Joachim Roth: SEWG Gas balance, JET, July, 2008 Recent analysis of Tritium retention in ITER Report from the joint EU-US meeting at MIT combining the ITPA.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Chemical Quantities or

Advertisements

HOLD UP YOUR BOARD! Chapter 7 Review game.

1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.

J. Roth, EU PWI TF, SEWG Fuel Retention, Cadarache, June 15, 09 Tritium inventory: Joint international scaling for ITER WP09-PWI-01-01/IPP/PS Status by.

G. Arnoux (1/19) SEWG on transient heat loads Ljubljana, 02/10/2009 Heat load measurements on JET first wall during disruptions G. Arnoux, M. Lehnen, A.

Member of the Helmholtz Association Fuel retention in carbon materials Arkadi Kreter et al.

Report IPP Garching EU Task Force PWI Meeting, Cadarache Oct Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik compiled by Arne Kallenbach (IPP - EU-PWI.

Report on SEWG mixed materials EU PWI TF meeting Madrid 2007 V. Philipps on behalf of SEWG members Mixed material formation is a among the critical ITER.

R. Doerner, Oct. 18, 2005 EU PWI TF meeting, France Beryllium and carbon mixed-material studies R. P. Doerner, M. J. Baldwin, J. Hanna and D. Nishijima.

A new look at the specification of ITER plasma wall interaction and tritium retention J. Roth a, J. Davis c, R. Doerner d, A. Haasz c, A. Kallenbach a,

Th Loarer - SEWG on Fuel retention – JET, July Th Loarer with special thanks to S Brezinsek, J Bucalossi, I Coffey, G Esser, S Gruenhagen.

WP10-PWI (02)/TEKES/BS(PS) Characterization of retention mechanisms in AUG Monitoring meeting of the EFDA PWI SEWG on Gas Balance and Fuel Retention,

M. Reinelt, K. Schmid, K. Krieger SEWG High-Z Ljubljana Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik EURATOM Association, Garching b. München, Germany.

R. Doerner, EU PWI Task Force Meeting, Frascati, Italy, Oct , 2008 US-EU Collaboration on Mixed Materials for ITER: Past, Present and Future R. P.

Kazuyoshi Sugiyama, SEWG meeting, Culham, July Outline: 1.Introduction 2.Experimental procedure 3.Result 4.Summary Kazuyoshi Sugiyama First.

R. Doerner, 8 th EU PWI Task Force Meeting, Warsaw, Poland, Nov. 4-6, 2009 Directions of the US-EU Collaboration on Mixed Materials for ITER R. P. Doerner,

ERO modelling of local 13 C deposition at the outer divertor of JET M. Airila, L. Aho-Mantila, S. Brezinsek, P. Coad, A. Kirschner, J. Likonen, D. Matveev,

SEWG Fuel Retention July 2008 © Matej Mayer Fuel retention in ASDEX Upgrade tungsten coatings M. Mayer, M. Balden, K. Krieger, S. Lindig, O. Ogorodnikova,

CIPS SEWG FR, JET 2008C. Hopf O 2 /He glow discharge cleaning: Experience at IPP Christian Hopf, Volker Rohde, Wolfgang Jacob Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik.

Kazuyoshi Sugiyama, SEWG meeting on Fuel retention, Garching, July Contribution of Boron on the D retention in the AUG full-W wall regime Max-Planck-Institut.

SEWG Gas Balance 2007 © Matej Mayer First results on deuterium depth profiling in W tiles M. Mayer 1, V.Kh. Alimov, V. Rohde 1, J. Roth 1, A. Herrmann.

1TPL Dismantling Project Review 08/12/06 Bernard Pégourié TORE SUPRA Association EURATOM-CEA D program: Specific experiments before dismantling Purpose:

C. Björkas, K. Vörtler and K. Nordlund Department of Physics, University of Helsinki Joint TFE-SEWG - Material Migration and Material Mixing meeting MD.

EU PWI Task Force V. Philipps, SEWG mixed materials, JET ITER-like Wall Project : Material choice, issues to investigate and role of new SEWG ITER-like.

1. Qualifying carbon as PFC Erosion (see report S. Brezinsek ) along plasma wetted areas, effect of substrate Local C migration to gaps Fuel retention.

V.Philipps, SEWG Gas balance and fuel removal, JET, , Association EURATOM – FZJ Effect of disruptions on fuel release from JET walls V. Philipps,

TFE Th Loarer – SEWG – 12 September Euratom Th Loarer V Philipps 2, J Bucalossi 1, D Brennan 3, J Brzozowski 4, N Balshaw 3, R Clarke 3, G Esser.

D retention and release behaviour of Be/C/W mixed materials

Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik EURATOM Assoziation K. Schmid SEWG meeting on mixed materials Parameter studies for the Be-W interaction Klaus Schmid.

