1 FutureGen FutureGen Zero Emissions Energy Plant of the Future 2004 Indiana Energy Conference “Perspectives on the Energy Puzzle” September 16, 2004 University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Joe Chaisson April 21, Integrated Coal Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Power Plants and Geologic Carbon Sequestration Joe Chaisson.
Advertisements

Clear Thinking on Nuclear: Hydrogen fuel 1.Demand for hydrogen is large and rapidly increasing 2.Cost effective with no gas emissions that pollute the.
Coal Gasification The Texas FutureGen Project Presented by Kristen Williamson ChE 379 Fall 2008.
1 Gas Turbine R&D and Emissions 4 th International Gas Turbine Conference Brussels 2008 Dr. Victor Der Office of Fossil Energy US Department of Energy.
CO 2 Capture and Storage (CCS). Contents The Need for CO 2 Capture and Storage 4 Reliance on Fossil Fuels 5 Largest CO 2 Emitters 7 Addressing the Challenge.
B9 Coal Deploying Fuel Cells to Generate Cheap, Clean Electricity from Fossil Fuels.
CERAWEEK ® 2007 Technology Needs for a Carbon-Constrained World Jeff Sterba Chairman, President, CEO PNM Resources, Inc. February 15, 2007.
SINTEF Energy Research Power cycles with CO 2 capture – combining solide oxide fuel cells and gas turbines Dr. ing. Ola Maurstad.
Director of Technology Development, Emerging Technology Department
Coal Gasification : A PRB Overview Mark Davies – Kennecott Energy Outline Background – Our Interest History – Development of IGCC Current status – Commercial.
The Case for Early Action Pew Center Early Action Conference September 13-14, 1999 Dale Landgren Asst. Vice President, Business Planning.
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE Carbon Dioxide Mitigation: The Technology Challenge Richard A. Bradley and Cedric Philibert.
CURRENT PERSPECTIVES ON FOSSIL FUEL RESOURCES Fusion Power Associates 25 th Anniversary Meeting and Symposium December 13, 2004 John Sheffield Joint Institute.
CO 2 Sequestration Options for California Larry Myer WESTCARB Technical Director California Energy Commission (916) ; ETAAC.
Lecture 12 Chapter 7 Conclusion Coal Conversion.
© J. Yan Towards a Sustainable Energy Future Sustainable Energy Systems and Challenges of Energy Utilization Jinyue Yan Lecture.
© J. Yan Towards a Sustainable Energy Future Sustainable Energy Systems and Challenges of Energy Utilization Jinyue Yan Lecture.
Oregon Climate Change Regulatory Activities and Policy Initiatives Bill Drumheller -- Oregon Department of Energy University of Oregon School of Law Climate.
Copenhagen 29 June Energy and climate outlook: Renewables in a world and European perspective Peter Russ.
Research Groups Committed to Understanding Energy One of the world’s premier centers for R&D on energy production, distribution,
Challenges to the Development and Commercialization of CCS Cheyenne A. Alabanzas 2009 ASME Intern University of Alaska – Anchorage.
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE 1 Dr. Robert K. Dixon Head, Energy Technology Policy Division International Energy Agency.
Advanced Fossil Energy Projects Loan Guarantee Solicitation November 2013.
FutureGen FutureGen Initiative Pathway to Near-Zero Emissions Federal Laboratory Consortium Mid-Atlantic Regional Meeting Rocky Gap, MD September 20, 2006.
The Energy Construct Ben Cipiti May 1, 2008 Mid-Town Brews.
The Lodge at Ballantyne Charlotte, North Carolina February 7, 2007 Panel Discussion: The Role of Coal Generation in a World of Greenhouse Gas Regulation.
Mississippi Power Kemper County IGCC Plant
1 CO 2 from capture to storage Gérard FRIES Executive Vice-President Institut Français du Pétrole.
Resource Planning Georgia Power’s Diverse Plan to Meet Georgia’s Energy Needs AWMA Fall 2010 Conference October 7, 2010 Jeff Burleson Director of Resource.
© OECD/IEA 2010 Cecilia Tam International Energy Agency Martin Taylor Nuclear Energy Agency The Role of Nuclear Energy in a Sustainable Energy Future Paris,
Wyoming’s Energy Future: Creating Options Mark A. Northam, Director UW School of Energy Resources September 25, 2008.
24 Jan What is Energy Policy?ECONOMICS ENVIRONMENT ENERGY SECURITY.
February 2010 February 8-10, 2009 Program Directors/Managers Session - UTEP Workshop Robert R. Romanosky Advanced Research Technology Manager National.
Hydrogen, fueling the sun today, fueling our cars tomorrow.
