Standards-Based Science Instruction. Ohio’s Science Cognitive Demands Science is more than a body of knowledge. It must not be misperceived as lists of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inquiry-Based Instruction
Advertisements

How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, editors.
Understanding by Design Stage 3
School/Centre: Reflecting on the effectiveness of Self-Evaluation Resource The levels on the board are as in How Good Is Our school? Above the board, type.
Analyzing Student Work
The Teacher Work Sample
Stephanie Burba, Noyce Graduate Tyler Ghee, Noyce Scholar Shelby Overstreet, Noyce Scholar Kathryn Crawford, Noyce Graduate Hope Marchionda, PhD Using.
Importance of Questioning and Feedback Technique in developing 3 Cs
PORTFOLIO.
Induction: Third Day.  How can we teach to promote learning goals? ◦ Approaches to Teaching  From teacher-focussed to student-centred ◦ Constructive.
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
1 Welcome to Module 1 Principles of Mathematics Instruction.
Cognitive Demands Revealed. Cognitive demands Describe the cognitive expectations associated with a learning task, the thinking that goes along with the.
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
Teacher Performance Assessment (edTPA) Partner School Visits Winter, 2014.
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric for Mathematics.
The Importance of Technology in High School Science Amy Roediger.
NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.
SUNITA RAI PRINCIPAL KV AJNI
Project-Based Learning
Rationale for CI 2300 Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENT LEARNING
The 5 E Instructional Model
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
© 2013 Boise State University1 What the Shifts in the Standards Mean for Learning and Instruction Michele Carney, PhD Spring 2014.
Emporia State University Phil Bennett (Some Slides by Dr. Larry Lyman) Teacher Work Sample The Teachers College.
Scientific Inquiry: Learning Science by Doing Science
Project-Based Learning ITECH 711 Summer 2007 Trena Noval, Instructor.
“Teaching Electricity and Circuits Through Inquiry” Shawna Young EdTech Leaders Online.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS AND READING K-5 Curriculum Overview.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) at Sojourner Douglass College Faculty and Staff Session One Saturday, November 9, 2013.
Central concepts:  Assessment can measure habits of mind or habits of recall.  Tests have their limits.  It is important to know the purpose the test.
Effective curriculum design and development Evidence from research For further school friendly resources visit For further.
Educational Services for Individuals with Exceptionalities Adapted Lesson Plan.
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
Educator Effectiveness Academy STEM Follow-Up Webinar December 2011.
1 Issues in Assessment in Higher Education: Science Higher Education Forum on Scientific Competencies Medellin-Colombia Nov 2-4, 2005 Dr Hans Wagemaker.
Authentic Learning and Assessment Erin Gibbons Five Standards of Authentic Instruction  Higher-Order Thinking  Depth of Knowledge  Connectedness to.
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
The 5 E’s Science Lesson Inquiry-Based Instruction.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
ENGAGING STUDENTS FOSTERING ACHIEVEMENT CULTIVATING 21st CENTURY GLOBAL SKILLS Designing Engaging Units for 21 st Century Learners Consider the 21st Century.
Ch. 3 StudyCast SarahBeth Walker. NETS-T Standard 1  Teachers use their knowledge of subject matter, teaching and learning, and technology to facilitate.
Crysten Caviness Curriculum Management Specialist Birdville ISD.
Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.
Project-Based Learning (PBL) Vivene Robinson.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Alternative Assessment Chapter 8 David Goh. Factors Increasing Awareness and Development of Alternative Assessment Educational reform movement Goals 2000,
The Learning Cycle as a Model for Science Teaching Reading Assignment Chapter 5 in Teaching Science to Every Child: Using Culture as a Starting Point.
Standards-Based Science Assessment. Ohio’s Science Cognitive Demands Science is more than a body of knowledge. It must not be misperceived as lists of.
M= Math in STEM College and Career Ready- Conference Summer, 2015.
Effective mathematics instruction:  foster positive mathematical attitudes;  focus on conceptual understanding ;  includes students as active participants.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
The 5 E Instructional Model A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction.
The Teacher- Child Interaction Linking Developmentally Appropriate Practices to the Characteristics of Effective Instruction.
Building Effective Content Literacy Tasks. The Cycle of Assessment Teach: Does the instruction and the tasks align to the identified learning target(s)?
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0 Part 4: Scientific Inquiry.
Northwest Georgia RESA Mathematics Academy According to Wagner, seven survival skills are imperative to our students’ success in the new world of work.
4:00 – 4:05pm Welcome and Introductions 4:05 – 4:20pm Ice Breaker 4:20-4:30 pm Norms 4:30 – 5:00pm Journaling 5:00 – 5:30 pm Enquiry activity stations.
Teacher Professional Learning and Development Presentation for PPTA Curriculum Workshops 2009.
Standards-based Grading and Reporting Information for Parents.
The Importance of Technology in High School Science
Teaching All Children: Planning and Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Standards-Based Science Instruction

Ohio’s Science Cognitive Demands Science is more than a body of knowledge. It must not be misperceived as lists of topics to be covered in the six standards in Ohio’s Academic Content Standards, K-12 Science. Holistically, science is a way of studying the natural world.

