USING DATA TO IMPROVE PROGRAM PERFORMANCE 2013 TIG CONFERENCE Presenters: Michael O’Connor, Prairie State Legal Services (IL) Rachel Perry, Cleveland Legal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Focusing an Evaluation Ben Silliman, Youth Development Specialist NC 4-H Youth Development.
Advertisements

1 LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION Technology Initiative Grant Program Developing and Submitting TIG Project Evaluation Plans Bristow Hardin, LSC,
St. Louis Public Schools Human Resources Support for District Improvement Initiatives (Note: The bullets beneath each initiative indicate actions taken.
1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.
Training/Technical Assistance RFP information. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act grant U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) Administration.
International Civil Aviation Organization Nancy Graham Director - Air Navigation Bureau 28 October 2011 Symposium on RSOOs Meeting Outcomes.
Presentation at The Conference for Family Literacy Louisville, Kentucky By Apter & O’Connor Associates April 2013 Evaluating Our Coalition: Are We Making.
Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
Methods of Administration MOA Element 4 Universal Access.
Monitoring and Evaluation in the CSO Sector in Ghana
Evaluation at The Prince’s Trust Fire Service Prince's Trust Association meeting 18 th February 2010 Subtitle.
Everything You Need to Know About Writing a Successful PRIME Application! Presented by Stacie Pace, Director of ED, Little Dixie Community Action Agency.
Evaluating the Alternative Financing Program Geoff Smith Vice President Woodstock Institute March 18, 2008 WOODSTOCK INSTITUTE.
How Do You Know You Are Achieving Excellence and Making an Impact? Presented by: IT Resource Center and TCC Group March 25, 2005.
IFAD Reform towards a better development effectiveness How can we all do better? Mohamed Béavogui Director, West and Central Africa January 2009.
7 Accountability Getting clear about what you want to accomplish with technology How will you measure its use? How will you communicate its effects?
Sustaining Community Based Programs CYFAR Conference Boston, 2005.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 10 – Maximizing the Use of Evaluation Results.
NRCOI March 5th Conference Call
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Legal & Administrative Oversight of NGOs Establishing and Monitoring Performance Standards.
Sustaining Local Public Health and Built Environment Programs Fit Nation NYC November 3, 2011 Annaliese Calhoun.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
ORC TA: Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility Grant Program HRSA U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Health Resources & Services Administration.
1 Qualitative Evaluation Terms Coding/categorization The process of condensing qualitative data through the identification of common themes. Data Matrix.
WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.
Do it pro bono. Key Messages & Brand Strategy Service Grant.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Investment Portfolio Methodologies Pertemuan Matakuliah: A Strategi Investasi IT Tahun: 2009.
Impact assessment framework
The Evaluation Plan.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the Evaluation System to Answer Key Questions About Your Initiative.
Overview of Performance Review Process
Planning for Sustainability National Child Traumatic Stress Network All Network Meeting February 6, 2007.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Evaluation Assists with allocating resources what is working how things can work better.
Community Assessments Presentation for the Nutrition, Environment, & Food Systems for Empowerment Internship Program Sharon Lezberg 6/2015.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Resource Development for Tobacco Control José L. Castro International Union Against Tuberculosis.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Planning and programming Planning and prioritizing Part 1 Strengthening Statistics Produced.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
CONNECTICUT HEALTH FOUNDATION: Update on Evaluation Planning for the Strategic Plan.
Strategic Plan Kidsafe NSW Inc.. ‘A Safer World for Kids’ Kidsafe NSW Inc.
By Bankole Ebisemiju At an Intensive & Interactive workshop on Techniques for Effective & Result Oriented Annual Operation Plan November 24th 2010 Annual.
EVALUATION PLANNING Legal Services Corporation May 19, 2004 Please standby while others connect.
Program Assessment Training September 29, Learning Objectives By participating in this session, you will develop a better understanding of: how.
OVERVIEW Partners in Pregnancy is a community program aimed at giving young couples the resources they need with their pregnancy. Young pregnant couples.
TIG 2012 INFORMATION SESSION David Bonebrake, Glenn Rawdon, Jane Ribadeneyra Legal Services Corporation.
Strategic Plan Strategic Goals (Thrusts) 1. Achieve Performance Excellence CRJ uses metrics of performance to evaluate, manage and plan its.
Objectives and Strategies of RRSF The RRSF has been prepared with an overall objective and four specific objectives to overcome the identified problems.
Office of Performance Review (OPR) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Stephen Dorage.
Community Planning Training 5- Community Planning Training 5-1.
1 Office of Community Services Division of State Assistance COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT (CSBG) Technical Assistance Coordination Strategy Office of.
Strategic Plan Report Goals 4 and 7B: Accountability, Accessibility, Effectiveness and Efficiency December 11, 2014.
IFAD Reform towards a better development effectiveness How can we all do better? Mohamed Tounessi Bamba Zoumana Virginia Cameroon Retreat 4-5 November.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the Evaluation System to Answer Key Questions About Your Initiative.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Just a Click Away Conference, February 2011 Slide 1 Focus Consultants for the Research & Statistics Division Department of Justice.
Evaluation: from Objectives to Outcomes Janet Myers, PhD MPH AIDS Education and Training Centers National Evaluation Center
MEYER ELEMENTARY SPRING ISD LORETTA DAVENPORT Campus Improvement Project III Teacher Mentoring Program.
December Why Program-for-Results (PforR)? Development Effectiveness and Client Demand – PforR responds to client demand that could not be fully.
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
A look into current and future trends in national policies for eHealth and Innovation in the WHO European Region Clayton Hamilton, eHealth and Innovation.
System Planning 101 ALINA TURNER, PHD TURNER RESEARCH & STRATEGY INC. TurnerResearchandStrategyInc.com.
International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAIs) Jennifer Thomson Director OPSPF & Chief Financial Management Officer World Bank.
Abstract # TUAE0102: Health Services Reporting Tool Helps ASOs and Funders Meet Accountability Requirements, Monitor Programs and Identify Emerging Trends.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Strategic planning A Tool to Promote Organizational Effectiveness
FCYO LEARNING AND EXCHANGE FUND
SANMAR Grant Writing Workshop
Nancy Graham Director - Air Navigation Bureau 28 October 2011
Presentation transcript:

