Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Forest Legacy Assessment of Need Identifying Future Forest Legacy Areas Governors Commission for Protecting the Chesapeake Bay through Sustainable Forestry.
Advertisements

Process – Resource Evaluation Design and perform a set of geographically based resource assessments Develop a methodology for prioritizing land according.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Stream Corridors Christine Hall Natural Resources Conservation Service North Jersey RC&D Slides 1-12.
Center for Watershed Protection VACO/VML Meeting June 2, 2010 David J. Hirschman Program Director.
1 Site Capacity and Natural Resource Protection Relationships in Subdivision Design.
Impervious Surface Connectivity and Urban Stream Corridors Land Use Workgroup Meeting January 30, 2014 Steve Stewart Baltimore County.
Title Text for Slide “ The region’s environmental and economic health will improve when we fully implement the Blueprint. The cleanup plan was designed.
Brian Wolyniak Urban Forester Penn State Extension ORDINANCES TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE TREE POPULATIONS.
1 The Challenge Preserving forest cover, parkland and open space can help to meet needs for water quality, air quality, recreation and wildlife habitat.
WOODSHED ANALYSIS Mad River Valley Towns Analysis by Marc Lapin, Chris Rodgers, & David Brynn Winter/Spring 2009.
Shale Gas Drilling County-wide SURFACE DRILLING CONSTRAINTS SPATIAL ANALYSIS EXERCISE.
WOODSHED ANALYSIS Addison County Five Towns Analysis by Marc Lapin, Chris Rodgers, & David Brynn Winter/Spring 2009.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
Fairfax County, Virginia Watershed Management Plans.
Shale Gas Drilling Deep Creek watershed SURFACE DRILLING CONSTRAINTS SPATIAL ANALYSIS EXERCISE.
Every Acre Counts The Newfound Watershed Master Plan Land Conservation Priorities In the Newfound Lake Watershed January 23, 2015 Dan Sundquist GreenFire.
Simulating Future Suburban Development in Connecticut Jason Parent, Daniel Civco, and James Hurd Center for Land Use Education and.
Getting the Big Picture How to Look at Your Watershed Indiana Watershed Planning Guide,
Protecting Working Lands: Through USDA Conservation Programs Denise Coleman National Farm and Ranch Lands Protection Program Manager USDA, Natural Resources.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
Jeremy Erickson, Lucinda B. Johnson, Terry Brown, Valerie Brady, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of MN Duluth.
1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, :30 PM.
Title Text for Slide “ The region’s environmental and economic health will improve when we fully implement the Blueprint. The cleanup plan was designed.
Mapping the future Converting storylines to maps Nasser Olwero GMP, Bangkok April
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Summit Urban Farming Initiative Land Access for Urban Agriculture.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
Morgan and Little Creeks Local Watershed Plan Totten Center, NC Botanical Garden 3 November 2004 Chapel Hill, NC
Jason R. Vogel, Ph.D., P.E. Stormwater Specialist Biosystem and Agricultural Engineering Oklahoma State University.
Integration Of Stormwater Master Plans with Watershed Plans The Link between Flooding and Development September 23, 2008 Bob Murdock, P.E., CFM.
Prioritizing Agricultural Lands for Riparian Buffer Placement in the Raritan Basin: A Geographic Information System (GIS) Model Project Partners: North.
Predicting Sediment and Phosphorus Delivery with a Geographic Information System and a Computer Model M.S. Richardson and A. Roa-Espinosa; Dane County.
1. Natural Resources Conservation Service Strategic Plan Strategic Plan
Saving the Chesapeake’s Great Rivers and Special Places High Resolution Land Cover Data in the Chesapeake Bay Chesapeake Conservancy.
Watershed Protection & CodeNEXT Austin Neighborhoods Council March 25, 2015 Watershed Protection & CodeNEXT Austin Neighborhoods Council March 25, 2015.
Coastal Web Atlases in the Chesapeake Bay Region: Examples from Virginia and Maryland Marcia R. Berman Center for Coastal Resources Management Virginia.
The WLP must be consistent with these objectives 1.maintaining or enhancing an economically valuable supply of commercial timber from the woodlot licence.
WASTE WOOD UTILIZATION WORKSHOP Forest Sustainability Program for Baltimore County, MD June 28, 2006 Donald C. Outen, AICP Natural Resource Manager
Stormwater 101 Ohio Lake Erie Commission Best Local Land Use Practices Kirby Date, AICP.
Municipal GIS Applications JOHN C. CHLARSON, P.E. UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE MUNICIPAL TECHNICAL ADVISORY SERVICE FURE.
A GIS-Based Model to Identify Sensitive Water Resource Properties in Need of Protection 2009 Watershed Science and Technical Conference September 14 &
BRAC RTF CGIA Progress Report July 26, BRAC RTF Task #10 CGIA role Mapping and analysisMapping and analysis Geographic Information SystemsGeographic.
Desktop Analysis Used To: Identify areas that meet certain criteria (e.g. contig forest 50 acres+, id gaps as well, or set lower value in urban area) Identify.
U.S. Department of the Interior Chesapeake Bay Watershed Land Cover Data Series 1984, 1992, 2001, and 2006 U.S. Geological SurveyThe Chesapeake Bay Program.
Presented by George Doubleday 1. What is The Woodlands Purpose of this Research Build and Calibrate Vflo TM model for The Woodlands Compare storms with.
Imagine there’s no tree canopy…....it’s easy if you try.
Characterizing, measuring and visualizing forest resources An inadequate treatment by an unqualified presenter.
Soil Movement in West Virginia Watersheds A GIS Assessment Greg Hamons Dr. Michael Strager Dr. Jingxin Wang.
Annexations as a Means to Preserve Open Space October 29, 2009.
It’s your urban forest - learn it, grow it, maintain it, enjoy it! Celebrating Rural Georgia Georgia Forestry Commission August 2006 Susan Reisch Urban.
Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service.
Assessing Linkages between Nearshore Habitat and Estuarine Fish Communities in the Chesapeake Bay Donna Marie Bilkovic*, Carl H. Hershner, Kirk J. Havens,
Landscape Analysis: 1.Determine 1993 and 2001 Land Cover of the Sougahatchee Basin Sougahatchee Basin 2. Compare 2001 Land Cover to 1993 Land Cover 3.
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN Prince George’s County MNCPP-C Draft: December, 2004.
Green Infrastructure Techniques Runoff Reduction by Area Conservation of natural areas Conservation of natural areas Vegetated buffer, filter strip and.
Helping Communities Protect Wildlife Habitat Emily Brunkhurst Wildlife Biologist NH Fish and Game Taking Action for Wildlife.
Duluth Watersheds Miller Chester Tischer Amity. Aerial Photos.
Update: Where We Are and Feedback Lake George Stream Corridor Management Stake Holder Meeting June 25, 2008.
Conservation Provisions of the 2002 Farm Bill Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002.
MCE: Criteria Development and the Boolean Approach Exercise 2-7.
Agricultural Land Use as it Relates to Land Slope James Plourde, Dr. Bryan Pijanowski Human-Environment Modeling & Analysis Laboratory Purdue University.
Capstone Project GI Analysis C Team. Leadership Forum Local/State GIS planners Planning/ZoningUtilities Citizen Groups USACoE Local Developers Parks &
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service NRCS Programs Applicable to Brownfields Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Community Development Department Ryan’s Landing Planned Unit Development Application No
Agricultural Soil and Water Conservation Stewardship
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
OPEN SPACE/ CONSERVATION
Green Infrastructure Tools for Planning & Management
Healthy Watersheds Consortium
Presentation transcript:

