Genetic evaluation of beef cattle in the Czech Republic J. Přibyl 1, J. Přibylová 1, P. Šafus 1, Z. Veselá 1, L. Vostrý 1, J. Kopecký 2, K. Malát 2, K.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enterprise:Animal Science Unit:Basic Genetics Factor Information needed I. Intro.A. The use of genetics to improve animals can not be overlooked by producers.
Advertisements

Livestock and Poultry Evaluation Animal Science II.
Selection and Judging of Beef
Genetic improvement of Brahman in Southern Africa Prof Norman Maiwashe (PhD, Pri Sci Nat) Agricultural Research Council, Private Bag X2, Irene 0062 University.
Animal Breeding Systems
Organic Beef Production – Sire breed comparison Richard Fallon, Brendan Swan & Elaine Leavy Organic Production Research Conference 2nd December 2008.
Importance of Genetic Evaluation for Structure in the US Dairy Industry October 10, 2012 Sam Comstock, Ph.D.
Lecture 3-22 Exam 3 Breeds FineMediumCoarse Most important breeds? Why so many in US?
2003 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD USDA Dairy Goat.
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION IS AI FOR YOU? PUREBRED COMMERCIAL.
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
THE ISRAELI BREEDING PROGRAM elite cows selected based on their genetic evaluations. About ½ of these cows are mated to local elite bulls, and.
THE ISRAELI BREEDING PROGRAM elite cows selected based on their genetic evaluations. About ½ of these cows are mated to local elite bulls, and.
But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.
Exploring the Beef Industry
Principles of Selecting and Mating Farm Animals (Chapter 9) Genetic improvement of farm animals –Involves selection (choosing the best to be parents) –Involves.
M. Dufrasne 1,2, V. Jaspart 3, J. Wavreille 4 et N. Gengler 1 1 University of Liège, Gembloux Agro Bio-Tech, Animal Science Unit - Gembloux 2 F.R.I.A.
Van Eenennaam 11/17/2010 Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D. Cooperative Extension Specialist Animal Biotechnology.
Dr. Gordon F. Jones Professor of Animal Science / Retired Western Kentucky University.
Breed and Trait Selection Considerations Dan W. Moser Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University.
Economically Relevant Traits Mark Enns Colorado State University.
Livestock and Poultry Evaluation Animal Science II.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
EBLEX Better Returns Programme Material produced for EBLEX Beef BRP by Signet Breeding Services Genetic Improvement of Beef Cattle in the UK.
A.I. Management Manual Fifth Edition CHAPTER 15 HEIFER A.I.
The Brown Bagger Beef Cattle Adaptability Current Tools of Assessment John L. Evans Oklahoma State University 1.
CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS for BEEF CATTLE By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
 Breeding Heifers Mark Carson Reproductive Specialist, EastGen.
Multi-breed Evaluation J. Keith Bertrand University of Georgia, Athens.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How do I decide what traits are important ? Selection Indices Dorian Garrick Department.
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
REGRESSION MODEL y ijklm = BD i + b j A j + HYS k + b dstate D l + b sstate S l + b sd (S×SD m ) + b dherd F m + b sherd G m + e ijklm, y = ME milk yield,
Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education “Economic value of genomic information: Sire and commercial heifer selection" Van Eenennaam 10/19/2011.
Selection of Breeding Program An S 426 Fall 2007.
Introduction to Pork Production. Definitions Female after giving birth: Sow Young female: Gilt Having piglets: Farrowing Male: Boar Castrated Male: Barrow.
Beef Cattle Production
Breeding for Profit A tool to assist you in designing and customizing your breeding programs.
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Understanding Cattle Data Professor N. Nelson Blue Mountain Agriculture College.
Why is it important for Geno to establish research collaboration with the U.S? Sverre Bjørnstad Sverre Bjørnstad.
XX International Grassland Conference 2005 (1) 2005 Genetic Alternatives for Dairy Producers who Practise Grazing H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell.
EPD’s: What They Are and How to Use Them. Introduction EPDs = Expected Progeny Differences Progeny = Offspring, usually the offspring of the sire Differences.
Growth and development Part two: Genetic factors: breeds Animal sex and hormones Climate Revision.
Cow Herd Performance Testing. Introduction Help evaluate economically important traits Calving ease Birth weight Weaning weight Calving interval Calf.
2002 George R. Wiggans and Curt P. Van Tassell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Selection & Judging of Beef Cattle
2004 P.M. VanRaden, M.E. Tooker*, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Advanced Animal Breeding
2001 ADSA Indianapolis 2001 (1) Heterosis and Breed Differences for Yield and Somatic Cell Scores of US Dairy Cattle in the 1990’s. PAUL VANRADEN Animal.
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
Meori Rosen Past, Present, and Future Dairy Cattle Breeding in Israel.
 Genes- located on chromosomes, control characteristics that are inherited from parents.  Allele- an alternative form of a gene (one member.
Genetic gain in selected herds of Khari goats over generations in Nepal Rupak Khadka European Master in Animal Breeding and Genetics Swedish University.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
Beef Genomics and Data Programme
Cattle Breeding in Ireland.
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
Exploring the Beef Industry
Beef Cattle Production
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION
Selection and Judging of Beef Cattle
Exploring the Beef Industry
Keith Vander Velde UW Extension
Update on Multi-Breed Genetic Evaluation
Selection Tools for Beef Cattle Improvement
Genetic evaluation of an index of birth weight and yearling weight
Definition of EBVs of Economically Relevant Traits in Sheep Production
Where AIPL Fits In Agricultural Research Service (ARS) is the main research arm of USDA (8,000 employees with 2,000 scientists at >100 locations) Beltsville.
Expected Progeny Differences
Presentation transcript:

Genetic evaluation of beef cattle in the Czech Republic J. Přibyl 1, J. Přibylová 1, P. Šafus 1, Z. Veselá 1, L. Vostrý 1, J. Kopecký 2, K. Malát 2, K. Šeba 2 1 Institute of Animal Science, Prague – Uhříněves, Czech Republic, 2 Czech Beef Breeders Association, Prague, Czech Republic,

Beef cattle population in % (N = 353,678)

23,002 active population with performance recording Commercial herds 155,000 cows in a suckler system

Cows in the active population in % ( )

Calves born in the active population in % (control year 2006/7 )

BREEDING: - Only purebred beef sires - Sire – state licence - Natural service majority - AI 12.8 %, for Charolais 21.9 % bulls enter into breeding / year for natural service - 85% from domestic production

The most important paths of breeding: - Selection of young bulls (young sires) for herds - Combination of parents for the future generation of sires

DEVELOPMENT of the SYSTEM - Performance recording - Genetic evaluation (BV) - Handling of databases - Operative feedback to the supervisors and farmers

Evaluated characteristics Recorded traitsOthers - health - genetic defects - defects conformation - sexual dimorphism - locomotion - ………

Performance recording Field test Calving difficulty 365 days weight Daily gain Birth weight 120 days weight Scoring body measurements and capacity Scoring muscling and overall type 210 days weight Performance – test stations ♂ Type

Estimation of BV Updated 4 times / year

Animals in genetic evaluation TraitAnimals in evaluation including pedigree Animals with production records Yearly augmentation of database – production records Field test Weight at 120 days kg 331, ,512 8,011 Weight at 210 days kg 113,60510,060 Weight at 365 days kg 44,585 3,498 Young ♂ Daily gain in test g/day 26,034 7,729 1,132 Type of young animals 10 traits points 44,404 17,612 5,379

Field test Breeding values: Multiple-Breeds, Multiple-Traits Animal Model with Maternal effect (5 direct + 5 maternal traits)

y ijklmnop = yr i + hys ij + s k + am l + a m + m n + p n + hd o + hm p +e ijklmnop y ijklmnop - recorded performance (ce, birth, 120, 210, 365) yr i - year hys ij - group of jointly evaluated animals (herd-year-season) s k - sex of the animal am l - mother’s age at calving a m - direct BV of the animal m n - maternal BV p n - maternal permanent environment hd o - direct heterosis of calves hm p - maternal heterosis of dams e ijklmnop - residual (a m and m n with joint relationship and genetic groups according to the breeds)

