AGENDA  A teacher’s perspective  Barb Schmidt Stevens High School  Acacia Trevillyan South Park Elementary  Review steps to create a quality CFA 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
King Kekaulike Complex Math Academy Mission: It is the mission of KKCMA to prepare all students for success in math as measured by performance on school,
Advertisements

Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Looking into the relationship between teacher and principal evaluation
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
Session 1: 4 T’s of Curriculum Design NTI March, 2015.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.
Leadership Role in Creating an Effective Mathematics Classroom.
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
OIP Resources and Training Documents Used in This PowerPoint
1 District PLC/Curriculum Team  To provide a liaison between the PLC teams and the Admin SIPPLC team  Revise and align K-12 curriculum to.
Session Materials  Wiki
Welcome to I-CAT Training! Iowa Core Outcome 4 …increase the degree of alignment of each and every student’s enacted curriculum … to the Iowa Core I A.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Examining Monitoring Data
Ensuring Exemplary Instruction for the Students Behind the Data Linking Informal Observation to Performance Measures.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
The Impact of the MMP on Student Achievement Cindy M. Walker, PhD Jacqueline Gosz, MS University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
Overview to Common Formative Assessments (CFAs) Adapted from The Leadership and Learning Center Presented by Jane Cook & Madeline Negron For Windham Public.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
A working team of professionals that are committed to ensure student achievement as life-long learners of the 21 st Century.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
FALCON Meeting #3 Preparation for Harnett County Schools Thursday, March 8, 2012.
RCAS Common Core State Standards Secondary BLT November 8, 2011.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
An Integral Part of Professional Learning Communities.
USING DATA TO IMPROVE LEARNING FOR ALL STUDENTS Advancing Improvement in Education (AIE) Annual Conference October 18, 2012 Victoria L. Bernhardt Education.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
The School Effectiveness Framework
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,
Office of Service Quality
English-Language Arts Content Standards for California By Ashleigh Boni & Christy Pryde By Ashleigh Boni & Christy Pryde.
Administrators Academy August 15, College Prepared and Career Ready.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
1. Welcome 2. Working with the WIKI 3. Discussion of Assessment in curriculum development 4. Break 5. Divide into curricular areas – discuss: A.Standards.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Australian Council for Educational Research School Improvement Christian Schools National Policy Forum Canberra, 26 May 2014.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
Montgomery Township Board of Education
Update on Teaching, Learning and Leading
BUMP IT UP STRATEGY in NSW Public Schools
Quality Comprehensive Improvement System
February 21-22, 2018.
Professional Learning Communities
Presentation transcript:

AGENDA  A teacher’s perspective  Barb Schmidt Stevens High School  Acacia Trevillyan South Park Elementary  Review steps to create a quality CFA  Using Danielson model to evaluate teachers during PLC time  Read and discuss High Leverage Strategies for Principals  Closure 1

A Teacher’s Perspective  Barb Schmidt  Stevens High School Teacher  Teaches Biology and Anatomy and Physiology 2

Literacy Leader’s Perspective  Acacia Trevillyan South Park Elementary  South Park Elementary Literacy Leader 3

PRIORITY: DEVELOP & DEPLOY CFAS LEARNING TARGETS  I can provide leadership for designing quality CFA’s.  I understand the value and importance of using the Danielson model to evaluate staff based on PLC processes. CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS  Discussion and collaboration.  Articulate how the Danielson Model can be used to evaluate teachers based on PLC process 4

Creating a CFA Decide on Power Standards Write Learning Targets Create a Quality CFA 5

INDICATORS of CFAS 1. The assessment is collaboratively developed (to allow teachers in the same grades or departments to measure the same things in the same way). 2. The assessment is aligned with the power standards. 3. The assessment is tied tightly to clearly identified learning targets within the power standards. 4. The assessment is written around 1-3 of the most important learning targets. 5. The assessment adheres to sound method and design elements (see “Test-Item Quality Checklist,” which provides guidelines for gathering reliable information about student learning). 6

Steps to Creating a Quality CFA Decide on Power Standards Write Learning Targets Determine Proficiency Levels Create a Quality CFA 7

QUALITY INDICATORS: DESIGN OF CFAS 1. The assessment is collaboratively developed (to allow teachers in the same grades or departments to measure the same things in the same way). 2. The assessment is aligned with the power standards. 3. The assessment is tied tightly to clearly identified learning targets within the power standards. 4. The assessment is written around 1-3 of the most important learning targets. 5. The assessment tasks are tied to the Proficiency Level Descriptions (PLDs). 6. The assessment adheres to sound method and design elements (see “Test- Item Quality Checklist,” which provides guidelines for gathering reliable information about student learning). 8

