New Teacher Introduction to Evaluation 08/28/2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Advertisements

NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework October 2011.
Performance Evaluation
1 Triangulated Standards-based Evaluation Framework Kathleen J. Skinner, Ed.D. Director, MTA Center for Education Policy & Practice Kansas Evaluation Committee.
New Mexico Public School Department Guidelines for Annual Teacher Performance Evaluation School Year PDP Revision Committee: Dr. Janaan Diemer,
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Natick Public Schools.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Unpacking the Rubrics and Gathering Evidence September 2012 Melrose Public Schools 1.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
Educator Evaluation Workshop: Gathering Evidence, Conducting Observations & Providing Feedback MSSAA Summer Institute July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Department.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation Regulations, Mandatory Elements & Implementation MTA Center for Education Policy and Practice August 2014.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
Collecting Artifacts: Showcasing Your Best Work!
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model Module 3: Reflection, Rating, and Planning 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
SMART Goals and Educator Plan Development
Differentiated Supervision
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation System Natick Public Schools.
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
1-Hour Overview: The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation September
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION New Regulation adopted on June 28, 2011.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
Using Student & Staff Feedback in Educator Evaluation November 5, 2014 MASC/MASS Joint Conference.
The New Massachusetts Principal Evaluation
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Educator Evaluation Information Edward Everett School Laura Miceli, Principal September 24, 2014.
Educator Evaluation Regulations, Mandatory Elements & Next Steps Prepared by the MTA Center for Education Policy and Practice January 2012.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
The District Management Council 70 Franklin Street Boston MA, Tel: 877.DMC Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective.
Monomoy Educator Evaluation System Training
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Springfield Effective Educator Development System (SEEDS)
 Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence National Institute April 12 and 13, 2012.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
 Teachers 21 June 8,  Wiki with Resources o
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Supporting Effective Teaching: An Introduction to Educator Performance Evaluation Introduction to Educator.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Supporting Effective Teaching: An Introduction to Educator Performance Evaluation.
Quality Review Updates for Presented by Mary Barton, SATIF CFN 204 Assistant Principals’ Conference September 2, 2011.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Professional Growth Through Self-Assessment and Goal Writing September 2012.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Monday, October 28 Leveraging Evaluation to Support School Priorities & Increase Effectiveness.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Objectives for today If we have done our job today, you will:
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

New Teacher Introduction to Evaluation 08/28/2012

Quick look at DESE Requirements Use of TeachPoint Within Evaluation System Today’s Objectives

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 5 Step Evaluation Cycle: Rubrics 10 Part III: Guide to Rubrics Pages 4-5 Rubric is used to assess performance and/or progress toward goals Rubric is used to analyze performance and determine ratings on each Standard and Overall Every educator uses a rubric to self-assess against Performance Standards Professional Practice goals – team and/or individual must be tied to one or more Performance Standards Evidence is collected for Standards and Indicators; rubric should be used to provide feedback

Administrators Instructional Leadership* Management and Operations Family & Community Partnerships Professional Culture Teachers Curriculum, Planning & Assessment* Teaching All Students (Instruction)* Family & Community Engagement Professional Culture * Indicates a “ power standard ” - Educators and leaders MUST be rated Proficient in these standards in order to receive an overall summative performance rating of Proficient. Know the Four Standards The New Standards

Beginning the Process Teacher completes Self-assessment Form Administrator views teacher self-assessment Teacher completes Goal Setting Form Evaluator and teacher complete Educator Plan Form * Handout with detailed process for this school year

S M A R T Goals are... Specific / Strategic Measurable Action-Oriented Rigorous/ Realistic/ Results-Focused Timed and Tracked

Wachusett Regional School District (Fall 2010) Apple Annual Tech Conference (Spring 2011) Developed in Collaboration with Schools

Built to Make the Evaluation Process Effective Flexible can be used with any forms/process Web-based access for teachers and tech. staff

Interaction and collaboration Sharing forms Automated notifications ( ) Teacher reflection/response Promote consistency through monitoring Use the right tools to leverage your effort 100% paperless DESE reporting Secure Built to Make the Evaluation Process Better

MA Regulations (603 CMR 35.00) School committees shall adopt either the Model System designed and regularly updated by the Department, or a locally developed system that is consistent with these principles.... a summative evaluation, in which the evaluator determines an overall rating of educator performance based on the evaluator's professional judgment and an examination of evidence Self-Assessment (Standards, Student Learning) 2a. Goal setting (Student Learning, Prof. Practice) 2b. Educator Plan (Action Plan) 3a. Formative Assessment 3b. Summative Evaluation } Beginning of Year (Oct 1st) -> Ongoing/mid-cycle -> End of cycle

Process Teacher receives TeachPoint and sets up account Teacher logs in, completes self-assessment, turns sharing on Evaluator logs in and views teacher self-assessment Teacher completes Goal Setting Form, evaluator adds Educator Plan Form Evaluator conducts observations and formative/summative evaluation

MA DESE Forms 1. Self-Assessment 2A. Goal setting 2B. Educator Plan Form 3A. Evaluator Record of Evidence 3B. Educator Collection of Evidence 4A. Formative Assessment 4B. Formative Evaluation Report 5. Summative Evaluation 6. Educator Response And Teacher rubric Issues: - too many - rubrics not included Forms are independent of DESE model and contract.

Share forms throughout year Use observations/rubric as motivational tool Build data over time to ease end-of-year burden

- Include MEPID in TeachPoint (employee ID) - Report professional status (end of year) - Overall rating (E, P, NI, U), and for each of 4 standards - Student Feedback (Sept 2013) - Impact on learning (low, moderate, high)... FUTURE REQ. DESE review by Sept. 2013, Use by June 2015 (2 yrs of data) Future DESE Reporting DESE Review

Frequently Asked Questions Who will be evaluating me? What’s my educator plan? What part do I play in my own evaluation process? How do I address concerns I may have about comments made in observations, walk-throughs, formative and/or summative assessments?

Training for Educators will continue at the building level with colleagues, principal and evaluators.