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry future land cover projections GIS-based method to estimate future land cover in a watershed “Leafout analysis” focuses on forest cover Local governments and watershed groups can use method to: evaluate the effect of different watershed protection scenarios on future land cover predict future stream health set numeric land cover goals develop watershed protection recommendations

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry why land cover is important to watersheds Impervious cover – excellent indicator of stream health More than 200 studies on relationship between IC and various measures of stream quality Forest and wetlands are a beneficial cover type from hydrologic, water quality, and habitat standpoint Other pervious areas – majority is often maintained as turf, may include cropland, pasture or grasslands

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry link between forest cover and stream health Stream health rating of Excellent requires no more than 6% IC and at least 65% riparian forest cover (Goetz et al, 2003) Stream health rating of Good requires no more than 10% IC and at least 60% riparian forest cover (Goetz et al, 2003) Watersheds with at least 65% forest cover usually had a healthy aquatic insect community (Booth, 2000)

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry steps for estimating future land cover 1.Identify developed and undeveloped parcels 2.Calculate the area of each zoning category for undeveloped land 3.Identify and subtract protected land from undeveloped land for each zoning category 4.Multiply the remaining buildable land in each zoning category by the corresponding land cover coefficients 5.Calculate the area of each land cover type for developed land and protected land 6.Sum future land cover on buildable, developed and protected land

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry GIS data needs for future land cover analysis Property boundaries and parcel data Current land cover – impervious, forest, turf, etc Zoning Protected land – conservation easements, conservation zones, parkland, stream buffers, steep slopes, wetlands, erodible soils, floodplains (will vary with local regs) Land cover coefficients (more on this later…) Recent aerial photos may also be helpful

