Difficulties, benefits and vision of 2-1-1 research collaboration Matthew W. Kreuter Kate Eddens Jason Q. Purnell Debbie Pfeiffer Health Communication.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating proactive health screening and referral into Matthew W. Kreuter, PhD, MPH* Kate Eddens-Meyer, MPH* Kay Archer AIRS 2009 I & R Training.
Advertisements

Kate Eddens Matthew W. Kreuter Health Communication Research Laboratory Washington University in St. Louis Keeping clients healthy: Integrating proactive.
A COLLABORATIVE EXPLORATION OF MINNESOTA PRAMS DIABETES CORE AND STANDARD QUESTIONS Barbara Frohnert, MPH Minnesota PRAMS Project Coordinator, Minnesota.
CPCRN Presentation Template Accelerating the Adoption of Evidence-Based Cancer Prevention and Control In Communities September 24, 2013.
The Greening of North Carolina Network NCSU IES: GNCN:
March 29, 2012 Improving Health Outcomes for Children in Foster Care: the Role of Electronic Information Exchange.
Session A Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication* *Adapted from CDC Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication (CERC) Training.
The National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (NCCCP): Current Progress and Future Action Temeika L. Fairley, Epidemiologist Comprehensive Cancer Control.
The Burden of Cancer and an Action Plan for Change in Monroe County January 2013 Byron Kennedy, MD, PhD, MPH Deputy Director of Health Monroe County, NY.
- 86% women - 53% child < 18 in home - 68% < $15, % < H.S. education - 45% out of work - 41% no health insurance Demographics Kreuter MW, et.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
Improving HPV Vaccination Coverage: Recent Activities Shannon Stokley National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases February 18, 2014 National.
David Smith United Way of Greater Houston Dr. Katharine Ball-Ricks University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health.
Coordinating Center Overview November 18, 2010 SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Healthy Heart Project Initiative: Year 1 Meeting 1.
Cancer Program Standards 2012: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care
Challenge Questions How good is our operational management?
By: Jennifer Cox.  HPV is the most common sexually transmitted disease affecting more than 20 million people in the U.S.  HPV is responsible for 70%
CPCRN Network Center: Comprehensive Cancer Control Collaborative of North Carolina University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Atlanta, GA October 15,
STI Prevention & Control Programs Local and State M. Terry Hogan, MPH STD/HIV Prevention Training Center at JH June 9, 2014 National Center for HIV/AIDS,
Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network A national network of academic, public health, and community partners who work together to reduce the burden.
Building Public Health / Clinical Health Information Exchanges: The Minnesota Experience Marty LaVenture, MPH, PhD Director, Center for Health Informatics.
The U.S. Surgeon General’s Family History Initiative Susan Vasquez May 2005.
Global Tobacco Surveillance System Accomplishments and Opportunities Samira Asma Associate Director Global Tobacco Control Office on Smoking and Health.
Be a Breast Friend Show them you care about more than their hair!
Proposed Cross-center Project Survey of Federally Qualified Health Centers Vicky Taylor & Vicki Young.
2-1-1 is not just another community investment. It’s a community impact tool that when leveraged can increase the effectiveness of all of United Way’s.
EVOLVING PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE LANDSCAPE AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR CANCER COMMUNICATION NCI Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch CPCRN.
Essential Service # 7:. Why learn about the 10 Essential Services?  Improve quality and performance.  Achieve better outcomes – improved health, less.
A Guide for Navigators 1National Disability Institute.
ARC NW Alliance for Reducing Cancer Northwest Boston November, 2007.
Welcome! Thank you for joining today’s webinar! Please make sure you’ve called in using the audio conference function so that you can ask questions While.
HPV Workgroup Update Chapel Hill October 20, 2010 Jennifer Allen, Roshan Bastani, Vicky Taylor.
calls per day, selected markets Houston, TX1,000 Atlanta, GA 900 Connecticut 900 Virginia 500 Indiana 500 Denver, CO 350.
“Working Together, Reducing Cancer, Saving Lives”
