UPPER MONUMENT CREEK LANDSCAPE RESTORATION Allan Hahn – District Ranger Mike Picard – ID Team Leader.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Riparian Thinning Logic
Advertisements

Marmot Creek Research Basin 50 th Anniversary Workshop March , 2013 John Diiwu Forest Management Branch Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource.
Spruce Beetle Epidemic & Aspen Decline Management Response EIS Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests.
Spruce Beetle Epidemic & Aspen Decline Management Response EIS Adaptive Implementation Process.
SIMulating Patterns and Processes at Landscape scaLEs HISTORIC RANGE of VARIABILITY.
Longleaf Maintenance Condition Class 1 Revised Draft for Longleaf Partnership Council Discussion Clay Ware April 7, 2014.
A Statewide Strategy for Restoring Arizona’s Forests A 20-YEAR ACTION PLAN.
Overstory and understory vegetation management to meet fire resilience and wildlife habitat objectives Eric Knapp, Becky Estes, and Carl Skinner U.S. Forest.
Fuel Management Objectives within Dry Forest Landscapes on the Okanogan-Wenatchee NF Dr. Richy J. Harrod Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest.
Biodiversity Adaption in Plymouth Kathryn Deeney Plymouth City Council.
Roles for Commodity Production in Sustaining Forests & Rangelands J. Keith Gilless Professor of Forest Economics UC Berkeley.
Physical Evidence used to Establish Reference Conditions for the Southwest Jemez CFLR Project In order to set goals that underlie restoration treatments,
Watershed Update, Kahler, ECF, 6/26/2014. The Kahler Challenge.
Urban Forest Hurricane Recovery Program
Natural Choices Greening the Gateway Kent & Medway 11 June 2011.
WLCI Update July 23, 2010 Conserving World-class Wildlife Resources Facilitating Responsible Development.
Controls on Fire in the Pacific Northwest: Climate, Fuels, and Land Management Dave Peterson & Don McKenzie Forest Service – PNW Research Station Pacific.
Sustainable Forest Management on the Yakama Reservation.
DFC: Desired Future Condition Forest Practices Board March 31, 2009 Chuck Turley/Lenny Young.
Indian Valley Meadow Restoration acre meadow located atop the Sierra Crest in Alpine County, CA. Headwaters of the Mokelumne River. Source for agricultural,
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
Wallowa Whitman Forest Collaborative Nils D. Christoffersen Wallowa Resources.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
CFLRP MONITORING Pike & San Isabel National Forests & Cimarron & Comanche National Grasslands 2013 FIELD TRIP September 13, 2013 Front Range Round Table.
Chapter 10 Land, Public and Private. The Tragedy of the Commons In 1968, ecologist Garrett Hardin described the “tragedy of the commons” Tragedy of the.
Schmidt et al GTR RMRS-87.
FireBGCv2: A research simulation platform for exploring fire, vegetation, and climate dynamics Robert Keane Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Rocky Mountain.
National Forest Projects West Virginia GIS Conference June 7 – 10, 2010 Huntington, WV Marshall University West Virginia GIS Conference June 7 – 10, 2010.
Colorado Front Range Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Project : Initial Pre and Post-Treatment Stand Structure Analysis for the Pike and San.
Overview of Organization and Community The Climate Change Adaptation Plan is being developed by the Nez Perce Tribe’s Water Resources Division. The “community”
4 Forest Restoration Initiative Overview of Vegetation Data, Modeling and Strategies Used to Develop the Proposed Action Neil McCusker Silviculturist 4FRI.
Elizabeth Reinhardt Forest Service Climate Change Office Changing Forests…Enduring Values FOREST SERVICE CLIMATE CHANGE SCORECARD.
Accelerating Vegetative Treatments to Improve Condition Class (also known as our Fuels Strategy Meeting!!!)
