Catherine Beaudry École Polytechnique de Montréal Alliances et partenariats : un défi pour les biotech Alliances and partnerships: a challenge for biotechs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INNOVATION AND PSD ISSUES IN THE EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA REGION Alfred Watkins (37277) Lead PSD Specialist ECSPF.
Advertisements

Presentation to Genome Canada September 27, 2011 ACOA’s Approach to Commercialization.
Entrepreneurship for Economic Growth A Review of Current Findings and Implications.
Promoting the Demand for Partnerships for Innovation Bob Hodgson Zernike (UK) Limited Lisbon December 2001 ZERNIKE (UK) Partnerships for Innovation: Fostering.
FINANCING ICT INNOVATIONS: TRENDS AND CHALLENGES OF THE VENTURE CAPITAL MARKET IN EUROPE - THE ROLE OF THE GOVERNMENT Yannis Pierrakis Head of Investments.
BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL LITERACY FOR YOUNG ENTREPRENEURS: EVIDENCE FROM BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA Miriam Bruhn and Bilal Zia (World Bank, DECFP)
Knowledge and Collaboration Networks CS 8803 – Networks and Enterprises.
Innovation and Commercialization in the Canadian Bioproduct Industry Pamela Laughland John Cranfield David Sparling University of Guelph.
Factors Fostering Academics to Start up New Ventures: an Assessment of Italian Founders' Incentives Fini R., Grimaldi R., Sobrero M. University of Bologna,
New Venture Financials and Business Valuation One Asset Management Limited.
© BIOTECanada 2010 Industry Comparison by GDP and Percentage of the Economy Note: Data based on preliminary 2009 GDP figures. Sources: Source Data - Statistics.
South Carolina Economic Summit Douglas P. Woodward Director, Division of Research Moore School of Business University of South Carolina.
Keeping older workers committed and employed by means of in/formal HRD initiatives Dr. A.A.M. (Ida) Wognum M. (Martine) Horstink MSc. Wognum-HorstinkCedefop.
Innovation: The BDC perspective By: Theodore Homa, International Consulting.
Supporting technology transfer: The role of business incubators John Gabriel Goddard Knowledge Economy Forum VII Ancona, Italy.
IN SEARCH OF IMPACT AND OUTCOME INDICATORS BASED ON VANCOUVER BIOTECH CLUSTER STUDIES Monica Salazar & Adam Holbrook CPROST-Simon Fraser University Vancouver,
Growth Firms Project Chris Parsley, Manager Small Business Policy Branch Industry Canada From Data to Research for Policy OECD Growth Firms Meeting.
Universities and Firms: A Comparative Analysis of the Interactions Between Market Process, Organizational Strategies and Governance Seminar, September.
Australia’s Innovation Action Plan – Self-Assessment Report June 2010 Barry Jones Industry and Small Business Policy Division.
Work Allocation Forms: Substitution between Full-time, Part-time and Contracted Labour in the Creative Industries Ralitza Dobreva and Gregory John Lee.
Enabling a Global Vision for the Baltic cleantech industry: Latvia country case Dr.sc.eng. Juris Vanags Latvian Biotechnology association Interregional.
INTERNATIONAL POLICY CONFERENCE “COMPETITIVENESS & DIVERSIFICATION: STRATEGIC CHALLENGES IN A PETROLEUM- RICH ECONOMY” National Systems of Innovation (NSI):
National Research Council Industrial Research Assistance Program (NRC-IRAP) Sault Ste Marie Innovation Center Finding Funding.
Panagiotis KARNIOURAS NCP for SPACE / Technology Transfer Consultant PRAXI/ HELP-FORWARD Network … the Greek experience 9 October 2009.
Dr. Ninko Kostovski UACS Importance of Availability of Sources of Finance for Small and Medium Enterprises Ninko Kostovski,PhD University American College.
National Research Council Industrial Research Assistance Program Characteristics of Firms that Grow from Small to Medium Size Presented by Denise Guillemette.
The Small-Firm Sector. Defining the Small-firm Sector EU definition of SMEs –by number of employees micro enterprises small enterprises medium enterprises.
Political Winds, Financing Constraints and Pharmaceutical Innovation Joshua Linn (UIC) and Robert Kaestner (UIC and NBER) November 9, 2007 Presentation.
National Innovation Strategy of the Republic of Moldova. Implementation, mechanisms and measures Ghenadie CERNEI Director, Agency for Innovation.
Barriers to participation in continuing education: The Czech Republic case Věra Czesaná National Training Fund Lille, May 21th –
Strategic Technology Alliances Prasada Reddy Centre for Entrepreneurship University of Oslo, Norway.
Marcus Bellamy Alun Jones Session 6: Knowledge & Collaboration Networks.
"The socio-economic impact of universities on local regions: A centralized empirical approach for Canada". Presentation by A. Hecht (WLU) and S. Mayer.
Influence of vocational training on wages and mobility of workers - evidence from Poland Jacek Liwiński Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
