Distributed Policy-based Management of Measurement- based Traffic Engineering Steven Van den Berghe IMEC / Ghent University (Intec)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QoS Strategy in DiffServ aware MPLS environment Teerapat Sanguankotchakorn, D.Eng. Telecommunications Program, School of Advanced Technologies Asian Institute.
Advertisements

APNOMS2003Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd.1 A QoS Control Method Cooperating with a Dynamic Load Balancing Mechanism Akiko Okamura, Koji Nakamichi, Hitoshi Yamada.
Design and Implementation of Performance Management for the DiffServ-aware-MPLS Network Dong-Jin Shin, Young-Tak Kim Advanced Networking Technology Lab.(ANT.
Japan Telecom Information & Communication Labs
Traffic Engineering over MPLS
Halina Tarasiuk, Robert Janowski and Wojciech Burakowski Warsaw University of Technology, Poland Admissible Traffic Load of Real Time Class of Service.
S Licentiate course on Telecommunications Technology (4+1+3 cr.) Course Topic Spring 2000: Routing Algorithms in the DiffServ MPLS Networks Introduction.
Philip Eardley, Bob Briscoe, Dave Songhurst - BT Francois Le Faucheur, Anna Charny, Vassilis Liatsos – Cisco Kwok-Ho Chan, Joe Babiarz, Stephen Dudley.
Nicolas Simar – DANTE : Premium IP and LBE transparency on GEANT QoS on GÉANT Premium IP and Less than Best Effort.
IETF Differentiated Services Concerns with Intserv: r Scalability: signaling, maintaining per-flow router state difficult with large number of flows r.
Logically Centralized Control Class 2. Types of Networks ISP Networks – Entity only owns the switches – Throughput: 100GB-10TB – Heterogeneous devices:
Deployment of MPLS VPN in Large ISP Networks
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—8-1 MPLS TE Overview Understanding MPLS TE Components.
1 Traffic Engineering (TE). 2 Network Congestion Causes of congestion –Lack of network resources –Uneven distribution of traffic caused by current dynamic.
INTERNET QOS: A BIG PICTURE XIPENG XIAO AND LIONEL M. NI, MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Jinyoung You CS540, Network Architect.
Designing a New Routing Simulator for DiffServ MPLS Networks Peng Zhang Zhansong Ma Raimo Kantola {pgzhang, zhansong,
IPv6 Technology and Advanced Services 19/10/2004 IPv6 Technology and Advanced Services IPv6 Quality of Service Dimitris Primpas
CPSC Topics in Multimedia Networking A Mechanism for Equitable Bandwidth Allocation under QoS and Budget Constraints D. Sivakumar IBM Almaden Research.
Differentiated Services. Service Differentiation in the Internet Different applications have varying bandwidth, delay, and reliability requirements How.
Traffic Engineering Jennifer Rexford Advanced Computer Networks Tuesdays/Thursdays 1:30pm-2:50pm.
MPLS H/W update Brief description of the lab What it is? Why do we need it? Mechanisms and Protocols.
School of Information Technologies IP Quality of Service NETS3303/3603 Weeks
Internet QoS Syed Faisal Hasan, PhD (Research Scholar Information Trust Institute) Visiting Lecturer ECE CS/ECE 438: Communication Networks.
An Architecture for Differentiated Services
Design of QoS Router Terrance Lee. Broadband Internet Architecture Intelligent Access Electronic Switch (Intserv or Diffserv) Switching /Routing QoS Security.
Ashish Gupta (98130) Ashish Gupta (98131) Under guidance of Prof. B. N. Jain.
1 Network Architecture and Design Internet QoS Differentiated Services (DiffServ) Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Reference Zheng Wang, Internet QoS,
Internet Traffic Management Prafull Suryawanshi Roll No - 04IT6008.
November th Requirements for supporting Customer RSVP and RSVP-TE over a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN draft-kumaki-l3VPN-e2e-mpls-rsvp-te-reqts-05.txt.
Implement a QoS Algorithm for Real-Time Applications in the DiffServ-aware MPLS Network Zuo-Po Huang, *Ji-Feng Chiu, Wen-Shyang Hwang and *Ce-Kuen Shieh.
Tiziana FerrariQuality of Service for Remote Control in the High Energy Physics Experiments CHEP, 07 Feb Quality of Service for Remote Control in.
25 January 2001TEQUILA Workshop Amsterdam1 Describing, Negotiating & Providing value-added IP services
