Why is Problem- Solving Important in School Psychology? Rachel Brown-Chidsey, Ph.D., NCSP University of Southern Maine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

Instructional Decision Making
Problem Analysis: Diagnostic Assessment What do we know and need to know about the problem? What are some of the possible causes for the problem and what.
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
1 © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training English K-6 Syllabus Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment.
Data Based Decision Making
YOUR IEP By Anita Breen. What is an IEP? I ndividualized E ducation P lan.
Standards-Based IEPs Writing Goals and Objectives
RTI and Special Education: Making sense of it all!
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
Response to Intervention Principles and Strategies for Effective Practice Second Edition Rachel Brown-Chidsey Mark W. Steege From Response to Intervention:
“Sorting Out Response to Intervention” Nassau Association of District Curriculum Officials February 26, 2009 Presented by Arlene B. Crandall ABCD Consulting,
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
How to Use Problem Solving Lorraine Wizda, M.A. Baltimore City Public Schools Lynne O. Thies, Ph.D., NCSP North Merrick Public Schools, Merrick, NY; St.
Curriculum Based Evaluations Informed Decision Making Leads to Greater Student Achievement Margy Bailey 2006.
Unit 15 Assessment in Language Teaching. Teaching objectives By the end of the lesson, students should be able to:  know what assessment is and how it.
Developing Short-Term Instructional Objectives For Effective Implementation of Common Core State Standards.
Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Georgia’s Pyramid. Pyramid Vocabulary  Formative Assessment  Universal Screening  Intervention  Progress Monitoring.
IIT: Supporting Staff and Students at PVMS.
Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model NC DPI Summer Preparation Preparation & Implementation Implementation North Carolina.
Developed by Gerald D. Nunn, Ph.D., NCSP School Psychology Program Idaho State University Lecture 7: Look at Results SCPY 6699 Response to Intervention.
Curriculum Based Measures vs. Formal Assessment
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
Strategies for Writing Meaningful, Measureable IEP Goals Presented to all Davis School District Related Service Providers November 2011 Based on a presentation.
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Copyright © 2001 by The Psychological Corporation 1 The Academic Competence Evaluation Scales (ACES) Rating scale technology for identifying students with.
 Special Education is mandated by federal law and we have to do what they say.
Response to Intervention. Background Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 Changes to align with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Allows districts.
Future Ready Schools Formative Assessment : An Essential Ingredient in a Recipe for a Comprehensive Balanced Assessment System.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Ofsted Parent Forum Welcome Please help yourself to tea/coffee. Ofsted Lead Inspector: “St. Andrew’s is an improving school, and improving quickly.” Aim.
Curriculum Mapping: its MANY benefits of investing time and effort.
New Eligibility Requirements for Special Education Karen Johnson Leigh Ann Roderick August 1, 2012.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Using Data for Decisions Points to Ponder. Different Types of Assessments Measure of Academic Progress (MAP) Guided Reading (Leveled Reading) Statewide.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Classroom Evaluation & Grading Chapter 15. Intelligence and Achievement Intelligence and achievement are not the same Intelligence and achievement are.
Multi-Tiered System of Support TMCSEA Psych Focus Group 12/17/13.
Presented by Dr. Jalilah Dukes and Bobbie Sievering Chicago Heights School District 170 October 2010.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Shelly Dickinson, MTSS Trainer Charlie Eccleston, MTSS Trainer.
Tier III Implementation. Define the Problem  In general - Identify initial concern General description of problem Prioritize and select target behavior.
Assessment Information from multiple sources that describes a student’s level of achievement Used to make educational decisions about students Gives feedback.
 Response to Intervention ◦ Most often associated with a new and effective special education model for identifying and servicing students ◦ In PA, and.
Catholic College at Mandeville Assessment and Evaluation in Inclusive Settings Sessions 3 & /14/2015 Launcelot I. Brown Lisa Philip.
Assessment Without Levels Buckingham Primary School.
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Georgia Performance Standards Day 3: Assessment FOR Learning.
Types of Assessment: Curriculum Based Measurement Characteristics : Simple Accurate Efficient Generalizable Reliable and valid Predictive Sensitive Flexible.
1 CECV Intervention Framework Module 5A Learning & Teaching EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Tier 2 Interventions Kristen N. Salamone, M.Ed. David Rodgers, M.Ed.
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
Chapter 7 Table of Contents Introduction Guidelines for Monitoring and Assessment Guidelines for Monitoring and Assessment Types of Monitoring and.
Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation P21 Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation Measuring outcomes.
Response to Intervention – A Good IDEIA Assessment Driving Instruction David Lillenstein, Ed.D., NCSP Director of Psychological Services.
Good Morning and welcome. Thank you for attending this meeting to discuss assessment of learning, pupil progress and end of year school reports.
Individualized Education Program Module 12
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
Lakeland Middle School Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
Individualized Education Program Module 12
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Overview of Assessment in Education
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module Two: Developing the Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLOP)
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Presentation transcript:

Why is Problem- Solving Important in School Psychology? Rachel Brown-Chidsey, Ph.D., NCSP University of Southern Maine

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes Module Overview Definition of Problem Solving Purpose of Problem Solving Benefits of Problem Solving Case Example Summary Review Questions

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes Definition of Problem Solving Problem-solving school psychology practices are based on the following definition of a problem:  Problem = the distance between what is expected and what is occurring Problem-solving is the work of reducing the distance between what is expected and what is occurring

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes Problem-Solving Steps (Deno, 1995) Problem identification: Someone thinks there’s a problem Problem definition: The size of the problem is described in measurable ways and a hypothesis about the cause is developed Exploring solutions: A possible solution is tried Monitoring progress: Weekly student progress is measured to see if the solution works Problem (re)solution: The student meets the learning goal or a new solution is tried

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes Purpose of Problem Solving Problem solving activities are designed to achieve three main goals:  Clearly state what is expected of students  Identify how close a student is to meeting the goal(s)  Identify instructional methods best suited to help students meet goal(s)

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes Establishing Expectations Having clear expectations for what students should be able to do at each grade level clarifies the learning objectives for students, teachers and parents Clear expectations provide a more equitable and accessible curriculum because they avoid the presence of a “hidden curriculum”:  Hidden curriculum refers to knowledge and skills students should have already learned or are expected to learn despite it not being stated specifically  Example: expecting all students to say “please” and “thank you” during classroom interactions

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes Expectations and Standards Recent initiatives in all 50 U.S. states have resulted in state-level learning standards These standards provide grade level expectations for all students Standards can only be achieved if effective instruction is used

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes Measuring Progress Student attainment of standards can only be known if sensitive measures of knowledge and skills are used Problem solving school psychology practices rely on assessment measures that can reliably indicate how close a student is to a learning goal State exams are not sufficient measures of student progress

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes Problem Solving Measures Two major types of problem solving assessments are used:  Benchmark: these are baseline measures of a student’s knowledge and skills in the curriculum being taught Usually done 3 times/year  Progress Monitoring: These are regular measures of a student’s progress toward learning goal(s) Usually done weekly

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes Why is Regular Assessment Necessary for Problem-Solving? “If you don’t know where you are going, any road will get you there” (George Harrison) Only by measuring how close a student is to the learning expectations can teachers know how much instruction is needed Only by measuring student progress regularly can teachers know if the instruction is working

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes How is Problem Solving Different from Traditional Assessment? Traditional assessment focuses on finding out whether a student has a disability  This is a deficit focused model Problem solving assessment focuses on finding out what kind of instruction a student needs to be successful in school and life  This is a success focused model

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes Benefits of Problem Solving Focuses on student’s skills and strengths instead of weaknesses and deficits Points directly to the type of instruction needed Provides a baseline measure of student knowledge and skills which makes monitoring progress easy

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes Summary Problem solving school psychology practices are beneficial to students because they  Focus on student success and not deficits  Link directly to instruction for students  Include measurable indicators of student progress  Prevent over-identification of learning disabilities

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes Resources Brown-Chidsey, R. (Ed.). (2005). Assessment for intervention: A problem-solving approach. New York: Guilford Press. Deno, S. (1995). The school psychologist as problem solver. In J. Grimes & A. Thoms (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology III (pp ). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of School Psychologists. National Association of School Psychologists. (2007). NASP position statement on identification of students with specific learning disabilities. Retrieved 20 September 2007 from LDPosition_2007.pdf LDPosition_2007.pdf

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes Review Questions The following slides include review questions about the information contained in this module Click to advance to the next slide After reading the slide and questions, click again to see the correct answer

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes A) What is the definition of a problem? 1. A discrepancy of 15 points or more 2. The difference between what is expected and what is occurring 3. Identified only through the use of published norm-referenced testing 4. None of the above

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes A) Answer: #2 The difference between what is expected and what is occurring

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes B) What are the 5 stages of problem solving? 1. Identification, definition, exploring solutions, monitoring solutions, solution 2. Definition, monitoring solutions, identification, referral 3. Benchmarking, progress monitoring, exploring solutions, defining, identification 4. None of the above

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes B) Answer: #1 Identification, definition, exploring solutions, monitoring solutions, solution

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes C) What are 2 advantages of problem solving practices? 1. The opportunity to use advanced and extended testing procedures 2. It is success focused and leads to instructional change 3. It provides data on how long a problem has been observed 4. None of the above

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes C) Answer: # 2 It is success focused and leads to instructional change

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes D) True or False? Problem solving school psychology is compatible with the 2007 NASP position statement on the identification of students with specific learning disabilities

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes D) Answer: True Problem solving school psychology is very compatible with the 2007 NASP position statement on the identification of students with specific learning disabilities

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes E) Problem solving school psychology is: 1. A deficit-focused method 2. A discrepancy-based method 3. A success-based method 4. None of the above

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes E) Answer: #3 A success-based method

Futures Task Force on Academic Outcomes For More Information… To learn more about problem solving, view the module entitled “Problem Solving Process.”Problem Solving Process.”