Innovation in the Supply Chain: lessons from the CBI/QinetiQ Innovation Survey Hugh Morgan Williams Chairman, Canford Group Vice Chair, CBI SME Council.
11-1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Part IV: Start-up Financial Strategy Chapter 11: Funding the Technology Start-up.
Characteristics of firms engaged in collaborations Charlene Lonmo Science, Innovation and Electronic Information Division Statistics Canada Presentation.
Perception des risques liés aux collaborations et partenariats dans les PME de biotechnologie : premiers résultats de l’enquête menée au Québec The perception.
Measuring Inbound Diffusion from Publicly Funded Research Organizations to Innovative Firms: A Statistical Perspective Frances Anderson Science, Innovation.
EU funded R&D collaboration networks in the area of Information Society Technologies and the role of Greek actors Aimilia Protogerou Team for the Technological,
Industrial Research Assistance Program (IRAP) Supporting SME growth through innovation and technology Presentation to Forum Innovation Bogdan Ciobanu,
HOW TO FINANCE INNOVATION PERSISTENTLY? A PANEL DATA STUDY ON EXPORTING FIRMS IN SWEDEN WRSA Hans Lööf and Pardis Nabavi Centre of Excellence.
Canada-Poland Cooperation in S&T Mona Ip Canadian Embassy, Warsaw.
UK INNOVATION SURVEY 2005 CIS4 – Introduction and Guide A brief introduction to the survey Some description of the data and analytical results, special.
Offshoring and Productivity: A Micro-data Analysis Jianmin Tang and Henrique do Livramento Presentation to The 2008 World Congress on National Accounts.
International Manufacturing Network Embeddedness and Innovative Performance Guannan Xu.
Technology Commercialization- BA468X Financing Your Venture.
MOEA SMEA APEC 2009 SME Innovation Seminar Innovation in SME Financing and Marketing Session II: Establishing a Market – based Economic Environment Su,
1 Trends in Science, Technology and Industry: An OECD Perspective Jerry Sheehan OECD Science & Technology Policy Division Knowledge Economy Forum III Budapest,
1 Int. J. of Transitions and Innovation Systems Special Issue: Clusters, System of Innovation and Intangible for fostering growth: finding the keys for.
HÉTFA Research Institute and Center for Economic and Social Analysis HÉTFA Research Institute For applicable knowledge Budapest, Hungary Managerial.
HEPTech Open Innovation Industry Forum Survey Report Executive survey on open innovation 2013 B. Denis – Bucharest 8 th October 2013.
1 Boško Nektarijević Executive Manager, Balkan Security Network Opportunities for SMEs in Horizon 2020 E-learning I Balkan.
1 Commercialization Segment Introduction Ralph Heinrich UNECE Team of Specialists on Intellectual Property Skopje, 1 April 2009.
Small Firms in the Credit Crisis: Evidence from the UK Survey of SME Finances* Presentation to CBI SME Council 7 th July 2009 Dr. Stuart Fraser Centre.
INSTITUTES OF INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT: THEIR ROLE IN REGIONAL CLUSTERS Anna Bykova PhD student, Higher School of Economics Russia 23th September 2011 Milocer,
Strategic Alliance. Alliance The alliance is a cooperation or collaboration which aims for a synergy. The alliance often involves technology transfer.
Impact of the inter-firm cooperation on company's performance: major changes during the economic crisis November 27, 2013 Oksana Kabakova.
Canadian College Student Attrition for Student Aid Receivers By: Paul J. Madgett University of Ottawa.
Policy issues in business innovation strategy and the marketing and distribution of innovation in Canada Catherine Beaudry Polytechnique Montréal One-Day.
Factors influencing innovativeness of SMEs: the case of emerging transition economy Sonja Radas Ljiljana Božić The Institute of Economics, Zagreb.
Business Essentials 9e Ebert/Griffin Entrepreneurship, New Ventures, and Business Ownership chapter three.
Enabling Building Efficiency: The NYC Urban Technology Innovation Center TIMOTHY CROSS, COLUMBIA ENGINEERING IEEE INNOVATION DAY POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE.
EVALUATIONS THAT CHALLENGE THE STATUS QUO: USE OF STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES IN MEASURING ADDITIONALITY Australasian Evaluation Society International Conference.
Chapter 8 Learning thorugh alliances
Collaborative Expedition Workshop #71 National Science Foundation
CHAPTER 9 Cooperative Strategy
From research to markets : why and how
Medical Technology Industry Sector Blueprint
How does network position affect firms’ innovation?
Presentation transcript:

Catherine Beaudry École Polytechnique de Montréal Alliances et partenariats : un défi pour les biotech Alliances and partnerships: a challenge for biotechs CIRANO, 19 septembre 2008

