Large distance modification of gravity and dark energy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page.
Advertisements

Benasque 2012 Luca Amendola University of Heidelberg in collaboration with Martin Kunz, Mariele Motta, Ippocratis Saltas, Ignacy Sawicki Horndeski Lagrangian:
1 1 Dissecting Dark Energy Eric Linder Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Dark Energy as the Gravitational Feedback of Mass-Varying Dark Matter André Füzfa* F.N.R.S. Postdoctoral Researcher GAMASCO, University of Namur, Belgium.
Massive Gravity and the Galileon Claudia de Rham Université de Genève Work with Gregory Gabadadze, Lavinia Heisenberg, David Pirtskhalava and Andrew Tolley.
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page S. Fay, S. Nesseris, L.P. gr-qc/
P ROBING SIGNATURES OF MODIFIED GRAVITY MODELS OF DARK ENERGY Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Yashar Akrami Modern Cosmology: Early Universe, CMB and LSS/ Benasque/ August 17, 2012 Postdoctoral Fellow Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics University.
CMB but also Dark Energy Carlo Baccigalupi, Francesca Perrotta.
Dark Energy and Extended Gravity theories Francesca Perrotta (SISSA, Trieste)
University of Texas at San Antonio Arthur Lue Dark Energy or Modified Gravity?
Non-linear matter power spectrum to 1% accuracy between dynamical dark energy models Matt Francis University of Sydney Geraint Lewis (University of Sydney)
BRANE-WORLD COSMOLOGY Porto 2004University of Portsmouth Roy Maartens Revent reviews: Brax, Davis, vd Bruck, hep-th/ RM, gr-qc/
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page.
Modified Gravity Takeshi Chiba Nihon University. Why?
Álvaro de la Cruz-Dombriz Theoretical Physics Department Complutense University of Madrid in collaboration with Antonio L. Maroto & Antonio Dobado Different.
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Dark energy II : Models of dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Physical Constraints on Gauss-Bonnet Dark Energy Cosmologies Ishwaree Neupane University of Canterbury, NZ University of Canterbury, NZ DARK 2007, Sydney.
Cosmic Microwave Radiation Anisotropies in brane worlds K. Koyama astro-ph/ K. Koyama PRD (2002) Kazuya Koyama Tokyo University.
DGP gravity Theory and Phenomenology
Portsmouth 2008 of gravity Luca Amendola INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma The dark side.
COSMO 2006, Lake Tahoe 9/28/2006 Cuscuton Cosmology: Cuscuton Cosmology: Dark Energy meets Modified Gravity Niayesh Afshordi Institute for Theory and Computation.
A model of accelerating dark energy in decelerating gravity Matts Roos University of Helsinki Department of Physical Sciences and Department of Astronomy.
1 What is the Dark Energy? David Spergel Princeton University.
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page.
Bin Wang (王斌) Fudan University WHAT COULD w BE?. Outline Dark energy: Discords of Concordance Cosmology What is w? Could we imagine w
Near-Horizon Solution to DGP Perturbations Ignacy Sawicki, Yong-Seon Song, Wayne Hu University of Chicago astro-ph/ astro-ph/
Gravity and Extra Dimensions José Santiago Theory Group (Fermilab) APS April meeting, Session Y4 (Gravity and Cosmology) Jacksonville (FL) April 14-17,
THE UNIVERSE AS A BRANE QG05 Sardegna Roy Maartens Portsmouth.
Cosmological Post-Newtonian Approximation with Dark Energy J. Hwang and H. Noh
Chaplygin gas in decelerating DGP gravity Matts Roos University of Helsinki Department of Physics and and Department of Astronomy 43rd Rencontres de Moriond,
Cosmological Tests using Redshift Space Clustering in BOSS DR11 (Y. -S. Song, C. G. Sabiu, T. Okumura, M. Oh, E. V. Linder) following Cosmological Constraints.
Dark Energy and Modified Gravity IGC Penn State May 2008 Roy Maartens ICG Portsmouth R Caldwell.
Modified (dark) gravity Roy Maartens, Portsmouth or Dark Gravity?
BRANEWORLD COSMOLOGICAL PERTURBATIONS
Relic Neutrinos as a Source of Dark Energy Neal Weiner New York University IDM04 R.Fardon, D.B.Kaplan, A.E.Nelson, NW What does dark energy have to do.
Jochen Weller Benasque August, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, , 2006.
Cascading gravity and de gravitation Claudia de Rham Perimeter Institute/McMaster Miami 2008 Dec, 18 th 2008.
Dark Matter and Dark Energy from the solution of the strong CP problem Roberto Mainini, L. Colombo & S.A. Bonometto Universita’ di Milano Bicocca Mainini.
Dark Energy The first Surprise in the era of precision cosmology?
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Dark Energy and Modified Gravity Shinji Tsujikawa (Gunma National College of Technology ) Collaborations with L. Amendola, S. Capozziello, R. Gannouji,
Observational test of modified gravity models with future imaging surveys Kazuhiro Yamamoto (Hiroshima U.) Edinburgh Oct K.Y. , Bassett, Nichol,
1 1 Eric Linder University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Interpreting Dark Energy JDEM constraints.
The Theory/Observation connection lecture 2 perturbations Will Percival The University of Portsmouth.
Cosmological Perturbations in the brane worlds Kazuya Koyama Tokyo University JSPS PD fellow.
Michael Doran Institute for Theoretical Physics Universität Heidelberg Time Evolution of Dark Energy (if any …)
1 1 The Darkness of the Universe: The Darkness of the Universe: The Heart of Darkness Eric Linder Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
ERE 2008September 15-19, Spanish Relativity Meeting 2008, Salamanca, September (2008) Avoiding the DARK ENERGY coincidence problem with a COSMIC.
Modified Gravity and Degravitation
Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, ,
Three theoretical issues in physical cosmology I. Nonlinear clustering II. Dark matter III. Dark energy J. Hwang (KNU), H. Noh (KASI)
Dark Energy and baryon oscillations Domenico Sapone Université de Genève, Département de Physique théorique In collaboration with: Luca Amendola (INAF,
GRAVITON BACKREACTION & COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT
1 1 Dark Energy with SNAP and other Next Generation Probes Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
THE DARK SIDE OF THE UNIVERSE Amna Ali Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics Kolkata, India 9/07/2012 LPNHE,PARIS.
@ 2012 Miniworkshop for String theory and Cosmology Dec. 01st Seokcheon Lee (KIAS)
Kazuya Koyama University of Portsmouth Non-linear structure formation in modified gravity models with Gong-bo Zhao (Portsmouth), Baojiu Li (Durham)
The HORIZON Quintessential Simulations A.Füzfa 1,2, J.-M. Alimi 2, V. Boucher 3, F. Roy 2 1 Chargé de recherches F.N.R.S., University of Namur, Belgium.
Cosmology in a brane-induced gravity model with trace-anomaly terms
Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation, University of Portsmouth
J. Tang, J. Weller, A. Zablocki
Probing the Coupling between Dark Components of the Universe
Recent status of dark energy and beyond
Stealth Acceleration and Modified Gravity
Shintaro Nakamura (Tokyo University of Science)
Probing the Dark Sector
Presentation transcript:

Large distance modification of gravity and dark energy Kazuya Koyama ICG, University of Portsmouth

Cosmic acceleration Cosmic acceleration Big surprise in cosmology Simplest best fit model LCDM 4D general relativity + cosmological const.

3 independent data sets intersect

Problem of LCDM Huge difference in scales (theory vs observation) vacuum energy =0 from fundamental theory (1) tiny vacuum energy is left somehow (2) Potential energy of quintessence field

Alternative models Tiny energy scale unstable under quantum corrections Alternative - modified gravity dark energy is important only at late times large scales / low energy modifications cf. from Newton to GR

Is cosmology probing breakdown of GR on large (IR) scales ?

Options Modify the Friedmann equation empirically or how to perturb? Modify the Einstein-Hilbert action cf. (Freese, …) (Dvali and Turner, …) (Carol et.al., …)

Problems of IR modification Modified gravity graviton has a scalar mode Solar system constraints - theory must be GR cf. difficult to explain dark energy purely from modified gravity (Chiba)

DGP model Crossover scale 4D Newtonian gravity 5D Newtonian gravity (Dvali, Gabadadze,Porrati) Crossover scale 4D Newtonian gravity 5D Newtonian gravity gravity leakage Infinite extra-dimension

Consistent with local experiments? DGP also has a scalar mode of graviton :4D Newtonian but not 4D GR! (Scalar-Tensor theory) Non-linear shielding theory becomes GR at solar-system constraints can be evaded if 5D ST GR 4D (Deffayet et.al.)

Cosmology of DGP Friedmann equation early times 4D Friedmann late times As simple as LCDM model and as fine-tuned as LCDM (stability against quantum corrections can be different) (Deffayet)

LCDM vs DGP Can we distinguish between DGP and LCDM ? Friedmann equation cf. LCDM

SNe + baryon oscillation SNLS + SDSS ‘Gold’ set + SDSS (Maartens and Majerotto in preperation) (Fairbairn and Goobar astro-ph/0511029) (cf. Alam and Sahni, astro-ph/0511473)

Why baryon oscillation? angular diameter at z=0.3 + shape parameter of power spectrum K=0 equivalent to dark energy model with (Lue.et.al) VS (LCDM)

DGP Cosmology As simple as LCDM a falsifiable model now the model is under pressure from the data measurements of is crucial Fit to SNe assuming flat universe A parameter is fixed!

Dark energy vs DGP Can we distinguish between dark energy in GR and DGP ? DGP model is fitted by DGP (Linder) Dvali and Turner

Cosmology as a probe of DGP gravity Non-linear linear Einstein Scalar tensor 4D 5D CMB ISW LSS CMB SNe Weak lensing Non-linear mapping Growth rate Expansion history

Growth rate of structure formation Evolution of CDM over-density GR If there is no dark energy dark energy suppresses the gravitational collapse DGP an additional modification from the scalar mode

Expansion history vs growth rate Growth rate resolves the degeneracy (Lue.et.al, Linder) LCDM dark energy DGP

Experiments ASSUME our universe is DGP braneworld (Ishak et.al, astro-ph/0507184) ASSUME our universe is DGP braneworld but you do not want to believe this, so fit the data using dark energy model m(z): apparent magnitude R: CMB shift parameter G(a): Growth rate OR SNe+CMB SNe+weak lensing Inconsistent!

Consistent 5D analysis of growth factor KK and R.Maartens astro-ph/0511634 Use correct 5D physics growth rate is sensitive to truncation of 5D physics Consistency in 5D physics (1) Analysis based on (2) must be revisited (1) Lue.et.al astro-ph/0401515 (2) Song astro-ph/0407489 LCDM Dark energy

Solutions for metric perturbations (Lue et.al, KK and R,Maartens) Solutions for metric perturbations Scalar tensor theory with Brans-Dick parameter

ISW effects and weak lensing Growth rate is determined by ISW effects and weak lensing effects depends on the same as GR! Difference comes from growth rate of

Einstein Scalar tensor 4D 5D Non-linear P(k) Large scale ISW Need 5D solutions Need non-linear mapping Non-linear linear Einstein Scalar tensor 4D 5D CMB ISW LSS CMB SNe Weak lensing

Summary Alternative to LCDM from large scale modification DGP model as an example The model is already in tension with the data Structure formation is different from GR 5D study of perturbations is crucial cf. Theoretical difficulties of DGP model strong coupling / a ghost in de Sitter spacetime (Luty, Porrati, Rattazi) (Nicolis, Rattati; KK hep-th/0503191 Gorbunov, KK, Sibiryakov; to appear)

Lessons from DGP Gravity is subtle modification at present day horizon scale does not mean no modification under horizon structure formation is different from GR great opportunity to exploit future observations Build consistent models Structure formation is sensitive to underlying theory Build consistent theory (ghost free etc.) Address fundamental questions (fine-tuning, coincidence)