Observation of a Saharan dust outbreak on 1-2 August 2007: determination of microphysical particle parameters Paolo Di Girolamo 1, Donato Summa 1, Rohini.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ewan OConnor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth, Nicolas Gaussiat Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds.
Advertisements

Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche 3 rd COPS and GOP workshop April 2006 Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto di Metodologie per lAnalisi.
C. Flamant (1), C. Champollion (1,2), S. Bastin (1) and E. Richard (3) (1) Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, UPMC/CNRS/UVSQ (2) Géosciences Montpellier UM2/CNRS,
Measured parameters: particle backscatter at 355 and 532 nm, particle extinction at 355 nm, lidar ratio at 355 nm, particle depolarization at 355 nm, atmospheric.
Constraining aerosol sources using MODIS backscattered radiances Easan Drury - G2
Aerosol and Cloud Microphysics Working Group Dietrich Althausen, Andrea Riede, Herman Russchenberg, Aldo Amodeo, Susanne Crewell, Paolo Di Girolamo, Stephen.
Raman Lidar observations of a MCS on July 20th Rohini Bhawar (1), Paolo Di Girolamo (1), Donato Summa (1), Tatiana Di Iorio (2), Belay B. Demoz (3,4) (1)
Lidar and radar measurements of the melting layer at Supersite R: observations dark and bright band phenomena Donato Summa(1), Paolo Di Girolamo(1), Rohini.
Atmospheric structure from lidar and radar Jens Bösenberg 1.Motivation 2.Layer structure 3.Water vapour profiling 4.Turbulence structure 5.Cloud profiling.
Water vapour intercomparison effort in the frame of the Convective and Orographically-induced Precipitation Study 6th COPS Workshop 27 – 29 February 2008.
Multiwavelength aerosol lidar and vertical-wind lidar observations during COPS Dietrich Althausen, Detlef Müller, Ronny Engelmann, Matthias Tesche, Patric.
Atmospheric Measurements at Capel Dewi field station Prof. Geraint Vaughan.
Using microwave radiometer and Doppler lidar data to estimate latent heat Chris. Collier 1, Jenny Davis 1, Fay Davies 1 and Guy Pearson 1,2 1. Centre for.
IRCTR - International Research Centre for Telecommunication and Radar ATMOS Ice crystals properties retrieval within ice and mixed-phase clouds using the.
4 th COPS Workshop, Hohenheim, 25 – 26 September 2006 Modeling and assimilation efforts at IPM in preparation of COPS Hans-Stefan Bauer, Matthias Grzeschik,
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
Lidar algorithms to retrieve cloud distribution, phase and optical depth Y. Morille, M. Haeffelin, B. Cadet, V. Noel Institut Pierre Simon Laplace SYMPOSIUM.
David N. Whiteman/NASA-GSFC, Belay Demoz/UMBC
Lidar remote sensing for the characterization of the atmospheric aerosol on local and large spatial scale.
University of Salford Doppler lidarUniversity of Manchester Radio Wind Profiler University of Salford MW RadiometerUniversity of Basilicata Raman lidar.
Remote-sensing of the environment (RSE) ATMOS Analysis of the Composition of Clouds with Extended Polarization Techniques L. Pfitzenmaier, H. Russchenbergs.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
A Radar Data Assimilation Experiment for COPS IOP 10 with the WRF 3DVAR System in a Rapid Update Cycle Configuration. Thomas Schwitalla Institute of Physics.
Application of Satellite Data to Particulate, Smoke and Dust Monitoring Spring 2015 ARSET - AQ Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training – Air Quality.
VRAME: Vertically Resolved Aerosol Model for Europe from a Synergy of EARLINET and AERONET data Elina Giannakaki, Ina Mattis, Detlef Müller, Olaf Krüger.
Water Vapour Intercomparison Effort in the Frame of the Convective and Orographically-Induced Precipitation Study: Airborne-to-Ground-based and airborne-to-airborne.
© Crown copyright Met Office Future Upper-Air Network Development (FUND)-Integration TECO 2008 St Petersburg Russia Catherine Gaffard, John Nash, Alec.
Lidar Working Group on Space-Based Winds, Snowmass, Colorado, July 17-21, 2007 A study of range resolution effects on accuracy and precision of velocity.
NARVAL South Lutz Hirsch, Friedhelm Jansen Sensor Synergy While Radars and Lidars provide excellent spatial resolution but only ambiguous information on.
Raman lidar characterization of PBL structure during COPS Donato Summa a, Paolo Di Girolamo a, Dario Stelitano a, Tatiana Di Iorio b a DIFA, Univ. della.
Precipitation Retrievals Over Land Using SSMIS Nai-Yu Wang 1 and Ralph R. Ferraro 2 1 University of Maryland/ESSIC/CICS 2 NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