USING DATA TO IMPROVE PROGRAM PERFORMANCE 2013 TIG CONFERENCE Presenters: Michael O’Connor, Prairie State Legal Services (IL) Rachel Perry, Cleveland Legal Aid Society Jonathan Pyle, Philadelphia Legal Assistance Bristow Hardin, Legal Services Corporation (moderator)

The Presenters Will Highlight: The value of effective data compilation, analysis and reporting for assessing and improving program management and program performance Concrete examples of: 1. How the use of data can improve specific program operations and activities, e.g., identifying client needs, targeting resources, strengthening advocacy strategies, and improving management oversight 2. Major components of systems designed to compile and use data to accomplish these purposes 3. Data sets and metrics for assessing and improving program operations 4. Key operational steps and major challenges involved in the development and implementation of data compilation and analysis systems.

Effective Use of Data is an Essential Management Tool Appropriate data are necessary to meaningfully assess program implementation and results. Without such data, how effectively can program managers: Identify client needs and target program resources? (U.S. poverty population grew by 42% from 2000 to 2011; significant changes in geographic location and demographics of client population; economic trends and Great Recession had diverse regional effects – How has program responded?) Assess the effectiveness and efficiency of programs operations (e.g., intake systems, legal work supervision)? Evaluate the results of advocacy and other client services (e.g., client groups served/not served, impact of advocacy strategies)? Most broadly: How effective is our work? How can we improve?

Different Types of Data for Different Audiences Program management & board: assess and improve operations Program staff: evaluation and feedback, improve advocacy and client services Funders: demonstrate effectiveness of work, support funding requests Partners: assess the potential value of and develop joint initiatives Public / Media: “tell the story” and demonstrate the value and effectiveness of legal services Client community: articulate what we’re doing, enhance dialogues about how we can improve

One Size Does Not Fit All Data systems must be tailored to a program’s particular needs, resources and capacities. Key questions: What operational components do you want to examine? What do you want to find out? What are the appropriate data sets? Will they tell you what you need to know? What type(s) of evaluation system(s) are appropriate and feasible? What resources – financial and staffing – will be available? Who are appropriate partners?

Effective Metrics and Data Sets Are Critical “Knowing it when we see it” is not an acceptable evaluation criterion Metrics/data sets must be tailored to and appropriate for: 1. Specific systems / activities 2. Purposes 3. Audiences Many useful data sets are readily available or can be obtained cost-effectively: 1. Administrative data, e.g., case management system, intake data 2. Surveys of / interviews with staff, clients, stakeholders (however, value of many “client satisfaction surveys” is limited) 3. Census Bureau data and data from other public entities Universities and other policy/research entities can provide valuable assistance

LSC Data Initiatives LSC is undertaking initiatives to improve its use of data to: Enhance its effectiveness and efficiency Enable it to more effectively: 1. assess and improve grantees’ services 2. demonstrate the results grantees achieve for clients 3. better measure the extent to which grantees are unable to meet clients’ needs because of limited resources. LSC Grantee-Focused Data Initiatives TIG Data Projects LSC Data Collection and Reporting Project:

LSC Grantee-Focused Data Initiatives TIG Data Projects An “area of interest” in the 2011 and 2012 TIG Grant Cycles was the “Use of Data to Analyze Service Delivery and Develop Advocacy Strategies to Data Analysis” Total of six (6) data projects were funded in 2011 and 2012 LSC Data Collection and Reporting Project: Improved system for collecting and analyzing data from LSC grantees Tools and resources that enhance LSC grantees’ ability to collect and use data to: 1. Design, assess and improve their delivery strategies and program operations 2. Demonstrate the need for and benefits of the services they provide clients in their communities Provide training and technical assistance that fosters LSC grantees’ effective use of the tools All LSC data initiatives informed by and responsive to Grantees’ particular delivery models and local circumstances Other funders’ oversight and reporting requirements