Member of the Helmholtz Association Institute of Energy Research – Plasma Physics | Association EURATOM – FZJ A. Litnovsky et al., Progress report on the.

Alberto Loarte EU Plasma-Wall Interaction Task Force Meeting – CEA – Cadarache 17 – 10– EU-PWI Task Force & EFDA Plasma Edge Technology Programme.

1E. Tsitrone PWI TF meeting, 27-29/10/2008, Frascati Euratom International context : ITPA (International Tokamak Physics Activity) Changes in the ITPA.

J. Roth, EU PWI TF, SEWG Fuel Retention, Garching, July 19, 2010 Report on: WP10-PWI /IPP/PS Multi machine scaling of fuel retention for ITER Validation.

PWI questions of ITER review working groups WG1 and WG8 : Materials Introduction EU PWI TF V. Philipps, EU PWI TF meeting, Oct 2007, Madrid V. Philipps,

Member of the Helmholtz Association Carbon based materials: fuel retention and erosion under ITER-like mixed species plasma conditions Arkadi Kreter et.

V.Philipps, SEWG mixed materials, EU PWI meeting Frascati, Oct 2008 EU Task Force Plasma Wall Interaction SEWG material mixing, report on 2008 activities.

No 1 V. Philipps, SEWG Fuel retention, July 2010, Garching Joint TEXTOR, MAGNUM and PISCES experiments on retention in W and mixed W/C system V. Philipps,

Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik K. Schmid, SEWG meeting Welcome to the SEWG meeting on gas balance and fuel retention.

R. Doerner, EU SEWG meeting, JET. July 9-10, 2007 Co-deposition/Co-implantation R. Doerner, M. Baldwin, G. De Temmerman, D. Nishijima UCSD K. Schmid, Ch.

Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen D retention in W and mixed systems in Pilot-PSI G. De Temmerman a, K. Bystrov a, L. Marot b, M. Mayer c, J.J. Zielinski.

6 th EU PWI TF Meeting Madrid, Oct Tritium Inventory in ITER: Laboratory data and extrapolation from tokamaks Th Loarer, J Roth, S Brezinsek, A.

Chemical Quantities or

Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13

Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13

Measurements and Their Uncertainty 3.1

Identifying money correctly 1

Break Time Remaining 10:00.

Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.

25 seconds left…...

We will resume in: 25 Minutes.

Clock will move after 1 minute

PSSA Preparation.

Select a time to count down from the clock above

Murach’s OS/390 and z/OS JCLChapter 16, Slide 1 © 2002, Mike Murach & Associates, Inc.

Y. Ueda, M. Fukumoto, H. Kashiwagi, Y. Ohtsuka (Osaka University)

R. Doerner, IAEA CRP on H in Materials, Vienna, Sept. 26, 2006 Mixed-material studies in PISCES-B R. P. Doerner, M. J. Baldwin, J. Hanna and D. Nishijima.

Key Issues in Plasma-Wall Interactions for ITER The European Approach V. Philipps, J. Roth, A. Loarte With Contributions G.F MatthewsH.G.EsserG. Federici.

Measurement and modeling of hydrogenic retention in molybdenum with the DIONISOS experiment G.M. Wright University of Wisconsin-Madison, FOM – Institute.

1 Greenwald FESAC, Aug. 07 Whyte First Wall Issues: ITER to DEMO D.G. Whyte, B. Lipschultz Plasma Science & Fusion Center, MIT, Cambridge USA Greenwald.

R. Doerner, ITPA SOL/DIV meeting, Avila, Jan. 7-10, R. P. Doerner, G. De Temmerman, M.J. Baldwin, D. Nishijima Center for Energy Research, University.

PSI 2008 Toledo May 2008 © Matej Mayer Carbon balance and deuterium inventory from a carbon dominated to a full tungsten ASDEX Upgrade M. Mayer a, V. Rohde.

ITPA May 2007 © Matej Mayer Carbon Erosion and Transport in ASDEX Upgrade M. Mayer 1, V. Rohde 1, J.L. Chen 1, X. Gong 1, J. Likonen 3, S. Lindig 1, G.

1 Deuterium retention and release in tungsten co- deposited layers G. De Temmerman a,b, and R.P. Doerner a a Center for Energy Research, University of.

Overview of recent work on carbon erosion, migration and long-term fuel retention in the EU-fusion programme and conclusions for ITER V. Philipps a Institute.

J. Roth: ITPA SOL/DIV, Avila, Jan Prediction of ITER T retention levels with W PFCs J. Roth, and the SEWG Fuel retention of the EU Task Force on.

ITERに係わる原子分子過程 Atomic and Molecular Processes in ITER SHIMADA, Michiya ITER International Team Annual Meeting of Japan Society of Plasma Science and Nuclear.

