Damon Franz California Public Utilities Commission ACEEE 2010 Hot Water Forum May 13, 2010 The California Solar Initiative - Thermal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solar Water Heating as a Green House Gas Reduction and Energy Conservation Strategy Florida Solar Energy Industries Association and Florida Solar Energy.
Advertisements

California’s MASH Low Income Solar PV Incentive Program October 5, 2011 Melanie McCutchan Senior Analyst California Center for Sustainable.
Next Steps. 2 Timelines and Action Items Immediate action items For parties: submit post workshop comments on all issues discussed in workshop In particular,
JOINT LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE HEARING SENATE BUDGET and FISCAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Delivering Energy Savings for California AMERICAN RECOVERY & Karen.
Public Interest Energy Research –Natural Gas Program Status Presentation to Air Emissions Advisory Committee May 12, 2005 Philip Misemer California Energy.
1 OEE Programs oee.nrcan.gc.ca Auto Smart. 2 Office of Energy Efficiency Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) created the Office of Energy Efficiency (OEE)
California Solar Initiative Go Solar California! Program Update Presentation to the Assembly Utilities & Commerce Committee Sean Gallagher, Energy Division.
City of Cape Town Residential Solar Water Heater Accreditation Programme Environmental Resource Management Date: 17/09/2014.
2 A Brief Energy Trust Primer Product of 1996 Regional Review and 1999 Oregon Legislation establishing a 3% public purpose charge on two electric investor.
State Incentives for Energy Efficiency Commercial and Industrial New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Office of Clean Energy Mona L. Mosser Bureau of Energy.
DRA Advocacy Joe Como, Acting Director. 2 DRA Facts The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference! 3  History: CPUC created DRA (formerly known as the.
1 CPUC Responsibilities for Renewable and Energy Efficiency Resource Commitments by Investor-Owned Utilities and Ratepayers Hearing on Public Goods Charge.
1 State Allocation Board Hearing Solar Energy and Energy Efficiency Project Options for California Schools Mark Johnson, Energy Solutions Manager - Schools.
Welcome and Introductions CoServ Presentation & Member Input.
Arizona Corporation Commission Natural Gas Workshop September 8, 2005 Presented by David Hutchens, General Manager, Fuels and Wholesale Power Joe Salkowski,
Cost-Effectiveness and Solar Water Heating. 2 Why is it important to discuss cost- effectiveness (C-E) of SWH? C-E is a metric by which the CPUC will.
CSI-Thermal Program Public Forum December 18, 2013.
Realtor Solar Overview California Solar Initiative Updated
California Solar Initiative Public Forum Hosted by CCSE October 15, 2008.
About the Energy Retailers Association Peak body representing electricity and gas retailers in the national energy markets Members are.
Energy Storage R Energy Storage Procurement & Policy Options Arthur O’Donnell/Aloke Gupta/Elizaveta Malashenko Energy Division Grid Planning.
ENERGY STAR ® for New Homes Jennifer Talsma Account Manager, New Housing Programs Office of Energy Efficiency Corey McBurney Managing Director, EnerQuality.
Hosted by Energy Division and Program Administrators California Public Utilities Commission February 23, 2011 CSI-Thermal Workshop Other Thermal Technologies.
CSI Phase II: R Solar for Affordable Housing CPUC Intent: Set aside a “minimum” of 10% of budget $216.8M Solar Economics Less Compelling to CARE-Households.
Self-Generation Incentive Program 1 California Solar Initiative Update.
CSI-Thermal Program. California Solar Initiative CSI Thermal Agenda CSI-Thermal Metrics Low-Income CALSEIA PTM Update- Incentive Increase Statewide Marketing.
Highlights of Commission Activities Little Rock ASHRAE Monthly Meeting October 12, 2011 Presented By: John P. Bethel.
C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N California Energy Commission’s Energy Efficiency Research Activities Related to the HVAC Industry David.
August 5, 2008 APPA Webinar Lindsay Joye City of Palo Alto Utilities (CPAU) Efficiency Studies from Comprehensive to Customer-Specific.
Presentation to the: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Demand-Side Response Working Group December 8, 2006 Gas Utility Decoupling in New Jersey A.
Energy Efficiency Program Costs Project No Rulemaking to Amend Energy Efficiency Rule June 30, 2010.
Context, Principles, and Key Questions for Allowance Allocation in the Electricity Sector Joint Workshop of the Public Utilities Commission and Energy.
IOU Low Income Program Applications CARE and Energy Savings Assistance Programs Presentation to the LIOB May 11, 2011 San Francisco, California.
1 CSI Staff Proposal Workshop James Loewen/Melicia Charles California Public Utilities Commission October 25, 2010.
Finance Workshop: Utility Support for Residential Sector Finance Mechanisms Downey, CA June 15, 2009 – Morning Jeanne Clinton, Facilitator California Public.
Legislative Summary For The Low Income Oversight Board (LIOB) Meeting on 24 March, 2009, at Burbank.
SDG&E ® Multi-Family Proposed Whole Building Performance Assessment Don Wiggins Residential Programs Manager San Diego Gas & Electric ® May 11, 2011.
M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Energy Optimization Plans 2011 Biennial Review Pre-Filing Update Rob Ozar, Manager Energy Optimization Section March.
1 Review of CPUC Role with the Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Program on Natural Gas Briefing for California Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications.
1 Update on the California Solar Initiative Molly Tirpak Sterkel California Public Utilities Commission December 8, 2008.
Local and Regional Govt Programs Jeremy Battis Regulatory Analyst, Energy Division May 7, 2015 Existing Buildings Energy Efficiency Workshop California.
CPUC Role in AB 32 Implementation LIOB – 2 nd June, 2010 San Diego, CA.
1 California Solar Initiative Low Income Multifamily Program Public Workshop March 17, 2008 San Francisco, CA.
Energy Efficiency Statewide Strategic Planning Effort and Progress Cathy Fogel, Ph.D., Analyst California Public Utilities Commission & Valerie.
1 CSI Staff Proposal Workshop Energy Division California Public Utilities Commission November 17, 2010.
LIOB Meeting 6/5/20081 CPUC Issues Impacting Low Income Community Climate Change Activities: Policy & Planning Division anticipates issuance in July 2008.
Senate Bill 1 and the New Solar Homes Partnership Valerie Hall California Energy Commission December 8,
Electric / Gas / Water Summary of White Paper Findings CPUC SWH Workshop August 26, 2008.
Program Update Sean Gallagher January 31, 2008 California Solar Initiative.
NARUC/FERC COLLABORATIVE: DEMAND RESPONSE Paul Suskie, Chairman, Arkansas Public Service Commission July 15, 2007.
1 Energy Efficiency Programs For Local Governments & Community Partners Christina Prestella Program Manager, Government & Community Partnerships PG&E September.
AB 32 Implementation Nuts and Bolts IEP Annual Meeting September 22, 2008 Kevin Kennedy Office of Climate Change California Air Resources Board.
CPUC Public Agenda 3247 Thursday, January 21, 2010, 10:00 a.m. 505 Van Ness Ave, San Francisco Commissioners: Michael R. Peevey Dian M. Grueneich John.
Utilities’ Update on Energy Savings Assistance Program Studies Ordered in D LIOB Meeting August 21, 2013 Sacramento, California.
California Solar Initiative Dian M. Grueneich, Commissioner California Public Utilities Commission March 30, 2006.
Energy Efficiency Forum State of California/Investor Owned Utility Partnership Program Date: September 27, Partnership. A Unique Opportunity.
Energy Efficiency Update Before the Senate Energy, Utilities & Communications Committee Part 2 May 17, 2011 – State Capitol Robin Smutny-Jones Assistant.
EmPower MD Act overview and Demand Response Training EmPower Maryland.
Program Overview Sachu Constantine April 23, 2008 Distributed Generation/ California Solar Initiative.
Statewide Marketing, Education, and Outreach ALJ Steve Roscow CPUC April 14,
2015 Statewide Collaborative December 1, 2015 Ameren Missouri and Laclede Co-delivered Residential Direct-Install Low Income Energy Efficiency Program.
1 Pepco and Delmarva Power Demand Side Management Programs Stakeholders Meeting February 20, 2009.
1 Detailed EM&V Approach for each of BGE’s Proposed Conservation Programs January 10, 2008.
11 Overview of the CPUC’s CSI-Thermal Low-Income Solar Water Heating (SWH) Program January 2012 California Public Utilities Commission Energy Division.
Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP)
Workshop Presentation
City-wide LED Street Light Conversion Program
Restructuring Roundtable April 11, 2008 Richard Cowart
State Allocation Board Hearing Solar Energy and Energy Efficiency Project Options for California Schools Mark Johnson, Energy Solutions Manager - Schools.
3 Year Plans for Energy Efficiency: lessons learned and forging forward Christina Halfpenny Director, Energy Efficiency Division
Presentation transcript:

Damon Franz California Public Utilities Commission ACEEE 2010 Hot Water Forum May 13, 2010 The California Solar Initiative - Thermal Program

2 Introduction Statewide effort to transform the market for solar thermal through rebates, standards, training and marketing What is the CSI-Thermal Program?