Involvement in SW Jemez Mountains Landscape Restoration Project (SWJMLRP), under CFLRP March 12, 2015 PUEBLO OF JEMEZ.
 The SNC’s mission is to initiate, encourage and support efforts that improve the environmental, economic and social well- being of the Sierra Nevada.
Dead/Dying Douglas-fir Granite Creek area Dead/Dying Douglas-fir Harvest up to 95% of dead/dying trees
Jonathan Long and Carl Skinner With Contributions from the Science Synthesis Team USDA FS Pacific Southwest Research Station SocialEcological.
SEQUOIA NATIONAL FOREST AND GIANT SEQUUOIA NATIONAL MONUMENT.
Are these the right areas to treat? Define Desired Conditions (DCs) for Ecological Restoration and Identify Uncertainties Defined by Front Range Roundtable.
The Wildfire Risk Reduction Grant Program Effectiveness Assessment and Program Overview Brett Wolk, Chad Hoffman, Claire Griebenow, and Tony Cheng January.
Utah’s Watershed Restoration Initiative Mule Deer.
What Does it Mean When >80 Equals Spotted Owl Habitat?
 Tier 1: Monitoring that will be done regardless of funding received:  Forest Service Preference is to focus on vegetation, e.g. Stand Structure including.
Southern Interior Forest Region Soils Plant Ecology Hydrology Geomorphology Silvicultural Systems Wildlife Ecology Forest Science Program Research, Consultation,
Sustaining Front Range Forests & Communities February 26, 2010.
Alachua County Forever Timber Harvesting Business Plan June 28, 2011.
What Drives Fire Frequency, Intensity, and Spread (focused on the Rocky Mountains) Aka: Fuels vs. Climate Bottom up or Top down Local vs Regional.
The following sentences provides examples of poor writing, why they may not meet landowner needs, and alternative ways to present the same information.
SIMulating Patterns and Processes at Landscape scaLEs HISTORIC RANGE of VARIABILITY.
Forest Succession.
Ron Torgerson – FFSL Central Area Manager Nick Mustoe – Central Area Forester Fred Johnson – Fire Management Officer.
John Day Fossil Beds National Monument By: Gray Gorbatoff.
POLICY, PLANNING, & MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES S-244 Field Observer & Fire Effects Monitor Goals Objectives Monitoring.
4FRI Biophysical Monitoring Indicators: Assigning Metrics of Success (or Failure) 4FRI Landscape Strategy & Science and Monitoring Working Groups –
Response of Understory Vegetation following Western Juniper (Juniperus occidentalis) Cutting on Two Sites Breanna S Sabin FS 533.
Wildfire Integration with Mitigation Planning and Risk MAP Brett Holt Mitigation Planner Region 10 April 21, 2015.
Karen Honeycutt, CFLR Coordinator, Natural Resource Program Manager LiDAR and the Northeast Washington Forest Vision 2020.
Recap from the 2005 workshop, “Managing Northern Spotted Owl Habitat in Dry Forest Ecosystems” Silvicultural Practices Supporting Northern Spotted Owl.
Adapting to Climate Change: Using the Green to Beat the Blues Roberta Clowater Executive Director Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society - New Brunswick.
Bill Hubbard Southern Regional Extension Forester taking the urban forest to the next level.
The Yin and Yang of Monitoring: Lessons Learned From Development of Monitoring Programs on Federal and Private Lands Brett Wolk Colorado Forest Restoration.
June 2016What problems/opportunities/needs are there with forest management? Development of the purpose of and need for action. July 2016What tools are.
WDFW Forest Management Mission
Clear Creek / Robie Creek
The Urban Forest Management Plan
MMG Homeowner Landscape Scale Inputs to Forsythe II Project (page 1)
WESTCAS Fall Conference Tuesday, October 23, 2018 Dick Fleishman
Shortleaf Pine Demonstration Areas Assist Promoting Restoration
Colorado’s Forest Action Plan Mike Lester, State Forester and Director
Angela Gee, US Forest Service July 22, 2019
Presentation transcript:

UPPER MONUMENT CREEK LANDSCAPE RESTORATION Allan Hahn – District Ranger Mike Picard – ID Team Leader

To inform the government organizations, agencies, public organizations, and interested citizens about the Upper Monument Creek Project. PURPOSE Upper Monument Creek Project

Upper Monument Creek Landscape Forest Service NEPA Process Forest Service Purpose and Need Forest Service Proposed Action Summary Questions Conclusion OUTLINE Upper Monument Creek Project

Approximately 67,000 acres Municipal Watersheds Significant Recreation Use Area Major Mountain Views from Plains Includes 7 Lakes and Reservoirs Includes 3 Powerline Corridors Extensive Wildlife habitats Varied Timber resources UPPER MONUMENT CREEK LANDSCAPE Upper Monument Creek Project

UPPER MONUMENT CREEK LANDSCAPE Upper Monument Creek Project

FOREST SERVICE NEPA PROCESS Upper Monument Creek Project

WHAT IS ADAPTIVE NEPA? Adaptive NEPA starts with Adaptive Management and then assesses those adaptations during the analysis process. Adaptive Management: Identifies Desired Conditions. Identifies Management Options to achieve the desired state. Requires Monitoring to assess whether or not the desired conditions are being achieved. Requires a Review Timeline or Evaluation Points to know if desired conditions are being achieved at a desired rate. Upper Monument Creek Project

The site specific purpose for the proposed action will focus on transitioning forested plant communities across the landscape towards desired future conditions that are more characteristic of a resilient forest. Resilient forests are better equipped to protect the following identified values at risk - infrastructure, and natural resources, and contribute towards the long-term sustainability of a full range of natural resource values including wildlife habitat, protecting aquatic resources and public drinking water. UPPER MONUMENT CREEK PURPOSE Upper Monument Creek Project

The size, severity, and behavior of recent wildfires on the Pike National Forest and across the Front Range have demonstrated the risks posed by current forest conditions, particularly in areas where homes and communities are intermixed with wildlands. The past decades saw significant increases in the human and environmental costs of wildfire across the region. Without strategic intervention the UMC landscape, and the surrounding communities and municipal watersheds are susceptible for more significant fires. There is a need to reduce vulnerability to similarly uncharacteristic and devastating events. UPPER MONUMENT CREEK NEED Upper Monument Creek Project

In response to the conditions described above, the proposed action is to treat up to 25,000 acres within the 67,000 acre analysis area. Combinations of mechanical thinning with product removal, mastication, hand thinning, and prescribed fire will be used to move vegetation types towards the desired conditions for the analysis area. Emphasis will be on retention of older trees in all forest types, opening up densely closed stands of mid to late seral classes, creating a more open forest environment and improving shrub and grass diversity. The forest ecosystems that will be the primary targets for treatments will be the ponderosa pine, dry mixed conifer, aspen, and mesic mixed conifer, with some treatments in the lodgepole and oak/ponderosa types. FOREST SERVICE PROPOSED ACTION Upper Monument Creek Project

FOREST SERVICE PROPOSED ACTION Upper Monument Creek Project

ASPEN ENHANCEMENT – PATCH CUTS Post-treatment density 30 sq. ft. of basal area Pre-treatment density  120 sq. ft. of basal area Upper Monument Creek Project

Aspen enhancement, treatment in progress PRE- & POST-TREATMENT COMPARISON

DRY MIXED CONIFER – THINNING Post-treatment density 50 sq. ft. of basal area Pre-treatment density  130 sq. ft. of basal area Upper Monument Creek Project

PRE- & POST-TREATMENT COMPARISON  Mechanized thinning, dry mixed conifer.  Retention of ponderosa pine, removal of Douglas-fir Upper Monument Creek Project

PRE- & POST-TREATMENT COMPARISON: MECHANIZED THIN, VARIABLE SPACING

PONDEROSA PINE – OPENING CREATION, REMOVAL OF DOUGLAS-FIR Post-treatment density 25 sq. ft. of basal area Pre-treatment density  115 sq. ft. of basal area

PRE- & POST-TREATMENT COMPARISON  Mechanized thinning  Conversion to ponderosa pine, removal of Douglas- fir and spruce.

Extensive review of the Analysis area has demonstrated a need for some intensive treatments. The Forest Service has determined that a full Environmental Impact Statement is the best analysis document and process for this project. To be successful the PSICC needs the support and cooperation of all of the affected governments, organizations, and individuals. The EIS will take about 1.5 years to complete. Project implementation is expected to take a decade. SUMMARY Upper Monument Creek Project

QUESTIONS?

Whenever you do a thing, act as if all the world were watching. Thomas Jefferson CONCLUSION Upper Monument Creek Project