Assessing foreign qualifications: examples and practice Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ECA working group 1: Mutual recognition PARIS, 6 December 2006 Europe in Transition: ACCEPTING & RESPECTING Marianne Cox NARIC/ENIC THE NETHERLANDS.
Advertisements

Joint degrees in Flanders Seminar Joint Degrees 6-7 May 2004 in Stockholm Erwin Malfroy NARIC-Vlaanderen.
Description of quality assurance in the Latvian vocational education Gunta Kinta Academic Information Centre NCP-VET-CO project fourth meeting.
1-st stage DoQuP Report on countries. State standards in the area of assurance of education quality are developed with the aim of:  meeting permanent.
The role of national standards for quality assurance of training programs in higher educational institutions of the Republic of Tajikistan Samadov Safarboy,
An institution might wish to have introduced JD in its policy documents (also explaining motivation) have developed a “template” agreement with partner.
“Articulating the work on NQF, QA and recognition ” JULY 2008, Cetinje.
For education and learning JOINT DEGREES AND THE LISBON RECOGNITION CONVENTION (LRC) Dr. Carita Blomqvist, Head of Unit Recognition and International Comparability.
1 Presentation title providing clarity. releasing potential The Bologna Process – An Overview.
HIGHER EDUCATION ACCREDITATION IN THE UNITED STATES What International Education Professionals REALLY Need to Know Presenters: Ann M. Koenig, AACRAO, USA.
For learning and competence Practical aspects of the Lisbon Recognition Convention UNICA Admission and Credential Evaluation University of Lausanne April.
INTER-HED The Internationalisation of HE An on-line training course for EM Administrators Action 1 Structure and content of the on-line course Rome, 14.
1 Education in Europe: Quality Enhancement and Setting Standards Dr Marie Donaghy Head of School of Health Sciences.
Polish education system
Bologna Process in Finland (Observations on the Bologna Process in Russia) Dr. Carita Blomqvist Head of Unit Recognition and international comparability.
ITALIAN UNIVERSITY SYSTEM Università degli Studi di Udine THE ITALIAN UNIVERSITY SYSTEM Franca Battigelli.
Vasyl Shynkaruk Deputy Minister of Education and Science of Ukraine “Qualifications Framework in Higher Education of Ukraine” International Seminar «National.
Bologna seminar Tbilisi, 8-9 november 2005 Anne Marie Mak Nuffic – Dutch ENIC/NARIC Prior Learning Assessment and Recognition in the light of Bologna Experiences.
Some points of view about Chapters 3 and 4 Grundtvig project
Diploma Supplement Dr. Norma Ryan Director Quality Promotion Unit UCC.
Implementing the Bologna Process: The experience of Estonia Workshop: Boosting quality: International Credential Evaluation and Higher Education Quality.
BOLOGNA PROCESSES On June 19, 1999, 29 European Ministers of Education signed a declaration in the oldest town of Bologna. By signing the document the.
Unit 2 Regulations and legal framework of ECTS introduction in Russian Federation.
Mobility Joint Degrees Bologna Promoters Seminar in Dubrovnik, 30 June 2005 Vera Stastna Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports.
Development and Evaluation of Joint Study Programmes Almantas Šerpatauskas Center for Quality Assessment in Higher Education.
Quality Assurance Systems in Higher Education in Uzbekistan TerSU / TSAU Z.Djumaev, S.Islomov S.Adilov.
RECOGNITION OF DEGREES FOR THE LABOR MARKET Sjur Bergan, Council of Europe Bologna conference on employability Luxembourg, November 6 – 7, 2008.
European Higher Education Area Dubrovnik, October 2003.
© Engineering Council (UK) 2002 Regulation and Accreditation in the UK Jim Birch Head of International Recognition.
Credential evaluation – criteria and procedure Workshop: Boosting quality: International Credential Evaluation and Higher Education Quality Assessment.
Recognition: the national centre and the ENIC Network Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.
