Building the Performance Culture. Introduction: Reflections from the Dean  University Context »Transparent and defensible process. »Evidence based »Academic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Advertisements

Building capacity for assessment leadership via professional development and mentoring of course coordinators Merrilyn Goos.
Jennelle Kyd Senior Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Provost 2014 Academic Promotions Information for mentors.
Teacher Certification Assessor Information Session November 27, 2014.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework
Head of Learning: Job description
Head teacher Performance Management
Department of Medicine Three Year Review Workshop Job Descriptions November 21, 2012 Joan Wither Co-Chair, Three Year Review Joan Wither Co-Chair, Three.
Making the Case for Research Academic Promotions 2015 Professor Stephen Garton | Provost and Deputy Vice-Chancellor Academic Promotions 2015.
Demonstration of sustained effective leadership in academic practice and academic development Evidence of impact on high quality student learning Draw.
Professional Recognition: Gain the recognition you deserve
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
Service to the University, Discipline and Community Academic Promotions Briefing Session Chair, Academic Board Peter McCallum.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Performance Management
Academic Promotions Applicant Information Session Tuesday 10 February 2015 Provost and Deputy Vice-Chancellor Professor Stephen Garton.
Partner reward – a help or a hindrance to effective business development? Peter Scott Peter Scott Consulting
Performance Appraisal System Update
Example claims for approaches to the support of learning and teaching that influence, motivate and inspire students to learn fostering student development.
CRICOS Provider No 00025B Strategies for enhancing teaching and learning: Reflections from Australia Merrilyn Goos Director Teaching and Educational Development.
Program Assessment, WASC and Cal Poly Pomona Bob Hurt Faculty Associate for Program Assessment and Academic Program Review.
Presenting a convincing teaching case for promotion Briefing for applicants 6 th February 2014 Institute for Teaching and Learning Professor Keith Trigwell.
What is HEA Fellowship? What’s the UK PSF?
Academic Promotion Committee Members Briefing Session A/Prof. Tony Masters,| Deputy Chair, Academic Board, University of Sydney.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Teaching Quality Indicators Project Ian Solomonides Excellence is as low as we go or When is good, good enough?
CPD4k Skills Competitions, CIF & PS
Northampton – Development Opportunities a framework for enabling positive change.
Developing a Partner Reward Strategy – to build competitive advantage Peter Scott Consulting
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
2015 Commendations and Citations Information Session.
FOLLOW UP SITE VISIT Dr Robert Schofield Dr Arthur Brown Advisors to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.
The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System.
Research Strategy Options Workshop FECM Strategic Review 2009.
Commitment plus INVESTORS IN PEOPLE In association with Business Link Surrey & Surrey County Council The Investors in People Standard New Version – New.
Accreditation at Professional Accomplishment and Leadership.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Higher Education Advisory Council Indigenous Leaders Forum Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Higher Education.
Key features of the University of Manchester Professor Cathy Cassell Deputy Director (Academic) Sarah Featherstone Head of Undergraduate Services Original.
Geelong High School Performance Development & Review Process in 2014.
Action research projects This sequence may help you when planning your case study What does the data identify about this target group? What will.
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING. Student Learning: A New Approach Victorian Essential Learning Standards Curriculum Planning Guidelines Principles.
CULTURES OF COACHING AND MENTORING Principal’s role in Coaching and Mentoring teachers.
Regional Director’s Meeting ePlanning Session. Aims of this session Ultranet update The eLearning planning matrix Where your school is Where your school.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework Consultation proposal.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
General Staff Performance Reviews Campus Briefings
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
Curriculum Renewal in the Faculty of the Professions: Overview.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
Applying for an OLT Citation 2016 INSTITUTE FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING INSTITUTE FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING October 2015 DR ALISON KUIPER, SENIOR LECTURER.
ATMCH meeting February 28, Outline Accountability Content Evaluation Communication and Outreach.
Tenure and Promotion Workshop November 1, Workshop Logistics Overview of SUNY tenure and promotion criteria Overview of SUNY tenure and promotion.
National Professional Standards for Teachers. Focus Role of the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Background on the National Professional.
ACADEMIC PROMOTIONS Promotions Criteria Please note, these slides only contain a summary of the promotions information – full details can be found.
Jerry E. Trapnell, PhD, CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Accreditation Officer AACSB International A BRIEFING ON AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION.
Academic Staff Performance Review This package will introduce you to the Academic Staff Performance Review process undertaken here at Griffith University.
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
2016 Academic Staff Promotion Round Briefing Session Professor Debra Henly Deputy Vice Chancellor (Academic)
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Professional Recognition and Development (PRD) Scheme
What is HEA Fellowship? What’s the UK PSF?
Program Review For School Counseling Programs
Discussion on peer review of teaching
Academic Promotion Information session, 22 March 2018.
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
Tenure and Promotion: Article 6
February 21-22, 2018.
Preston & Wingham Primary Schools Federation
Presentation transcript:

Building the Performance Culture

Introduction: Reflections from the Dean  University Context »Transparent and defensible process. »Evidence based »Academic leadership & expectations  Clarifying the expectations  How do staff come to know about, understand and ‘buy into’ these?  Group Directions »Building the performance culture »Insert other group directions here 2

Aims of Workshop  To support the University’s commitment to annual staff reviews as an essential element of career development, the maintenance of academic standards and the advancement of the University’s strategic objectives  To focus on the role and responsibility of academic supervisors »Your role & responsibility »Givens »Debrief of previous assessments »Expectations »Hot spots/concerns 3

Your Role  Assist in the achievement of University Strategic Objectives  Ensure annual reviews are taking place in a timely way  Mentor and advise staff regarding clear pathways to advancement  Evaluate staff member’s performance against their previously set objectives and the position classification standard for the level of appointment  Make an assessment against the evidence and promote a culture of performance and achievement  Discuss work profiles and enable staff to focus on areas of excellence  Seek feedback from other sources if indication of unsatisfactory performance and consult with HRM  Act on constructive feedback from the staff member 4

Givens  All staff due for performance review will participate in the process  Everyone must perform at a satisfactory level in each of the three areas  Performance is measured by the evidence  Someone with a teaching focussed workload should be engaging in scholarly work  Everyone who teaches must be able to demonstrate ‘effectiveness as a teacher’ 5

6 Group Reflection of performance against the evidence

So, what are the expectations..... in Learning & Teaching  University Goal »To provide an excellent educational experience to attract and retain students who, regardless of their background, will succeed at university and become graduates of influence  Group Priorities »Brief of group priorities here  Group Expectations of individual staff »Outline expectation here - based on level »Outline expectation here – based on level 7

So, what are the expectations..... in Research  University Goals »To continuously improve our research performance and, through our research, deliver social dividends. Through increased  research income  number and quality of research publications  number of higher degree research commencements and completions  Group Priorities »Brief of group priorities here  Group Expectations of individual staff »Outline expectation here - based on level »Outline expectation here – based on level 8

So, what are the expectations..... in Service  University Expectation »All staff will make a contribution to institutional planning and governance and be engaged in service to the relevant profession and/or academic discipline and make relevant contribution to the wider community  Group Priorities »Brief of group priorities here  Group Expectations of individual staff »Outline expectation here - based on level »Outline expectation here – based on level 9

Scenarios:  What advice could you provide to a staff member who has had low SET & SEC scores and what other evidence could you draw on to assess teaching performance?  What feedback and advice could you provide to a high performing Level B staff member with a view to sustaining or improving this level of performance?  A staff member has not had any research outcomes/publications in the previous year. What strategies can you recommend to assist the staff member to improve research performance? 10

Scenarios:  A staff member has not had any research outcomes/publications in the last 3 years, however continues to submit at least 2 C1 articles each year. What is your approach to this review?  A staff member on a balanced profile has consistently exceeded expectations in teaching performance and just scraping by in the other two areas. How would you approach a conversation regarding suitability for a teaching focussed profile, but you know that the staff member would be resistant to this change. 11