Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars 2003 1 CONGESTION PRICING IN AIR TRANSPORTATION Karine Deschinkel Laboratoire PRiSM – Université de Versailles.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Transportation Systems. PART II: FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION.
Advertisements

Using dynamic flow network modeling for global flight plan optimization CARE workshop 14th –15th March 2001, EUROCONTROL Brussels. Dritan Nace Heudiasyc.
UNIVERSITY of GLASGOW A Comprehensive Approach to ATM Incorporating Autonomous Aircraft ATM Research Group University of Glasgow.
1 Market-based DEMAND MANAGEMENT strategies Giovanni Andreatta, University of Padova Lorenzo Brunetta, Milan Polytechnic Un. Guglielmo Guastalla, Eurocontrol.
CHARLES N. GLOVER MICHAEL O. BALL DAVID J. LOVELL Collaborative Approaches to the Application of Enroute Traffic Flow Management Optimization Models.
Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment I)
Collaborative Gate Allocation Alex Cuevas, Joanna Ji, Mattan Mansoor, Katie McLaughlin, Joshua Sachse, and Amir Shushtarian.
MOLINO II -model structure- KULeuven and ADPC. Contents MOLINO I: –Overview –list of improvements needed MOLINO II: –Network structure and definitions.
CWI PNA2, Reading Seminar, Presented by Yoni Nazarathy EURANDOM and the Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, TU/e Eindhoven September 17, 2009 An Assortment.
European Commission Slot allocation at Community airports Infrastructures and Airports Unit Klaas Pel.
Yu Stephanie Sun 1, Lei Xie 1, Qi Alfred Chen 2, Sanglu Lu 1, Daoxu Chen 1 1 State Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University, China.
1 EL736 Communications Networks II: Design and Algorithms Class8: Networks with Shortest-Path Routing Yong Liu 10/31/2007.
GEOG 111 & 211A Transportation Planning Traffic Assignment.
LMI Airline Responses to NAS Capacity Constraints Peter Kostiuk Logistics Management Institute National Airspace System Resource.
4-step Model – Trip Assignment 1CVEN672 Lecture 13-1.
© 2003 Warren B. Powell Slide 1 Approximate Dynamic Programming for High Dimensional Resource Allocation NSF Electric Power workshop November 3, 2003 Warren.
*Sponsored in part by the DARPA IT-MANET Program, NSF OCE Opportunistic Scheduling with Reliability Guarantees in Cognitive Radio Networks Rahul.
Department of Engineering, Control & Instrumentation Research Group 22 – Mar – 2006 Optimisation Based Clearance of Nonlinear Flight Control Laws Prathyush.
Job Release-Time Design in Stochastic Manufacturing Systems Using Perturbation Analysis By: Dongping Song Supervisors: Dr. C.Hicks & Dr. C.F.Earl Department.
Airspace Resource Allocation -Operations Impact Prof. R. John Hansman, Director MIT International Center for Air Transportation
Rethinking Internet Traffic Management: From Multiple Decompositions to a Practical Protocol Jiayue He Princeton University Joint work with Martin Suchara,
Planning operation start times for the manufacture of capital products with uncertain processing times and resource constraints D.P. Song, Dr. C.Hicks.
TRIP ASSIGNMENT.
Transportation Logistics Professor Goodchild Spring 2009.
Airline Fleet Routing and Flight Scheduling under Market Competitions
MODEL FOR FLIGHT LEVEL ASSIGNMENT PROBLEM ICRAT International Conference on Research in Air Transportation Alfred Bashllari National & Kapodistrian.
Luis Cadarso(1), Vikrant Vaze(2), Cynthia Barnhart(3), Ángel Marín(1)
Location Models For Airline Hubs Behaving as M/D/C Queues By: Shuxing Cheng Yi-Chieh Han Emile White.
Elements of the Heuristic Approach
Equilibrium problems with equilibrium constraints: A new modelling paradigm for revenue management Houyuan Jiang Danny Ralph Stefan Scholtes The Judge.
Internet Infrastructure and Pricing. Internet Pipelines Technology of the internet enables ecommerce –Issues of congestion and peak-load pricing –Convergence.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
1 Congestion Pricing and Queuing Theory Giovanni Andreatta and Guglielmo Lulli Dip. di Matematica Pura ed Applicata - Università di Padova.
EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE1 AIRSPACE CONGESTION: Pre-Tactical Measures and Operational Events ICRAT Conference, Zilina November 22, 2004 Nabil BELOUARDY.
EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE1 1st ICRAT Zilina 04/11/22-24 Frédéric Ferchaud EEC INO/LaBRI Vu Duong EEC INO Cyril Gavoille, Mohamed Mosbah LaBRI, University.
. Center TRACON Automation System (CTAS) Traffic Management Advisor (TMA) Transportation authorities around the globe are working to keep air traffic moving.
Modeling and simulation of systems Simulation optimization and example of its usage in flexible production system control.
Some network flow problems in urban road networks Michael Zhang Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California Davis.
Federal Aviation Administration ATO Future Schedule Generation Performance Analysis and Strategy January 27, 2010.
Workshop PRIXNET Distributed Virtual Circuit Switching protocol with auction pricing Loubna ECHABBI Dominique BARTH Laboratoire PRISM.
1 1st ANNUAL WORKSHOP NAS-WIDE SIMULATION IN SUPPORT OF NEXTGEN: REQUIREMENTS AND CAPABILITIES Lance Sherry Center for Air Transportation Systems Research.
LMINET2: An Enhanced LMINET Dou Long, Shahab Hasan December 10, 2008.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Dynamics of Traffic Flows in Combined Day-to-day and With- in Day Context Chandra Balijepalli ITS, Leeds September 2004.
Presented By Evan Demick  Sector Traffic Control (R-Side) and Sector Traffic Planning (D-Side).  Facility Flow Planning (TMU).  National Flow Planning.
Ames Research Center 1 FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Banavar Sridhar Shon Grabbe First Annual Workshop NAS-Wide Simulation.
June 14th, 2006 Henk Taale Regional Traffic Management Method and Tool.
Benjamin Heydecker JD (Puff) Addison Centre for Transport Studies UCL Dynamic Modelling of Road Transport Networks.
Improving Revenue by System Integration and Cooperative Optimization Reservations & Yield Management Study Group Annual Meeting Berlin April 2002.
1 An Integer Linear Programming model for Airline Use (in the context of CDM) Intro to Air Traffic Control Dr. Lance Sherry Ref: Exploiting the Opportunities.
Benefits of CDM Within AFI Region Presented by: Mikateko Chabani.
Turning Goals Into Reality: Revolutionizing Air Transportation Mobility George L. Donohue George Mason University.
Fair Allocation and Network Ressources Pricing Fair Allocation and Network Ressources Pricing A simplified bi-level model Work sponsored by France Télécom.
1 An Arc-Path Model for OSPF Weight Setting Problem Dr.Jeffery Kennington Anusha Madhavan.
Data Consolidation: A Task Scheduling and Data Migration Technique for Grid Networks Author: P. Kokkinos, K. Christodoulopoulos, A. Kretsis, and E. Varvarigos.
Generated Trips and their Implications for Transport Modelling using EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi Senior Transport Planner PDC Consultants, UK Also at Napier.
RSPA/Volpe Center Arrival/Departure Tradeoff Optimization at STL: a Case Study Dr. Eugene P. Gilbo tel.: (617) CDM.
Assignment. Where are we? There are four scopes 1. Logit 2. Assignment Today! 3. LUTI 4. Other models and appraisal.
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Route Choice CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Optimization-based Cross-Layer Design in Networked Control Systems Jia Bai, Emeka P. Eyisi Yuan Xue and Xenofon D. Koutsoukos.
Credit and Collections optimization and decision support An example of the intersection of decision tool development and management consulting Includes.
RSPA/Volpe Center Arrival/Departure Capacity Tradeoff Optimization: a Case Study at the St. Louis Lambert International Airport (STL) Dr. Eugene P. Gilbo.
Transportation Planning Asian Institute of Technology
COmbining Probable TRAjectories — COPTRA
A Multi-Airport Dynamic Network Flow Model with Capacity Uncertainty
A Modeling Framework for Flight Schedule Planning
ME 521 Computer Aided Design 15-Optimization
Nikola Ivanov, Fedja Netjasov, Radosav Jovanovic
Boltzmann Machine (BM) (§6.4)
Presentation transcript:

Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars CONGESTION PRICING IN AIR TRANSPORTATION Karine Deschinkel Laboratoire PRiSM – Université de Versailles

Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars OUTLINE Problem Assignment theory Congestion pricing Strategy adopted Numerical experiment

Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars Problem (1) Airspace under control is divided into sectors. A sector is a volume of space defined by a floor, a ceiling and vertical borders Sectors are assigned to controllers that ensure safety of the flights.

Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars Growth of air traffic demand (between 5 % and 12 % since 1985) Problem (2) Congestion of airports and sectors (8 % of delays > 15 mn). High controller workload. How to reduce congestion? To modify the structure of airspace (by increasing the number of runways and sectors) but : increase of coordination workload and additionnal costs. To perform flow control  By finding a slot allocation (Ground delay programs)  By finding a route-slot allocation (Works of Oussedick and Delahaye)

Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars Problem (3) Proposed approach Context A target route-slot allocation is supposed to be known and calculated so that air traffic congestion is reduced. Companies choose, for each flight, an option An option : a combination of a departure time and a route. Objective is Find a pricing policy to reach this target allocation assign fees to each option airline companies modify the departure times and the routes of their flights.

Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars Choices of departures times and routes by airlines = Distribution of the users in the network Wardrop’s principles System approach (-> system equilibrium) routes and departure time are assigned to each user by a central organism User approach (-> user equilibrium) users are free to choose their route and their departure time Traffic assignment models Deterministic assignment Transportation costs supposed to be known Stochastic assignment Uncertainties in the costs  stochastic model Traffic assignment theory (1)

Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars Airport charges currentlyresearch f(origin,destination,service,weight,…) f(…, departure time) = - Route charges = f(distance, weight, unit rate) f(route, departure time) Overview of congestion pricing in air transportation (1)

Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars Marginal cost pricing Tax = marginal social cost – marginal private cost Bi-level optimisation Leader : Min U F(u, v(u)) s. to G(u,v(u))  0 (u: prices) Users : Min V f(u,v(u)) s. to g(u,v(u))  0 (v: flows) Queuing model Priority pricing Peak pricing Auctions Overview of congestion pricing in air transportation (2)

Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars How to compute prices ?  Model formulation : to develop a model describing the relation between fees charged to aircraft and the choices of routes and takeoff time  Identification problem : to estimate the parameters of the model by using statistics of observed traffic flows  Optimization problem : to minimize the difference, in terms of takeoff time and route, between the target assignment and the assignment resulting from fees  Simulation : to evaluate the impact of pricing on congestion Strategy (1)

Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars Model Formulation (1) Structure of the model Price model for an option Airline choice model Prices of sectors (P S ) Prices of options (P O ) Delay and flying costs (C) Utilities of options (U) Expected number of flights (NE) List of sectors crossed by a route Scheduled flights (NP) P O =A P S U=C+P O P S : price of sector k during time period n (P S (k,n)) Option : a route and a takeoff period

Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars Model Formulation (2) Model of airline choices Logit model (probabilistic discrete choice model for stochastic traffic assignment) Utility of an option (o) for a flight planned on period u: U(o,u) = C(o,u) + P O (o) C(o,u) : cost of the option : flying cost : depends only on o delay cost : depends on the difference between the scheduled take off period u and the take off period of the option NE(o) =  NP(u)exp(-  U(o,u)) Route 1 Route 2    exp(-  U(q,v)) u qv u time

Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars Criterion Min J =   ( NO(option) - NE(option)) 2 , ,  Origin- Destination option pair (OD) Identification Problem Observed number of flights (NO) Criterion Expected number of flights (NE) Model Delay and flying costs (C) Parameters structuring C: o=(i,j) : option (route i, take-off period j) u : take-off period planned d(i) : duration of the flights on route i cms = cost of ground delay (euros/mn) C(o,u) =  cms (d(i) +  (i)) + cms (j-u)

Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars Criterion Min J =   ( ND(option) - NE(option)) 2 0  P S  P MAX OD option Criterion Expected number of flights (NE) Desired number of flights (ND) Model Prices of sectors (P S ) Optimization Problem (1)

Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars Optimization Problem (2) First strategy : To set the price of each sector at each period independently of other prices continuous optimization Method : gradient’s method, simulated annealing Disadvantage : price table not readable Second strategy : To limit the number of prices (structure by levels : low, high and medium price) To assign a price level to each sector at each time period discrete optimization Method : gradient algorithm to compute new prices + simulated annealing to find an optimal assignment

Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars Model of simulation sorting random values with the discrete choice model Sector Capacity C S (k,n) Prices of sectors (P S ) Workload = W(k,n) W(k,n)=p I I(k,n) + p O O(k,n) + p M M(k,n) Congestion indicators Q 1 = number of sector  period saturated Q 1 =   W(k,n)- C S (k,n)) k n Q 2 = total excess load Q 2 =   W(k,n)- C S (k,n))  W(k,n)- C S (k,n)) k n Input volume + Output volume + Number of aircraft Simulation

Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars NETWORK 52 Origin-Destination pairs between airports : Bordeaux, Lille, Strasbourg, Rennes,Marseille, Paris Orly, Lyon, Toulouse 35 sectors DEMAND Time horizon : 1 traffic day = 6h h15 65 periods of 15 minutes 433 planned flights TARGET target constructed manually  reduction of congestion Numerical experiments

Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars Simulation results

Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars Conclusion and Perspectives A simple assignment model for air traffic is proposed. It takes into account dynamic sector prices. A formulation of 2 problems To identify parameters of the model To get to the desired number of flight at each period and for each route Solution of the optimization problem by gradient and simulated annealing algorithms Simulation of air traffic with pricing policy : Significant reduction of congestion Perspectives Improvement of the optimization process (simulated annealing, tabu search) Direct minimization of congestion (no desired number of flights) Modeling of the traffic which does not follow timetables Calibration of the model on real life data

Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars

Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars