1 WRAP Policy Fire Tracking Systems Draft December 9, 2002 FEJF Meeting December 10-11, 2002 Jackson, WY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Identification of BART-Eligible Sources in the WRAP Region A Summary of the April 4, 2005 Draft Report.
Advertisements

Region 9 Tribal Air Quality Conference Regional Haze Rulemakings: Western Regional Air Partnership Annex July 25, 2002.
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
1 OAQPS Guidance on -- “Consulting with Indian Tribal Governments” November 28, 2007.
1 OAR Guidance on -- “Consulting with Indian Tribal Governments” May 21, 2012.
Western Regional Air Partnership Emissions Database Management System Presentation to Fire Emissions Joint Forum Las Vegas, Nevada December 09, 2004 E.H.
1 WRAP Fire Tracking Systems Draft Intent of WRAP FTS Policy – Assist states/tribes to address emissions inventory and tracking associated with fire in.
The Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) WRAP formed in 1997 as the successor organization to Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission (GCVTC) –
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Fire Emissions Joint Forum –Section 308 Strategies for Fire Coordinating efforts of states changing or developing smoke management strategies for regional.
MONTANA REGIONAL HAZE VISIBILITY PROTECTION PLAN REGULATION OF OPEN BURNING SOURCES BOB HABECK Montana Department of Environmental Quality June 17, 2004.
Fire Emissions Joint Forum Products for Section 309 WRAP June 24, 2002 Pete Lahm, USDA-FS FEJF Chair.
An Update on the Colorado Regional Haze SIP Process and Outcomes Presented at: WRAP – Implementation Work Group San Francisco, CA March 2005.
WRAP Committee and Forum Updates WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
1 Update on the STIP-II Project & Draft Model SIP Brian Finneran Oregon Department of Environmental Quality WRAP Meeting Portland, OR April 3, 2003.
Stationary Sources Joint Forum Update Eric Massey Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Lee Alter and Patrick Cummins Western Governors’ Association.
Next Steps in Regional Haze Planning in the Western U.S. Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31,
Summary of WRAP 2004 Work Plan WRAP Board Meeting October 14, 2003 Salt Lake City, UT.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
REGIONAL HAZE BART – Key Issues For Consideration Eric Massey, Arizona DEQ Lee Alter, WGA SSJF Meeting June 3, 2004 Denver, Colorado.
Guidance for Categorizing Natural vs. Anthropogenic Fire Emissions Follow-up Task from WRAP to Policy for Categorizing Fire Emissions WRAP Fire Emissions.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
1 Fire Emissions Joint Forum: Section 309 Requirements Continued… -Enhanced Smoke Management Programs -Annual Emission Goals for Fire -Fire Tracking Systems.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Santa Fe December 2006 Update on Regional Haze 308 SIP Template.
Market Trading Forum Update Ira Domsky and Colleen Delaney, Co-chairs.
Update on the STIP-II Project: Draft Model SIP Brian Finneran Oregon Department of Environmental Quality WRAP Air Manager’s Committee Santa Fe, NM March.
February 23-24, 2005Salt Lake City, Utah1 Rangeland Burning (Non-Federal Lands) Methodology Phase 2 Fire Emission Inventory WRAP – FEJF.
EPA – Regional Haze Issues IWG Meeting April 17 th Keith Rose and Laurel Dygowski.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Introduction Session (Day 1 – ) Phase III/IV Project Technical Workshop #2 November 1-2, 2005 – San Diego, CA.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Portland August 2006 Suggested Changes to IWG Section 308 SIP Template.
Overview of WRAP FEJF Work Products WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 23-24, 2006 Sacramento, CA Darla Potter (WDEQ) & Mark Fitch (USFS)
WRAP 2003 Work Plan: Overview and IOC Elements WRAP 2003 Work Plan: Overview and IOC Elements WRAP Board Meeting November 12, 2003 Tempe, AZ Rick Sprott.
1 Incorporating Smoke Management Plans into SIPs: THE OREGON 309 SIP Brian Finneran Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Smoke Management Planning.
Exceptional Events and Fire Policy Presented by Don Hodge, U.S. EPA Region 9 Interagency Air and Smoke Council meeting May 2, 2012 Disclaimer: Positions.
VISIBILITY SIPS The Regional Haze Rule Requirements for Fire The Role of the RPOs Opportunities for Participation US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Dennis Haddow.
Implementation Workgroup Meeting December 6, 2006 Attribution of Haze Workgroup’s Monitoring Metrics Document Status: 1)2018 Visibility Projections – Alternative.
Fire Emissions Joint Forum Technical & Policy Products Overview June 16, 2004 Portland, OR.
309/308 Technical & Policy Overview Fire Emissions Joint Forum March 10-11, 2004 San Diego, CA.
Reasonable Further Progress Policy and Mid-Course Reviews John Summerhays EPA Region 5 June 20, 2007.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
Work Items for §309 SIPs WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002 Tom Moore & Brian Finneran.
308 Outline (a) Purpose (b) When are 1st plans due (c) Options for regional planning (d) Core requirements (e) BART requirements (f) Comprehensive periodic.
WRAP WORK PLAN UPDATE NOVEMBER 2001 Submitted to WRAP Board for Approval Andy Ginsburg ODEQ, Co-Chair IOC Forum Mike George ADEQ, Co-Chair TOC Forum.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
Regional Haze SIP Template: Mobile Sources Edie Chang California Air Resources Board WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 2002.
Significance of Mobile Source Emissions for the Purposes of Section 309 of the Regional Haze Rule Patrick Cummins Western Governors’ Association WRAP Board.
Draft Modeling Protocol for PM2.5
Status Report to the Stationary Sources Joint Forum:
BART Overview Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association
WRAP Workplan WESTAR (State Caucus) Recommendations and Action Items
Annual Emission Goals for Fire
WRAP Regional Haze Grant Status, Technical Project Priorities, & Proposed Technical Analysis Forum Tom Moore WRAP Technical Coordinator Attribution.
Western Regional Haze Planning and
Air Update, Georgia EPD Karen Hays Chief, Air Protection Branch
WRAP Overview and Role of Dust Forum
Market Trading Forum Update
Status Report: “Significant Impact” from Mobile Sources and Road Dust
Regional Haze SIP Status Report
Andy Ginsburg, Oregon DEQ
Workshop Technical and Policy Studies to Support the Annex
Uinta Basin General Conformity
Summary of RH-LTS Requirements (d)(3)
Defining “Significant Impact” from Mobile Sources and Road Dust
Fire Emissions Joint Forum February 9, 2005
Market Trading Forum Update
Presented to WRAP November 15, 2001 John Kowalczyk & Bob Neufeld
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
Presentation transcript:

1 WRAP Policy Fire Tracking Systems Draft December 9, 2002 FEJF Meeting December 10-11, 2002 Jackson, WY

2 Introduction 4 Intent of WRAP FTS Policy –Assist states/tribes to address emissions inventory and tracking associated with fire in a way that is adequate for SIP/TIP implementation. 4 WRAP FTS Policy Identifies –Essential fire activity information necessary to consistently calculate emissions and uniformly assess fire impacts to regional haze.

3 Section “A statewide inventory and emissions tracking system (spatial and temporal) of VOC, NOx, elemental and organic carbon, and fine particle emissions from fire. In reporting and tracking emissions from fire within the State, States may use information from regional data gathering and tracking initiatives.” (d)(6)(ii)

4 Section 309 & Section Periodic Progress Reports –Demonstrate reasonable progress –Tracking emissions of pollutants from all sources (including fire)

5 Section SIP/TIP must provide for –“...inventory of emissions of pollutants that are reasonably anticipated to cause or contribute to visibility impairment…” (d)(4)(v) 4 Long-Term Strategies –Emissions information relied upon to determine the emission reduction obligations –Identify all anthropogenic sources of visibility impairment considering area sources –Anticipated net effect on visibility due to projected changes in area source emissions

6 Policy Statement A 4 Fire activity information for all fire types is needed in the WRAP region. A fire tracking system that captures this information will form the basis of a fire emissions inventory compiled annually, which is needed to support Regional Haze Rule requirements.

7 Policy Statement B 4 A fire tracking system includes the following seven essential components that are necessary in order to consistently calculate emissions and to uniformly assess impacts to regional haze: 1. Date of Burn 2. Burn Location 3. Area of Burn 4. Fuel Type 5. Pre-Burn Fuel Loading 6. Type of Burn 7. “Anthropogenic” or “Natural” Classification

8 Policy Statement C 4 A fire tracking system should include additional components as needed to support the development and implementation of annual emission goals and other control measures.

9 Policy Statement D 4 A fire tracking system should include a component that addresses the projection of fire emissions, which is necessary to meet the requirements of the Regional Haze Rule.

10 Policy Statement E 4 The development of fire tracking systems by states and tribes will be done collaboratively with state, tribal, local and federal land management agencies, and private parties.

11 Appendix C Supporting Information 4 Essential Components 1 through 7 4 Optional Components –Daily Tracking –Fuel Consumption –Non-Burning Alternatives –Additional Fire Tracking Information 4 Data Collection Methods –Direct Data Collection –Indirect Estimation NEW

12 Future FTS Related Work 4 Assess potential de minimis levels –FEJF base on source/impact relationships 4 Format for fire tracking system components –FEJF work closely with Emissions Forum –FEJF develop further guidance procedure for submittal and format of fire tracking system information quality assurance methods 4 Fire emissions projection component –FEJF develop guidance

13 WRAP November 13, WRAP FTS Policy presented by Pete 4 WRAP Board discussion –No major concerns –FEJF thanked for developing the FTS Policy –Support for FTS Policy but no formal action due to ongoing comment period –Support for the FEJF to come back to the WRAP Board for an approval process prior to the next WRAP meeting

14 WRAP FTS Policy Review 4 November , 2002 –WRAP website posting –Notice of review to 200+ people 4 10 Comments Received –7 States (AK, CA, CO, ID, OR, UT, WY) –EPA OAQPS –Salish and Kootenai Confederated Tribes –NTEC 4 Comment summary will be posted

15 Changes Based on Comments 4 No changes to Policy Statements. 4 Clarification regarding states/tribes responsibility to supply essential activity information from their FTS to the WRAP. 4 Addition of Non-Burning Alternatives section to the Optional Components in Appendix C. 4 Revised Fire Emissions Projection annotation for clarification.

16 Changes Based on Comments 4 Applicability of FTS to other emission inventory needs (e.g., NAAQS). 4 Inclusion of some sources not addressed by the Policy (e.g., residential wood combustion) in other emissions inventory efforts as area sources in populated areas. 4 Tribal language modified for appropriateness and consistency.

17 Changes Based on Comments 4 Additional footnoting for clarification purposes. 4 Additional website references for FEJF work products. 4 Other minor formatting/wordsmithing changes throughout. 4 Several comments applicable to upcoming work (i.e., guidance) will be forwarded to a new FEJF Task Team for consideration.

18 Review / Approval Process 4 FEJF –Review December 10-19, 2002 –Conference Call December 19, 2002 for consensus approval 4 WRAP – review and consensus approval –After FEJF consensus approval and before the next WRAP meeting (April 2-3, 2003)