Page 1 Validation by Balloons and Aircraft - ESRIN - 9– 13 December 2002 Observations of aerosol and clouds obtained during the M-55 Geophysica ENVISAT.
Measurement Example III Figure 6 presents the ozone and aerosol variations under a light-aerosol sky condition. The intensity and structure of aerosol.
Wu Sponsors: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) New York.
Monitoring aerosols in China with AATSR Anu-Maija Sundström 2 Gerrit de Leeuw 1 Pekka Kolmonen 1, and Larisa Sogacheva 1 AMFIC , Barcelona 1:
The Use of Optical Methods to Study Aerosols in the Paso del Norte Region Rosa M. Fitzgerald, Javier Polanco, Angel Esparza, Richard Medina Physics Department,
Dual-Aircraft Investigation of the inner Core of Hurricane Norbert. Part Ⅲ : Water Budget Gamache, J. F., R. A. Houze, Jr., and F. D. Marks, Jr., 1993:
LASE Measurements During IHOP Edward V. Browell, Syed Ismail, Richard A. Ferrare, Susan A Kooi, Anthony Notari, and Carolyn F. Butler NASA Langley Research.
Characterization of Aerosols using Airborne Lidar, MODIS, and GOCART Data during the TRACE-P (2001) Mission Rich Ferrare 1, Ed Browell 1, Syed Ismail 1,
Substructure of a MAP-Streamer Mark A. Liniger (MeteoSwiss) Huw C. Davies (IACETH) QJRMS, 129, (MAP special issue) 12 UTC 6 Nov 1999 (MAP IOP-15)
1 Atmospheric profiling to better understand fog and low level cloud life cycle ARM/EU workshop on algorithms, May 2013 J. Delanoe (LATMOS), JC.
Numerical simulations of optical properties of nonspherical dust aerosols using the T-matrix method Hyung-Jin Choi School.
C. J. Senff, R. J. Alvarez II, R. M. Hardesty, A. O. Langford, R. M. Banta, W. A. Brewer, F. Davies, S. P. Sandberg, R. D. Marchbanks, A. M. Weickmann.
AEROSOL CLASSIFICATION RETRIEVAL ALGORITHMS FOR EARTHCARE/ATLID, CALIPSO/CALIOP, AND GROUND-BASED LIDARS Sugimoto, N., T. Nishizawa, I. Matsui, National.
Preliminary LES simulations with Méso-NH to investigate water vapor variability during IHOP_2002 F. Couvreux F. Guichard, V.
Introduction 1. Advantages and difficulties related to the use of optical data 2. Aerosol retrieval and comparison methodology 3. Results of the comparison.
Theory West African dust outbreaks and the relationship with North Atlantic hurricanes Amato T. Evan, Christopher S. Velden, Andrew K. Heidinger & Jason.
CLOUD PHYSICS LIDAR for GOES-R Matthew McGill / Goddard Space Flight Center April 8, 2015.
Relating Aerosol Mass and Optical Depth in the Southeastern U.S. C. A. Brock, N. L. Wagner, A. M. Middlebrook, T. D. Gordon, and D. M. Murphy Earth System.
II GALION workshop - Geneva, Switzerland – September 21-23, 2010 EARLINET contribution to SDS-WAS Europe – North Africa regional node Lucia Mona Istituto.
Modeling. How Do we Address Aerosol-Cloud Interactions? The Scale Problem Process Models ~ 10s km Mesoscale Models Cloud resolving Models Regional Models.
Airborne in-situ measurements of transported mineral dust aerosols in the Mediterranean region 1 Cyrielle Denjean *, Paola Formenti, Claudia Di Biagio,
Modeling the emission, transport, and optical properties of Asian dust storms using coupled CAM/CARMA model Lin Su and Owen B. Toon Laboratory for Atmospheric.
Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin SIRTA Cloud and Radiation Observatory M. Haeffelin, A. Armstrong, L. Barthès, O. Bock, C. Boitel, D.
Mobile Integrated Profiling System (MIPS) Observations of Boundary Layer and Water Vapor Variations around Boundaries and Storms Kevin Knupp University.
UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA CNR-IMAA (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto di Metodologie per l’Analisi Ambientale) Tito Scalo (PZ) Analysis and interpretation.
number Typical aerosol size distribution area volume
Large Eddy Simulations of Entrainment and Inversion Structure Alison Fowler (MRes Physics of Earth and Atmosphere) Supervisor: Ian Brooks Entrainment Zone.
Continuous Humidity Profiling using a Wind- Profiler Radar in the UHF band (continued) F. Saïd* (1), B. Campistron (1), D. Bengochea (1), O. Bock (2),
Card 2. Option to use “Aerosol Plus” a parameter that characterizes the user defined aerosols and optical properties.
By SANDRA E. YUTER and ROBERT A. HOUZE JR
G. Mevi1,2, G. Muscari1, P. P. Bertagnolio1, I. Fiorucci1
Generation of Simulated GIFTS Datasets
PHY Lecture 16 Lidar remote sensing.
Guy Dagan, Ilan Koren, Orit Altaratz, Yoav Lehahn  iScience 
M. De Graaf1,2, K. Sarna2, J. Brown3, E. Tenner2, M. Schenkels4, and D
Comparison of Simulated Top of Atmosphere Radiance Datasets
Alexandre Baron, Patrick Chazette, Julien Totems
Presentation transcript:

Observation of a Saharan dust outbreak on 1-2 August 2007: determination of microphysical particle parameters Paolo Di Girolamo 1, Donato Summa 1, Rohini Bhawar 1, Tatiana Di Iorio 2, Marco Cacciani 2, Igor Veselovskii 3, Alexey Kolgotin 3 1 DIFA, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, Potenza, Italy, 2 Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”, Roma, Italy 3 Physics Instrumentation Center, Troitsk, Moscow Region, Russia 6 th COPS Workshop, 27 – 29 February 2008 University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart

Particle Backscatter Ratio at 1064 nm, 1-2 August TIME (UTC) ALTITUDE A.G.L. (m) 8 BASIL

18:45 Water Vapour Mixing Ratio 1-2 August :16 TIME (UTC) g/Kg ALTITUDE A.G.L. (m) out-flow boundary

Measured parameters: particle backscattering 355, 532 and 1064 nm 3  particle extinction 355 and 532 nm 2  depolarization 355 & 532 nm, atmospheric temperature water vapour mixing ratio relative humidity from simultaneous measurements of temperature and water vapor mixing ratio BASIL Raman Lidar Raman lidar measurements (25 May – 30 August 2007) More than 500 hours of measurements distributed over 58 days particle size and microphysical parameters COPS Web Page Operational Products

The retrieval scheme employs Tikhonov’s inversion with regularization Algorithm developed at the Physics Instrumentation Center Inversion algorithm Particle size distribution parameters: Mean radius r mean Effective radius r eff Number concentration N Surface concentration S Volume concentration V Complex refractive index m r and m i Parameters of a bimodal size distribution 3 + 23 + 2 In the solution of the inverse problem, particle size distribution f(r) is approximated by the superposition of base functions B j (r) as: where c j (z) are the weight coefficients. Base functions have a triangular shape on a logarithmic-equidistant grid Veselovskii et al., Appl. Opt. 41, 3685–3699, 2002.

