An alternative way of looking at research performance, based on citation patterns (co-citation analysis) rather than traditional journal classifications.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCOPUS Searching for Scientific Articles By Mohamed Atani UNEP.
Advertisements

Collaboration, Competition and the Global Drivers of Research Collaborative Research: Trends and Future Directions Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt,
International Conference KRE-11 Prague, 9 September 2011 J.M. Verheggen, Elsevier Multi-dimensional research assessment and SciVal; a very brief overview.
Scopus. Agenda Scopus Introduction Online Demonstration Personal Profile Set-up Research Evaluation Tools -Author Identifier, Find Unmatched Authors,
Presented by: Charles Pallandt Title: Managing Director EMEA Academic & Governmental Markets Date: April 28 th, Turkey “Driving Research Excellence.
Leveraging NC’s Knowledge Assets & Research Capacity January 29, 2010 Faculty Council.
SciVal - Making data more visible and accessible for effective research management " Bilimsel Araştırmalarda Performans Değerlendirme ve Rekabet" Sherif.
National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan. Japan 國立成功大學 National Cheng Kung University (NCKU) 台北 Taipei 高雄 Kaohsiung 台中 Taichung Where is NCKU?
Disasters and Human Factors Literature Nestor L Osorio Northern Illinois University.
Office of the Provost - Institutional Research Colombian Leadership Dialogue: The Renewal of Research Universities Value of Comparative Data Lydia Snover.
1 Using Scopus for Literature Research. 2 Why Scopus?  A comprehensive abstract and citation database of peer- reviewed literature and quality web sources.
1 Scopus Update 15 Th Pan-Hellenic Academic Libraries Conference, November 3rd,2006 Patras, Greece Eduardo Ramos
ARDI Portal/Other Resources (Module 5). Module 5: ARDI Portal/Other Resources Reference Tools Databases.
SciVerse Science Direct SciVerse Scopus Gamze Keskin Customer Development Manager Turkey, Iran, Middle East and Central Asia.
LibQUAL+ Process Overview Introduction to LibQUAL+ Workshop University of Westminster, London 21st January 2008 Selena Killick Association of Research.
Web of Science Pros Excellent depth of coverage in the full product (from 1900-present for some journals) A large number of the records are enhanced with.
Rating and Ranking: Pros and Cons Dr. Mohsen Elmahdy Said Professor, Mechanical Design and Production Department Faculty of Engineering – Cairo University.
SCOPUS AND SCIVAL EVALUATION AND PROMOTION OF UKRAINIAN RESEARCH RESULTS PIOTR GOŁKIEWICZ PRODUCT SALES MANAGER, CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE KIEV, 31 JANUARY.
Scientometric study of CSIR-NAL Scholarly Literature.
Identifying Research Strengths through Bibliometric Analysis Rachel Link, Research Analyst Craig W. Abbey, Associate Vice Provost and Director of Institutional.
Welcome to Scopus Training by : Arash Nikyar June 2014
In the Name of Allah the Compassionate, the Merciful.
The Latest in Information Technology for Research Universities.
Scholarly Activity and Research Networking Tools at the University of Minnesota Kate McCready, University Libraries.
Bibliometrics toolkit: ISI products Website: Last edited: 11 Mar 2011 Thomson Reuters ISI product set is the market leader for.
Questionnaires on Gap Analysis and Benchmark Report.
FAEIS – A Resource for Agriculture Faculty and Institutions Mary A. Marchant, Joseph R. Hunnings, Jolene D. Hamm (Virginia Tech), Timothy P. Mack (Indiana.
Rutgers Highlights Fall Quick Points Founded in Became New Jersey’s State University in 1956 One of the 62 leading research universities in.
1 Scopus as a Research Tool March Why Scopus?  A comprehensive abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature and quality web sources.
MARKETING STRATEGIES More information:
Bibliometrics: coming ready or not CAUL, September 2005 Cathrine Harboe-Ree.
______________________________________ Öz/Atıf Veri Tabanlarında Yeni Gelişmeler, Veri Grubu Analizleri Yoluyla Akademik Rekabete Yeni Bir Bakış “ SCIVAL.
A month in the life of a university bibliometrician Dr Ian Rowlands University of Leicester, UK.
Reference Databases Guides 2010 ISI Web of Science IEEE ACM SpringerLink Wilson Proquest Wiley-Blackwell ScienceDirect Scopus SciFinder.