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry assumptions Full buildout of the watershed will occur based on allowable zoning (e.g., no rezoning) Current land cover on developed land will remain the same with the future buildout Protected land will remain the same in future buildout scenario Buildable land will be converted to impervious cover, forest, or other pervious cover, as dictated by land cover coefficients

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry No buildings. Parcels not selected Parcels intersect with buildings so they are selected as “developed” parcels Step 1: identify developed and undeveloped parcels

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry Step 1: results

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry Step 2: calculate the area of each zoning category for undeveloped land

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry Step 3: identify and subtract protected land from undeveloped land for each zoning category Protected land includes specific parcels that are under permanent conservation (e.g., easements, conservation zones, parkland) Also includes types of land that must be preserved during development according to local regulations: stream buffers, wetlands, steep slopes, erodible soils, floodplains… This will vary locally and requires a little research or local knowledge

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry protected lands

undeveloped land…

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry …minus protected land…

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry …equals buildable land

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry Step 3: results buildable land by zoning category

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry Step 4: multiply the remaining buildable land in each zoning category by the corresponding land cover coefficients Land cover coefficients represent the fraction of a particular land use that is a certain land cover type Land cover coefficients vary by land use type and intensity Impervious cover coefficients are available from Cappiella and Brown (2001) Forest cover coefficients are an important data gap

impervious cover coefficients vary by land use Land useICC Agriculture.019 Open urban land acre lot residential acre lot residential.143 ½ acre lot residential.212 ¼ acre lot residential.278 1/8 acre lot residential.326 Townhomes.409 Multifamily residential.444 Institutional.344 Light industrial.534 Commercial.722 Source: Cappiella and Brown (2001)

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry factors affecting forest cover coefficients Land use type and intensity Age of development Local forest conservation regulations Pre-development land cover (agriculture versus forest) Local clearing and grading practices Reforestation and landscaping requirements

forest conservation regulations influence forest cover coefficients Photo courtesy of Harford County DPW Photo courtesy of Randall Arendt Forest cover coefficient =.057 Forest cover coefficient =.40

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry options for deriving forest cover coefficients Assume the worst: 95% of the site (except for protected lands) will be cleared If local forest conservation regulations exist, use the required conservation thresholds Use data from Urban Ecosystems Analyses or Urban Forests Effects Model for your area Do your own detailed calculation using methods described in Cappiella and Brown (2001)

Zoning Category Buildable Area (acres) Forest Cover Coefficient Future Forest Cover on Buildable land (acres) Agriculture Open Urban Land LDR MDR HDR Institutional Commercial Total2,

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry Step 5: calculate the area of each land cover type for developed land and protected land Impervious cover – good indicator of stream health Forest cover – most beneficial type of cover from hydrologic, water quality, and habitat standpoint Other pervious areas – majority is often maintained as turf, may include cropland, pasture or grasslands

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry sources of land cover data Maryland DNR Urban Tree Canopy assessment (includes impervious surfaces from IKONOS data) Chesapeake Bay Program land cover data (includes 2000 impervious surface data and RESAC land cover data Local government impervious surfaces (roads, parking lots, etc) and forest cover data

common scale issue: Map B contains alot more detail on forest cover while Map A is fairly generalized B A

Impervious cover layers

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry Step 5: results

Step 6: sum future land cover on buildable, developed and protected land Current land cover on developed and protected land: Impervious: 1,917 acres Forest: 639 acres Turf: 1,278 acres Future land cover on buildable land (estimated using land cover coefficients): Impervious: 680 acres Forest: 600 acres Turf: 1,350 acres +

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry Step 6: results Future land cover in the watershed =

future land cover spreadsheet

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry you’ve got results: now what? Identify ways to increase future forest cover Repeat Steps 1-6, making adjustments for these measures May need to run several scenarios to find acceptable and realistic future forest cover Set/adopt forest cover goal Implement techniques to maintain or increase forest cover

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry techniques to maintain or increase forest cover Protect priority forests Prevent forest loss during development and redevelopment Maintain existing forest canopy Plant trees during development and redevelopment Reforest public land Reforest private land

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry additional resources Urban Watershed Forestry Manual Part 1: Methods for Increasing Forest Cover in a Watershed. Available for free download from Impervious Cover and Land Use in the Chesapeake Bay. Available for free download from USDA Forest Service’s Urban Forests Effects Model (UFORE) American Forests’ Urban Ecosystem Analysis

Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry group exercise: estimating future forest cover in the Green River Watershed Identify group reporter Read the Green River Watershed scenario Select a combination of Urban Watershed Forestry techniques to implement in the Green River Watershed Report your results to the entire group Be ready to report out in 30 minutes!