Program Collaboration and Service Integration: An NCHHSTP Green paper Kevin Fenton, M.D., Ph.D., F.F.P.H. Director National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral.
Nebraska Breast Cancer Control Partnership Network Strengthening relationships, sharing resources and celebrating successes
Overview: FY12 Strategic Communications Plan Meredith Fisher Director, Administration and Communication.
EBA / TACTIC Workgroup Report Maria E. Fernandez, PhD and Pat Dolan Mullen, DrPH Latinos in Network for Cancer Control University of Texas School of Public.
Multifaceted HPV Vaccination Strategies in California Achieving the Promise Avoiding the Pitfalls Heidi M. Bauer, MD MS MPH California Department of Public.
Filling evidence gaps Karen Glanz, PhD, MPH Emory University Glorian Sorensen, PhD, MPH Harvard University Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.
Integrating evidence-based practice into state and national cancer control programs Karen Glanz, PhD, MPH Emory University Cathy Melvin, PhD, MPH University.
Emerging Issues in Cancer Control Roshan Bastani PhD & Vicky Taylor MD, MPH.
Evelyn Gonzalez Program Evaluation. AR Cancer Coalition Summit XIV March 12, 2013 MAKING A DIFFERENCE Evaluating Programmatic Efforts.
1 The EBA Work Group: Development of a conceptual framework to guide use of evidence based cancer control interventions Debbie Pfeiffer, MA; Washington.
HPV Latino Survey Workgroup: Update CPCRN Spring Meeting South Carolina March 22, 2012 Roshan Bastani & Jennifer Allen.
Strategies for Grappling with a Changing Business Environment and Achieving Excellence Kathy Koehler Koehler Partners September 19, 2012.
CPCRN Collaboration with CDC Office of Colorectal Cancer Programs Roshan Bastani and Matt Kreuter CPCRN Meeting Boston, Nov 1-2, 2007.
1 Overview of CPCRN and Recent Accomplishments Kurt M. Ribisl, PhD University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill CPCRN Coordinating Center CPCRN Dialogue.
Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network A national network of academic, public health, and community partners who work together to reduce the burden.
CPCRN and the Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) A proposed cross-center collaboration Peggy Hannon & Matt Kreuter, co-chairs May 10, 2010.
BreastCare in Arkansas: Results from the Arkansas BRFSS Presented By: LaTonya Steward, B.S. Arkansas BRFSS Coordinator.
Onslow County Schools Division of Media and Instructional Technology This presentation was prepared under fair use exemption of the U.S. Copyright Law.
Enhancing Local Implementation of Cancer Control Efforts Partnering with Local Health Deparments.
Course Evaluation Thank you for taking the time to provide us with your feedback on this educational activity.
Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (CPCRN) Case Studies of Local and National Partnerships Putting Evidence into Practice CDC Cancer Partners.
The OCIO/PSCD, in collaboration with the Advisory Board’s Long Range Planning Committee, developed this Strategic Plan to foster the leadership and.
REACH Lay Health Worker Intervention Program: A Community-Based Model to Promote Breast Cancer Screening Among Vietnamese-American Women Gem M. Le, MHS.
Health Marketing, Health Communication, and the New CDC Doğan Eroğlu, PhD Acting Associate Director for Marketing & Communication Science National Center.
2-1-1 Workgroup Update Submitted Grants Results of Pooled Data Collection 1.
Economies of Scale: A National Network of Quitlines Suzy McDonald, Program Consultant, Tobacco Control Programme, Health Canada.
1 Live like Your Life Depends on it. Advancing the Message Section of Chronic Disease Prevention & Nutrition Services.
Barnsley Cancer Information and Support Service Healthwise it is easier than you think! Katie Hopkins Cancer Information Manager Barnsley Hospital.
CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response and the CIFOR Toolkit: An Overview New York Integrated Center of Food Safety Center of Excellence.
David M. Murray, Ph.D. Associate Director for Prevention Director, Office of Disease Prevention Multilevel Intervention Research Methodology September.
CCC and the CPCRN Garry Lowry, MPH Mary Frost
Research Translation: Lessons from Dissemination and Implementation Research for Interventions Promoting Walking and Walkability August 18, am Pacific,
Wyoming association of sheriffs and chiefs of police
Community-Based Co-Supervisory Community Health Worker Model
National Cancer Center
The Futures Initiative Creating the Future of CDC for the 21st Century
Presentation transcript:

Difficulties, benefits and vision of research collaboration Matthew W. Kreuter Kate Eddens Jason Q. Purnell Debbie Pfeiffer Health Communication Research Laboratory Washington University in St. Louis

Session goal Explore 2-1-1/research collaboration Interactive Your opinions matter

Why this topic? Researchers discovering Balancing service & research Protecting interests

Structure of the session Audience response survey Discussion of results A sample project Tomorrow

Audience response survey

Using your Handset Questions & answers on screen Numbers on slide = numbers on handset When countdown clock appears, push button on handset to answer Please leave Handset on chair when session is over.

Practice questions

Should the toilet paper roll go over or under? 1.Over 1.Under

You are stranded on a desert island. Which would you most want with you? 1.Your favorite food 1.Your favorite music 1.Your favorite book 1.Your own pillow

REAL questions

Background information

Which best describes your I&R? Aging / Disability 1.Blended Crisis 1.Comprehensive I&R (non 2-1-1) 1.Other specialized

Which best describes your role in your I&R? 1.President, VP, or CEO 1.Executive or program director 1.Call center manager 1.Information specialist 1.Resource specialist 1.Data manager or research analyst 1.Training coordinator 1.Other

Evaluation of standard services

How often does your I&R prepare a formal evaluation report in print or online form? 1.Every few years 1.Once a year 1.More than once a year 1.Not on a consistent schedule 1.Dont know/not sure

How would you rate the process used to evaluate your I&R? 1.Outstanding 1.Excellent 1.Very Good 1.Good 1.Fair 1.Poor 1.Dont know/not sure

Evaluation of special initiatives

Has your I&R ever conducted a special initiative? 1.Yes 1.No 1.Dont know/not sure

Has your I&R ever conducted a special initiative focused on personal finance? 1.Yes 1.No 1.Dont know/not sure

Has your I&R ever conducted a special initiative focused on health? 1.Yes 1.No 1.Dont know/not sure

How often does your I&R formally evaluate its special initiatives? 1.Every time 2.Some of the time 3.Almost never 4.Never 5.Dont know/not sure 6.Not applicable

How would you rate the process used by your I&R to evaluate special initiatives? 1.Outstanding 2.Excellent 3.Very Good 4.Good 5.Fair 6.Dont know/not sure 7.Not applicable

Media campaigns

Has your I&R ever conducted a media campaign to promote awareness or use of services? 1.Yes 1.No 1.Dont know/not sure

How often does your I&R formally evaluate the effects of its media campaigns? 1.Every time 2.Some of the time 3.Almost never 4.Never 5.Dont know/not sure 6.Not applicable

Work with researchers: Experience & perceptions

Has your I&R ever worked with researchers? 1.Yes 1.No 1.Dont know/not sure

How would you rate your past experience working with researchers? 1.Very positive 2.Somewhat positive 3.Somewhat negative 4.Very negative 5.Dont know/not sure 6.Not applicable

What would be your greatest concern about working with researchers? 1.There would be additional strain on staff & resources 2.Researchers may have different priorities than ours 3.Our stakeholders may not value research 4.Our callers may not benefit from research 5.Assuring we can protect the privacy of our data 6.I have some other concern 7.I dont have any concerns

What would be your next greatest concern about working with researchers? 1.There would be additional strain on staff & resources 2.Researchers may have different priorities than ours 3.Our stakeholders may not value research 4.Our callers may not benefit from research 5.Assuring we can protect the privacy of our data 6.I have some other concern 7.I dont have any concerns

What would be the most important benefit of working with researchers? 1.Strong evaluation methods 2.Help analyzing data 3.Potential for improved services 4.Access to research funding 5.Learning about program effectiveness 6.Some other benefit 7.I see no benefits

What would be the next most important benefit of working with researchers? 1.Strong evaluation methods 2.Help analyzing data 3.Potential for improved services 4.Access to research funding 5.Learning about program effectiveness 6.Some other benefit 7.I see no benefits

How interested would you be in forming a research partnership involving your I&R? 1.Extremely interested 2.Very interested 3.Somewhat interested 4.Not at all interested

Which best describes how valuable your responses are? Thank you!

Please leave the Handset on your chair when session is over.

Building a research consortium Can research… …advance 2-1-1s mission? …enhance 2-1-1s services? …help secure funding?

Building a research consortium Can 2-1-1… …build a knowledge base? …monitor population needs? …expand its scope of helping services?

Cancer risks in callers in Missouri, North Carolina, Texas, and Washington Presented at the Alliance of Information & Referral Systems Conference Rochester, NY May 25, 2010 Jason Q. Purnell, PhD, MPH

Cancer Prevention & Control Research Network (CPCRN) King County United Way Missouri North Carolina United Way Houston

Study goals 1.To estimate the unmet cancer control needs of callers 2.To compare findings from to state and national rates 3.To demonstrate the feasibility of partnering with systems for research

Risk Assessment Six areas of cancer risk: Breast cancer screening (mammography) Colorectal cancer screening (colonoscopy) Cervical cancer screening (Pap test) Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination Smoking Smoke-free homes and cars Provided appropriate cancer control referrals

Next steps Journal article reporting results Ongoing studies integrating cancer referrals into systems Exploring additional research collaborations through work of consortium

Acknowledgments Collaborators Katherine Eddens, Washington University Peggy Hannon, University of Washington Maria Fernandez, University of Texas Matthew Kreuter, Washington University Kurt Ribisl, University of North Carolina Susan Gemmel, King County Crisis Clinic Debbie Fagin, United Way Missouri Marti Morris, North Carolina systems King County North Carolina 2-1-1, Centralized Call Center United Way Houston United Way Missouri Staff support Debbie Pfeiffer, Bindu Kalesan, Susie Rath, Andrea Spray CDC