No One is Leaving Without You... or Me Knowing: Interactive Classroom Assessment Techniques (iCATs) Using Clicker Technology Dale Vidmar Information Literacy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T H A N K Y O U !. Charlie Robinson Charlie
Advertisements

Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Confirming Student Learning: Using Assessment Techniques in the Classroom Douglas R. Davenport Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Truman State University.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
PORTFOLIO.
California Standards for the Teaching Profession
Dale Vidmar Information Literacy and Instruction Librarian Southern Oregon University Library
How Do You Know That Your Students Are Learning? 2012 Curators’ Teaching Summit Nov. 12, 2012 – Session 3.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
What are your students learning? Classroom Assessment Strategies Center for Teaching & Learning Oregon State University
Assessing Learning for Classroom Success Friday, February 16, :00-3:00.
Guidelines and Methods for Assessing Student Learning Karen Bauer, Institutional Research & Planning, Undergraduate Studies; Gabriele Bauer, CTE.
Cultivating Intention and Reflection to Improve Teaching Dale Vidmar Information Literacy and Instruction Librarian Southern Oregon University Library.
February 9, 2012 Session 1: Observing Lessons NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
Types and Purposes of Assessment Mathematics Assessment and Intervention.
1 CCLI Proposal Writing Strategies Tim Fossum Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Vermont.
Classroom Assessment Techniques
Reflective Peer Facilitation: Crafting Collaborative Self-Assessment in Teaching Dale Vidmar Information Literacy and Instruction Coordinator/ Education,
How do we document evidence of student growth in Healthful Living?
Planning, Instruction, and Technology
Professional Growth Portfolio Your Name Here Date.
Activity: Pre-Assessment Probe Classroom Assessment Technique (CAT) Domain: Assessing Prior Knowledge, Recall, and Understanding: CAT Activity: Background.
Grappling with Grading Assessment & Rubrics
Outline Define Classroom Action Research (CAR)
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Source Code: Assessing Cited References to Measure Student Information Literacy Skills Dale Vidmar Professor/Information Literacy and Instruction Librarian.
Dale Vidmar Information Literacy and Instruction Coordinator/
Dale Vidmar Information Literacy and Instruction Librarian Southern Oregon University Library
Formative Assessment.
{ Career and Technical Education Assessment Brent Wallace, Ph.D. Vice President of Instruction North Central Texas College.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
Articulating Intention and Reflecting upon Action Dale Vidmar Information Literacy and Instruction Coordinator/ Education, Communication, Health & Phys.
Dale Vidmar Information Literacy and Instruction Librarian Southern Oregon University Library
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 7: Formal Observation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
Adriana Signorini, CRTE, SATAL Coordinator Greg Dachner, SSHA, SATAL Student Sharai Kirk, SSHA, SATAL Student How do we know our students are learning?
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING Focus on English.
ED 502: Transforming Teaching Practice, Tuesday, Feb 1, 2012 (7:00 p.m. ET) Final Seminar/ Methods for Teaching Concepts.
Mullaney and Pino, May 2007 Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs) Critical Thinking Conference Workshop May 23, 2007 J. Pino J. Mullaney.
INACOL Standard D: CLEAR EXPECTATIONS PROMPT RESPONSES REGULAR FEEDBACK.
Interactive Classroom Assessment Techniques (iCATs) Using Clicker Technology Dale Vidmar Information Literacy and Instruction Coordinator/ Education, Communication,
Classroom Assessment Techniques
Information Literacy: Assessing Your Instruction Texas Library Association District 10 Fall Workshop October 15, 2005 Michelle Millet Information Literacy.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING Focus on mathematics.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Classroom Assessment Techniques 1. Definitions Assess gather evidence and document learning (KNOW & SHOW) Evaluate make judgements based on data collected.
August 15th 2007 Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes by Kirby Hayes.
CATS Classroom Assessment Techniques. What are CATS? Simple tools for collecting data on student learning in order to improve it. CATS are feedback devices.
The Value in Formative Assessment Prepared By: Jen Ramos.
Prof. Elba Martoral.  State the importance of social learning when managing online content  Show effective practices in an online course  Distinguish.
Charlie Robinson Charlie
OLA 2004: Astute Observers Librarian Teaching Mentors Pam Kessinger Reference Librarian Portland Community College
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
 “I have to teach the same information skills each year because students do not learn them.”  “I don’t have time to give tests so I do not assess student.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Formative Assessment. Fink’s Integrated Course Design.
PRESENTED TO: ISW FACILITATOR’S CONFERENCE JUNE, 2009 PRESENTED BY: MARIE KRBAVAC MARJORIE CONTENTI SAIT POLYTECHNIC Using Technology to Enhance ISW Delivery.
Intentional Reference: A Mindful Approach to Making Good Even Better Dale Vidmar Information Literacy and Instruction Coordinator/ Education, Communication,
CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES Departmental Workshop Wayne State University English Department January 11, 2012.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Incorporating Instructional Design into Library Instruction Classes NEFLIN Live Online July 7, 2011.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Strategies to Check Student Learning in the Classroom Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs)
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
A Classroom Action Research Tool
The Power of Small Changes
Presentation transcript:

No One is Leaving Without You... or Me Knowing: Interactive Classroom Assessment Techniques (iCATs) Using Clicker Technology Dale Vidmar Information Literacy and Instruction Coordinator/ Education, Communication, and Health, Physical Education, & Leadership Librarian Online Northwest 2013 Conference Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon February 8, 2013

The Existential Question: Why are We Here?