SCOPUS AND SCIVAL EVALUATION AND PROMOTION OF UKRAINIAN RESEARCH RESULTS PIOTR GOŁKIEWICZ PRODUCT SALES MANAGER, CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE LVIV, 11 SEPTEMBER.
FAEIS – A Resource for Agriculture Faculty and Institutions Mary A. Marchant, Joseph R. Hunnings, Jolene D. Hamm, Lisa Hightower (Virginia Tech), Timothy.
NSF Higher Education R&D Survey Update Ronda Britt, NSF Samuel Peterson, University of Missouri 2013 NCURA Annual Meeting August 6, 2013 National Science.
OARE Module 5A: Scopus (Elsevier). Table of Contents About Scopus (Elsevier) Using Scopus Search Page Results/Refine Search Pages Download, PDF, Export,
Where Should I Publish? Journal Ranking Tools eigenfactor.org SCImago is a freely available web resource available at This uses.
Why publishing (and publishing in European Urology) is important for you Christian Gratzke Associate Editor European Urology How to Write a Manuscript.
To Find contents by publisher, click on the drop down menu. This is different than the Partner publishers services where users enter the publisher’s portals.
IREG Forum: National University Rankings on the Rise Bratislava, October 11 th 2011 Valerie Thiel MBA, SciVal Consultant, Elsevier SciVal: Input, Output.
1 Scopus as an Editor’s Workflow Tool Andy Teo Account Manager, Elsevier Science & Technology 17 Feb 2011
Bibliometrics toolkit Website: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Further info: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scopus Scopus was launched by Elsevier in.
Database collection evaluation An application of evaluative methods S519.
SciVal Spotlight Training for KU Huiling Ng, SciVal Product Sales Manager (South East Asia) Cassandra Teo, Account Manager (South East Asia) June 2013.
RESEARCH – DOING AND ANALYSING Gavin Coney Thomson Reuters May 2009.
1 Making a Grope for an Understanding of Taiwan’s Scientific Performance through the Use of Quantified Indicators Prof. Dr. Hsien-Chun Meng Science and.
RESEARCH EVALUATION - THE METRICS UNITED KINGDOM OCTOBER 2010.
CiteSearch: Multi-faceted Fusion Approach to Citation Analysis Kiduk Yang and Lokman Meho Web Information Discovery Integrated Tool Laboratory School of.
1 RUSSIAN SCIENCE UNDER THE MICROSCOPE Philip Purnell Moscow, October 2013.
Speech Pathology Databases Your Tools for Success! Jennifer Yack November 3, 2015.
Bibliometrics in support of research strategy & policy Anna Grey and Nicola Meenan.
Scopus Fueling Research, Driving Innovation. Scopus Introduction What is Scopus ? Why do you need Scopus? Why do our customers use Scopus?
MEASURING RESEARCHERS: FROM RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS AND COMMUNICATION TO RESEARCH EVALUATION Lucie Vavříková 1.
1 e-Resources on Social Sciences: Scopus. 2 Why Scopus?  A comprehensive abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature and quality web sources.
Measuring Research Impact Using Bibliometrics Constance Wiebrands Manager, Library Services.
Bibliometrics at the University of Glasgow Susan Ashworth.
#SciVal Publication and Citation data: what can SciVal show you? Dr Peter Darroch – Research Intelligence Consultant.
Data Mining for Expertise: Using Scopus to Create Lists of Experts for U.S. Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs Good afternoon, my name.
It’s not about searching…. It’s about finding.
Alliance 4 Universities
Selecting a journal where to publish...
Bibliometrics toolkit: Thomson Reuters products
How to Improve the Visibility and Impact of Your Research
Optimize your research performance using SciVal
Office of External Faculty Recognition (OEFR)
Metrics: a game of hide and seek
Identifying Research Strengths through Bibliometric Analysis
Selecting a journal where to publish
Presentation transcript:

An alternative way of looking at research performance, based on citation patterns (co-citation analysis) rather than traditional journal classifications. Publication data for presentation provided by SciVal Spotlight ™ database, Elsevier B.V., (downloaded November 2012). SciVal Spotlight

WSU’s Office of Research response to: Weak U.S. economy End of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act WSU’s Office of Research need to analyze our distinctive and emerging strengths to help determine resource allocations Why SciVal?

WSU’s strongest Subject Areas How interdisciplinary (or not) WSU is, and how we compare to our peers Who are our publication and citation leaders? How do we compare with our peers? Who we are/should be collaborating with Spotlight Analysis Helps Analyze…

Spotlight mines data from the Elsevier Scopus Database The worlds largest abstract and citation database of peer reviewed literature and quality web sources Based on co-citation impact So how does Spotlight mine and classify data? Co-Citation Analysis and “Article Clusters” Scopus Database

The Scopus database now collects over 19,500 Journals Including over 3,500 Arts and Humanities Journals 2,148 Journals from Elsevier in Scopus Totaling over 47 million records 70% with Abstracts Also includes many conference proceedings, websites and reports Figures

Distinctive Competencies Distinctive if the market share - number of papers in a field of research - is large enough (roughly around or more than 285 papers) AND meets at least one of the following: Publication Leadership Reference Leadership State of the Art Leadership Emerging Competencies Either strong in an emerging market OR Institution has potential as a leader in the area Competencies Defined

Circle View Circular display of Competencies Matrix View Grid display of Competencies Explore Competencies

WSU Stats Total R&D Expenditures 304,352,000 Ttl R&D Exp./T-TT Faculty 343,901 : 1 Fed R&D Expenditures 113,452,000 Fed R&D Exp/T-TT Facl. 128,194 : 1 Natl. Acad. Members 9 Significant Faculty Awds. 11 Doctorates Awarded 177 Doctorates/T-TT Faculty 0.20 : 1 Postdoc Appointees161 Postdocs/T-TT Faculty 0.18 : 1 Undergrads/T-TT Faculty 27.9 : 1 Tenure & TT Faculty885 Articles/T-TT Faculty 2.2 : 1 Competencies/T-TT Faculty 1 : 7.7 WSU Circle View Comparison Competencies 115 Competencies

WSU Stats Total R&D Expenditures 304,352,000 Ttl R&D Exp./T-TT Faculty 343,901 : 1 Fed R&D Expenditures 113,452,000 Fed R&D Exp/T-TT Facl. 128,194 : 1 Natl. Acad. Members 9 Significant Faculty Awds. 11 Doctorates Awarded 177 Doctorates/T-TT Faculty 0.20 : 1 Postdoc Appointees161 Postdocs/T-TT Faculty 0.18 : 1 Undergrads/T-TT Faculty 27.9 : 1 Tenure & TT Faculty885 Articles/T-TT Faculty 2.2 : 1 Competencies/T-TT Faculty 1 : 7.7 WSU Competency Breakdown Areas: 1.CAHNRS – 18 PI’s 2.Engineering and Architecture – 15 PI’s 3.Arts and Sciences – 6 PI’s 4.Veterinary Medicine – 5 PI’s 5.Education – 3 PI’s 6.Health Sciences – 2 PI’s 6. Business – 2 PI’s Departments: 1.Mechanical & Materials Engineering – 10 PI’s 2.Biological Systems Engineering – 4 PI’s 2. Plant Pathology – 4 PI’s 4.Food Science – 3 PI’s 4. Electrical Engineering and Computer Science – 3 PI’s PI Counts inside WSU’s Top 25 Competencies:

Total R&D Expenditures 304,352,000250,120, ,980,000515,133,000689,624,000 Ttl R&D Exp./T-TT Faculty 343,901 : 1227,589 : 1 328,533 : 1308,648 : 1393,172 : 1 Fed R&D Expenditures 113,452,000109,461, ,564,000303,852,000288,173,000 Fed R&D Exp/T-TT Facl. 128,194 : 199,601 : 1 139,176 : 1182,056 : 1164,294 : 1 Natl. Acad. Members Significant Faculty Awds Doctorates Awarded Doctorates/T-TT Faculty 0.20 : : : : : 1 Postdoc Appointees Postdocs/T-TT Faculty 0.18 : : : : : 1 Undergrads/T-TT Faculty 27.9 : : : : : 1 Tenure & TT Faculty8851,099 1,6711,6691,754 Scopus Articles /T- TT Faculty 2.2 : 12.6 : : 13.7 : 13.4 : 1 Competencies/T-TT Faculty 1 : 7.71 : : 7.31 : 7.9 WSU Aspirational Peers

