Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management © Elkus Manfredi Architects Franklin & Marshall College.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
April 21, 2010 Barbara C. Jordan Elementary School Update Presented by.
Advertisements

Skyscraper Construction
Optimizing “Big Box” Construction Lauren Hughes Josh Hogan Kevin Hanson Joseph Garrott Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.
TECHNICAL ASSIGNMENT #1 – NATHAN BRASKEY SUNNYVALE PLAZA [Cooper Carry, Inc.]
The University Sciences Building Northeast, USA Final Presentation Chris Dunlay Structural Option Dr. Boothby.
C AMPUS S QUARE H ARRISBURG, P ENNSYLVANIA A NDREW M ARTIN | C ONSTRUCTION M ANAGEMENT | A PRIL 12, 2010.
Kyle Goodyear BAE in Construction Management Pennsylvania State University Senior Thesis Presentation April 12, 2010.
Pennsylvania College Of Technology Dauphin Hall Williamsport, Pennsylvania Aubert Ndjolba Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Thesis Advisor: Dr.
2001 Winter Presentation. Site Location Site View.
Crocker West Building State College, Pa Eric M. FosterStructural OptionSpring 2009.
Frank Burke Structural Option Sallie Mae HQ Reston, VA.
The Warrenton Aquatics and Recreation Facility Warrenton, Virginia Derek DiPiazza Construction Management.
Courtesy of Holbert Apple Associates Georgia Avenue Building Introduction Statistics Gravity System Lateral System Problem Statement & Solution.
Daniel Suter Construction Management AE Senior Thesis Presentation The Pennsylvania State University Unknown Data Center Somewhere, USA
Bethesda Triangle Brian Groark Construction Management Faculty Consultant: Dr. Messner.
360 State Street New Haven  CT  Structural | Sabrina Duk | T. Boothby.
Dan Packer Construction Management Senior Thesis April 16, 2002
George Read Hall The University of Delaware
Board of Education Presentation 2015 Referendum Projects September 9, 2015 Update.
Hershey Research Park Building One Jonathan Krepps Structural Option Senior Thesis 2013 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
Senior Thesis Structural Option Ryan Friis Spring Morgan St. Chicago, IL 111 Morgan St. Chicago, IL Ryan Friis Structural Option.
All Hakuna Resort photos in courtesy of LMN Development LLC Young Jeon Structural Option Advisor: Heather Sustersic Hakuna Resort AE Senior Thesis 2015.
Introduction Connected to existing Benton Hall via skywalk Size: 103,154 SF above grade on 4 levels 82,661 SF below grade parking on 3 levels Cost: $23,651,159.
Team Central Winter Presentationslide 1 of 65 Winter Presentation AEC Global Team Class 2002 Winter presentation Team Central.
GARY NEWMAN STRUCTURES OPTION ADVISOR: DR. HANAGAN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION SPRING 2008.
Kennedy Krieger Institute Outpatient Medical Center Baltimore, Marylan d Katie Sennett Construction Management Dr. Messner Spring 2008.
Council Rock High School South Seth Glinski Construction Management Spring 2003 Thesis.
CARDEROCK SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Bethesda, Maryland Joe Hirsch | Construction Management | Dr. Magent.
First Baptist Church of Doylestown Senior Thesis Structural Emphasis James Chester Preliminary Phase II Design.
Charles Miller Construction Option Spring Dr. Riley WestEnd25.
BRYAN DARRIN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION MILLENNIUM HALL DREXEL CAMPUS PHILADELPHIA, PA.
Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Washington, DC M ICHAEL F UNK Construction Management.
Army National Guard Readiness Center Arlington, VA Arne Kvinnesland Construction Management AE Senior Thesis Final Presentation, Spring 2010 The Pennsylvania.
Lancaster, PA Courtyard by Marriott Danielle Shetler - Structural Option Senior Thesis - Spring 2005.
Caitlin Ferrell Structural Option Senior Thesis Presentation Spring 2006 The Erie Convention Center and Sheraton Hotel Erie, Pennsylvania Architectural.
The Health Care Center Dauphin County, PA Ken Lorenz Penn State University Architectural Engineering Construction Management April 17, 2007.
Wilsdorf Hall Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Construction Management Option Senior Thesis.
Waynesburg Central High School Waynesburg, Pennsylvania Robert Owen Brennan The Pennsylvania State University Construction Management.
Whiteland Village Mary Longenecker Structural Option Senior Thesis August 7, 2007.
DEREK BAUER CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AE SENIOR THESIS 2008 PENN STATE UNIVERSITY AE SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION APRIL 15, 2008 OFFICE/RETAIL BUILDING WASHINGTON,
New Middle School Geneva, Il Greg Kemerer AE Senior Thesis 2006 – CM Option.
Senior Thesis 2006 The Pennsylvania State University
UPMC Passavant Pavilion & Addition Pittsburgh, Pa Jeremy McGrath Construction Management Senior Thesis Presentation 2009 The Pennsylvania State University.
Jonathan Goodroad Structural Option 2005 Thesis Penn State AE Delaware State University Administration and Student Services Building.
Todd McCaskey Spring 2006 Senior Thesis Construction Management Penn State University Todd McCaskey’s Senior Thesis The Pennsylvania State University Architectural.
Sullivan Trail Junior High Pocono Summit, Pennsylvania Andrew Mellow Goals Background Drawings Site Plan Schedule April 13, 2005.
Andrew Diehl The Pennsylvania State University Architectural Engineering Department Structural Option 5 th Year Senior Thesis Project “The Comparison of.
151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions 151 First Side Pittsburgh, PA.
Eastern USA University Academic Center Alexander AltemoseIStructural Option.
Arts & Humanities Instructional Building Noah J. Ashbaugh Construction Management 2006.
Thesis Research Proposal Aimee Bashore Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA.
Brandon mckee ae senior thesis 2007 construction management penn state university ambridge area high school Ambridge Area High School ambridge, pennsylvania.
Michael A. Troxell Structural Option Senior Thesis 2006 The College of Business Administration Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona.
Biobehavioral Health Building The Pennsylvania State University Daniel Bodde Structural Option Advisor – Heather Sustersic.
THE NORTHBROOK CORPORATE CENTER Redesign of the Lateral Load Resisting System.
Arlington Gateway Hotel 801 North Glebe Road Arlington, Virginia Michael Gray Penn State University AE Senior Thesis Presentation 2005.
Bellefonte Area High School Mark Demianovich Construction Management 2007.
Hunter Woron Spring 2012 Structural Professor Parfitt.
Precast Concrete Panel Group 6 Alex Cooper Yadir Avila Erjan Kadrakunov.
North Hall | American University| Washington D.C.
Pearl Condominiums Philadelphia, PA
The Stuckeman Family Building
Design of a Commercial Shopping Center
Advisor: Professor M. Kevin Parfitt
Redifer Commons Addition & Renovation Project
Wrangle Hill Elementary School New Castle, DE
Acterna Headquarters John M Sekel, EIT Germantown, Maryland
Project Background Type of building: Mixed-use residential building
North Shore at Canton The Pennsylvania State University
Masonry Bearing Walls.
Presentation transcript:

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management © Elkus Manfredi Architects Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA

Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management 1. Project Overview 2. Analysis 1 – Building Information Modeling (BIM) Utilization 3. Analysis 2 – Composite Metal Deck v. Precast Concrete Plank Flooring 4. Analysis 3 – Cold Weather Construction 5. Conclusion Outline of Presentation Topics

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Project Cost Project Cost –$15,250,000 Project Size Project Size –111,641 SF –6 stories Project Duration Project Duration –15 months –5/8/06 to 7/31/07 Project Delivery Method Project Delivery Method –CM at Risk with a GMP Project Overview

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management 81% Residential 81% Residential –Top 5 floors containing 65 units - 1, 3 and 4 bedrooms –Handicap-accessible unit, common lounge, and laundry facilities on each floor 15% Retail 15% Retail 4% Offices 4% Offices Building Features

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Spread footings with selective compaction grouting Spread footings with selective compaction grouting Strip footings for masonry foundation walls Strip footings for masonry foundation walls Structural steel Structural steel Slab on grade Slab on grade Composite slab on deck Composite slab on deck Load-bearing block and precast hollow core concrete plank Load-bearing block and precast hollow core concrete plank Façade is brick veneer, metal sheeting, and calcium silicate masonry units Façade is brick veneer, metal sheeting, and calcium silicate masonry units Building Design