Inversion with regularization r min =0.05  m, r max =15  m 1.3 <m r < 1.6 0<m i <0.04 f(r) Mean radius r mean Effective radius r eff Number concentration N Surface concentration S Volume concentration V numerically integrating f(r) over the radius interval [r min, r max ]

Particle Backscatter Ratio at 1064 nm, 1-2 August TIME (UTC) ALTITUDE A.G.L. (m) 8 Focus: two specific times when aerosol loading was higher 21:00-21:30 UTC on 1 August :00-00:30 UTC on 2 August 2007 (red dashed lines in figure)

1 August 2007, 21:00-21:30 UTC 2 August 2007, 00:00-00:30 UTC averaging layers m m m m m m m m 400 m thick

1 August 2007, 21:00-21:30 UTC2 August 2007, 00:00-00:30 UTC Particle size distribution 0.1  m <r mean < 0.2  m, 0.1  m <r eff < 1.0  m 5  m 3 /cm 3 <V< 40  m 3 /cm 3 Particle size distribution fine mode:  m coarse mode: 1-4  m

1.44 <m r < <m i < August 2007, 21:00-21:30 UTC Method: Inversion with regularization, performed by generalized cross-validation. In this retrieval, the combination of particle extinction and backscatter coefficients becomes especially important. The number of backscatter coefficients in the retrieval procedure should exceed the number of extinction coefficients by a factor of 2–3.

Backward trajectories ending at 00:00 UTC on 2 August 2007 NOAA-ARL HYSPLIT Lagrangian trajectory model The air masses observed in Achern in the altitude region km a.g.l. originated in the mixed layer over the Saharan desert

21:30 01:15 23:22 Particle Backscattering coefficient at 355nm (log scale) ALTITUDE A.G.L. (m) TIME (UTC) 1-2 August 2007 Dust particle hygroscopicity 22:00-23: km

21:30 01:1523: ALTITUDE A.G.L. (m) TIME (UTC) Relative Humidity 1-2 August : :00-23: km

Particle backsc. coeff. at 355 nm vs RH, 1 August 07, 22:00-23:00 UTC,  t=2min, km RH [%] Particle back 355 nm [m-1 sr-1] x x10 -6 Substantial increase in particle backscattering when RH > 75 % Swelling tendency of hygroscopic aerosol particles at large RH values Trend compatible with partially soluble aerosol particles Back-trajectories show that airmasses originated in the Saharan desert transited for several days over the Atlantic Ocean Aged dust particles presumably mixed with maritime aerosol during the advection to the meaurement site and partially coated with hygroscopic material

lidar dark band freezing level radar bright band freezing level University of Manchester Radio Wind Profiler, 1290 MHz UHF Doppler radar BASIL Raman Lidar radar bright band freezing level MIRA 36, Radar Reflectvity at 36 GHz radar bright band freezing level MIRA 36, Linear Depolarizatio Ratio 9 m/s 4.5 m/s 4000 ALTITUDE (m) radar bright band freezing level

10:46 11:37 Shear IOP 9c – 20 July 07 Passage of the frontal zone, with a Mesoscale Convective System inbedded The waves like structures seen in the data just prior to the arrival of the thunderstorm are due to shear between inflow and outflow regions ALTITUDE A.G.L. (m) TIME (UTC) THUNDERSTORM Range corrected signals at 1064 nm

21:00 04:00 00:30 BASIL – Rhine Valley Supersite (Lat: ° N, Long: 8.06 E, Elev.: 140 m) July 2007 – Water vapour mixing ratio g/kg 1 0 Height a.s.l. (m) TIME (UTC)  T = 5 min,  z = 150 m mixing ratio (g/kg)

10:46 11:37 10:46 11:37 Range corrected signals at 1064 nm Water vapour mixing ratio

 1064  532  355  355  532

Particle Backscatter Ratio at 1064 nm

Particle Backscatter Ratio at 532 nm

1-D approach 2-D approach

mRmR