Cynthia M. Anderson, University of Oregon Lisa Bateman, Bethel School District Bruce Stiller, School District 4j Chris Borgmeier, Portland State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Instructional Decision Making
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
School-wide PBIS Universal Systems Year 3 Chris Borgmeier, PhD Portland State University
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
District Level Implementation of Secondary & Tertiary PBS Interventions: So Our Universal System is Working! What’s Next? Chris Borgmeier, PhD Portland.
Supporting District Yellow/ Red Zone planning for Behavior Chris Borgmeier, PhD Portland State University
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
PBIS Applications NWPBIS Washington Conference November 5, 2012.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
Professional Development and Technical Assistance: The National Blueprint for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral.
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Building Tertiary Systems of Support Terry Bigby, Ed.D. Material adapted from Illinois PBIS & Tim Lewis, Ph.D., University of Missouri- Columbia.
Support systems and sustained implementation of a data-driven, problem-solving model Margie McGlinchey MAASE Summer Institute August 11, 2009 Steve Goodman.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
VTPBiS Intensive Level Wraparound Webinar Presented by: Jesse Suter February 4, 2015.
Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.
V 2.1 Tier II Critical Features Building the Infrastructure to Support Tier 2.
Intensive Positive Behavior Support -- Secondary and Tertiary Behavioral Interventions Bruce Stiller, Ph.D.; Celeste Rossetto Dickey, M.Ed.
Implementation Drivers March 23, 2012
Rob Horner University of Oregonwww.pbis.org. Celebrate: PBS now being used in many parts of society. Focus: On school-wide positive behavior support.
District Systems to Support School Implementation of Tier 2 & Tier 3 PBIS: Applying implementation science Chris Borgmeier, PhD February 14th, 2013 NorthWest.
A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
New Coaches Training. Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Rainbow Crane Behavior RtI Coordinator
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
Targeted and Intensive Interventions: Assessing Process (Fidelity) Cynthia M. Anderson, PhD University of Oregon.
Monitoring Advanced Tiers Tool (MATT) University of Oregon October, 2012.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Tier 3 Systems for Sustainable Success WI RtI Center WI PBIS Network Rachel Saladis.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Administrator’s Role Donna Morelli Cynthia Zingler Education Specialists Positive Behavioral.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR SWPBS Rob Horner and Bob Algozzine.
1 Module L R ole of Coaches Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
 This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved. Advanced Tiers in High Schools Ali Hearn, IL PBIS Network Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network.
Washington PBIS Conference Northwest PBIS Network Spokane, WA November 2013.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
 This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved. Tier Two Systems in High Schools Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network.
Systems, Data, & Practices to Move PBIS Forward in Ravenswood City School District Sheldon Loman, Ph.D.
COACHING AT THE BUILDING LEVEL Lori Newcomer – University of Missouri.
1 EBISS Basics for New Districts Developing systems for the sustained implementation of school-wide PBS, Literacy, and RTI.
Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability.
ORGANIZATION & DELIVERY OF TERTIARY SYSTEMS AT THE DISTRICT LEVEL Cynthia M. Anderson & Kimberli Breen University of Oregon & Illinois PBIS.
Priority Initiative for KSDE Multi Tiered System of Support.
Implementing School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Tier 2 Coaching Jessica Swain-Bradway, IL PBIS Network
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS (PBIS)
Coaching PLC April 5, 2011 Pat Mueller
District Leadership SCCOE October,  How are things going with this first SW-PBIS cohort? What has worked? What are challenges? What tangible outcomes.
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports District-wide Implementation: Ensuring Success Kentucky Center for Instructional Discipline.
RDQ 5 District Coaching Capacity Discussion Leader: George Sugai, University of Connecticut.
Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.
Presentation transcript:

Cynthia M. Anderson, University of Oregon Lisa Bateman, Bethel School District Bruce Stiller, School District 4j Chris Borgmeier, Portland State University Intensive Positive Behavior Support

Where it starts

Where it often Ends

How do we improve support for students with challenging behavior in schools?

We Know What Works… Prevention and early intervention Interventions based on science of behavior Teach desired behavior Arrange environment to encourage desired behavior Explicitly reinforce desired behavior Minimize reinforcement for less desired behavior Progress monitoring enhances outcomes

Implementation is a Challenge Limited resources Expertise Time Money Multiple competing initiatives and “interests” Lot’s of research on what works, little on how to do it

SWPBS: Framework to Guide Implementation Team-based decision-making Resource management and allocation Access to technical assistance Data guide decisions Outcomes Systems Practices Tiers II and III District planning & oversight

GOOD FASTCHEAP Three Degrees of Freedom

Putting it Together Effective intervention practices and programs No other combination of factors reliably produces desired outcomes Effective implementation practices Good outcomes for students +

© Fixsen & Blase, 2008 Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Competency Organization Student Benefits Leadership Integrated & Compensatory

Leadership in a District IPBS is a priority in the district Agenda item at every district meeting District action plan guides training and TA in all schools FTE allocated to resources in district and schools Clear link and collaboration with: Special education (placement & service delivery) Academic programs (RtI) District data systems District coordinates relevant roles and responsibilities Building administrator School psychologists Counselors

© Fixsen & Blase, 2008 Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Coaching Training Selection Systems Intervention Facilitative Administration Decision Support Data System Competency Organization Student Benefits Leadership Adaptive Technical Integrated & Compensatory

© Fixsen & Blase, 2008 Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Coaching Training Selection Competency Organization Student Benefits Leadership Adaptive Technical Integrated & Compensatory

Behavior Specialist Old model: Put out fires IPBS: Guide systems-change and implementation

District Behavior Specialist/Coach/Leader Coaching Meetings Data use Intervention fidelity

IPBS in a School What we do not do: Admire the problem What we do: Progress monitor Develop and oversee interventions How schools do it Meetings SWPBS team IPBS team Data guide decision-making

Decision-Making Flowchart

District Behavior Specialist/Coach/Leader Coaching Meetings Data use Intervention fidelity Guide school-level evaluation Team process Specific interventions Overall IPBS (BAT ) Coordination Communicate with district team Plan training schedule Schedule assessments

© Fixsen & Blase, 2008 Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Coaching Training Selection Competency Organization Student Benefits Leadership Adaptive Technical Integrated & Compensatory

Selection (School) In a district that is committed Active support Commits FTE to district coordinator/Beh specialist Sustained implementation of Tier I Administrative support and buy-in Willingness to reallocate roles Commitment for 5 plus years

Selecting the District Level Behavior Specialist Expertise Coaching and data use Tier II & Tier III Parent-school collaboration Selection Start with clear job description Interview process Vignettes Rehearsal Ask for previously completed FBAs and BSPs Model FBA interview

Selection Within the School Building administrator—involved with discipline IPBS Team facilitator Building Behavior Specialist(s) Tier 2 intervention coordinator(s) Data manager

© Fixsen & Blase, 2008 Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Coaching Training Selection Competency Organization Student Benefits Leadership Adaptive Technical Integrated & Compensatory

Training Strategic Sequential Training Sequence

Capacity Building Step 1 IPBS overview Team organization, structure, and functioning Data-based decision-making Step 2 Secondary interventions CICO as “go to” Tier II intervention Step 3 Function-based support/capacity building Step 4 Formative evaluation Planning for sustainability Step 5 Comprehensive supports

© Fixsen & Blase, 2008 Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Coaching Training Selection Systems Intervention Facilitative Administration Data-Based Decision are Supported Competency Organization Student Benefits Leadership Adaptive Technical Integrated & Compensatory

Data-Based Decision-Making District provides data system for schools Schools use data to guide decision-making District uses data to guide district-level decision-making

Data Systems SIWS and CICO SWIS…stay tuned for ISIS For now Spreadsheet at Tier III

Teacher Daily Ratings of Behavior

SWIS-CICO Report Support Plan Change Description 09/10/2008Check out with Joe Binder 09/19/2008Check in and out with Joe Binder

Data-Based Decision-Making District provides data system for schools Schools use data to guide decision-making District uses data to guide district-level decision-making

>85 <85

© Fixsen & Blase, 2008 Systems Intervention Facilitative Administration Decision Support Data System Organization Student Benefits Leadership Adaptive Technical Integrated & Compensatory

Facilitative Administration Make sure sped AND Gen ed are bought in /remove barriers Policies and organization supports implementation Shift accountability for students with challenging behavior Monitor student placement Look beyond ODRs

© Fixsen & Blase, 2008 Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Systems Intervention Facilitative Administration Decision Support Data System Organization Student Benefits Leadership Adaptive Technical Integrated & Compensatory

Systems Interventions Planning for Personnel & Resources District behavior specialist with skills and FTE

Systems Interventions Planning for Personnel & Resources District behavior specialist with skills and FTE Buildings FTE for Tier II coordinators FTE for Tier III coordinators Link to academic systems

Systems Interventions Planning for Personnel & Resources Training Sequence Build interventions for district and schools Build capacity – Use tools to allocate resources: resource mapping & gap analysis

© Fixsen & Blase, 2008 Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Competency Organization Student Benefits Leadership Adaptive Technical Integrated & Compensatory

Performance Assessment District leadership team reviews school data monthly ODR patterns Out of school placements IEP needs Monthly meetings for all building leaders Review data Address challenges Identify training and resource needs

© Fixsen & Blase, 2008 Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Coaching Training Selection Systems Intervention Facilitative Administration Data-Based Decision are Supported Competency Organization Student Benefits Leadership Adaptive Technical Integrated & Compensatory

Cynthia Anderson University of Oregon

50 Academic Social Behavior 1-5% 5-10% 80-90% Individual Individually Design Instruction Individual Behavior Support Plan (BSP) Safety Plan Targeted: Some Students (at-risk) Core Plus Pre-teach, Re-teach Supplemental Programs Alter Group Size Targeted: Some Students (at-risk) Advance CICO Social Skills Lunch Buddies Boy/Girls Groups Check-in, Check-out (CICO) Universal Screening: All Students Core Program Universal Screening: All Students Schoolwide expectations taught explicitly reinforced frequently Practices for Student Success Adapted from: Horner & Sugai