1.Explain the pedagogical advantages of implementing clickers to improve teaching and learning. 2.Differentiate formative on-going, collaborative assessment vs. summative periodic, high stakes evaluation activities. 3.Develop interactive classroom assessment techniques to measure the “real-time” learning of students. 4.Design “effective” questions to assess what you value implementing interactive classroom assessment techniques (iCATs). Learning Outcomes: Participants will be able to:

Where We are Going.... Basic Schema: 1.Formative Assessment vs. Summative Evaluation 2.Classroom Assessment Techniques – Thomas Angelo & K. Patricia Cross 3.iCATs – interactive CATs 4.Clicker Systems 5.Why Bother 6.Designing Effective Questions 7.Some Example Questions 8.Suggestions for Success

Summative Evaluation (sporadic, high stakes, judgmental “good” or “bad”, accountability) Formative Assessment (continuous, self-improvement, growth, introspection, student achievement) vs.

Classroom Assessment Techniques - Thomas Angelo and K. Patricia Cross

Metacognition Higher order thinking involving: 1.Planning and Intention 2.Monitoring Comprehension 3.Assessing Progress Thinking about Thinking

Prior knowledge is critical to developing learning that is appropriate to what students already know and building upon that knowledge.

Interactive Classroom Assessment Techniques (iCATs) 1.Background Knowledge 2.Misconception/Preconception 3.Opinion Polls 4.Self-Confidence Survey 5.Check-In 6.Activity Reactions/Assessment 7.Assignment Ratings 8.Review Materials 9.Accentuate Important Points

Audience Response Systems (Clickers) 1.Turning TechnologiesTurning Technologies 2.Padgett CommunicationsPadgett Communications 3.Keypoint InteractiveKeypoint Interactive 4.QClickQClick 5.Poll EverywherePoll Everywhere 6.Clicker SchoolClicker School 7.iRespondiRespond 8.SocrativeSocrative 9.SMSPollSMSPoll Some Popular Clicker Systems:

Audience Response Systems (Clickers) Research evidence suggests clickers increase student learning. Pre- and post-test scores of 200 students determined student learning was the lowest when students did not have clickers (Buhay, Best, and McGuire, 2010). When clickers were used during varying intervals during class, students were better able to recall factual information. In addition, questions often alerted students to important information (Shapiro & Gordon, 2012). Why bother?

Audience Response Systems (Clickers) Why bother? 1.Assess Prior Knowledge 2.Promote Interactivity/Participation 3.Elicit Diverse Points of View 4.Maintain Attention 5.Emphasize Major Ideas 6.Clarify Misconceptions 7.Ensure Understanding 8.Improve Teaching and Learning 9.Enhance the Learning Experience

Audience Response Systems (Clickers) Research evidence suggests clickers increase nonconformity and willingness to respond. Two groups of students (128 total) asked to respond to 50 controversial questions. Control group responded by a show of hands. Experimental group responded with clickers. Study concluded students with clickers responded with greater variability and were more comfortable answering the questions (Stowell, Oldham, & Bennett, 2012). Why bother?

Clicker Satisfaction Summary of Study Criteria CriterionNumber of SampleSignificant Postive Outcomes Actual performance3422 Satisfaction4746 Perceived performance3735 Attention span2523 Participation2120 Feedback15 Ease of use88 Keough, S. M. (2012) Clickers in the classroom: A review and a replication. Journal of Management Education, 36(6),

Designing “Effective” Questions 1.Assess what you value. 2.Keep it simple. 3.Avoid double negatives. 4.Details belong in the question, not the answer. 5.Maintain consistent language. 6.At all cost, avoid “all of the above” or “none of the above.” 7.At all cost, avoid “a and b, b and c, or a and c. 8.Share and discuss questions with colleagues. Take time to reflect.

Suggestions for Success 1.Use clickers to further class objectives. 2.Make time to integrate clickers. 3.Be prepared and have a Plan B. 4.Increase your creativity along with your experience. 5.Provide students with rationale of use. 6.Avoid too many questions—better to have 4-5 questions at well placed intervals during 50 minutes. 7.Revert back to a show of hands to gain a full appreciation of clickers.

References Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Buhay, D., Best, L. A., & McGuire, K. (2010). The effectiveness of library instruction: Do student response systems (clickers) enhance learning? The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1). Retrieved from Briggs, C. L., & Keyek-Franssen, D. (2010). Clickers and CATs: Using learner response systems for formative assessments in the classroom. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 33(4). Retrieved from cats-using-learner-response-systems-formative- assessments-classroom cats-using-learner-response-systems-formative- assessments-classroom

References Bruff, D., (2012). Classroom Response System (“Clickers”) Bibliography. Retrieved from system-clickers-bibliography/ system-clickers-bibliography/ Connor, E. (2011). Using cases and clickers in library instruction: Designed for science undergraduates. Science & Technology Libraries, 30(3), doi: / X Keough, S. M. (2012) Clickers in the classroom: A review and a replication. Journal of Management Education, 36(6), Retrieved from ERIC Moniz, R. J., Eshleman, J., Jewell, D., Mooney, B., & Tran, C. (2010). The impact of information literacy-related instruction in the science classroom: clickers versus nonclickers. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 17(4), doi: /

References Shapiro, A. M., & Gordon, L. T. (2012). A controlled study of clicker-assisted memory enhancement in college classrooms. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(4), doi: /acp.2843 Stowell, J. R., Oldham, T., & Bennett, D. (2010). Using student response systems (“clickers”) to combat conformity and shyness. Teaching Of Psychology, 37(2), Retrieved from Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection Vidmar, D. (2013). Interactive Classroom Techniques (iCATs). Retrieved from cats-outline.pdf cats-outline.pdf

No One is Leaving Without You... or Me Knowing: Interactive Classroom Assessment Techniques (iCATs) Using Clicker Technology Dale Vidmar Information Literacy and Instruction Coordinator/ Education, Communication, and Health, Physical Education, & Leadership Librarian Online Northwest 2013 Conference Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon February 8, 2013