Correlations between BV of sires in consecutive years

Own growth of bulls at performance-test stations Breeding value: Multiple-Breeds Single-Trait Animal Model

Daily gains of bulls from birth to the end of the test (Bohmanová, 2001)

y ijklm = hys i + am j + ch k + at l + g m + e ijklm y ijklm - recorded daily gain in test hys i - group of jointly evaluated animals (station-year-season) am j - mother’s age at calving ch k - class of the herd from which the individuals came according to the average gain at l - regression on the age of introduction into the test g m - BV of the animal with genetic groups according to the breeds e ijklm - error

Type traits of young animals HS- height at sacrum BL- body length LW- live weight CW- front chest width CD- chest depth PE- pelvis (length and width) SM- shoulder muscling BM- back muscling RM- rump muscling PT- production type

Breeding values: Multiple-Breeds, Multiple-Traits Animal Model (10 traits) Traits two groups: 1) Body measurements and body capacity ( HS, BL, LW, CW, CD and PE) 2) Muscling and overall type (SM, BM, RM and PT).

First group: y ijklmn = hys i + s j + am k + ae l + g m + e ijklmn Second group: y ijlmno = hys i + s j ae l + bdg n + g m + e ijlmno y ijklmn (yijlmno) - scoring of the trait hys i - group of jointly evaluated animals (herd-year-season) s j - sex of the animal am k - mother’s age at calving ae l - regression on age at evaluation bdg n - regression on daily gain from birth g m - BVof the animal with genetic groups according to the breeds e ijklmn (e ijmnol ) - error

Relative BV of sire - muscling SEUROP Points 81 – – – – – – Slaughtered sons according to BV of sires for muscling

Selection indexes for young bulls IM - terminal crossing IZ - foundation sires IS - common beef herd

The sources of information - BV: - Field test -10 BV for direct and maternal effects for easy calving and growth, - Performance-testing stations - BV for daily gain bulls - Type traits of young animals -10 BV

Highest importance in the breeding objective - Direct effects for daily gain until weaning and after weaning 90% to 96% of the total selection effect

The time trend of BVof Charolais bulls

Future development female fertility direct evaluation of carcass traits.

ORGANIZATION OF BEEF

MINISTRY ČSCHMS Praha Czech Beef Breeders Association (CBBA) 1990

CHAIRMAN ČSCHMS Praha (CBBA) election BREEDERS (voluntarily)

CHAIRMAN EXECUTIVE MANAGER (employee) 7 PROFESSIONALS + SECRETARY (employees)

BREED CLUBS CHAIR PERSONS (elected) coordination of breeds ČSCHMS Praha (CBBA)

PLEMDAT ČMSCH a.s. (CMBC) BREEDERS state responsibility BV calculation central evidence of animals ČSCHMS Praha (CBBA)

PLEMDAT RESEARCH ČSCHMS Praha (CBBA) ČMSCH a.s. (CMBC) BREEDERS state responsibility BV calculation central evidence of animals

PLEMDAT RESEARCH ČSCHMS Praha (CBBA) ČMSCH a.s. (CMBC) BREEDERS state responsibility BV calculation central evidence of animals INSEMINATION COMPANY

INSPECTORSHERD BOOK ADMINISTRATION - PERFORMANCE RECORDING - EVALUATION OF ANIMALS - PROMOTION OF BEEF CATTLE - SUBSIDIES ……. ČSCHMS Praha (CBBA)

INFORMATION FLOW BREEDERS - CONTACT WITH INSPECTORS - PRINTED REPORTS - PUBLICATIONS ČSCHMS Praha (CBBA)

- ANNUAL REPORTS

- ASSOCIATION MAGAZINE 4 x / year

WEBSITE – updated daily

- Internet Tool for Breeders - Breeding Programmes - Interactive Database of Animals - On – Line Performance Recording - Breeding Bull Search Database - BV - News– vet. – economic – husbandry …………….

Thank for your attention See you soon in the Czech Republic