Collaboration in Canada In , 52.6% of biotech firms participated to at least one collaborative alliance Large (> 150 employees): 59.6% (10% of the sample) Medium ( employees): 56.6% (15% of the sample) Small (<50 employees):50.9 % (75% of the sample) What are the most common types of collaborative arrangements? With which partners do SMEs cooperate? Are SMEs different from larger firms in terms of the number of collaboration arrangements to which they participate? Do specific characteristics of a firm influence how much it collaborates?  negative binomial regressions 19 th September of 17Factors that affect collaboration of small biotech firms

Why collaborate? To survive! (Oliver 2004) Access to financial resources R&D: long and expensive Difficult for small firms that depend on angels, venture capital, debt, grants, alliances Access to human capital Lack of skilled labour is one of the principal reason to collaborate Access to knowledge and competences Rather than developping within the firm Learning networks are the source of innovation (Powell et al. 1996) 19 th September of 17Factors that affect collaboration of small biotech firms

Data Statistics Canada Biotechnology use and development surveys, 1999, 2001, 2003, 2005 Binary variable – collaboration yes/no Count variable – number of collaborative arrangement 19 th September of 17Factors that affect collaboration of small biotech firms Purpose\PartnerPrivate enterprisePublic institutionTotal Knowledgeeccpri n eccpub n ecc n Production, market, capitalecpcpri n ecpcpub n ecpc n Totalecepri n ecipub n ec n Purpose\PartnerPrivate enterprisePublic institutionTotal Knowledgeneccpri n neccpub n necc n Production, market, capitalnecpcpri n necpcpub n necpc n Totalnecepri n necipub n nec n *

Evolution of collaboration Percentage of firms that collaborate Small56.0%58.8 %50.3 %50.9 % Medium80.0 %51.6 %49.4 %56.6 % Large81.6 %80.9 %59.0 %59.6 % All62.5 %60.3 %51.2 %52.6 % Average number of collaborations Small Medium Large All th September of 17Factors that affect collaboration of small biotech firms Credit crunch in 2001  reduction in collaboration in 2003

With whom and why? Among those that collaborate With other firms47.8 %61.5 %47.4 %62.3 % With public institutions73.7 %48.2 %39.8 %68.6 % For knowledge purposes96.0 %91.6 %65.7 %95.0 % For commercialisation purposes57.6 %33.0 %42.2 %35.7 % 19 th September of 17Factors that affect collaboration of small biotech firms

With whom and why? Proportion among all firms With another firm29.8 %37.0 %24.2 %36.4 % Small25.4 %35.3 %24.6 %36.2 % Medium53.4 %35.3 %29.2 %35.8 % Large24.4 %48.2 %15.9 %38.9 % With a public institution46.2 %29.0 %20.4 %36.1 % Small38.1 %28.8 %19.0 %33.3 % Medium65.0 %18.0 %17.3 %42.6 % Large71.2 %44.8 %31.5 %47.3 % For knowledge purposes60.1 %55.2 %33.7 %50.0 % For commercialization purposes36.0 %19.9 %21.5 %18.8 % 19 th September of 17Factors that affect collaboration of small biotech firms Decrease over 4 years of collaboration with public institutions (increase in 2005)

With whom and why? Proportion among all firms With another firm29.8 %37.0 %24.2 %36.4 % With a public institution46.2 %29.0 %20.4 %36.1 % For knowledge purposes60.1 %55.2 %33.7 %50.0 % Small52.4 %52.7 %33.4 %47.8 % Medium80.4 %49.5 %32.6 %57.2 % Large80.4 %76.7 %36.4 %55.7 % For commercialization purposes36.0 %19.9 %21.5 %18.8 % Small33.9 %22.3 %22.8 %18.2 % Medium48.8 %12.0 %16.2 %15.2 % Large30.4 %16.1 %20.9 %28.7 % 19 th September of 17Factors that affect collaboration of small biotech firms Decrease over 4 years of knowledge–related collaboration (increase in 2005)

With whom and why? With firms for knowledge With pub. inst. for knowledge Small 35.35%21.61%31.30% Small 33.79%19.21%31.86% Medium 40.24%17.76%35.75% Medium 20.50%21.14%42.57% Large 57.67%12.61%35.98% Large 47.95%28.70%47.31% All 38.95%19.88%32.47% All 33.35%20.70%35.04% With firms for commercialisation With pub. inst. for commercialisation Small 18.43%16.77%14.28% Small 6.16%9.55%6.55% Medium 12.04%13.68%10.44% Medium 0.00%4.68% Large 16.13%12.94%14.63% Large 0.00%13.34%14.11% All 17.09%15.81%13.72% All 4.38%9.27%7.01% 19 th September of 17Factors that affect collaboration of small biotech firms Following the credit crunch of 2001, firms decreased dramatically their alliances with other firms for knowledge purposes, but maintained their commercialization partnerships Resurgence of knowledge-related alliances in

