WTO Public Symposium The TRIPS Agreement Ten Years Later: The Relationship Between Trademarks and GIs Presentation by Clay Hough Senior Vice President.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The Changing Fortunes of the EUs Energy Market Antony Froggatt.
Advertisements

Doha's Impact on TRIPS: Balancing Geographical Indications Protection Clark W. Lackert Chair, INTA International Amicus Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
Better GI protection within the WTO framework Stefano Fanti – Managing Director Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma Geneva, 27 May 2004.
The Benefits of a New WTO Agreement for Agri-food Trade Shiferaw Adilu Alberta Agriculture and Food.
World Intellectual Property Organization The Protection of Geographical Indications: the Context Marie-Paule Rizo Head of the Design and Geographical Indication.
Geographical Indications: Prospects for the development of the International Legal Framework Tegan Brink Australian Permanent Mission to the WTO, Geneva,
Geographical indications and their use to promote local products Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
The Foundations of Globalization Motivations and Free Trade.
Geographical Indications Law: a new tool for Africa? All Africa House (UCT) Aug. 28, 2012 Seble Baraki Open A.I.R. Research Fellow.
1 WTO and medicines: from Doha to Cancún Germán Velásquez Essential Drugs and Medicines Policy World Health Organization Geneva, October 2003.
The Impact of Current Doha Round Agricultural Negotiations on the Canadian Dairy Industry Xiangxiang Ye April 4th 2006.
Negotiating EU-Australian Engagement: the 1994 and 2008 Wine Trade Agreements Lachlan McKenzie PhD Candidate School of Social and Political Sciences The.
Brussels Briefing n. 31 Geography of food: reconnecting with origin in the food system 15 th May Existing global and.
Unit 13 International Marketing
AIPPI-MIE-MSZJF Budapest 2005 “Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU" Similarities and differences in the enforcement of trademarks and designations.
DS 174 – Trademarks & Geographical Indications
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
Geographical Indications Intellectual Property & Competition Law Presentation By: Brinda Sreedharan Ravi Teja Rethu Kumari.
Global Dairy Markets: The Foremost Farms Experience Doug Wilke Foremost Farms USA Vice President-Marketing & Technology.
Entering the Global Marketplace: Lessons Learned David Fuhrmann President.
Organic Market Overview Andre Leu – Chairman Tim Marshall – Deputy Chairman Organic Federation of Australia, Chairman Andre Leu – Chairman Tim Marshall.
CHAPTER 4 Prepared by Mr.Sonmezay, Business Teacher at Santee Educ. Complex, Los Angeles, CA.
Retail Distribution of Dairy Products Bob Cropp Dairy Marketing and Policy Specialist University of Wisconsin-Madison April 2001.
Alexander Anton Attorney-at-Law German Dairy Association (MIV), Brussels Trademarks, Geographical Indications and Generics in cheeses.
Trade Marks, Geographical Indications, Generic Names – Conflict or Coexistence Worldwide Symposium on Geographical Indications Parma, June 27 to 29, 2005.
Geographical Indications in the WTO and the Doha Negotiations Worldwide Symposium on Geographical Indications WIPO/Italian Foreign Affairs Ministry Parma,
Free Trade? Despite policy reforms enacted as a result of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture, global dairy markets remain among the most protected.
Geographical Indicators Daniel Pick Economic Research Service.
The U.S. Geographical Indications System: Building GI Brands
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND COLLECTIVE MARKS
The need for recognition and protection of geographical indications in South Africa Prof Johann Kirsten Head of the Department of Agricultural Economics,
IPO-PAKISTAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION OF PAKISTAN 1 GIs as Economic Tool for SMEs Development: Current Status of Protection in Pakistan; Future.
Annual Exporters Conference 2014
Department of International Relations – Geographical Indications (GIs)
SWG Agro - Food Presentation of Italy and cluster-activities PP2 Emilia Romagna Region Elahe Rezaian Sofia, November 25th, 2010.
On Cooking Sarah R Labensky, Alan M. Hause, Priscilla A. Martel On Cooking Sarah R Labensky, Alan M. Hause, Priscilla A. Martel © 2012 by Pearson Education,
Czech Presidency High Level Conference on the Future of Quality Policy of Agricultural Products and Foodstuff PDOs/PGIs: The point of view of GI producers.
Glossary of Key Terms balance of payments. An account of the flow of goods, services, and money coming into and going out of the country. capital. Money.
EPA Negotiations: Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development for ECOWAS Countries By Catherine Grant Director: Trade Policy Business Unity South.
The Protection of Geographical Indications in Brazil Cristina Ninô Biscaia LL.M Munich Intellectual Property Law Center.
“Legal frameworks for the protection of Geographic Indications” Carmen Bullon FAO Development Law Service.
TOPIC #7 Canada and International Trade Agreements.
World Intellectual Property Organization International Protection of Geographical Indications Overview and Recent Developments Tbilisi, October 28, 2009.
Globalization and Recent Economic Developments Chapter 1.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1 Click to edit Master title style.
INTRODUCING FONTERRA To ensure this document information is current please check with the following content owner. UPDATED: 6 November 2013 CONTACT:
General Assembly BCZ – CBL | | Brussels „The European dairy sector: The German way“ Dr. Karl-Heinz Engel President of the German Dairy Industry.
History of the GI system How it all started. History of the GI system Foods have be named after their geographical origin since Antiquity: examples: 5th.
1 How to promote the added- value of agricultural products “Geographical Indications- A tool to promote the of the agricultural sector” “Geographical Indications-
Food Quality Labels: the situation today in Europe Assembly of European Regions, Kriti 15 September 2006 Nikiforos SIVENAS European Commission.
The Australian wine industry position on Geographical Indications TONY BATTAGLENE DIRECTOR, INTERNATIONAL & REGULATORY AFFAIRS.
Unit 15 Why Nations Trade.. Section 1-4 Why Nations Trade In a recent year, about 8 percent of all the goods produced in the United States were exported,
WTO and the TRIPS Agreement Wolf R. MEIER-EWERT WTO Secretariat A Business-oriented overview of Intellectual Property for Law Students WIPO, Geneva 20.
International Trade Dr. David J. Molina Economics 4850/5850.
1 THE NEGOTIATIONS ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AT THE WTO AND THEIR EFFECTS ON AGRICULTURE NEGOTIATIONS David Vivas Eugui UNCTAD, Commercial Diplomacy.
Fashion and Economics.
Agriculture Outlook Forum 2011 Scott Faber Vice President for Federal Affairs Grocery Manufacturers Association.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1 Click to edit Master title style.
JA Global Marketplace Name Title Company. JA Global Marketplace Session One Objectives: “X” Marks the Spot Define trade Explain why countries trade with.
World Intellectual Property Organization Geographical indications: the international legal framework; latest developments Bratislava, December 1st., 2009.
“…global multinationals have … viewed developing Asia [countries]…as an offshore-production platform. The offshore- efficiency solution is still an attractive.
International Trade Describe the benefits of international trade.
Recent Developments at the International Level
Geographical Indications: Connecting Products with Geographical Origin for Value Creation. Flavio Innocenzi.
…around the World Click to edit Master text styles Protecting Geographical Indications... …around the World Click to edit Master text styles Second.
74 PDOs - 27 names PGIs (Sum 101 without wines)
The Convenient side of the Pdo certification
Better Dairy. Better World.
Presentation transcript:

WTO Public Symposium The TRIPS Agreement Ten Years Later: The Relationship Between Trademarks and GIs Presentation by Clay Hough Senior Vice President and General Counsel International Dairy Foods Association April 22, 2005

What is the International Dairy Foods Association? IDFA is the U.S. dairy processors collective voice in Washington, D.C., throughout the country and in the international arena. Members range from large multinational corporations to single plant operations, and represent more than 85% of the total volume of milk, cultured products, cheese, and ice cream and frozen desserts produced in the United States. IDFA members market approximately 80 percent of the cheese products sold in the United States.

Extending protection of Geographic Indications (GIs ) IDFA is concerned about: Extension of protection of GIs. Restriction of terms (claw back) that are in some cases deemed generic for foods. The establishment of a multilateral register for wines and spirits and possible implications for food products.

EUs Wish List In September 2003, during the Fifth Ministerial meeting in Cancun, Mexico, the EU presented a list of the following GIs to the WTO: Asiago Feta Fontina Gorgonzola Grana Padano Manchego Mozzarella di Bufala Campagna Parmiggiano Reggiano Pecorino Romano Reblochon Roquefort

Why are GIs a concern ? The current EU internal GI system protects: - 2,100 types of wines and spirits foods, including 149 cheeses - 63 meat-based products - 16 types of table olives

The Problem with the EU GI System ? The current EUs GI system: - inhibits U.S. feta and parmesan manufacturers to export their cheese to EU. -In Europe, Kraft cannot sell Parmesan instead it sells Pamesello.

A faulty EU GI System The EU has problems enforcing its own GI system: –Germany is Europe's leading producer of Parmesan after Italy. –The largest producer of Feta is not a Greek company. The Danes manufacture most of the Feta in the EU. Imagine enforcing and monitoring the use of GI terms.

Why are GIs a Concern? Restrict use of commonly known product names in domestic market. Result is reduced choice and consumer confusion as known products are withdrawn from the market. Impact on exports to other WTO Member countries.

Why are GIs a concern? If WTO Members accept the GI registration system: - IDFA members companies would lose access to established product names. - Consumers would have to be convinced that the new product is the same quality as the cheese that they have been buying for decades. -Millions of dollars in packaging costs and marketing to preserve and regain sales.

Generic cheeses IDFA members companies are some of the Worlds largest producers of Mozzarella and Parmesan. Leprino started manufacturing Mozzarella in Kraft has been producing and marketing: - Parmesan cheese for more than six decades, and - Feta cheese for twenty years.

Potential GI Impact On IDFA Members Cheese# of Companies - Asiago24 - Blue Cheese/Gorgonzola 22 - Cream Cheese/Neufchatel29 - Feta29 - Fontina12 - Harvati19 - Mascarpone8 - Mozzarella72 - Parmesan43 - Provolone39 - Romano27 - Swiss/Emmental34

Potential GI impact In 2002, the U.S. cheese industry was valued $13.7 billion (at wholesale). The amount of cheese produced in U.S. in 2003: billion lbs of Mozzarella 676 million lbs of Cream Cheese/Neufchatel 283 million lbs of Provolone 264 million lbs of Swiss (Emmental) 127 million lbs of Parmesan

GI solution Key question is not whether to protect geographical indications but how to protect them. U.S. trademark system provides for the registration of certification marks, including indications of regional origin. The following are all examples of GIs protected in the U.S. under the trademark system : - Parmigiano-Reggiano - Roquefort - Parma Ham - Stilton