ITER consequences of JET 13C migration experiments Jim Strachan, PPPL Jan. 7, 2008 Modeled JET 13C migration for last 2 years- EPS 07 and NF paper in prep.

Presentation transcript:

Joachim Roth: SEWG Gas balance, JET, July, 2008 Recent analysis of Tritium retention in ITER Report from the joint EU-US meeting at MIT combining the ITPA SOL/DIV, EFDA PWI TF and ITER PWI Team B. Lipschultz, J. Roth, A.Loarte, V. Philipps, A. Kallenbach, K. Schmid, R. Doerner, D. Whyte, G. Wright, A. Haasz, J. Davis, R. Kolasinski, B. Wampler

Joachim Roth: SEWG Gas balance, JET, July, 2008 Meeting held at MIT on June,23-24, 2008 Evaluation of retention in different materials in ITER Monday (start 8:30 AM) Session 0 – 08:30 – 09:00 Introduction and discussion of goals (Roth and Lipschultz) Session 1 (chair, Roth) – Goal: Agree on wall fluxes and temperatures over the entire vessel for use in empirical and code models of erosion, re-deposition and retention (09: :30) Kallenbach – Review scaling from ASDEX-Upgrade and application to ITER (10 minutes) Lipschultz – Review multiple machine scaling and application to ITER (10 minutes) Discussion - till 10:10 Break 10:10-10:30 Agenda:

Joachim Roth: SEWG Gas balance, JET, July, 2008 Session 2 (chair – Kallenbach) – Goal: Be and C erosion sources and resultant flow paths for C and Be. Schmid – Model calculations of C, Be sources and resultant paths for impurity transport and final deposition - should cover modelling of Be wall flux for Doerner (20 minutes) Philipps – ERO code calculations (Kirschner) for CFC divertor erosion including Be influxes and resultant deposition and retention. (20 minutes) Philipps – empirical scaling of Be and C erosion and co-deposition based on JET (10 minutes) Whyte – empirical scaling of multiple C-wall tokamaks for both Be and C (10 minutes) Discussion till lunch Lunch 12:30-14:00 Discussion continued till 15:00 Agenda:

Joachim Roth: SEWG Gas balance, JET, July, 2008 Session 3 (Chair – Doerner) Goal – Review the current lab and tokamak data for D retention in C, Be and W. (15:30-18:00) Doerner – Data on concentration in co-deposited layers vs temperature and flux for Be, C and W (10 minutes) Haasz – Data basis for W from ion beams and linear plasma devices (10 minutes) Kallenbach – Retention measurements in all-W AUG and extrapolation to ITER (10 minutes) Lipschultz/Whyte – Retention measurements in C-mod and extrapolation to ITER (10 minutes) Discussion till end of day Agenda:

Joachim Roth: SEWG Gas balance, JET, July, 2008 Tuesday (start 8:30) Session 4 (chair – Philipps) - Goal: Review of assumptions in codes modeling retention in W, on ranges of recombination, neutron damage and its conversion to trap sites (08:30-10:10) Whyte – Parameters for modeling of DIONISOS and C-Mod (15 minutes) Kolasinski – DIFFUSE and TMAP7 modeling of TPE results(15 minutes) Roth/Schmid for Ogorodnikova – Modeling of data from ion beams and linear devices (15 minutes) Wampler – Assessment of n-induced damage and hydrogen trap site characteristics (15 minutes) Whyte – Assessment of n-induced damage and hydrogen trap site characteristics (15 minutes) Break 10:10-10:30 Discussion continued until 12:00 12:00-13:30 – Lunch Session 5 (Chair – Lipschultz) – Goal: Finalize calculations and figures based on earlier sessions (13:30 - end of day) Schmid, Whyte, Kolasinski, empirical estimates – final calculation if different Agenda:

Joachim Roth: SEWG Gas balance, JET, July, 2008 Wall and divertor fluxes from B2/EIRENE (Kukushkin) Wall erosion/deposition from DIVIMP Divertor erosion/deposition using ERO Co-depostion from exp. data Retention in W from exp. data extrapolated by diffusion codes Recent EU evaluation: e.g. review PPCF, PSI Toledo

Joachim Roth: SEWG Gas balance, JET, July, 2008 High FluxLow Flux Wall Flux1E24 /s1E23 /s Carbon yield0.02 Be yield0.01 Wall deposition50%0 Outer divertor deposition 1/4 Inner divertor deposition 3/4 D/CRegression equation from PISCES D/BeRegression equation from PISCES Retention in WFit to data base at 500 K Temp. dependence for different fluxes Effect of n damageMaximum amount between 370g and 2 kg, to be settled by Bill and Dennis Different approach: An plasma experimentalist view:

Joachim Roth: SEWG Gas balance, JET, July, 2008 Area (m 2 ) Tsurf (K) Flux atoms (/m 2 s) E atoms (eV) Flux ions (/m 2 s) E ions (eV) Flux ions (1/s) outer divertor 11,213259E221,56E2237,2E22 22,395931,1E244,654E239,89,5E23 37,675203,2E22296,1E221264,7E23 422,13182,2E21333E21946,6E22 Inner divertor 11,153223,3E220,92E221,92,3E22 24,44664,8E233,371,7E237,57,3E23 34,93823,9E2295,6E22202,7E23 46,13243,2E2111,25,8E21253,5E22 dome ,8E221,4 wall high flux E211003,5E23 ELMs505003E212001,5E23 wall low flux ,75E211003,5E23 wall atoms ,5E2120 upper divertor E22201,5E221005,2E23 ELMs354509E ,15E22 Sum wall450121,4E24 Sum divertor2,6E24 Flux conditions: e.g. High flux limit, 1E24 /s (Bruce)

Joachim Roth: SEWG Gas balance, JET, July, 2008 D/Be yield D/C yield Chem yield Eroded C Depos C T in CEroded Be Depos Be T in Be T in WITER Mix T in W/Be outer divertor001E-37,3E195E203,4E2101E211,6E181,8E201,6E181,5E18 000,0021,9E214E217,0E2008E211,0E192,3E201,0E19 0,060,020,011,4E225E205E192,8E221E215,2E194E201,4E215,2E19 0,060,020,011,9E214E216,6E20 Inner divertor001E-32,3E191E201,3E2103E202,7E179,5E192,7E17 001E-47,5E191E215,8E2002E223,3E195,4E203,3E19 0,010 2,7E213E203,2E202,7E216E206,6E185,1E206,6E18 0,0100,027,1E203,5E202,5E20 wall high flux0,050,0207E212E222,8E211,7E228,9E202,6E20 0,070,0203E211,0E225,6E20 wall low flux0,050,0207E211,7E222,2E21 wall atoms0,0100,021,5E227,5E214E222,6E202,5E21 upper divertor0,050,0201,0E222,6E221,2E21 0,050,0206,3E201,6E212,6E20 Sum wall4,3E228,1E227,6E21 Sum divertor2,2E223,5E222,8E21 total6,5E229,2E211,2E233,7E201,0E229,8E218,5E21 Erosion data from literature Co-deposition from Russ D in W from data base Numbers before correcting the temperature by 100 K

Joachim Roth: SEWG Gas balance, JET, July, 2008 Erosion yields: Comparison with Y C =0.02, Y Be =0.01 1% Be 2% C

Joachim Roth: SEWG Gas balance, JET, July, 2008 For beryllium: From De Temmerman et al., Nucl. Fusion 48 (2008) Co-deposition with Be: Regression formula from PISCES

Joachim Roth: SEWG Gas balance, JET, July, 2008 Von Keudell determined retention below 200C behaved differently than above 200C For ITER we can ignore everything below 200C Impact of deposition rate on D/C is still unknown (so I ignore it, which is saying its saturated) Temperature scales as exp(2268/T) similar to metal codeposits (between 473 < T < 973K) D/C scales with incident D energy as E (-0.43) different from metal codeposits (15 < E <100 eV) Co-deposition with C: Regression formula from PISCES (Russ)

Joachim Roth: SEWG Gas balance, JET, July, 2008 Data base for retention in W: e.g. fluence dependence at 500 K

Joachim Roth: SEWG Gas balance, JET, July, 2008 Assumed temperature dependence is the envelope of the maxima. In most cases it overestimates the inventory. With better knowledge of temperatures and fluxes better estimates can be achieved. Normalised to 2x10 24 /m 2 Data base for retention in W: e.g. temperature dependence at 2x10 24 /m 2 y = 56.88*exp(-x/185)

Joachim Roth: SEWG Gas balance, JET, July, 2008 New EU-US evaluation: Retained tritium vs. discharge duration

Joachim Roth: SEWG Gas balance, JET, July, 2008 Recent EU evaluation: e.g. review PPCF, PSI Toledo

Joachim Roth: SEWG Gas balance, JET, July, 2008 Reasonable agreement, but still open questions: What is the reason for uncertainty of factor of 10 in wall flux? Can this uncertainty be reduced? What is the re-deposition fraction in the main vessel. Is it reducing net erosion? Does it lead to co-deposition at cool vessel walls? Why is divertor erosion not important for erosion and co- deposition? Does the divertor material matter for tritium retention? Deposition and co-deposition is known to occur not only on divertor targets. This is not taken into account. How can we include this effect? ERO and DIVIMP code with grid extended to the walls must support the present rough assumptions.