1 Own Your Future The Long-Term Care Awareness Campaign Demonstration Project Overview, Results, and Future Sponsored by the United States Department of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Custom Marketing Program for
Advertisements

Jack Jedwab Association for Canadian Studies September 27 th, 2008 Canadian Post Olympic Survey.
EPITA IT Markets Basic Finance and Marketing
Investor Education in Your Workplace®
Consumer and Business Buyer Behavior
© GfK Using ancillary information to stratify and target young adults and Hispanics in national ABS samples J. Michael Dennis, Charles DiSogra,
An overview of the National Performance Measures 118 NOVEMBER 2011 THE CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL & COMMUNITY SERVICE.
1 Changing Profile of Household Sector Credit and Deposits in Indian Banking System -Deepak Mathur November 30, 2010.
MEASURING LABOUR FORCE PARTICIPATION OF WOMEN
Increasing Survey Cooperation: Motivating Chronic Late Responders to an Annual Survey National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics.
The University of Texas at El Paso Building a National Reputation By Successfully Serving its Region The University of Texas at El Paso Building a National.
1 Medicare Part D: Cost Management Issues Jack Hoadley Research Professor Georgetown University Health Policy Institute Families USA Health Action 2005.
UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
Advertising, Sales Promotion, and Public Relations
Improving the lives of older Americans Using Technology to Screen and Enroll People in Benefits: An Overview of BenefitsCheckUp Marlene Schneider AIRS.
The Impact of Drug Benefit Caps Geoffrey Joyce, PhD.
TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1.0: Trends in the Overall Health Care Market Chart 1.1: Total National Health Expenditures, 1980 – 2005 Chart 1.2: Percent Change.
1 Telling the Right Story Adapting your message to multiple audiences AoA Grantees Meeting Washington, DC January 19, 2006.
1 1 Medicare Marketing Danielle R. Moon, J.D., M.P.A. Director, Medicare Drug & Health Plan Contract Administration Group National Association of Health.
Transactional Services in the UK: effective or Just Efficient? Norman Mellor e-citizen National Project Programme Director 15th Feb 2005.
2008 MTA NYC Travel Survey Summary of Selected Results June 22, 2009.
February 16, 2014Ministry of Regional Development - 2 Mid-term assessment of information and publicity measures Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006.
Commission européenne Investing in competitive businessess and high quality jobs Stimulating entrepreneurs and new enterprise Financing business.
New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission June 2007 Fair and Clean Elections Pilot Project 2007.
Washoe County Citizen Survey December th Citizen Survey conducted since 1995 Statistically-valid; proportional to and representative of county population.
Undergraduates in Minnesota: Who are they and how do they finance their education? Tricia Grimes Shefali Mehta Minnesota Office of Higher Education November.
11 Liang Y. Liu, Ph.D. Community Mental Health & Substance Abuse Services Section Texas Department of State Health Services
AYP Federal Cap and Exceptions ESC Title I/Texas Assessment Conference AYP Presentation TEA Division of Performance Reporting December 11, 2006.
Addition Facts
OFCOM Workshop: Good Evidence for Copyright Policy Liz Bales September 2013.
1 Contact details Colin Gray Room S16 (occasionally) address: Telephone: (27) 2233 Dont hesitate to get in touch.
Webinar: June 6, :00am – 11:30am EDT The Community Eligibility Option.
1 Medicare Part D Implementation North Dakotas Efforts.
Child Care Subsidy Data and Measurement Challenges 1 Study of the Effects of Enhanced Subsidy Eligibility Policies In Illinois Data Collection and Measurement.
BT Wholesale October Creating your own telephone network WHOLESALE CALLS LINE ASSOCIATED.
© Prentice Hall, 2005 Business In Action 3eChapter Developing Distribution and Promotional Strategies.
Slides prepared by Joe Rosagrata
Essentials of Marketing 13e
Advertising, Sales Promotion, and Public Relations Chapter 19 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Canada Inc. CHAPTER 13 Sales Promotion 13-1.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
A VALUE-ADDED PROMOTIONAL PREMIUM OPPORTUNITY. MARKET TRENDS CDs are becoming music delivery dinosaurs- consumers much prefer to get their selections.
GSA Federal Supply Service DOING BUSINESS WITH GSA.
MARKETING INFORMATION AND RESEARCH
National Association of Farm Broadcasters 2005 Rural Lifestyles Farms Research Commissioned by NAFB and conducted by AMR in August 2005, this report is.
Results from a Mobile Finance Survey. 2 2 Second survey sponsored by CheckFree with fieldwork in April 2008; First survey completed in March ,007.
Holiday Giving Poll November 14, 2012 Telephone survey of 1,010 U.S. Adults 18 years and older on November conducted in ORC Internationals CARAVAN®
1 FY10 ACS Methods Panel Update Jennifer Guarino Tancreto Chief, ACS Data Collection Methods Staff Decennial Statistical Studies Division Presentation.
นำเสนอ หนังสือ เรื่อง Advertisi ng Procedur e Procedur e.
Problems, Skills and Training Needs in Nonprofit Human Service Organizations Dr. Rick Hoefer University of Texas at Arlington School of Social Work.
The Longevity Economy The Emerging Market in Plain Sight.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
Strategy Review Meeting Strategy Review Meeting
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Week 1.
Engaging Landlords, Builders & Managers in the Invasive Second-Hand Smoke Debate 5th National Conference on Tobacco or Health “Smoke Free: A World of Difference”
Media Channel Study Media Channel Study - 1 Contents Main Objectives2 Survey Method3 Media Channels Studied4 Executive Summary5 Detailed Findings6.
Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Alex Y. Chen, M.D. UCLA Children’s Hospital LA
Understanding Common Concerns about the Focus School Metric August
Patient Web Portals: What’s the Convenience Worth to Patients? Kenneth Adler, MD, MMM Medical Director of Information Technology Arizona Community Physicians.
Patient Survey Results 2013 Nicki Mott. Patient Survey 2013 Patient Survey conducted by IPOS Mori by posting questionnaires to random patients in the.
End User Research Project: What are they doing and why? IMA Conference, January 2005 Alisa Miller, PRI Debra May Hughes, Public Interactive Bruce Fohr,
Copyright © 2004 South-Western. All rights reserved.14–1 Learning Goals Explain promotion benefits. advertising personal selling sales promotion. public.
Campaign Overview Congressional Briefing December 1, 2004 Long Term Care Awareness Campaign Own Your Future!
BreastCare in Arkansas: Results from the Arkansas BRFSS Presented By: LaTonya Steward, B.S. Arkansas BRFSS Coordinator.
Strategies for integrated, population-based recruitment into telephone-based smoking cessation counseling Linda C. Lockard Senior Project Coordinator Center.
Long-Term Care Planning: Federal Initiatives & Resources Linda Velgouse Administration on Aging
LTCG Long Term Care Group, Inc Helping People Plan for Long Term Care Needs Presented by Eileen J. Tell Senior Vice President 6 October 2005.
Presentation transcript:

1 Own Your Future The Long-Term Care Awareness Campaign Demonstration Project Overview, Results, and Future Sponsored by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, the National Governors Association and the National Conference of State Legislatures

2 Why conduct a long-term care awareness campaign? Many individuals underestimate both the risks and costs of long-term care Currently, Medicaid is the largest source of funding for long-term care services With shifting age demographics, state governments are concerned that demands for long-term care will exceed their public resources Encouraging personal financing and other planning activities for long-term care may reduce the burden on public programs such as Medicaid

3 Campaign Goals Increase awareness of the need to plan ahead for future long-term care needs Associate long-term care planning with increased dignity and control over ones future Promote a broad range of planning options, applicable to all socio-economic levels

4 Phase I Campaign Model Letter and brochure from Governor to every household with individuals aged 50 to 70 (approx 2.1 million) Governors press event Paid media (TV and/or radio) Local state activities Follow-up reminder postcard

5 Communication Summary STATEGovernors Letter Press Event RadioTV Arkansas298,000YesNoYes Idaho126,000Yes New Jersey 822,000NoYesNo Nevada230,000YesNoYes Virginia631,000YesNoYes

6 Results (as of 7/26/05) Over 190,000 Planning Kit requests Just over 184,000 from the five Pilot Campaign states Interest in contiguous and other states Overall response rate of 7.7% Significantly higher than comparable private sector direct mail campaign (0.6% to 1.4%)

7 Response Rates (as of 7/26/05) Total Orders Individuals Arkansas 7.4 %5.2 % Idaho 8.7 %7.9 % Nevada 9.3 %8.0 % New Jersey 7.9 % 7.5 % Virginia10.3 %9.1 % Overall 8.8 %7.7 %

8 Response Method 67% through business reply card (BRC) 33% through telephone system (IVR) Response rates still good without TV exposure Timing of responses suggests follow-up postcard provided small lift in response

9 Evaluation Strategy Response Analysis – Appended demographic data to augment analysis – Compare results across states with different strategies (e.g., paid media, Governor message and other differences) – Compare responders and non-responders and comparisons across states

10 Evaluation Strategy Baseline and Follow-up Surveys – Sample of 4,500 households in Phase I Pilot Campaign states – Baseline conducted in November and December of 2004 – Results will provide insight into Campaign impact on long-term care planning attitudes and behaviors

11 Response Analysis Findings Pilot Campaign had broad-based appeal Interest in planning apparent across all demographic groups Public sector affinity is critical Direct mail more cost-effective than paid media Good consumer acceptance of business reply cards as response vehicle

12 Who Responded? Little difference in response rates across socio-demographic groups Slightly higher response rates by age, income, and education Findings consistent across states

13 Typical Responder Age: 58 Household Income: $60,000 to $75,000 Home Value: $130,000 Education: Some college or more State differences in responder income, and home value reflect differences in state general populations

14 Baseline Survey Findings 87% say planning ahead gives more options and better protects family Few have done any long-term care planning and over one-third dont know what planning steps to take 64% have seen or heard something about long-term care in the media Only 5% say they have done any planning activities

15 Industry Impact – Responses Pilot Campaign had significant positive impact – Response Rate increase of % during prime phase of mailing (receipt of Governor letter) – Response Rate spikes for isolated weeks increase as high as 245% – Increase concentrated to a two to four week period – Unique package designed for campaign yielding 1,000+ responses

16 Industry Impact – Sales Pilot Campaign had positive impact on sales – Agents note increased consumer readiness to buy (many have the planning kit) – Sales volume in Pilot Campaign states 15% higher on average than non-Campaign states with weekly surges tied to campaign as high as 97% – Sales impact expected to continue as awareness increases for ~10% of target population

17 Campaign Demonstration Project Phase II Time Frame: January through May 2006 Size: Approximately 5 million households Sponsors: HHS (CMS, ASPE, AoA), NGA & NCSL Evaluate how response rates change using a different set of media strategies and adding a new information portal

18 Campaign Demonstration Project Phase II Components Similarities: – Governors letter – Target Market (age 50 to 70) – Same message and fulfillment – Toll-free phone number and business reply card – CMS television and radio spot available for PSA use

19 Pilot Campaign Phase II Components Differences: – Increased state contribution (Governors letter) – Competitive state procurement – No federal media buy – No follow-up post card – Additional state initiated activities – Additional fulfillment portal (Own Your Future website)

20 Consumer Website Developed and maintained by AoA Website address: From website will be able to: – Download planning kit – Listen to Campaign audio CD tracks – Order planning kit (only for people from a Campaign state, starting January 2006) – View details about the Pilot Campaign – Take an interactive long-term care planning quiz (starting January 2006) Volumes and types of people using the website are tracked by zip code and a small informational survey

22 Applying for Pilot Campaign Phase II Obtain an electronic copy of the Program Announcement at or Open only to state and territorial agencies who have expressed consent from the Governors office Due October 7, 2005 at 12:00 am EDT Phase II states will be announced November 1, 2005

23 Questions? Address: LTC Pilot Awareness Campaign: Phase II Application U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Hubert H. Humphrey Building: Room 424E 200 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC, Website: (Consumer) (Project)