3 Introduction Rebates are now available! CSI-Thermal Program began offering rebates to single-family residential customers on May 1, 2010 CPUC is currently finalizing the multi-family and commercial portion of the program Applications for low-income housing and non-water heating technologies likely in the fall or early next year

4 Program Development Timeline July 2007 – December 2009: SWH rebates introduced as a pilot program in San Diego, administered by CCSE. October 2007: Assembly Bill 1470 (Huffman) directs CPUC to study the results of the Pilot, and if cost-effective, design and implement a statewide program April 2009: Itron releases analysis of pilot data on SWH rebates

5 Program Development Timeline July 2009: CPUC Energy Division issues Staff Proposal recommending statewide rebate program January 2010: Decision authorizing statewide incentive program approved by the CPUC Commissioners May 1, 2010: Incentives are available for single-family residential customers May 24, 2010: Program Administrators file Handbook for Multifamily/Commercial Incentives

6 CSI-Thermal Program Design Funding is separate for SWH systems that displace natural gas than for those that displace electricity (as required by law) N-G displacing systems are funded from N-G ratepayers under AB 920 Electric-displacing systems are funded from electric ratepayers under CSI Incentive amounts for the two types of systems are different due to differing economics Both types of systems use the same application forms, database, etc.

7 Design Builds on Prior Efforts The CSI-Thermal Program incorporates lessons learned from the SWH programs of the 1970s and 1980s Incentives that are too rich can increase the retail price for SWH systems Quality control is essential Government support is not eternal, and we should plan for the day when it no longer exists by reducing incentives gradually

8 CSI-Thermal Program Goals Increase the size of the market in California Install the equivalent of 200,000 residential systems, displacing 585 million therms of natural gas Increase consumer confidence and understanding of SWH technology Program requirements and inspections protect consumers ensure quality systems are installed SRCC Certification is required Maximum allowances on shading and other installation parameters Random inspections and penalties ensure that contractors comply with quality standards

9 CSI-Thermal Program goals Support reductions in the cost of SWH systems through efficiency and innovation Installer training and “learning by doing” likely to reduce labor costs Competition for market share can spark innovation that drives technology costs lower Reduce other market Barriers Example: Program will provide training for local permitting officials to reduce cost and time of obtaining a permit

10 Market Transformation The CSI-Thermal Program is designed to drive market transformation through three parallel efforts Cash-back rebates for solar thermal systems Funding for advertising, public outreach and awareness Training for installers and building inspectors

11 Rebates Total of $305.8 million in rebates structured to drive market transformation Incentives start high to encourage market entrants, then decline to foster competition Incentives start at about $1,500 for a single-family system gas-displacing system and decline in 4 steps to $550 for the same system Incentive declines are triggered by growth on the natural- gas side of the market Rebates are based on system output to encourage efficient, well-performing systems

12 Rebates Rebates split between two customer classes 40% of rebates set aside for single-family residential class Multi-family/commercial class may use up to 60% of rebates Capped at $500,000 per system Large systems more cost-effective, but small systems have more “market transformation” potential

13 Rebates – Natural Gas StepRebate for average system Maximum rebate Incentive per therm displaced Funding amount 1$1,500$1,875$12.82$50 M 2$1,200$1,500$10.26$45 M 3$900$1,125$7.69$45 M 4$550$687.5$4.70$40 M

14 Rebates – Electric StepRebate for average system Maximum rebate Incentive per kWh displaced 1$1,010$1,263$0.37 2$820$1,025$0.30 3$600$750$0.22 4$380$475$0.14

15 Market Facilitation Total budget of $31.25 is split between marketing, outreach and training PAs will undertake a statewide marketing campaign to increase customer awareness of solar thermal technologies Technical training will be offered to increase the pool of qualified installers Training and outreach will be offered to local permitting officials to reduce the time and cost of obtaining building permits

16 Measurement and Evaluation Program has a budget of $6.125 million for measurement and evaluation A sample of systems will be monitored and the data recorded Participants and non-participants will be surveyed Market knowledge gained from this program will inform and improve future efforts

17 Questions What are the additional barriers to widespread market adoption of solar thermal technologies? Which technologies have the greatest potential for widespread adoption? How can government best promote these technologies with minimal distortions of the market? How can we encourage creative financing arrangements to mitigate high up-front costs? Others questions?