WSU Legislative/GCS Peers Total R&D Expenditures 304,352,000398,169,000679,915, ,896,000 Ttl R&D Exp./T-TT Faculty 343,901 : 1313,766 : 1497,741 : 1 317,168 : 1 Fed R&D Expenditures 113,452,000162,566,000332,325, ,297,000 Fed R&D Exp/T-TT Facl. 128,194 : 1128,105 : 1243,283 : 1 221,253 : 1 Natl. Acad. Members Significant Faculty Awds Doctorates Awarded Doctorates/T-TT Faculty 0.20 : : : : 1 Postdoc Appointees Postdocs/T-TT Faculty 0.18 : : : : 1 Undergrads/T-TT Faculty 27.9 : : : : 1 Tenure & TT Faculty 8851,2691, Scopus Articles /T- TT Faculty 2.2 : 12.5 : 14.3 : : 1 Competencies/T- TT Faculty 1 : 7.71 : 8.81 : : 10.3

WSU Other Notable Peers Total R&D Expenditures 304,352,000 1,022,740,000329,345, ,500,000 Ttl R&D Exp./T-TT Faculty 343,901 : 1 755,905 : 1199,603 : 1 201,266 : 1 Fed R&D Expenditures 113,452, ,885,000172,202, ,965,000 Fed R&D Exp/T-TT Facl. 128,194 : 1 613,366 : 1104,368 : 1 98,705 : 1 Natl. Acad. Members Significant Faculty Awds Doctorates Awarded Doctorates/T-TT Faculty 0.20 : : : : 1 Postdoc Appointees 161 1, Postdocs/T-TT Faculty 0.18 : : : : 1 Undergrads/T-TT Faculty 27.9 : : : : 1 Tenure & TT Faculty 885 1,3531,650 1,185 Scopus Articles /T- TT Faculty 2.2 : : 12.1 : : 1 Competencies/T- TT Faculty 1 : : 4.71 : : 8.4

WSU Matrix View Comparison Competencies 115 Competencies

Aspirational Peers

Legislative/GCS Peers

Other Notable Peers

Explore Collaboration Mapping tool showing where, and with whom, WSU is collaborating on publications world-wide Two views: Explore Collaboration Map View – Visual demonstration Explore Collaboration Table View – Listing and count of collaborations

Explore Collaboration – Map View

Explore Collaboration – Table View –Who WSU IS collaborating with

Explore Collaboration – Table View –Who WSU IS NOT collaborating with in our Competencies

Collaboration Comparison – A 5 Year Look Tenure & TT Faculty 885 1,353 1,650 1,099 1,671 1, Total Articles in SciVal Spotlight ,805 41,974 16,619 13,60622,28628,41110,086 Spotlight Articles/T-TT Faculty : : : : : : : 1 Total Citations , , ,984 87,743133,435228,93164,824 Total Citations/T- TT Faculty : : : : : : : 1 Articles with a U.S. Collaborator 49.0% 57.8% 46.0% 46.2%45.8%50.4%53.5% Articles with an International Collaborator 26.7% 29.1% 25.7% 31.0%27.4%33.8%28.9% Articles with NO Collaborator 31.2% 30.2% 38.9% 36.9%39.5%31.6%32.0% Notable Notable Aspirational Aspirational Legislative/GCS Legislative/GCS

World Rankings Publication and citation data help determine our world-wide University rankings and prestige Academic Ranking of World Universities (Shanghai University Rankings) – 70%. WSU ranked “ ” worldwide, “90-111” in the United States. Higher Education and Evaluation Accreditation Council of Taiwan (HEEACT) – 100%. WSU ranked 294. The Times Higher Education World University Rankings – 38.5%. WSU ranked “ ”. Research survey and research income combine for another 26.5% QS World University Rankings – 20%. WSU ranked 356. The Center for Measuring University Performance – Arizona State – U.S. ranking site. Pubs N/A.