AIMS’99 Workshop Heidelberg, May 1999 Ko / CP 4/99 Linkage between Internet Service Architectures and ATM
May 2001GRNET GRNET2 Designing The Optical Internet of Greece: A case study Magda Chatzaki Dimitrios K. Kalogeras Nassos Papakostas Stelios Sartzetakis.
{vp, sra, Security in Differentiated Services Networks Venkatesh Prabhakar Srinivas R.
QoS in MPLS SMU CSE 8344.
Computer Networking Quality-of-Service (QoS) Dr Sandra I. Woolley.
Integrated Services (RFC 1633) r Architecture for providing QoS guarantees to individual application sessions r Call setup: a session requiring QoS guarantees.
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS). 2 MPLS Overview A forwarding scheme designed to speed up IP packet forwarding (RFC 3031) Idea: use a fixed length.
8/98 1 A Two-Tier Model for Internet Resource Management Lixia Zhang UCLA IETF RSVP WG August 26, 1998.
Lecture 15. IGP and MPLS D. Moltchanov, TUT, Spring 2008 D. Moltchanov, TUT, Spring 2015.
Internet Traffic Management. Basic Concept of Traffic Need of Traffic Management Measuring Traffic Traffic Control and Management Quality and Pricing.
IP QoS for 3G. A Possible Solution The main focus of this network QoS mechanism is to provide one, real time, service in addition to the normal best effort.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.3: Selecting an Appropriate QoS Policy Model.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Optimizing Converged Cisco Networks (ONT) Module 3: Introduction to IP QoS.
MPLS and Traffic Engineering Ji-Hoon Yun Computer Communications and Switching Systems Lab.
Class-based QoS  Internet QoS model requires per session state at each router  1000s s of flows  per session RSVP is complex => reluctance.
Budapest University of Technology and Economics Department of Telecommunications and Media Informatics Optimized QoS Protection of Ethernet Trees Tibor.
Monitoring and Measurement System in EuQoS project dr Andrzej Beben Telecommunication Network Technology Group Warsaw University.
Sub-ip - 1 Blurring the Lines Between Circuits and Protocols: Plans to Re-Organize Sub-IP Technologies in the IETF Scott Bradner Harvard University.
Applicazione del paradigma Diffserv per il controllo della QoS in reti IP: aspetti teorici e sperimentali Stefano Salsano Università di Roma “La Sapienza”
A Practical Approach for Providing QoS: MPLS and DiffServ
Differentiated Services MPLS Doug Young Suh Last updated : Aug 1, 2009 diffServ/RSVP.
Bjorn Landfeldt, The University of Sydney 1 NETS3303 Networked Systems.
Supporting DiffServ with Per-Class Traffic Engineering in MPLS.
TEQUILA Traffic Engineering for Quality of Service in the Internet at Large Scale Kostas G. Anagnostakis TERENA Project partially funded by the EC under.
Differentiated Services IntServ is too complex –More focus on services than deployment –Functionality similar to ATM, but at the IP layer –Per flow QoS.
1 QoS monitoring and SLS auditing TEQUILA, Amsterdam January 25 th, 2001 Victor Reijs.
Internet Traffic Engineering Motivation: –The Fish problem, congested links. –Two properties of IP routing Destination based Local optimization TE: optimizing.
Multi-protocol Label Switching
Bearer Control for VoIP and VoMPLS Control Plane Francois Le Faucheur Bruce Thompson Cisco Systems, Inc. Angela Chiu AT&T March 30, 2000.
MPLS Introduction How MPLS Works ?? MPLS - The Motivation MPLS Application MPLS Advantages Conclusion.
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Routing algorithms provide support for performance goals – Distributed and dynamic React to congestion Load balance.
Multi-protocol Label Switching (MPLS) RFC 3031 MPLS provides new capabilities: QoS support Traffic engineering VPN Multiprotocol support.
Inter domain signaling protocol
Potential Areas of Research Activity – March 2000
Point-to-Multipoint Pseudo-Wire Encapsulation draft-raggarwa-pwe3-p2mp-pw-encaps-00.txt R. Aggarwal (Juniper)
Dynamic Management for End-to-end IP QoS
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS). 2 MPLS Overview A forwarding scheme designed to speed up IP packet forwarding (RFC 3031) Idea: use a fixed length.
DiffServ Support in MPLS Networks
Presentation transcript:

Distributed Policy-based Management of Measurement- based Traffic Engineering Steven Van den Berghe IMEC / Ghent University (Intec)

outline draft-ietf-tewg-measure Measurement-based Tunnel management ?

Tequila ( SLS management Traffic Engineering Data Plane Monitoring Policy Management Policy Consumer Pol. Mgt tool SLS Subs SLS invoc. Traffic Forecast DRsM DRtM MPLSTC ND SLS Repos. PHB

Tequila ( SLS management Traffic Engineering Data Plane Monitoring Policy Management USERUSER SLS Demand Resources Status Feedback Configuration

Resource Provisioning 2-level TE DiffServ / MPLS config Admission Control Path Selection SLS subscription Demand Forecast SLS Invocation Injected Traffic

Requirements Feedback Mechanism Operating in Multipath / Multiclass environment (DiffServ over MPLS) Large set of possible metrics One way Loss, delay, offered load Sollicited / Unsollicited report triggering Regular status updates If (delay>x) then trigger Need for measurement architecture

Where / How to Measure Active Measurement Endpoints Passive Measurement point Scalability/Multipath Issue Every ingress 2 every egress 4 every CoS No single path => no single measurement result Complexity Issue New measurement functions needed in every node Could also be an ISP Trust Issue Isnt nobody touching my injected packets Not for TE

SLS MonitorNetwork Monitor Measurements For TE: tequila approach ICE Node Monitor AM PM AM SLS scope (Link,PHB) scope

What to Measure Service Level Agreement (SLA) Transport Service Service Level Specification (SLS) QoS class / Path Per Domain Behaviour (PDB) Per Hop Behaviour (PHB) Traffic Conditioning Block Scheduler (e.g. WFQ) Algorithmic Dropper (e.g. RED) Throughput Monitoring End-to-End delay/loss LSP stats Per Hop Delay/Loss/Queue stats

Down at the wire Queue Loss Offered Load LSP Offered Load Classified Load Conditioning Loss LSP Throughput Classified Load Active Measurement Loss/Delay How do I manage all of this ?

Measurement-Based Tunnel Management 2-Level Traffic Engineering High-level multipath balancing & DiffServ provisioning Low-level Path Selection based on accurate network status Tunnel Management DiffServ Management Uniform Measurement Management Tunnel Management Uniform Measurement Management

Case study: Level 2 Tunnel Management Tunnel Manager Evaluator Monitor If signal then switch traffic to Path with less problems Signal:

Impact of Read-Out Periods Tunnel Manager Monitor Evaluator RSVP-TE

Active vs. Passive 20 applications started & buffers full Active loss measurements Long RO needed to be accurate Long RO-> less responsive Try to Avoid Active Measurements

Whats Next Tunnel Management Tunnel creation, maintenance & traffic mapping Regardless of technology Regardless of application MPLS IPsec P2P Grid Tunnel Set-up Tunnel Monitoring Tunnel Mapping

Whats Next Tunnel Management Uniform Measurement Management Uniform access to measurements & reporting Regardless of technology Regardless of application Next to TE: DoS, network diagnostics, accounting,…. Resource control Aggregation close to the wire (~high speed links) Security

Thank You Any Questions ? draft-ietf-tewg-measure-02.txt