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Features Features –Demolition of historical buildings –Limited pedestrian traffic –Keep footbridge accessible –Reroute gas and electric lines Site Plan – Existing Conditions Campus

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Features Features –One main gate for deliveries –Centrally located crane and laydown area –Open site Site Layout Plan – Superstructure Campus

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Digital representation of the building process to facilitate exchange and interoperability of information in digital format Digital representation of the building process to facilitate exchange and interoperability of information in digital format BIM covers geometry, spatial relationships, geographic information, quantities, and properties of building components BIM covers geometry, spatial relationships, geographic information, quantities, and properties of building components Application possibilities of BIM include coordination of trades, activity sequencing, and scope of work details Application possibilities of BIM include coordination of trades, activity sequencing, and scope of work details Analysis 1 – Building Information Modeling

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Goals Goals –Address benefits of BIM, focusing on owners –Look at the integration of BIM with operations and maintenance procedures –Review software applications Outcomes Outcomes –BIM provides owner with visualization of building –Ease of coordination during construction –Organization of maintenance operations –Benefits for future renovations BIM Goals and Outcomes

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Benefits Benefits –Coordination of trades –More detail, more accurate estimates –Reduced paper usage Drawbacks Drawbacks –Integration of new technology Cost, Training, Capability Cost, Training, Capability –Industry’s willingness to change BIM after project completion BIM after project completion –Turnover as-built model, only good if accurate –Ease of future renovation Design and updates Design and updates –Reduce storage space –Helpful for operations and maintenance Questionnaire Results

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Penn State Penn State –University Park Project Cost Project Cost –$60,000,000 Building Size Building Size –113,000 SF Design Phase Design Phase –October 2005 to April 2007 Construction Phase Construction Phase –January 2007 to January 2009 Building Features Building Features –library, mock courtroom, classrooms, offices, cafeteria, and parking BIM Case Study – Dickinson School of Law Building

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Decision to use BIM late in 2006 Decision to use BIM late in 2006 Hope that additional costs will be outweighed by any “savings" from use of BIM Hope that additional costs will be outweighed by any “savings" from use of BIM –Easier coordination –Less conflicts –Less time lost in field High quality as-builts High quality as-builts Ease of maintenance operations Ease of maintenance operations BIM Case Study – Dickinson School of Law Building

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Owner benefits before, during, and after construction Owner benefits before, during, and after construction Owner characteristics Owner characteristics –Understand time = money –Enforce training for using the technology –Set standards among design, construction, and conclusion of project Facility Management Facility Management –Knowledgeable employees –Update technology BIM from an Owner Perspective

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Tool to maintain as-built model Tool to maintain as-built model Facility manager functions Facility manager functions –Space and asset management –Project management –Emergency management –Maintenance management Facility manager features Facility manager features –Tabular or graphical output –view, query, pan, zoom, print, and share facility drawings –Planning, tracking, and managing BIM Software Review – Autodesk FMDesktop

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management 1. Decision to invest the money into the technology 2. Ability to hire knowledgeable designers and contractors 3. Eliminates room for drawing storage 4. Simplifies maintenance operations 5. Eases future renovations BIM Conclusions – Relating BIM to Franklin & Marshall

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Problem Problem –Current system is a combination of composite metal deck and precast hollow core concrete plank Goal Goal –Compare two systems based on methods, schedule, and cost Outcomes Outcomes –Precast concrete plank has higher cost –Composite metal deck has longer schedule –Precast concrete plank better suited to repetition and residential construction Analysis 2 – Composite Metal Deck v. Precast Plank

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Floor System Comparison Composite Metal Deck More on-site labor More on-site labor Formwork Formwork Reinforcement Reinforcement More bearing walls needed for support More bearing walls needed for support More affordable equipment More affordable equipment Horizontal load resistance Horizontal load resistance Precast Concrete Plank Eliminates on-site prep work Eliminates on-site prep work High strength – less support needed High strength – less support needed Substantial crane needed Substantial crane needed Delivery expenses Delivery expenses Less sound transmission Less sound transmission Longer fire safety rating Longer fire safety rating