Maiki Udam Tallinn University of Technology Estonia.
Recognition in Europe: Principles of the Lisbon Recognition Convention, implementation and challenges Prof. Andrejs Rauhvargers, BFUG member Chairman of.
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN BULGARIAN HIGHER EDUCATION Prof. Anastas Gerdjikov Sofia University March 30, 2012.
Recognition: General Overview and Latest Developments Gunnar Vaht Estonian ENIC/NARIC (Archimedes Foundation)
Improving the recognition system Prof. Andrejs Rauhvargers President, Lisbon Convention Committee.
CURRICULUM DESIGN AND RECOGNITION OF PERIODS OF STUDY ABROAD: ECTS PROCEDURES Maria Sticchi Damiani t.
Traditional educational models in Europe Diversities of educational systems Workshop: Boosting quality: International Credential Evaluation and Higher.
THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA MINISTRY OF HIGHER EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY e: Kotnikova 38, 1000 Ljubljana p:
1, avenue Léon-Journault Sèvres - France Centre international d’études pédagogiques.
Bologna Process in Croatia Melita Kovačević University of Zagreb Consortia Meeting of the Tempus Project UM-JEP Moving Ahead with the Bologna Process.
Information on recognition Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Estonian ENIC/NARIC.
Bologna Declaration Workshop: Boosting quality: International Credential Evaluation and Higher Education Quality Assessment in SSH (PHOENIX) Bishkek,
Bologna Process in Europe: Two-cycle degrees
The quality assurance of tertiary education in New Zealand
Information sources Workshop: Boosting quality: International Credential Evaluation and Higher Education Quality Assessment in SSH (PHOENIX) Bishkek,
Recognition of qualifications: legislation, policy and practice Sjur Bergan Council of Europe Baku, April 2005.
Recognition 2010: the recognition agenda for the EHEA Bologna seminar Riga, 3-4 December 2004 Gunnar Vaht President of the ENIC Network
Assessment process in Latvia Gunta Kinta Academic Information Centre NCP-VET-CO project third meeting 3 – 4 June 2010 in Riga.
Current issues in internationalization of higher education in Finland Conference in Seinäjoki Dr. Carita Blomqvist Head of Unit Recognition and.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 3 – Right of establishment and freedom.
For learning and competence The Finnish approach to NQF/EQF Dr. Carita Blomqvist, Head of Unit, Counsellor of Education Finnish National Board of Education.
Network of VET institutions Olav Aarna TAIEX expert Estonian Qualifications Authority.
Academic and professional recognition in Europe International legal framework Workshop: Boosting quality: International Credential Evaluation and Higher.
Rezeknes Augstskola, Latvia1 HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM IN LATVIA.
For education and learning Free movement of workers with the focus on Estonia and Finland Recognition of diplomas and access to the labor market 16 September.
Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Qualification Recognition Policy Merima Baraković University of Tuzla Banja Luka/March, 8th.
Quality assurance in Europe The Bologna declaration.
Portugal a. Institution types & credentials b. School leaving and higher education credentials c. Structure of Educational System in Portugal 1. Pre-School.
Assessment and recognition of foreign qualifications in Estonia Gunnar Vaht Estonian ENIC/NARIC 2016.
Recognition of Distance Learning Programmes
Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian ENIC/NARI Baku, 2017
Bulgaria Higher Education System
Raimonda Markeviciene, Minsk, 27 October, 2016
General recognition of foreign education
Recognition of foreign education for the purpose of further studies at the University of Maribor Brina Zavrl
Recognition Tools and Practices – Criteria and Procedure
International Legal Instruments
Presentation transcript:

