureau  Mediation of MHS terminologies  “Core Domain” ontology based SNOMED CT as modified by Language & Computing  Hosted in Language &Computing LinkFactory  Source terminologies retained intact  Source terminologies mapped to “Core Domain”  Content management environment  Run Time environment

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I PKC Codes and Structure AHLTA CDR, MEDCIN, and PKC Interoperability Provider AHLTA CDR PKC MEDCIN 3M Codes and Structure MEDCIN Codes and Structure Stovepipe Systems  Systems isolated  Provider must correlate data  Provider must filter data  No knowledge support across all data  Duplicate data entry MHS Clinical Ontology (From TSB) Integrated Systems  Systems integrated  System correlates data  System filters data  Knowledge support across all data  Eliminate duplicate data entry Separate Clients: AHLTA Client, PKC Client, MEDCIN Client Single Client

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Terminology Services Bureau  Content management environment  Semi-automated term mapping using NLP  Manual mapping and editing by terminology experts  Run Time environment

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Terminology Services Bureau Contents  SNOMED CT  Core Domain for all areas of medical practice  PKC  Wellness, health screening, military readiness  MEDCIN  Granular outpatient encounter documentation  RXNORM  Medications  LOINC  Laboratory results  Document types

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Terminology Services Bureau Advantages  Reusability  LOINC Laboratory Content integrated into TSB for MEDCIN flowsheet implementation  LOINC content is being used for AHLTA Clinical Reminder Notification  LOINC content is being reused for CliniComp Monitoring Device data integration  Ease of maintenance  Central mapping repository versus distributed, redundant hard code and data tables.

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Terminology Services Bureau Challenges  Proprietary content  Source terminology issues  Inconsistent use of terminology  Task specific structure of terminologies.  Context dependency  Rules based mapping  The content of several local fields determine concept to be mapped to core ontology  “Systolic blood pressure in the left arm while seated”  Run time implementation  One to one mapping  Rules assisted information translation

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Use Case: Lab Flow Sheet  Goal:  Given diagnosis from MEDCIN – show all related lab results for the patient.  Issues:  Diagnosis is a MEDCIN ID  Lab data stored in the CDR using 3M NCIDs  CDR does not understand MEDCIN IDs for Lab  MEDCIN contains list of LOINC codes associated with each diagnosis  Solution:  Need to correlate knowledge from MEDCIN and CDR

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Use Case: Lab Flow Sheets - What the Provider Sees Provider 1. Select the patient. 2. Show list of the current problems. 3. Show only lab results which are pertinent to the selected problem.

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Use Case: Lab Flow Sheet - How it is technically done AHLTA CDR NCID LOINC MEDCIN MEDCIN ID LOINC MHS Clinical Ontology (in TSB) TSB Run-time Environment Flow Sheet Knowledge Agent MEDCIN/LOINC Mappings NCID/LOINC Mappings Lab Results via NCID Lab Results from CDR Displays Pertinent Lab Results For Diagnosis Import Export Web Services Data Display

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Planned and Future Uses of TSB  Encourage use of TSB for all integration tasks  Eliminate custom point-to-point mappings  Map once – use many times  Lab flow sheet project in progress  Allow provider to retrieve pertinent lab results for specific problem  Interoperability MEDCIN and AHLTA CDR  Interoperability between PKC, MEDCIN, and CDR  Pre-populate PKC coupler with data already in CDR  Pre-populate MEDCIN note with data already in CDR  Pre-populate MEDCIN note with data entered into the coupler  Use of PKC knowledge engine against CDR and MEDCIN data  Use of MEDCIN Diagnosis Prompt against CDR and PKC coupler data

© 2006 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION Mar 06 Northrop Grumman Private / Proprietary Level I Planned and Future Uses of TSB (cont.)  Educate customers to the advantages of reuse of mediating terminologies  Increase number of mediation terminologies and maps.