Energy Day Timing Issues and Operational Concerns Pipeline Segment Wholesale Gas Quadrant North American Energy Standards Board Business Practices Subcommittee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NAESB WEQ/WGQ Business Practices Subcommittee Jan
Advertisements

TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
APPA CEO Roundtable Phoenix, AZ March 15, 2011
Terms. 1. Globalization 2. Financing 3. Inputs.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
For APNOMS Managing Pervasive Computing and Ubiquitous Communications Challenges Ahead Graham Chen.
December 1-2, 2004 Energy Day Meetings 1 North American Energy Standards Board Wholesale Gas Quadrant Overview of Gas Day Standards December 2004.
1 Interstate Pipeline Gas Quality Primer Business Practices Subcommittee June 15-16, 2004 PIPELINE SEGMENT Wholesale Gas Quadrant North American Energy.
June 22, 2005 NAESB Board of Directors Meeting, San Antonio, Texas 1 North American Energy Standards Board Meeting of the Members NAESB Board of Directors.
© 2004 Dominion Dominion Proposal January 24, 2005.
June 25, 2009 Prepared by D. Davis and C. Burden – Williams Gas Pipeline 1 North American Energy Standards Board Capacity Release Modifications Summary.
Energy Day Dolores Chezar – KeySpan Energy Kathryn Burch – Duke Energy January 24, 2005.
NiSource Presentation of Work Paper on Request to Create a Standard Energy Day January 2005.
1 Intra-Day Nominations through a Posted Point of Restriction Kathryn Burch Project Manager – Standards and Regulatory Compliance Spectra Energy Transmission.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange Version 1 Standard Revision 1, Draft 5 August, 2005.
North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) Procedures (Note : Titles of Swim lanes change periodically) NAESB Office Triage Subcommittee Executive Subcommittee.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange
and 6.855J Cycle Canceling Algorithm. 2 A minimum cost flow problem , $4 20, $1 20, $2 25, $2 25, $5 20, $6 30, $
Definition of Firm Energy and Interruptible Transmission Two Issues Causing Problems for Business in the Western Interconnection.
Natural Gas Tutorial MIC Meeting March Discussion Topics Analogies. Electric vs. Gas day. Trading & Scheduling. Operating Constraints.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
0 - 0.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt Time Money AdditionSubtraction.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING Think Distributive property backwards Work down, Show all steps ax + ay = a(x + y)
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
£1 Million £500,000 £250,000 £125,000 £64,000 £32,000 £16,000 £8,000 £4,000 £2,000 £1,000 £500 £300 £200 £100 Welcome.
Richmond House, Liverpool (1) 26 th January 2004.
Show Order 2 Shows 8:00 – 10:30 Weigh in 11:00 Ewes – by Weight Champion Ewe Market Classes (Hamp) Champion Drive 1:00 – 2:30 Weigh in 2 nd show (approximate.
Chapter 7 Process Management.
Water Distribution Systems – Part 1
Denver Fire Alarm Test Preparation Speed Drill © Ted Smitty Smith 2013.
ABC Technology Project
05/ Working Smart For You Access to multiple Midwest markets Access to multiple supply sources Access to Michigan & Ontario storage fields Flexible.
Describe a water supply distribution system
1 Considerations in Gas Contracts Using LNG Supply Texas Utility Lawyers Association October 13, 2005 Craig Enochs Jackson Walkter L.L.P.
VOORBLAD.
8.6 Linear Programming. Linear Program: a mathematical model representing restrictions on resources using linear inequalities combined with a function.
Created by Susan Neal $100 Fractions Addition Fractions Subtraction Fractions Multiplication Fractions Division General $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
North American Energy Standards Board Activities and Work Group Update Market Issues Subcommittee August 9-10, 2010.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
H to shape fully developed personality to shape fully developed personality for successful application in life for successful.
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
PSSA Preparation.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Winter Energy Market Assessment 2005 – 2006 Item No.: A-3 October 20, 2005.
Nominations and Scheduling Questar Gas Company Annual Account Management Customer Meeting Will Schwarzenbach Director, Gas Supply.
® July 30 th, 2014 Utah PSC Technical Conference.
Energy Day Strawman Proposal
Presentation transcript:

Energy Day Timing Issues and Operational Concerns Pipeline Segment Wholesale Gas Quadrant North American Energy Standards Board Business Practices Subcommittee Energy Day Meetings January 24-25, 2005

2 WGQ Gas Day Standard WGQ Gas Day – Standard Time for the gas day should be 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. (Central Clock Time) * – Significant requirement – flow change times should have a high degree of operational reliability Capacity optimization Delivery assurance Safety (MAOP) – Time required to provide reliability * Adopted March 7, 1996 – Executive Committee – GISB FERC Order No. 587 – July 17, 1996 FERC Order No. 587 – July 17, 1996 GISB Standards – Version 1.0 – July 31, 1996 GISB Standards – Version 1.0 – July 31, 1996

3 Energy Day Flow Change Time Requirement – Overview Flow planning Operational flexibility Issues related to non-coincident nomination and flow changes – Operational flexibility requirements – Flow rate characteristics ExamplesSafety

4 Energy Day Flow Change Time Requirement Flow planning – Confirmation of supplies and markets Coordination of resources and requirements – Operational changes necessary after scheduling Flow rates changes resulting from scheduling can be anticipated (or planned for) Flows can be optimized to meet daily quantity

5 Energy Day Flow Change Time Requirement Operational flexibility requirements – Time to pre-position gas – Optimize use of compression – Optimize pipeline pressures – Flow changes coordinated between receipt and delivery Minimizes unnecessary line pack changes Minimizes operational imbalances – Optimizes capacity availability

6 Energy Day Flow Change Time Requirement Flow rate characteristics – 25 to 30 mph – Rate changes are not instantaneous – Affected by line pack and pressures Pre-positioning for anticipated loads Compression set up – Adjustability of intra-day flow rates to meet end-of-day scheduled quantities

7 Energy Day Flow Change Time Requirement Pipeline capacity is impacted by – Daily flow rates – Daily scheduled quantities – Scheduled flow changes not made on time Capacity Example – Scheduled flow change from Day 1 to Day 2 – Flow change does not occur until several hours after scheduled time

8 Energy Day Flow Change - Capacity Issue Example Receipt Point Delivery Point Capacity = 240,000 dth/day (10,000 dth/hour) X - Receipt Point – Remote set point actuation Y - Delivery Point – Manual set point actuation x Y Flow

9 Energy Day Flow Change - Capacity Issue Example Nominations – Day 1: Nomination and flow 120,000 dth (5,000 dth/hour) – Day 2: Nomination 240,000 dth (10,000 dth/hour) Operational changes – X - Receipt Point – Change at start of Gas Day – Y - Delivery Point – Change 6 hours after start of Gas Day

10 Energy Day Flow Change - Capacity Issue Example Daily flow at receipt point – 10,000 dth/hour X 24 hours=240,000 dth Daily flow at delivery point – 5,000 dth/hour X 6 hours= 30,000 dth – 10,000 dth/hour X 18 hours =180,000 dth – Delivery total =210,000 dth Consequences – 30,000 dth shortfall at delivery point – 30,000 dth increase in line pack – 30,000 dth imbalance on pipeline

11 Energy Day Flow Change Time Requirement Pipeline delivery reliability is impacted by – Pressure at delivery point – Line pack in place – Daily scheduled quantities Delivery reliability example – Scheduled flow change from Day 1 to Day 2 – Line pack/supplies not in place until several hours after scheduled time

12 Energy Day Flow Change – Delivery Assurance Example Receipt Point Delivery Point Capacity = 240,000 dth/day (10,000 dth/hour) X - Receipt Point – Manual set point actuation Y - Delivery Point – Remote set point actuation Z - Delivery Point – Manual set point actuation X Y Flow Z

13 Energy Day Flow Change – Delivery Assurance Example Nominations – Day 1: Nomination and flow – 120,000 dth (5,000dth/hour) X to Y = 60,000 dth (2,500 dth/hour) X to Z = 60,000 dth (2,500 dth/hour) – Day 2: Nomination – 180,000 dth (7,500 dth/hour) X to Y = 120,000 dth (5,000 dth /hour) X to Z = 60,000 dth (2,500 dth /hour) Operational changes – X - Receipt Point – Change 6 hours after start of Gas Day – Y - Delivery Point – Change set point at start of Gas Day – Z - Delivery Point – No set point change required

14 Energy Day Flow Change – Delivery Assurance Example Day 2 daily flow at receipt point X – 5,000 dth/hour X 6 hours= 30,000 dth – 7,500 dth /hour X 18 hours =135,000 dth – Receipt total =165,000 dth – Scheduled flow = 180,000 dth Day 2 daily flow at delivery point Y – 5,000 dth /hour X 24 hours =120,000 dth – Scheduled flow = 120,000 dth Day 2 daily flow at delivery point Z – 0 dth/hour X 6 hours = 0 dth – 2,500 dth/hour X 18 hours = 45,000 dth – Delivery total = 45,000 dth – Scheduled flow = 60,000 dth Consequences – 15,000 dth shortfall at receipt point X – 15,000 dth shortfall at delivery point Z – No change in line pack

15 Energy Day Timing Safety Issue Safety is a primary requirement/goal – Physical changes often required to effect flow changes ValvesMeasurementCompression – Night operations are not desirable Visibility Travel conditions Availability of other services (assistance, communications, EMT, etc)

16 Energy Day Flow Change Time Requirement Summary Flow planning – Confirmations/coordination – Gas pre-positioning Operational flexibility – Gas pre-positioning – Compression and measurement set-up – Set point / flow control – Manage physical flow rates – Achieve daily quantities Issues related to non-coincident nomination and flow changes – Physical over / under deliveries Limited by pipeline ability to absorb swings May include the availability of system storage – Increased imbalances – Loss of useful capacity – Operational shortfalls / failures Safety

Questions? Pipeline Segment Wholesale Gas Quadrant North American Energy Standards Board Business Practice Subcommittee Energy Day Meetings January 24-25, 2005