Technology options under consideration for reducing GHG emissions SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ROUNDTABLE SERIES: Next Steps Post-Kyoto: U.S. Options January 13,
1 15 December 2004 Climate Friendly Technologies.
IGCC: Technology to Make Coal Green(er)
US Priorities for New and Renewable Energy Technologies Cary Bloyd Argonne National Laboratory APEC Expert Group on New and Renewable Energy Technologies.
California Energy Commission Sacramento 9/30 to 10/ Stationary CO 2 Sources Sequestration Data and Impacts on Total Emissions Coal-Fired Power Plant.
Energy Policy Act of 2005 Frank Prager Xcel Energy Inc. February 22, 2006.
1 FUTURE EU ENERGY MIX - WILL COAL PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE? International Conference in Gliwice 29 May 2006 Matthias Dürr RWE AG.
Coal as a Future Generation Fuel Chris M. Hobson S enior Vice President and Chief Environmental Officer December 3, 2009.
The Future of Coal Matt Jahnke February 13, 2006.
Game Changers. Technology Game Changer Barriers Many technologies are capable of significant deployment as “Game Changers” (energy efficiency, CH&P, renewables,
KEC MGA Committee, 2/21/2008 Midwestern Governor’s Association (MGA) Energy Security and Climate Stewardship Platform and Midwestern GHG Accord.
Clean Energy Solutions Milton L. Charlton Chief for Environment, Science, Technology and Health Affairs U.S. Embassy Seoul.
1 ZERO-EMISSION ENERGY PLANTS Dr. Robert ‘Bob’ Wright Senior Program Manager Office of Sequestration, Hydrogen and Clean Coal Fuels Office of Fossil Energy.
1 ISEE Wants You! UofC Faculty of Engineering Planning Workshop May 9 & 10, 2005 Eddy Isaacs Managing Director, AERI and Interim CEO of EnergyINet Government.
RM GEP/SMG 05/17/ Clean Coal Technology and Sustainable Development Barbara Bauman Director, Washington Relations EPRI World Environment Center May.
Carbon Dioxide Capture and Geological Storage: Contributing to Climate Change Solutions Luke Warren, IPIECA.
January 14, Coal Power Summit January 14, 2008 Sponsored by: Sierra Club of IL Climate Justice Chicago.
ARKANSAS ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION GHG EMMISSIONS TRADING CONFERENCE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MARCH 2006 Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission.
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle
Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin Texas FutureGen: A win for the region Ian Duncan.
Energy Innovation and Business Unit Hydrogen– the DTI Perspective Financing the Hydrogen Revolution Thursday 26 th February 2004 Bronwen Northmore Department.
AMBITIOUS TARGETS FOR ENERGY RD & D MEETING PLANETARY EMERGENCIES.
2002 European Commission - Directorate-General for Research CO2 Strategy.ppt 1 An EU Research Strategy for the Mitigation of CO 2 Emissions An EU Research.
S Carbon Storage Stewardship Trust Fund Act of 2009 Presented to Washington Coal Club September 9, 2009 Tom Feeley Chris Tomassi.
Crystal Shawne Fish Candy Serena. IGCC Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle It is an advanced power system can combinate the coal gasification technology.
Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships… “Pathways to Sustainable Use of Fossil Energy”
© 2008 Dominion Building New Nuclear Plants: Are Utilities Ready? Wisconsin Public Utility Institute Advances in Nuclear March 26, 2008 Eugene S. Grecheck.
M idcontinent I nteractive D igital C arbon A tlas and R elational Data B ase James A. Drahovzal, Lawrence H. Wickstrom, Timothy R.Carr, John A. Rupp,
Carbon Sequestration A Strategic Element in Clean Coal Technology Presentation to: Mid-America Regulatory Conference (MARC) Columbus, Ohio, June 20, 2006.
Energy and Environmental Policy Renewable Energy: Wind Presented by: Adam Smith Damien Hammond Veera Kondapi Jeff Gruppo.
1 PNNL-SA The Role of Technology in a Low- carbon Society Selected Key Findings from the Global Energy Technology Strategy Program Jae Edmonds February.
The Case for IGCC Kay Pashos President, Duke Energy Indiana MARC 2006 Annual Meeting June 20, 2006.
Pathway to Low Emission Power Generation using Fossil Fuels : an EU Technology Perspective Nick Otter International Workshop on “Power Generation with.
Nuclear Hydrogen Production Program in the U.S.
Activity By: martin Cabrera.
Presentation transcript:

1 FutureGen FutureGen Zero Emissions Energy Plant of the Future 2004 Indiana Energy Conference “Perspectives on the Energy Puzzle” September 16, 2004 University Place Conference Center at IUPUI Indianapolis, Indiana Victor K. Der Director Office of Clean Energy Systems, Office of Fossil Energy U.S. Department of Energy 2004 Indiana Energy Conference “Perspectives on the Energy Puzzle” September 16, 2004 University Place Conference Center at IUPUI Indianapolis, Indiana Victor K. Der Director Office of Clean Energy Systems, Office of Fossil Energy U.S. Department of Energy

2 FutureGenFutureGen +A Government/Industry cost shared partnership +Pioneer advanced hydrogen production from coal +Emit virtually no air pollutants +Capture and permanently sequester carbon dioxide +A Government/Industry cost shared partnership +Pioneer advanced hydrogen production from coal +Emit virtually no air pollutants +Capture and permanently sequester carbon dioxide FutureGen What is the FutureGen prototype? A global effort to build the world’s first zero emission power plant: A global effort to build the world’s first zero emission power plant: +Other nations invited to join in this research project (~1 billion dollars over the next ten years) utureGen  FutureGen will be an international test facility for breakthrough technologies that addresses feasibility of zero emissions +Other nations invited to join in this research project (~1 billion dollars over the next ten years) utureGen  FutureGen will be an international test facility for breakthrough technologies that addresses feasibility of zero emissions

3 U.S. Department of Energy Tomorrow’s Hydrogen Why is Hydrogen from Coal Important? +95% of U.S. hydrogen comes from natural gas +Future “Hydrogen Economy” must have more diversified sources +Over longer term, hydrogen will likely come from renewables, nuclear power, fusion, etc. +95% of U.S. hydrogen comes from natural gas +Future “Hydrogen Economy” must have more diversified sources +Over longer term, hydrogen will likely come from renewables, nuclear power, fusion, etc. But coal can also be a major feedstock +Most abundant U.S. fossil fuel (250-yr supply); if transportation fuel today was hydrogen, potential for additional 1.3 billion tons coal per year; by 2025 that addition could grow to 2.4 billion tons +Hydrogen from coal for transportation enhances energy/economic security +Can be environmentally clean source of hydrogen +Most abundant U.S. fossil fuel (250-yr supply); if transportation fuel today was hydrogen, potential for additional 1.3 billion tons coal per year; by 2025 that addition could grow to 2.4 billion tons +Hydrogen from coal for transportation enhances energy/economic security +Can be environmentally clean source of hydrogen

4 U.S. Department of Energy Climate Change Carbon Management Paths  Switch to low- & no-carbon fuels  Increase energy efficiency  Sequester carbon Renewables, Nuclear, Natural Gas Demand-Side & Supply Side Why is Sequestration Important? +Since the world relies on fossil fuels (~ 88%), sequestration is an important option +May be only option that removes enough carbon to stabilize CO 2 concentrations in atmosphere +May prove to be lowest cost carbon management option +Since the world relies on fossil fuels (~ 88%), sequestration is an important option +May be only option that removes enough carbon to stabilize CO 2 concentrations in atmosphere +May prove to be lowest cost carbon management option FutureGen The FutureGen plant will be a first-of-its-kind project by the U.S. electric power industry to prove that large-scale sequestration is safe and practicable, and one that encompasses all three carbon management paths.