Cognitive Demand Every Ohio achievement test item for science is classified on the basis of what the item asks of the student in terms of reasoning, evaluating investigative procedures, understanding science concepts or analyzing scientific information and technological solutions

Types of Cognitive Demand Recall / Identify Accurate Science Communicate Understanding / Analyze Science Information Demonstrate Investigative Processes of Science Apply Concepts / Make Relevant Connections with Science

Types of Cognitive Demand Recall / Identify Accurate Science Students provide and identify accurate statements about previously learned, scientifically valid facts, concepts and relationships Teachers use a variety of motivators to engage students’ thinking to help them access previously learned science knowledge and skills

Types of Cognitive Demand Communicate Understanding / Analyze Science Information Students analyze scientific information and communicate scientifically, given rich investigative scenarios and valid scientific data and information Teachers use questioning and science content knowledge and content-pedagogy to facilitate exploration of standards-based questions, challenge misconceptions and help students develop scientifically valid conceptions and explanations

Types of Cognitive Demand Demonstrate Investigative Processes of Science Students use scientific inquiry skills, grounded in standards-based science content Teachers integrate the teaching of standards for Scientific Inquiry and Scientific Ways of Knowing into opportunities for students to conduct investigations aligned with the content standards

Types of Cognitive Demand Apply Concepts / Make Relevant Connections with Science Students apply science in the context of individuals and society and scientifically analyze consequences and alternatives, given real-world situations and technological problem-solving scenarios Teachers integrate the teaching of standards for Science and Technology, Scientific Inquiry and Scientific Ways of Knowing into opportunities to help students contextualize and expand understandings of science content standards

Cognitive Demand Distributing items across the types of cognitive demand ensures a balance of ways for students to demonstrate science skills and understandings

Implications for Instruction Employing instructional strategies that allow students a variety of ways to demonstrate their science skills and understanding can improve student learning

Implications for Instruction Appropriate use of the cognitive demands focuses on standards-based, learning-cycle driven science instruction. This focus is intended to help support teachers’ efforts to foster and monitor inquiry-based student learning opportunities ranging from engagement and exploration, to analysis and explanation, to application and extension.

Cognitive Demand How can the student science rubric help inform classroom instruction to improve student performance?

Standards-based Instruction Research suggests that student achievement is positively impacted by: Teaching for transfer by providing students with a variety of tasks Varying the complexity of tasks and emphasizing higher-order thinking skills Teaching for mastery and helping students reflect on their learning D. W. Tileston. ( 2000.) Ten Best Teaching Practices R. J. Marzano. (2003.) What Works in Schools

Standards-based Instruction Research suggests that student achievement is positively impacted by: Ensuring multiple exposure to, and complex interactions with knowledge Comparing classroom or individual student data to statewide data to reveal gaps in instruction or student experience D. W. Tileston. ( 2000.) Ten Best Teaching Practices R. J. Marzano. (2003.) What Works in Schools

Implications for Instruction “Dialogue between pupils and a teacher should be thoughtful, reflective, focused to evoke and explore understanding, and conducted so that all pupils have an opportunity to think and express their ideas.” Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment by Paul Black and Dylan William

Implications for Instruction Reflection Feedback provided without evaluations or grades helps to avoid feelings of failure but comments help to identify both strengths and weaknesses and promote self-awareness and reflection. Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment by Paul Black and Dylan William

Implications for Instruction Homework “Feedback on tests, seatwork* and homework should give each pupil guidance on how to improve, and each pupil must be given help and an opportunity to work on the improvement.” *[e.g., conducting and analyzing science investigations] Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment by Paul Black and Dylan William

Aligning to the Standards Click on the following links to learn more about: The Learning Cycle and Classroom Inquiry Standards-based Science Instruction Standards-based Science Assessment Teacher Tools for Reflecting on Teaching Science Student Tools for Reflecting on Learning Science