My Own Health Report: Case Study for Pragmatic Research Marcia Ory Texas A&M Health Science Center Presentation at: CPRRN Annual Grantee Meeting October.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Advertisements

Introduction to the unit and mixed methods approaches to research Kerry Hood.
Study Objectives and Questions for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Engaging Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Research
Introduction to the User’s Guide for Developing a Protocol for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research.
The Olympic Team Trials: An Orientation to the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Breakthrough Series* Joe Kyle, MPH Kim McCoy, MPH, MS *some adaptations.
The Community Engagement Studio: Strengthening Research Capacity through Community Engagement Consuelo H. Wilkins, MD, MSCI Executive Director, Meharry.
Program Evaluation and Measurement Janet Myers. Objectives for today… To define and explain concepts and terms used in program evaluation. To understand.
Economic Analysis and Management Todd Wagner, PhD.
NRCOI March 5th Conference Call
Cancer Disparities Research Partnership Program Process & Outcome Evaluation Amanda Greene, PhD, MPH, RN Paul Young, MBA, MPH Natalie Stultz, MS NOVA Research.
SWIFT School Wide Integrated Framework for Transformation
Clinical Management Nutr 564: Management Summer 2003.
Clinical Management Nutr 564: Management Summer 2005.
Tathmini GBV: Evaluating Comprehensive Gender-Based Violence Program Scale-up in Tanzania Susan Settergren Futures Group.
Health Systems and the Cycle of Health System Reform
Proposed Cross-center Project Survey of Federally Qualified Health Centers Vicky Taylor & Vicki Young.
FORMATIVE EVALUATION Intermediate Injury Prevention Course August 23-26, 2011, Billings, MT.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.
Nursing Care Makes A Difference The Application of Omaha Documentation System on Clients with Mental Illness.
Designing Survey Instrument to Evaluate Implementation of Complex Health Interventions: Lessons Learned Eunice Chong Adrienne Alayli-Goebbels Lori Webel-Edgar.
Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 18 Mixed Methods and Other Special Types of Research.
SESIH Redesign Update Older Persons and Chronic Care Project Paul Preobrajensky Manager Redesign Program 19 September 2007.
Sue Huckson Program Manager National Institute of Clinical Studies Improving care for Mental Health patients in Emergency Departments.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Dissemination and Implementation Ellen Goldstein, MA, Kevin Grumbach, MD Translating Practice into Evidence: Community Engaged Research.
Barbara Resnick, PhD, CRNP, FAAN, FAANP
Overview of Chapter The issues of evidence-based medicine reflect the question of how to apply clinical research literature: Why do disease and injury.
Secondary Translation: Completing the process to Improving Health Daniel E. Ford, MD, MPH Vice Dean Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Introduction to Clinical.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Setting a Culture for Innovation Penn Medicine Center for Health Care Innovation Shivan Mehta, MD, MBA Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division.
Clinical Quality Public Hearing June 7, 2012 HIT Standards & Policy Committees Summary: June 20, 2012 Marjorie Rallins, Clinical Quality WG, HIT Standards.
Begin at the Beginning introduction to evaluation Begin at the Beginning introduction to evaluation.
Liberating the NHS : An Information Revolution Kathy Mason DH Informatics Directorate.
Module II: Developing a Vision and Results Orientation Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24,
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
1 Evaluation of Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Initiatives Meredith B. Rosenthal, PhD February 24, 2009.
Sustainability Planning Framework and Process Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24, 2015 ©
Research article structure: Where can reporting guidelines help? Iveta Simera The EQUATOR Network workshop 10 October 2012, Freiburg, Germany.
Welcome to Program Evaluation Overview of Evaluation Concepts Copyright 2006, The Johns Hopkins University and Jane Bertrand. All rights reserved. This.
Introduction to OR/IR: purpose and definitions Jane Kengeya-Kayondo, WHO/TDR.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
Guidelines Recommandations. Role Ideal mediator for bridging between research findings and actual clinical practice Ideal tool for professionals, managers,
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Open Forum: Scaling Up and Sustaining Interventions Moderator: Carol O'Donnell, NCER
Why are we Here? Russell E. Glasgow, Ph.D. University of Colorado School of Medicine With thanks to the NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory.
Implementation Science: Finding Common Ground and Perspectives Laura Reichenbach, Evidence Project, Population Council International Conference on Family.
LifeCIT Development and pilot evaluation of a web-supported programme of Constraint Induced Therapy following stroke (LifeCIT) Meagher C 1, Conlon A 2,
National Cancer Institute U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Dissemination & Implementation Research: Study Designs.
PRAGMATIC Study Designs: Elderly Cancer Trials
The PRECIS-2 tool: Matching Intent with Methods David Hahn, MD, MS, WREN Director Department of Family Medicine & Community Health University.
Tim Friede Department of Medical Statistics
Stages of Research and Development
BC SUPPORT Unit: Overview and update
Translating Research Into Practice: Pragmatic Research Approaches
Incorporating Evaluation into a Clinical Project
Health Systems Analysis
Introduction.
Russell Glasgow Marina McCreight Borsika Rabin
Clinical Studies Continuum
IMPROVE HEALTH IN YOUR PRACTICE
Pre-implementation Processes Implementation, Adoption, and Utility of Family History in Diverse Care Settings Study Lori A. Orlando, MD MHS.
An Information Technology tool to support implementation
A Path of Learning and Improvement
What can implementation research offer?
Diversity and Reform of the aged care system
Siân Curtis, PhD OVC Evaluation Dissemination Meeting,
Regulatory Perspective of the Use of EHRs in RCTs
Presentation transcript:

My Own Health Report: Case Study for Pragmatic Research Marcia Ory Texas A&M Health Science Center Presentation at: CPRRN Annual Grantee Meeting October 2013

Pragmatic Research: Theory & Practice Trial Definitions: Contrasts A pragmatic trial is a real- world test in a real-world population An explanatory trial is a specialized experiment in a specialized population and often optimal setting Practical Example The MOHR study is designed to develop rapid, actionable evidence around the use of patient-reported outcomes in patient care.

‣ Diverse populations ‣ Questions from and important to stakeholders ‣ Multiple, heterogeneous settings ‣ Comparison conditions are real-world alternatives ‣ Multiple outcomes important to decision and policy makers Pragmatic Study Methods: Key Characteristics

Pragmatic Features of MOHR Relevant Diverse, real-world primary care settings; Embed MOHR into ongoing clinical processes Rigorous Cluster randomized, delayed intervention design Rapid Eighteen months from concept, planning, and execution Resource Informative Low cost; studying costs and cost-effectiveness under different delivery conditions Transparent Report on adaptations, failures, variation across sites and implementation models, lessons learned Riley WT, et al. Rapid, responsive, relevant (R3) research… Clin Transl Med 2013;2(1):10

Rapid Timeline: Four Research Stages

Designing a Pragmatic Trial: Balancing Rigor and Pragmatic Approaches Common features Randomization of immediate & delayed groups within pairs Study wide participant outcome goal (~150 outcome surveys per clinic setting) MOHR tool assessments Contextual and cost assessment Site specific features Selected practice sites purposively Different recruitment strategies—evolving over time Could vary how collected General guidance of data to be gathered

Key Features: Choice of Study Population Desire to have as broad as a population as possible Key factor: Avoid having staff select the “most responsive patients” Strategies: Recruit by type of patient visit (wellness or chronic care visits) By time of recruitment (e.g., Tuesdays and Thursdays) Indicate number of refusals

Diversity in Practice Partners: Early Intervention Sites

Key Features: Tailor Implementation Involvement of research and clinical stakeholder- circles of teams Discussions regarding what is possible regarding assessment and intervention Example: Changed implementation—from incorporation of MOHR into electronic health records to figuring out what would work best in each setting

Practice MOHR Implementation

Key Features: Choice of Measures Rapid decisions were facilitated by prior work identifying patient reported outcomes Still needed to discuss pros/cons of different decisions Couldn’t fully reflect 5 A framework How to fit all the essential behaviors into assessment Streamline to focus on patient behaviors and goal setting, practice behaviors not clinical outcomes

Pragmatic Research Trials: Conclusions Pragmatic design do not mean “lack of rigor” Pragmatic designs require an understanding of the context in which research is being conducted Important to understand common and flexible elements of PRTs Pragmatic designs can result in more rapid research translation

Revisiting Rapid Timeline  What is the ideal amount of time for a multi-center project such as MOHR?  What do you gain and lose from an accelerated time frame?  Are there settings where acceleration is likely to be more or less successful?