NPRR 209 Presentation Adrian Pieniazek – NRG Texas Technical Advisory Committee May 6, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC Kathy Scott January 28,
Advertisements

Proposal on Ancillary Service Deliverability Requirements QMWG January 6, 2012.
Unresolved Issues in NPRR 555 Texas Steel Companies July 9, 2013.
ERCOT Update on PUCT Posting changes DEWG Meeting 11/27/07 Matt Mereness.
February 25, 2011 Demand Side Working Group EILS Update Mark Patterson ERCOT, Manager Demand Integration.
DSWG Update to WMS May 17, DSWG Goals Update.
TPTF Presentation Registration of PUN Facilities December 19, 2007.
MISUG Meeting Materials ERCOT 10/16/ Agenda 10/16/ Antitrust AdmonitionJ. Lavas 9:30 a.m. 2.Introduction/Agenda OverviewJ. Lavas 9:35 a.m.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal Version EDS 3 R6.3 8 Focused Input Test (FIT) II Web Ex Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control.
NPRRs NPRR680 Allow QSEs to Self-Arrange AS Quantities Greater Than Their AS Obligation. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) proposes to allow.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee April 8, 2010.
Distributed Generation Registration Threshold Protocols Section 16.5 (5) ERCOT Staff DER Workshop June 18, ERCOT Public.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee June 4, 2009.
Market Mitigation Concept Group Update Jim Galvin April 26, 2004.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 External Web Services Update Nodal Implementation Team Presentation July 7, 2009.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee March 4, 2010.
ROS Meeting – 12/06/071Texas Nodal Program - TPTF Update Texas Nodal Transition Plan Task Force ROS Meeting Stacy Bridges, ERCOT Thursday, 12/06/2007.
NPRR XXX: PRR 307 Inclusion in Nodal…Part II. Questions Raised 06/26/06 Section 3 –COP (resource parameters) –CLR participation limits –Telemetry Requirements.
Commercial Operations Subcommittee (COPS) January 2014 Update to TAC 1/29/2015.
Profiling Working Group 1 PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Direct Energy ERCOT PWG Chair Ed Echols Of Oncor ERCOT PWG Vice Chair for COPS Meeting.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
CRR Issues Transparency provided by CRR Reports CRR EDS handbook Business process NPRR TPTF November 27, 2007.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Enterprise Data Warehouse Section 8 – Performance Monitoring.
RMS/COPS Workshop VI 1 October 06, Antitrust Admonition ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in.
NPRRs 663NPRR Ancillary Service Insufficiency Actions. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) specifies the actions ERCOT will take to ensure sufficient.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee May 8, 2008.
ERS Update – DSWG Presentation September 21, 2012.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board February 16, 2005.
1 Tests for Reasonable LMPs & Price Validation Tool Overview October 27, 2009 NATF.
MCWG Update to WMS 11/13/2013. MCWG Update to WMS General Update - October 30 th Joint MCWG/CWG Meeting Review September 25 Meeting Minutes - Approved.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee January 6, 2010.
Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) TITLE: Performance Measurement & Verification and Telemetry Requirements for Load Resources providing Non-Spin March.
1 Protocol Clarification: Section , Resolution of Dispute Notification of Financial Impact of Granted and Granted with Exception Disputes COPS.
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 03, :30 PM.
“Managing the Integration of Energy Storage Technologies” Kenneth Ragsdale ERCOT.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee October 1, 2009.
Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Operations Model Posting NATF Sep 29, 2009 Matt Mereness, ERCOT.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 High-Level Overview of draft NPRR implementing PUCT Rule Posting Requirements January 8,
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 27, 2010.
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
Profiling Working Group 1 PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Direct Energy ERCOT PWG Chair Ed Echols Of Oncor ERCOT PWG Vice Chair for COPS Meeting.
December 2010 Wholesale Market Subcommittee Report to Technical Advisory Committee.
ERCOT Update on Day-Ahead Extract and other PUCT Posting changes DEWG Meeting 10/29/07 Matt Mereness.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
Demand Side Working Group March 5, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
Load Participation in Nodal Training Session Update DSWG December 7, 2007.
June 26 and July 31, 2014 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott August 5, 2014 TAC Update to RMS 1.
ERCOT Wholesale Market SubcommitteeJanuary 12, ERCOT Wholesale Market SubcommitteeJanuary 12, ERCOT/IMM/PUCT Proposal for Redaction of State.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board July 18, TAC Summary 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 5 Nodal PRRs for approval.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors July 15, 2008.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Update on TPTF Comments on MMS Clarification Notes May 21,
NPRRs 705NPRR Provides Consistency for References to the End Date of the Generation Interconnection Process. In the Resource Interconnection Handbook,
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
ROS Meeting – 06/12/081Texas Nodal Program - TPTF Update Texas Nodal Transition Plan Task Force ROS Meeting Stacy Bridges, ERCOT Thursday, 06/12/08.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris May 5, 2011.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations November 2, 2012 – RCWG Meeting.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Tom Burke November 29, 2012.
February 26, 2015 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott March 3, 2015 TAC Update to RMS 1.
August 11, 2008 TPTF EDS Sequence and Durations Discussion Daryl Cote.
Commercial Operations Subcommittee (COPS) Update to TAC 4/28/2016
Protocol Revision Subcommittee
Exceptional Fuel Costs in LMP
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Ancillary Service Trades and Ancillary Service Settlement
Interpreting DREAM NPRR 777.
NPRR829 Incorporate Real-Time Telemetered Net Generation for Non-Modeled Generation into the Real-Time Liability Estimate ERCOT PRS Meeting May 11, 2017.
Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461
Presentation transcript:

NPRR 209 Presentation Adrian Pieniazek – NRG Texas Technical Advisory Committee May 6, 2010

What NPRR209 “Is NOT” An attempt to “overreach” or otherwise unduly limit market transparency. An attempt to make a statement on whether or not current market transparency provisions are “bad policy”. What NPRR209 “Is” An attempt to bring the nodal protocols into compliance with PUCT Substantive Rule

Rule Language PUCT Subst. R. §25.505(f)(3)(B) – (3)The following information in entity-specific form, for each settlement interval, shall be posted as specified below. (B) Two months after the start of operation of the market under a nodal market design: (i) Offer curves (prices and quantities) for each type of ancillary service and for energy at each settlement point in the real time market, shall be posted 60 days after the day for which the information is accumulated except that, for the highest-priced offer selected or dispatched for each interval on an ERCOT-wide basis, ERCOT shall post the offer price and the name of the entity submitting the offer 48 hours after the day for which the information is accumulated. (ii) If the MCPE or the MCPC exceeds the event trigger during any interval, the portion of every market participant’s price-quantity offer pairs for balancing energy service and each other ancillary service that is at or above the event trigger for that service and that interval shall be posted seven (7) days after the day for which the offer is submitted. (iii) Other resource-specific information, as well as self-arranged energy and ancillary capacity services, and actual resource output, for each type of service and for each resource at each settlement point shall be posted 60 days after the day for which the information is accumulated.” (emphasis added)

Intent of NPRR209 Language Changes Changes Section , Items Considered Protected Information, to change protected information status of Base Points from 7 days to 60 days, synching up the language with Section 3.2.5, Publication of Resource and Load Information. Requires that transmission and transformer voltages not be posted for 60 days, subject to a clarification from ERCOT on the actual data being posted. Reinstates the posting of transformer tap positions.

State Estimator Snapshot of November 11, 2008, 00:53 a.m.

Data from the ERCOT “60 Days Later Report” Same Operating Day Report title: 60_QSE_Actual_Res_Output-10-Jan-09 WAP5 = * 4 = MW Sum of WAP6, WAP7, WAP8 = ( ) * 4 =

Closing and Summary Comments Existing protocol language violates PUCT Subst. Rule § NPRR209 brings the protocol language into compliance with the rule. There is an important distinction between “market transparency” and “market participant transparency”. The intent of NPRR209 is to address the latter and comply with the rules. Even opponents of NPRR209 have stated a “subset” of transmission flows may conflict with Subst. Rule § PUCT Staff has stated that “Protocol , as currently drafted, requires the release of information that could be used to determine the actual output of Resources on the system in violation of PUC Subst. R (f)(3)(B).” There are LMP markets all over the country and none of them post state estimator information every hour of every day. These markets seem to be doing just fine. The PUCT and the IMM are responsible for efficient market outcomes and monitoring market participant behavior.