Assessing foreign qualifications: examples and practice Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian ENIC/NARIC

Differences in higher education systems Differences –access requirements general secondary education; vocational qualifications, preparatory year; state examinations; Bachelor Doctor –degree structures one-tier; two-tier; multi-tier structures –type of institutions university-type; non-university type; mixed; binary –nominal duration –credit systems/marking systems –names of degrees and other qualifications same or similar name of degree may have different content and outcome –graduation requirements –FAIR ASSESSMENT AND RECOGNITION - based on assessment of learning outcomes

Diversity of names of qualifications Baccalaureat, Bachiller, Bakalaureus, Bachelor, Bacharel Master, Maisteri, Maestro, Meester, Magister, Maitrise, Magistere, Mestre, Magisterexamen Licencie, Licenciado, Licence, Lizentiat, Lisensiaatti Kandidaat, Kandidaatti, Candidatus, Candidat, Kandidat nauk Diplomado, Diplomirani, Diplom, Diploma di Specialista, Diploma Universitarion, Diploma de… Laurea, Ptychio, Egyetemi oklevel, Gradue, Akademski, Doctorandus

Terminology academic (degree, education) degree university-type, non-university type qualification undergraduate-graduate-postgraduate professional degree, professional doctorate college, institute

Recognition problems Domination of assessment and recognition practices based on the name of degree –Bachelor, Baccalaureat, Bachiller etc are not corresponding degrees –Master, Maisteri, Maitrise, Magister are not equivalent qualifications Misunderstanding or incorrect interpretation of levels –Bachelor-Master indicates the levels and does not mean the named degrees –undergraduate, graduate and postgraduate may have different meanings and vary in the systems

Recognition Academic recognition –the recognition of a qualification for the purpose of further studies. Main task is to assess whether the applicant is capable of continuing studies in the chosen direction and at the chosen level. Professional recognition –the recognition of a qualification for the purpose of employment in a certain profession. Main task is to found out whether the knowledge and professional skills of the applicant are sufficient to pursue a particular profession. de jure - regulated professions; de facto - non-regulated

Legal instruments Conventions Declarations Directives Bilateral or multilateral agreements International recommendations National legal acts Internal regulations

The purpose of assessment of foreign qualification Higher education institution –in admission to HEI –in continue of studies on next stage –in transfer of credits –employment of teacher candidates Employer –what is the level of qualification higher- or vocational qualification? what is a speciality? is the degree at master´s level?

Assessment criteria - access qualifications I Assessment of institution –acceptance of the institution and curricula by competent authority of home country –in case of international qualification - is it awarded by the official international organisation (for example - IBO) –in case of “overseas” qualification - is it officially established and approved by the competent authorities II Assessment of qualification –type of curricula (general, specialised or vocationally oriented) –(nominal duration) –subjects, content and amount –results of studies, examinations, marks; central level examination(s)? –status of qualification and rights in home country (is the qualification eligible to higher education)

Assessment criteria - higher education qualifications I Assessment of institution –type of institution - HEI or vocational school, university of professional HEI, private or public, etc –quality assurance/accreditation –status and recognition of institution in home country II Assessment of qualification –access requirements (previous education) –field of study - specialisation –content (subjects), practice, research, graduation requirements –nominal duration, capacity of study program - number of credits –access to further studies –professional status/rights in labor market –Learning outcomes

Outcome of assessment Recommendation for recognition comparison, the corresponding qualification access to the same rights as to the holders of national corresponding qualification

Assessment procedure Information to applicants –acknowledgment of the receipt of their application –standardised information on the procedure and criteria for the assessment of qualification (required documents, translations, principles and criteria of assessment, fee, time, status of the evaluation statement) –advice applicants about the possibilities and procedures for submitting application –information on educational systems and legal acts, on principles of recognition

Translations Acceptance of as much languages as possible without translations Many countries or institutions issues the documents (diplomas, transcripts, Diploma Supplement) in two languages As a rule, titles of foreign qualifications should be provided in the original language, without translation –For example the degrees “Bakalaureus”, “Master” and “Doctorandus” from different higher education systems are corresponding qualifications. The result of translations may give a wrong value and recognition decision to the qualification

Translations PROBLEMS –direct translations of terminology –terminology is not correct –additions in the translations –omissions in the translations –general quality of translations is insufficent

Assessment of transnational qualifications Program articulation (joint degrees) Branch campuses in other territory Franchising Off-shore institutions (no “parent” institution, but belong to the educational system of another country) distance learning virtual arrangements

Transnational activities and assessment of qualifications Quality assurance Many “international” or “foreign” programs at national HEI and promotion of foreign degree - BA, MSc, MBA etc Joint study programs and joint degrees “European” or “International” universities (College of Europe, Central European University, European University) Non-recognised “studies” at diploma mills

Fraudulent documents Diploma mills (no study program, no license, no study, earn degree on 48 hours!) Incompetent institutions (legal institution but offer education at the level with no license (higher education program at training or consultation centre) Licensed but not accredited (quality assured) Unofficial degrees (recognised HEI, but degree awarded against the national legislation framework) Forgeries Altered credentials or credentials filled incorrectly