Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update IDCWG October 12 th, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2 Draft of proposed metrics for the WEQ BPS to conduct analysis and evaluation of the Parallel Flow Visualization pilot project. (PFV Pilot)
Advertisements

Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL Houston, December 1-2, 2010.
Parallel Flow Visualization Data Requirements Parallel Flow Visualization Data Requirements NERC ORS Meeting Toronto, Ontario September 23-24, 2009 Jim.
Parallel Flow Visualization and Flowgate Allocations Equity Concerns of Non-Market Transmission Owners Equity Concerns of Non-Market Transmission Owners.
First to Curtail – Last to Curtail Examples December 1 – 2, 2010 (Revised based on Requests/Suggestions During Review) 1.
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update NAESB BPS Yasser Bahbaz – IDCWG Chair May 17 th, 2012.
First to Curtail – Last to Curtail Examples December 1 - 2,
Business Practices Subcommittee Update October 23, 2012 DRAFT.
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update Jim Busbin IDCWG Chairman NAESB WEQ BPS Meeting Minneapolis, Minnesota November 10-11,
Parallel Flow Visualization/Mitigation Proposal
Future NERC Congestion Management Tool Option 3A (Proposed by NERC/NAESB TLR TF) 5/11/2005.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update NAESB BPS Yasser Bahbaz – IDCWG Chair November 9 th, 2011.
E-Tag 1.8 An industry tutorial.
1 Credit for Redispatch Small Group Review of Unconstrained MFs NAESB BPS Meeting December 14-15, 2011.
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update NAESB BPS Yasser Bahbaz – IDCWG Chair September 13 th, 2012.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update October 26, 2010.
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update NAESB BPS Yasser Bahbaz – IDCWG Chair April 4 th, 2012.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update February 2, 2010.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update February 1, 2011.
© 2009 The Williams Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. ______________ WECC November 12, 2012.
Overview Seams Coordination Process. 2 Introduction Midwest ISO Non-profit organization that manages the reliable flow of electricity across much of the.
Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Update October 2008 Gary Nolan ISAS Vice-Chair.
FERC Order minute Scheduling.
FEBRUARY 27, 2013 BY NARINDER K SAINI ED SKIBA BPS-CO-CHAIRS Parallel Flow Visualization Overview 1.
Intra-BA Pseudo Ties Errors to Market Flow Calculations Nate Schweighart Tennessee Valley Authority 02/11/2014.
IDCWG Update. September 2013 December 2013 February 2014 April 2014 July 2014 Data Submission WEQ 008 Assessment CO 283 Report GTL CO’s Draft CO’s Development.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
SPP.org 1. 2 Aggregate Transmission Service Study (ATSS)
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N WIAB WECC Interchange Authority Backup BY LOU MIRANDA BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION TRANSMISSION.
NERC Congestion Management Congestion Management Option 3 Vendor Meeting Julie Pierce – NERC IDCWG Chair.
Business Practices Subcommittee
Peak RCCo Performance Metrics Draft –November 2013.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update May 4, 2010.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update Executive Committee Meeting February 18, 2014.
Reload PFV September 12, Reload PFV  Concern that need to be addressed:  The RC need to have an option in PFV to allow gradual reload of markets.
Flowgate Allocation Option Parallel Flow Visualization Business Practices Subcommittee Meeting June , 2010.
Parallel Flow Visualization Project NERC ORS Meeting May 4, 2011.
NAESB WHOLESALE ELECTRIC QUADRANT BUSINESS PRACTICES SUBCOMMITTEE ACTIVITIES UPDATE TO JOINT ELECTRIC SCHEDULING SUBCOMMITTEE JANUARY 5, 2012 BY ED SKIBA.
2013 Wind Conference. Congestion Management & Communication Processes CJ Brown.
Long-Term Solution for Negative Generation Entergy Transmission AFC Stakeholder Meeting August 22, 2006.
Generator Prioritization Option Parallel Flow Visualization Business Practices Subcommittee Meeting June , 2010.
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update Yasser Bahbaz IDCWG Chair BPS Update September 13 th, 2011.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update Executive Committee Meeting April 29, 2014.
NAESB BPS Yasser Bahbaz– IDCWG Chair January 5 th, 2016.
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee Report for MIC Pete Heiman October 14, 2015 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
RAWG Agenda Item LAR Data WECC Staff. Data Elements Generator information – Existing – Changes Monthly Peak Demand and Energy (actual year and.
Parking Lot Item 19. BPS Bert Bressers 10/31/2011 Firm rights of resources that have a Firm priority to what load (Sink area granularity)
NAESB BPS UPDATE TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AUGUST 21, 2012 BY NARINDER K SAINI ED SKIBA BPS-CO-CHAIRS PARALLEL FLOW VISUALIZATION PROJECT 1.
1 Parallel Flow Visualization Goals NAESB BPS Meeting September 15-16, 2010.
RELIABILITY COORDINATOR TOPICS 2006 FRCC SYSTEM OPERATOR SEMINAR.
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update
Frank Koza – PJM Dave Zwergel – Midwest ISO
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update
Business Practices Subcommittee Update
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee MIC/OC Report
Business Practices Subcommittee Update
Impact Calculation – BPS Issues
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Mgr. Interconnection Reliability Initiatives
Review of After-the-Fact (ATF) Tagging Criteria Scheduler’s Meeting May 24, 2016 Raymond will ask the audience what their expectations are in regard to.
Resource Adequacy Demand Forecast Coincidence Adjustments
Future NERC Congestion Management Tool Option 3A (Proposed by NERC/NAESB TLR TF) 5/11/2005.
Review of After-the-Fact (ATF) Tagging Criteria Scheduler’s Meeting May 24, 2016 Raymond will ask the audience what their expectations are in regard to.
Two-Tier Firm Curtailment Overview
NERC Congestion Management
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee Report for MIC
WIAB WECC Interchange Authority Backup
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Presentation transcript:

Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update IDCWG October 12 th, 2011

PFV Metrics Report A Monthly and yearly report. The data in the report will be captured on a select list of flowgates. The flowgates list will be managed by the IDCWG. The data report will be in form of a statistical average. A seasonal, peak and off-peak statistical breakdown will also be provided for these flowgates.

PFV Metrics Objectives Measure the accuracy of the data submitted by RC(s), BA(s), TO(s) and TSP(s). Measure the availability and the frequency of updated data submission by entities. Validate the correct PFV calculation logic is implemented. Measure the accuracy of the results of the PFV logic. Quantify the differences between the PFV calculations and results with respect to the current IDC logic.

PFV Metrics Measure the availability and frequency of data submittal by responsible entities Compare forecasted to actual data provided by entities Compare Market Flow Calculations performed by OATIs PFV engine to production Calculate the unreported impacts Compare and Validate Non Firm Curtailments Compare and Validate Firm Curtailments Compare and Validate NNL Calculations

Data Availability Determine the upload frequency of the following data: Transmission outages and generator outages. Actual BA Load and forecasted BA Load Real time flows of monitored element and contingency element Real time output of all generators Real time flow of all tie lines Priority of all generators (Firm MW, Non Firm MW ) Count of instances when data not sent by entities at least once an hour (exclude priority of generators) Count of instances where any of these files sizes are below a certain % of max file size. Count of instances when data not sent by entities at least once an hour (exclude priority of generators)

Forecast Accuracy Measure A measure of how well entities and OATI are forecasting for load and generation output for next hour. The following metrics will be captured as part of the report LOAD Show all forecasted values from the previous hour in comparison to integrated load value that materializes over the next hour. A percentage of accuracy between each forecasted value and the integrated value.

Forecast Accuracy Measure Generation impact Measure impact forecasted values from the previous hour in comparison to integrated generation impact value that materializes over the next hour. A percentage of accuracy between each forecasted value and the integrated value will be captured The generation impacts value would be a direct measure of next hour generation output forecast. The default scaled values will be used as the basis for the comparison in the case that no forecast is submitted.

Market Flow Calculation Comparison OATI will be calculating market flows for each market entity. Market entities will continue to submit market flows calculated on their end to OATI. A comparison of the two calculations will be captured as part of the report.

Market Flow Calculation Comparison The following parameters will be used for comparison for each market entity Total Forward Market Impact >0% Total Forward Market Impact >5% Total Reverse Market Impact >0% Total Reverse Market Impact >5% Net Market flow impact >0%

Flowgate Flow Breakdown A total flowgate flow will be split into the following categories: Net Market Flow Impact by each market Net Impact of Inter BA Tags Net Impact of Intra BA Tags Net Impact of each BA GTL The difference between total flowgate flow and the accounted for flow will be the unreported impacts The metric report will highlight any unreported impact on each flowgate

Non-Firm Curtailments and Impacts In the case of TLR level 3 or 4, the difference between IDC production and GTL for the parameters below will be captured Non Firm Inter BA Tags Non Firm Market impacts Non Firm Intra BA Tags Non Firm GTL impacts of Non Market BA(s)

Firm Curtailments In the case of TLR level 5 or 6, the difference between IDC production and GTL for the parameters below will be captured Non Firm and Firm Inter BA Tags Non Firm and Firm Market impacts Non Firm and Firm Intra BA Tags Non Firm and Firm GTL impacts of Non Market BA(s) NNL Allocation

NNL Comparison In the case of a TLR level 5, the difference between NNL calculated in IDC production on a flowgate and GTL impact captured on the same flowgate in GTL engine will be captured as part of the metrics.

IDCWG Update