Proficiency Level Descriptions 4 (Advanced) – Level 3 performance, plus applications that go beyond what was explicitly taught. 3 (Proficient) – No major errors or omissions of explicitly taught material (Webb’s DOK 3 & 4) 2 (Approaching) – No major errors or omissions of simpler material, but major errors involving complex material (Webb’s DOK 1 & 2) 1 (Emerging) – With help, partial knowledge of some of the simpler and complex details and processes 9

Review  What is the value in knowing and using the Quality Indicators for Design of CFAs? 10

Quality Common Formative Assessments  How are you currently evaluating your PLC teams?  Are your teachers acting as a group or a team? Is there a difference? Explain  How do you plan to assess your teacher’s CFAs?  Please discuss at your tables and be prepared to share your responses. 11

DuFour’s Perspective  DuFour explains the difference between a group and a team? DuFour explains the difference between a group and a team?  (2 nd video on plc) 12

 Discuss at your table the impact of working in isolation?  Do you currently have staff in your building who prefer working in isolation? What impact does this have on student achievement?   DuFour explains the impact of isolation  (3 rd video) 13

Danielson Model  How are you currently using the Danielson Model to ensure your teachers are working as a team?  If you are not using the Danielson Model how can you implement it to ensure teachers are working as a team?  Be prepared to share your responses. 14

DuFour and Marzano  High Leverage Strategies for Principal Leadership by Dufour and Marzano  By promoting teacher learning in collaborative teams, a principal is far more likely to improve student achievement than by focusing on formal teacher evaluation.  Read and discuss and significance of the article  (20 minutes) 15

READ AND DISCUSS THIS SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ARTICLE! 16

DuFour and Marzano 17

DuFour and Marzano 18

19

Marzano  “One of the most powerful strategies schools can employ for improving student learning is to ensure what is being taught in the classrooms is both guaranteed( that is students have access to the same essential learning regardless of who is teaching the class) and viable (that is the curriculum can be taught in the amount of time available).” Marzano  For this reason it is essential administrators effectively evaluate our staff on the PLC processes. 20

Using the Danielson Model 21

Danielson Model  The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument2011 Edition by Charlotte Danielson  Domain 3 Using Assessment in Instruction  Domain 4 Participating in a Professional Community  The Danielson 2011 Edition is available at FfTEvaluationInstrument - The Danielson Group FfTEvaluationInstrument - The Danielson Group 22

23

24

Danielson Model  __________________’s PLC team is in the process of developing common formative assessments which are a powerful tool in school improvement. Common assessments provide teachers with a basis of comparison as they learn, skill by skill, how the performance of their students is similar to and different from the other students who took the assessment. With this information a teacher can seek assistance from teammates on areas of concern and can share strategies and ideas on skills in which students excelled. The PLC teams will focus on creating high quality common formative assessments. High quality common assessments include the following quality indicators:  The assessment is collaboratively developed  The assessment is aligned with the power standards  The assessment is tied tightly to clearly indentified learning targets within the power standards  The assessment tasks are tied to the proficiency level descriptions  The assessment provides reliable information about what students have learned  Throughout this process _________________ has taken a leadership role, acting as a positive mentor to her department.  Domain 3 Instruction 25

26

27

Danielson Model  According to research, the number one factor successful schools have in place is a guaranteed and viable curriculum. This is the first year the district is involved in professional learning communities and ____________’s PLC group is in the process of developing a guaranteed and viable curriculum. __________ PLC team is obtaining a collective focus on what it is that all students must learn, and subsequently, what learning they will monitor with common formative assessments. ____________ shared in the preconference she looks forward to having additional time to collaborate in a systematic fashion and further enhance the Science department’s practices. Domain 4 Professional Responsibility 28

Debrief  How can the Danielson model help you in your PLC leadership work with teachers?  Discuss with your team and be prepared to share your response. 29

Closure  When a student doesn’t perform or presents academic or behavioral problems, someone is to blame? Who can we blame? 30

The President? 31

Sports figures? 32

Professor  The college professor says: “The high schools in this country didn’t prepare this person.” 33

High School  The high school teacher says: “Those middle school teachers just didn’t do their job.” 34

Middle School  The middle school teacher says: “Those elementary teachers fall asleep on the job.” 35

Elementary Teacher  The elementary school teacher says: “The kindergarten teacher should have done better.” 36

 The kindergarten school teacher responds: “The parents of this child really dropped the ball.” 37

Mother  The mother says: “Don’t blame me you should see my husband’s side of the family!” 38

Future Work Next Steps: (April 2 Meeting)  Next Principals’ Student Achievement Meeting—Complete handout that addresses how you built your staff’s capacity to design quality CFAs and use PLDs. Bring examples of strong and weak CFAs. Future Work:  Deploying (using) CFAs effectively  Displaying and using data to create a quality response to CFAs  Integrating an assessment plan into an instructional unit 39

Future Work 40