5 U.S. Department of Energy Project Performance Objectives +Design, construct and operate a full – scale prototype plant (integrated with CO 2 sequestration) that produces electricity and hydrogen with essentially zero emissions +Sequester at least 90 percent of CO 2 initially and 100 percent sequestered eventually +Prove the effectiveness, safety, and permanence of CO 2 sequestration +Establish technology standards and protocols for CO 2 measuring, monitoring, and verification +Validate the engineering, economic, and environmental viability of advanced coal-based, zero emission technologies for commercial readiness in Design, construct and operate a full – scale prototype plant (integrated with CO 2 sequestration) that produces electricity and hydrogen with essentially zero emissions +Sequester at least 90 percent of CO 2 initially and 100 percent sequestered eventually +Prove the effectiveness, safety, and permanence of CO 2 sequestration +Establish technology standards and protocols for CO 2 measuring, monitoring, and verification +Validate the engineering, economic, and environmental viability of advanced coal-based, zero emission technologies for commercial readiness in 2020

6 U.S. Department of Energy Features of the Project  Coal-fueled gasification process that produces electricity and hydrogen--275 MW e [net equivalent output]  Operational rate of 1 million tons per year of CO 2 captured and sequestered  Incorporates advanced technologies that will be competitive in future zero emission energy plants  Full-scale integrated operations  Coal-fueled gasification process that produces electricity and hydrogen--275 MW e [net equivalent output]  Operational rate of 1 million tons per year of CO 2 captured and sequestered  Incorporates advanced technologies that will be competitive in future zero emission energy plants  Full-scale integrated operations

7 U.S. Department of Energy Project Concept Refinery CO 2 Oil Hydrogen Enhanced Oil Recovery Geological Sequestration Electricity And/Or FutureGen

8 U.S. Department of Energy FutureGen FutureGen Conversion Process Oxygen (from air) Coal +H 2 O Hydrogen + Carbon Gases (CO 2, CO) Converting Coal into Gas is Key +Up to 99%+ of Clear Skies pollutants (sulfur/nitrogen/mercury) can be cleaned from gasified coal +Hydrogen is a primary product +Carbon gases are in concentrated form for easier capture and sequestration +Up to 99%+ of Clear Skies pollutants (sulfur/nitrogen/mercury) can be cleaned from gasified coal +Hydrogen is a primary product +Carbon gases are in concentrated form for easier capture and sequestration FutureGen No coal-to-gas plant in the world today is configured to optimize hydrogen production or to capture carbon. The FutureGen prototype plant would be the world’s first.

9 U.S. Department of Energy Technology Challenge Traditional Advanced Technology Cryogenic Separation Amine Scrubbers Gas Stream Clean-Up Syngas Turbine Fuel Cell ($4,000/kW) EOR based Existing Gasifier System Integration Plant Controls Traditional Advanced Technology Cryogenic Separation Amine Scrubbers Gas Stream Clean-Up Syngas Turbine Fuel Cell ($4,000/kW) EOR based Existing Gasifier System Integration Plant Controls Emerging Research Inventions O 2 Membranes Hydrogen Membranes “Clathrate” CO 2 Separation “Dirty” Shift Reactor Hydrogen Turbine SECA Fuel Cell ($400/kW design) Sequestration Technology Advanced Transport Reactor “First of a Kind” System Integration “Smart” Dynamic Plant Controls & CO 2 Management Systems (including in-situ CO 2 monitoring)

10 U.S. Department of Energy FutureGen FutureGen Systems Oxygen Products/ Byproducts Utilization H 2 /CO 2 Separation Fuels/Chemicals Fuel Cell High Efficiency Turbine Electricity Liquids Conversion Process Heat/Steam Gasification Gas Stream Cleanup Coal Gas Cleaning Oxygen Membrane Gasifier H2H2 CO 2 Enhanced Oil Recovery Coal Seams Saline Reservoir CO 2 Sequestration Power Fuels and Chemicals Fuel + H 2 O