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Main Functions: 1. Platform during construction 2. Act as a form 3. Provide positive bending reinforcement for a concrete slab 4. Provide resistance to horizontal wind or earthquake loads Flooring Design – Composite Metal Deck

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Flooring Design – Composite Metal Deck Deck and Bearing Wall Deck and Steel Beam

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Flooring Design – Precast Hollow Core Concrete Plank Speedy production and erection Speedy production and erection Fire protection rating up to 4 hrs Fire protection rating up to 4 hrs Noise control Noise control Unique designs, colors, and textures Unique designs, colors, and textures

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Exterior Wall Connection Interior Wall Connection Exterior Wall Connection Interior Wall Connection Flooring Design – Precast Hollow Core Concrete Plank

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Composite Metal Deck Cost: $1,288,000 Cost: $1,288,000 Schedule: 45 days Schedule: 45 days Precast Concrete Plank Cost: $1,583,500 Cost: $1,583,500 Schedule: 30 days Schedule: 30 days Cost and Schedule Comparisons Comparison parameters 5 upper floors of building 5 upper floors of building Total of 93,034 square feet Total of 93,034 square feet Same crew size for each system Same crew size for each system

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management 1. Precast plank approximately $300,000 more than composite metal deck 10% of structural cost 10% of structural cost 2% entire budget cost 2% entire budget cost 2. Composite metal deck 15 days longer than precast plank 3. Varying floor layouts and uses 1 st floor tenant space 1 st floor tenant space 2 nd - Roof are repeated pattern and residential space 2 nd - Roof are repeated pattern and residential space Flooring Analysis Conclusions

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Problem Problem –Concrete activities scheduled during winter months, effect on those activities –Schedule and cost impacts Goals Goals –Analyze requirements for cold weather concrete work –Analyze effects on schedule and budget Outcomes Outcomes –Concrete activities on critical path, difficult to change –Expedite work to avoid working in extreme conditions Analysis 3 – Cold Weather Construction

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Cold weather construction at 40 o F Cold weather construction at 40 o F Average temperatures for Lancaster, PA Average temperatures for Lancaster, PA –December 40 o F/24 o F –January 35 o F/19 o F –February 39 o F/21 o F –March 49 o F/29 o F Air-entraining agents Air-entraining agents Increase set time Increase set time Reduced strength gain rates Reduced strength gain rates Cold Weather and Concrete

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Concrete activities on critical path Concrete activities on critical path Steel delayed, delaying concrete work Steel delayed, delaying concrete work Bulk of concrete work in December, January, February, and March Bulk of concrete work in December, January, February, and March Expedite work Expedite work –Increase crew size –Extend working hours –Weekend work Schedule Analysis

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Temporary Heat Temporary Heat –Cost of natural gas –Heater rentals Temporary Protection Temporary Protection –Labor (overtime) Extended hours Extended hours Weekend work Weekend work –Material Hoses Hoses Blankets Blankets Plastic window covers Plastic window covers Additional cost approximately $145,000 Additional cost approximately $145,000 Cost and Material Analysis

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Expedited work Expedited work –Longer working hours –Weekend work Concrete protection Concrete protection –Temporary heaters –Steam hoses –Insulating blankets –Plastic window/opening covers Admixtures Admixtures Need to have a good temporary protection plan Need to have a good temporary protection plan Cold Weather Conclusions

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Analysis 1 – Building Information Modeling Analysis 1 – Building Information Modeling –Design phase: aid in visualization, reduce rework –Construction phase: ease coordination, reduce change orders –Lifecycle: ease maintenance operations and future renovations Analysis 2 – Composite Metal Deck v. Precast Plank Analysis 2 – Composite Metal Deck v. Precast Plank –Precast plank suited for residential and repetition projects –Precast plank would increase cost by 2%and decrease schedule by 3 weeks Analysis 3 – Cold Weather Construction Analysis 3 – Cold Weather Construction –Need a good temporary protection plan –Schedule can be reduced by expediting work Summary and Conclusions

Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA Aimee Bashore Senior Thesis 2007Construction Management Questions? Acknowledgments Acknowledgments –Penn State AE Faculty –Penn State OPP Personnel –Alexander Building Construction, LLC –Campus Apartments, Inc –Elkus|Manfredi Architects –Franklin & Marshall College –BIM Questionnaire Participants –My Friends and Family