Timing and Flowchart Assignment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
W. WeathersModeled after Redirect Examples Examples: Reservations that are dotted show Capacity Available to Resell or Transfer. MWs in Gray are.
Advertisements

11 OASIS Subcommittee - Notification Task Force UPDATE May
DRAFT Recommendation Preemption & Competition CHALLENGER COUNTEROFFER June 25, 2013 NAESB OS.
1 Defender Mitigation Proposed Name Change: Defender Reservation True-up Jan 15, 2012 NAESB OASIS Subcommittee Progress Report.
OASIS Subcommittee Status Preemption and Competition EC Meeting 4/30/13.
Lottery Method in BPA’s Simultaneous Submission Windows and Potential Application to the Simultaneous Defender Matching Process NAESB Meeting 05/01/13.
Preemption and Competition Redirect Issues NAESB OS Meeting June 6, 2012 BPA Presenting.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange
W. Weathers1A Conference Call 8/18/05 Examples: In all cases a Parent Reservation to be Redirected must be Firm Point-to-Point. Unless noted otherwise,
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Timing Considerations for Short-term Preemption and Competition Automation NAESB OS Presentation.
Tiers 1 & 3 Assignment Flat Profile Recommendation.
NAESB OASIS Subcommittee Long Term Competition Mike Norris, Rebecca Berdahl May 13, /13/141.
Standards Development Improvement Opportunities February 18, 2014.
DRAFT E-Tag Notification Presentation NAESB OS Mar 26-28, 2013 Seattle, WA.
WELCOME Western Area Power Administration1. Where did the journey begin? Western Area Power Administration2.
OASIS Subcommittee Status EC Meeting 2/18/14. Preemption and Competition Annual Plan Items Affected 2013 AP Item 2(a) Develop version 2 business practice.
EC Meeting 2/24/ AP Item 7(b) Modify NAESB standards WEQ , WEQ , and related standards to be consistent with the Commission’s policy.
Treatment of Firm Redirects Recent FERC Order. Entergy Order Docket Nos. ER OA ER Issued May 16, 2013
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Thursday, January 19, :00 to 4:00 p.m. EST 4 th Quarter
DRAFT Request for Initiation of a NAESB Standard NAESB OS Oct 23-24, 2013 Richmond, VA.
MOD Customer Information Session September 10, 2010.
Short-Term Competitions and Preemption.  Overview  Standards being covered are:  Motion 2 - Fixed Capacity Over Term of Request. ▪ Tier 1 Service –
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Resales, Aggregations & Redirects of Resales NAESB OS July 22-24, 2014 BPA Presenting.
Resale Business Practice Standards 3 Options remain.
Short-term Competition and Preemption (STCP) May 2015 Presenter: Marie Pompel Bonneville Power Administration.
Electronic Scheduling /Information Technology Subcommittees (ESS/ITS) Update 2008 Review November 4, 2008.
E-Tag Notification Assignment NAESB OS Sep 17-19, 2013 Seattle, WA Assignee – Robin Cross Seattle City Light Interested Resources: Marie Pompel - BPA Power.
Resale Business Practice Standards 3 Options remain.
NITS Concepts  Contract Data Model: NITS Agreement represented as a Contract Contract has one or more Facilities Facility may be one or more Resources.
OASIS SUBCOMMITTEE STATUS EC Meeting 4/29/14. Preemption and Competition Annual Plan Items Affected  2013 AP Item 2(a) Develop version 2 business practice.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Resales, Aggregations & Redirects of Resales NAESB OS Presentation August 20, 2014 BPA Presenting.
Network Transmission and Rollover Rights July 22, 2015 BPA.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Capacity Reassignments, Aggregation & Redirects of Reassignments NAESB OS – May 13th, 2014 BPA.
NAESB WEQ EC Meeting 10/20/2015.   Workload  Long-Term Competition for Rollover Rights OASIS Subcommittee.
NAESB Update Kathy Anderson October 2015 MIC Meeting.
02/19/14 REVIEW AND UPDATE FLOWCHART AND TIMING. Goals Finish going through the process flowchart listing the steps and various options for each. Develop.
Parking Lot Item 19. BPS Bert Bressers 10/31/2011 Firm rights of resources that have a Firm priority to what load (Sink area granularity)
03/11/14 RECOMMENDATION FLOWCHART AND TIMING. GOALS Finish going through the process flowchart listing the steps and various options for each. Develop.
UNCONDITIONAL AND LEAD TIMES PREEMPTION AND COMPETITION TIMING.
NT Assignment Update: 9/17/13. NT Assignment Update Resources: CompanyResources BPARebecca Berdahl, Milos Bosanac, Ann Shintani, Bob Zerfing ClarkBrenna.
NITS on webSmart OASIS. NITS on webSmart OASIS Agenda  Company and User Permissions  Electronic Industry Registry requirement  WebSmart OASIS NITS.
NAESB NITS, and Long-term Competition
Preemption-ROFR Notification
NT Assignment Update: 9/17/13.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
WEQ OASIS Subcommittee
WEQ OASIS Subcommittee Development Update to the
BPA Formal Comments Overview to NAESB OS
NITS on webSmartOASIS InfoSession
BPA Formal Comments Recap of ‘Best Offer’ Proposal
NAESB WEQ OASIS Subcommittee Report NAESB WEQ Executive Committee
Recommended Appendix B Redirect Standards Examples
Service Across Multiple Transmission Systems
Preemption & Competition Standards BPA – Southern Compromise Proposal October 24, 2017 PURPOSE: Review and discuss the inequity with the Short-Term Firm.
NITS Review Scoping Document.
Add/Terminate NITS DNR
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
Service Across Multiple Transmission Systems
2018 API 3b & 3c Proposal 05/22/2018.
BPA Formal Comments Recap of ‘Best Offer’ Proposal
4th Quarter 2015 Thursday, October 15, :00 to 3:30 p.m. EST
2018 API 3b & 3c 02/21/2018.
Short-term Competition and Preemption (STCP)
2018 API 3b & 3c Proposal 05/22/2018.
NITS on OASIS Implementation.
2019 Annual Plan Items 3b and 3f (formerly 2018 API 3c and 3h)
NITS on webSmart OASIS.
OASIS Subcommittee Status Preemption and Competition
NAESB WEQ OASIS Subcommittee Report NAESB WEQ Executive Committee
OASIS Notification Recommendation.
Presentation transcript:

Timing and Flowchart Assignment Communication of ROFR Timing and Flowchart Assignment

Purpose Recommend a mechanism for the submission and processing of MATCHING TSRs TP submission to the pre-submittal workspace Exercising ROFR Opting out of ROFR Define requirements for TP communication of the minimum Matching profile Define requirements for communication of TC Match submission Define requirements for communication of TC opt-out

Parking lot items Requirement 68 (unresolved) Requirement 24 Expand the requirements needed on how to create a matching request Requirement 24 Consider Pre-submittal Workspace to queue a valid matching request Requirement 54 Should the minimum matching request created automatically by the TP and made available to the defender?

The Pre-submittal Workspace When competition is initiated for a valid Challenger, each valid Defender that has ROFR shall be notified of the competition through a MATCHING request created on OASIS in a PRESUBMITTED status in the pre-submittal workspace This is an expansion of the pre-submittal workspace concept developed for NITS Will require changes to the PTP State Transition Diagram Template changes will be needed to support this functionality The PRESUBMITTED state indicates the MATCHING TSR is present in the pre-submittal workspace but has not yet been submitted

TP communication of terms The MATCHING request placed in the pre-submittal workspace by the TP shall communicate the following information: The Aref of the Challenger The Matching profile, consisting of the transmission service and minimum profile of capacity and price over time and required to be submitted by the Defender in order to exercise their ROFR. This is the profile that was tested for feasibility of the Defender to exercise their ROFR The remaining profile of capacity over time that the Defender would retain if they do not exercise their ROFR

Exercising rofr To exercise their ROFR, the Defender must move the MATCHING request to QUEUED status and provide the following information: The Matching profile, consisting of the transmission service, profile of capacity, and price over time. This profile can meet or exceed the minimum requirements to exercise ROFR The remaining profile of capacity over time that the Defender is requesting to retain in the event that the MATCHING request is denied. This can be the same remaining profile provided by the TP, or a lower profile as allowed by the TP.

Exercising rofr (cont.) The remaining profile allowance fulfills the mandatory portion of Motion 51, and can allow for the optional portion of Motion 51 as allowed by the TP. “A Defender with ROFR that elects to exercise ROFR during the Preemption and Competition process shall also be given the opportunity to simultaneously submit a revised transmission service capacity profile for the time periods subject to recall which may be at or below the service capacity remaining after preemption, indicating the final amount of service to be held by the Defender in the event the MATCHING request is denied due to other simultaneous matching opportunities being exercised by other Defenders.” The TP shall be obligated to either grant the MATCHING request in full or, if infeasible, to reduce the remaining transmission service obligation held by the Defender to the amount so indicated by the Defender.”

Exercising rofr: items not addressed The recommendation proposes a mechanism for exercising ROFR. It is not intended to address how specific scenarios should be implemented. How will the Match and remaining profile be processed when: The Match is infeasible due to exceeding the minimum term The Match fails to meet the minimum term The Match becomes infeasible due to system changes while in the pre-submittal workspace How does the TP indicate that the remaining profile has been applied? Can a Matching request be REBID and/or WITHDRAWN?

Opting out of rofr The defender may explicitly indicate their intent to NOT exercise ROFR by submitting the MATCHING request with status of QUEUED and the following information: The MATCHING profile of the PRESUBMITTED MATCHING request set to 0 MW over time Restatement of the remaining profile of capacity over time as stated in the PRESUBMITTED MATCHING request. This can be the same remaining profile provided by the TP, or a lower profile as allowed by the TP.

Opting out of rofr (cont.) This is part of the same response mechanism used to exercise ROFR. Only the information submitted to the TP has changed. The discretionary portion of Motion 51 applies to the profile submitted when opting out of ROFR “At the election of the TP such TP may, through its business practice standards, offer to the Defender with a confirmed reservation subjected to Recall or Displacement as a result of the Preemption and Competition process, the option to reduce some or all of the remaining capacity on the preempted reservation to an amount below the capacity remaining after preemption.”

Questions?