11 U.S. Department of Energy FutureGen FutureGen Research Initiative - Status +February 27, Presidential announcement Received strong support from states, industry, international community and some environmentalists +April 2003 – Initial project plan developed +October Completed DOE affirmation of Mission Need for FutureGen (zero-emission coal option) +FutureGen Program Plan submitted to Congress +Fiscal Year 2004 funding of $9 million appropriated +DOE ready to enter into negotiations with industry +February 27, Presidential announcement Received strong support from states, industry, international community and some environmentalists +April 2003 – Initial project plan developed +October Completed DOE affirmation of Mission Need for FutureGen (zero-emission coal option) +FutureGen Program Plan submitted to Congress +Fiscal Year 2004 funding of $9 million appropriated +DOE ready to enter into negotiations with industry

12 U.S. Department of Energy Project Schedules --- Key Phases Major Project Milestones Fiscal Year 2015 Supporting Research* Design / Construction Shakedown / Operation Project Definition &Site Characterization Follow-on Testing * Supporting research includes research embedded in the FutureGen project and additional research in FE’s carbon sequestration, IGCC, turbines, and fuel cell R&D programs.

13 U.S. Department of Energy Project Schedule

14 U.S. Department of Energy Potential For State and Local Participation  Compete for the FutureGen host site  Offer incentives to Industrial Participants (e.g., streamline siting and permitting process, offer subsidies if project is sited in the state, offer land for the site)  Cost-share in the project with the Federal Government  Conduct outreach and education; provide geologic data and services via State geological offices  Continue participation in Sequestration Regional Partnership program to assess and characterize future potential sites  Compete for the FutureGen host site  Offer incentives to Industrial Participants (e.g., streamline siting and permitting process, offer subsidies if project is sited in the state, offer land for the site)  Cost-share in the project with the Federal Government  Conduct outreach and education; provide geologic data and services via State geological offices  Continue participation in Sequestration Regional Partnership program to assess and characterize future potential sites

15 U.S. Department of Energy Potential For International Participation  Participation on a cost-shared basis can be either on the industry side or on the government side.  Interest in participation from Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum members encouraged  Mechanisms for participation can be through existing, modified, or new international agreements or protocols  Benefits and information negotiable depending on extent of cost- shared participation.  FutureGen International Participation Prospectus  Benefits to worldwide use of coal is enormous if zero emissions coal option is proven and accepted.  Participation on a cost-shared basis can be either on the industry side or on the government side.  Interest in participation from Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum members encouraged  Mechanisms for participation can be through existing, modified, or new international agreements or protocols  Benefits and information negotiable depending on extent of cost- shared participation.  FutureGen International Participation Prospectus  Benefits to worldwide use of coal is enormous if zero emissions coal option is proven and accepted.

16 U.S. Department of Energy FutureGen FutureGen Near-Term Next Steps  Begin Environmental (NEPA) process for project  Begin development of competitive site selection criteria and process  Complete selection process for industry Consortium  Once cooperative agreement in place with Consortium:  Develop test scope for validating FutureGen  Assess cutting-edge technology readiness  Site characterization, evaluation and selection  Start preliminary design work  Conduct permitting activities  Begin Environmental (NEPA) process for project  Begin development of competitive site selection criteria and process  Complete selection process for industry Consortium  Once cooperative agreement in place with Consortium:  Develop test scope for validating FutureGen  Assess cutting-edge technology readiness  Site characterization, evaluation and selection  Start preliminary design work  Conduct permitting activities

17 U.S. Department of Energy Summary Remarks +FutureGen is a key research step towards proving the feasibility of a zero-emission coal option. +The goals are very challenging and it will collectively require our best minds and resources to meet these goals. +The cooperation and support of all stakeholders (federal state, and local governments, industry; environmental; NGO’s; and international) will be needed for FutureGen to be successful and accepted. +The potential benefits of a zero-emission coal option are enormous with respect to energy, environmental and economic security. +FutureGen is a key research step towards proving the feasibility of a zero-emission coal option. +The goals are very challenging and it will collectively require our best minds and resources to meet these goals. +The cooperation and support of all stakeholders (federal state, and local governments, industry; environmental; NGO’s; and international) will be needed for FutureGen to be successful and accepted. +The potential benefits of a zero-emission coal option are enormous with respect to energy, environmental and economic security.

18 U.S. Department of Energy Web Sites For Additional Information GENERAL SPECIFIC