Collaboration in general (negative binomial regressions) SmallSMEs Number of collaborative arrangements Number of employees (size)++ % of biotech employees++ Age--- Spinoff+++ Products / Processes/+ +/ Number of products and processes Patents / Numbers/-/-/++/ Contracts out/in+//++//++/ Number of contracts out /in+/ % biotech revenue / % biotech exports+/-/-/- Success raising capital / government funds/++//++/ 19 th September of 17Factors that affect collaboration of small biotech firms

Collaboration by type SMEs (small)For knowledgeFor commercialization Nb. collaborative arrangements Number of employees (size)+(+)+ % of biotech employees+ Age(-) -(-) Spinoff+(+)+(+) Products / Processes/+ /-(-)/+(+) Number of products and processes+(+) (+)+(+)+ Patents / Numbers/(+)/(-)+(+)//-(-) Contracts out/in+/+++//+(+) Number of contracts out /in(+)/+(+)+/-/-(-) R&D$ / % biotech R&D+//+(+)/+/-(-)/+(+) % biotech revenue / % bio exports/-(-) /+(+)+(+)/-(-)/ Success K raising / gov’t funds/+(+)+/-(-)+(+)/+(+)/+/+(+) 19 th September of 17Factors that affect collaboration of small biotech firms

Collaboration by partner SMEs (small)With firmsPublic Institutions Nb. collaborative arrangements Number of employees (size)-(-)+ % of biotech employees+(+) Age-(-)(-)+ (+) Spinoff++(+) Products / Processes/(+)-(-)/+(+)//+/+(+) Number of products and processes+(+) Patents / Numbers/(+)+(+)//(-)/(+)/(-) Contracts out/in/+(+) (+)/+(+)/ Number of contracts out /in/-/-+(+)/-(-)(+)/-/+(+) R&D$ / % biotech R&D/-(-)(+)/ % biotech revenue / % bio exports+(+)//-(-) +/ Success K raising / gov’t funds+(+)/+//+(+) 19 th September of 17Factors that affect collaboration of small biotech firms

Collaboration for knowledge SMEs (small)With firmsPublic Institutions Nb. collaborative arrangements Number of employees (size)(+)-(-)+ % of biotech employees+(+)+(-)+(+) Age(-) + (+) Spinoff++(+) Products / Processes+(+)/(+)/+/+ Number of products and processes(+)+(+)+ Patents / Numbers/(+)(+)//(-)/(+)/(-) Contracts out/in/+(+)+(+)/+(+)/+(+)+/+(+)/- Number of contracts out /in-/--/-+(+)/-(-)(+)/-/+(+) R&D$ / % biotech R&D+/(+)/-(-)(+)/ % biotech revenue / % bio exports/-(-) Success K raising / gov’t funds+(+)/-/+(+)+/-(-)/(+) 19 th September of 17Factors that affect collaboration of small biotech firms

Collaboration for commercialization SMEs (small) With firmsPublic Institutions Nb. collaborative arrangements Number of employees (size)(-) % of biotech employees+(+) Age-(-)+(+) Spinoff+(+) (+) Products / Processes/-(-)/++(+)/ /(+) Number of products and processes(+)+(+) Patents / Numbers++(+)//(-) Contracts out/in/+(+) +(+)/-(-) Number of contracts out /in(+)/-/-(-)+/(+)/- R&D$ / % biotech R&D-(-)/+(+)/-/(+)/+(+) % biotech revenue / % bio exports/(+)+/-(-)/+(+)-(-)/+ Success K raising / gov’t funds+(+)/ /+(+)(+)/(+)/+(+) 19 th September of 17Factors that affect collaboration of small biotech firms

Conclusions Younger firms collaborate in a greater number of alliances Spinoffs in general are more likely to have a greater number of collaborative arrangements The number of products and processes has a strong and positive influence on the extent of collaboration Patents needed for commercialization but not for other types of alliances (not in terms of numbers) Contracting out is no substitute for alliances Contracting in makes use of the lab space that would otherwise be used for collaboration Firms with more export revenues are further along the market path and require less to collaborate 19 th September of 17Factors that affect collaboration of small biotech firms

Further research Follow the firms over the years Linked database at Statistics Canada (4 linked surveys) Find out which firms survive and which firms disappear Discover what are the success factors for firm survival and success Link the databases with the science-base network Find the influence of the geographical and technological space on industrial innovation 19 th September of 17Factors that affect collaboration of small biotech firms

Thank you Questions? Here is some of the work being done at École Polytechnique de Montréal 20 th June of 17Factors that affect collaboration of small biotech firms Hairy roots of the Madagascar periwinkle (Catharanthus roseus)