CH3 Factor model.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sequential learning in dynamic graphical model Hao Wang, Craig Reeson Department of Statistical Science, Duke University Carlos Carvalho Booth School of.
Advertisements

Tests of CAPM Security Market Line (ex ante)
LECTURE 8 : FACTOR MODELS
Covariance Matrix Applications
Question 1 (textbook p.312, Q2)
EigenFaces.
1 V. Simplifying the Portfolio Process. 2 Simplifying the Portfolio Process Estimating correlations Single Index Models Multiple Index Models Average.
Economics 173 Business Statistics Lecture 14 Fall, 2001 Professor J. Petry
Copyright: M. S. Humayun1 Financial Management Lecture No. 23 Efficient Portfolios, Market Risk, & CML Batch 6-3.
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000
Principal Components Analysis Babak Rasolzadeh Tuesday, 5th December 2006.
The Multiple Regression Model Prepared by Vera Tabakova, East Carolina University.
Risk-Return Problems 7. Calculating Returns and Deviations Based on the following information, calculate the expected return and standard deviation for.
Risk Modeling.
Asset Management Lecture 5. 1st case study Dimensional Fund Advisors, 2002 The question set is available online The case is due on Feb 27.
Mutual Investment Club of Cornell Week 8: Portfolio Theory April 7 th, 2011.
Combining Individual Securities Into Portfolios (Chapter 4)
Asset Management Lecture 22. Review class Asset management process Planning with the client Investor objectives, constraints and preferences Execution.
1 MULTIVARIATE GARCH Rob Engle UCSD & NYU. 2 MULTIVARIATE GARCH MULTIVARIATE GARCH MODELS ALTERNATIVE MODELS CHECKING MODEL ADEQUACY FORECASTING CORRELATIONS.
SOME STATISTICAL CONCEPTS Chapter 3 Distributions of Data Probability Distribution –Expected Rate of Return –Variance of Returns –Standard Deviation –Covariance.
Last Study Topics Measuring Portfolio Risk Measuring Risk Variability
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory CHAPTER 7.
Topic 4: Portfolio Concepts. Mean-Variance Analysis Mean–variance portfolio theory is based on the idea that the value of investment opportunities can.
Fin 2802: Investments Spring, 2010 Dragon Tang
Structural Risk Models. Elementary Risk Models Single Factor Model –Market Model –Plus assumption residuals are uncorrelated Constant Correlation Model.
An Alternative View of Risk and Return: The Arbitrage Pricing Theory Chapter 12 Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Pairs Trading Ch6 Pairs Selection in Equity Markets 郭孟鑫.
Calculating Expected Return
MathematicalMarketing Slide 2.1 Descriptive Statistics Chapter 2: Descriptive Statistics We will be comparing the univariate and matrix formulae for common.
Chapter 13 CAPM and APT Investments
Yale School of Management Portfolio Management I William N. Goetzmann Yale School of Management,1997.
Modern Portfolio Theory. History of MPT ► 1952 Horowitz ► CAPM (Capital Asset Pricing Model) 1965 Sharpe, Lintner, Mossin ► APT (Arbitrage Pricing Theory)
Chapter 4 Appendix 1 Models of Asset Pricing. Copyright ©2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.4-1 Benefits of Diversification Diversification.
Economics 434 Financial Markets Professor Burton University of Virginia Fall 2015 September 10, 2015.
Derivation of the Beta Risk Factor
Finance 300 Financial Markets Lecture 3 Fall, 2001© Professor J. Petry
Risk Analysis & Modelling Lecture 2: Measuring Risk.
© 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson LimitedChapter  The Market Portfolio ◦ Portfolio of all assets in the economy. In practice a broad stock market index,
7.1 A SINGLE-FACTOR SECURITY MARKET  Input list (portfolio selection) ◦ N estimates of expected returns ◦ N estimates of variance ◦ n(n-1)/2 estimates.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Efficient Diversification CHAPTER 6.
2 2.9 © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc. Matrix Algebra DIMENSION AND RANK.
Chapter 9 CAPITAL ASSET PRICING AND ARBITRAGE PRICING THEORY The Risk Reward Relationship.
Chapter 7 Expected Return and Risk. Explain how expected return and risk for securities are determined. Explain how expected return and risk for portfolios.
CAPM Testing & Alternatives to CAPM
Lecture 7 Introduction to Risk, Return, and the Opportunity Cost of Capital Managerial Finance FINA 6335 Ronald F. Singer.
1 Stock Valuation Topic #3. 2 Context Financial Decision Making Debt Valuation Equity Valuation Derivatives Real Estate.
1 Ch 7: Project Analysis Under Risk Incorporating Risk Into Project Analysis Through Adjustments To The Discount Rate, and By The Certainty Equivalent.
Chapter 14 – Risk from the Shareholders’ Perspective u Focus of the chapter is the mean-variance capital asset pricing model (CAPM) u Goal is to explain.
MANY RISKY SECURITIES èWith many risky securities, principles of portfolio optimization are still the same as in Portfolio Problem #2 èSolution is also.
Expected Return and Risk. Explain how expected return and risk for securities are determined. Explain how expected return and risk for portfolios are.
Lecturer: Ing. Martina Hanová, PhD..  How do we evaluate a model?  How do we know if the model we are using is good?  assumptions relate to the (population)
Topic 3 (Ch. 8) Index Models A single-factor security market
Economics 434: The Theory of Financial Markets
Momentum and Reversal.
Topic 4: Portfolio Concepts
Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory
Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory
(5) Notes on the Least Squares Estimate
Investments: Analysis and Management
Return and Risk: The Capital Asset Pricing Models: CAPM and APT
Quantitative Analysis
The Markowitz’s Mean-Variance model
Arbitrage Pricing Theory and Multifactor Models of Risk and Return
LECTURE 8 : FACTOR MODELS
Momentum Effect (JT 1993).
CHAPTER ELEVEN FACTOR MODELS.
Arbitrage Pricing Theory and Multifactor Models of Risk and Return
Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000
Top Down Investing Bottom-up Approach Top-Down Approach
Presentation transcript:

CH3 Factor model

Agenda Arbitrage Pricing Theorem The Covariance Matrix Application: Calculating the risk on a portfolio Application: Calculating portfolio beta Application: Tracking basket design Sensitivity Analysis Summary

Arbitrage Pricing Theorem 𝑟= 𝛽 1 𝑟 1 + 𝛽 2 𝑟 2 +…+ 𝛽 𝑘 𝑟 𝑘 + 𝑟 𝑒 APT is an extension of the CAPM model, so denote the factor exposures as (𝛽 1 , 𝛽 2 ,…, 𝛽 𝑘 ) . ( 𝑟 1 , 𝑟 2 ,…, 𝑟 𝑘 ) denote the return contributions of each factor. 𝑟 𝑒 is the idiosyncratic return or specific return on the stock that is not explicable by the factors in the model , so r is return of the stock. We focus on the evaluation of risk ( variance of stock’s return). Let us convenience to illustrate factor model , so we take only two factor! 𝑟= 𝛽 1 𝑟 1 + 𝛽 2 𝑟 2 + 𝑟 𝑒

Arbitrage Pricing Theorem 𝑅= 𝛽 1 𝑟 1 + 𝛽 2 𝑟 2 + 𝑟 𝑒 𝑅 2 = 𝛽 1 2 𝑟 1 2 + 𝛽 2 2 𝑟 2 2 +2 𝛽 1 𝛽 2 𝑟 1 𝑟 2 +2 𝛽 1 𝑟 1 𝑟 𝑒 +2 𝛽 2 𝑟 2 𝑟 𝑒 + 𝑟 𝑒 2 𝑉𝑎𝑟 𝑅 = 𝛽 1 2 𝑉𝑎𝑟 𝑟 1 + 𝛽 2 2 𝑉𝑎𝑟 𝑟 2 +2 𝛽 1 𝛽 2 𝐶𝑜𝑣 𝑟 1 , 𝑟 2 +𝑉𝑎𝑟 𝑟 𝑒 ⇒𝑉𝑎𝑟 𝑅 = 𝛽 1 𝛽 2 𝑉𝑎𝑟 𝑟 1 𝐶𝑜𝑣 𝑟 1 , 𝑟 2 𝐶𝑜𝑣 𝑟 1 , 𝑟 2 𝑉𝑎𝑟 𝑟 2 𝛽 1 𝛽 2 +𝑉𝑎𝑟( 𝑟 𝑒 ) ⇒𝑉𝑎𝑟 𝑅 =𝑒𝑉 𝑒 𝑇 +𝑉𝑎𝑟 𝑟 𝑒 ⇒ 𝜎 𝑟𝑒𝑡 2 = 𝜎 𝑐𝑓 2 + 𝜎 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐 2 The factor exposure vector denote “e” Covariance matrix denote “V”

Arbitrage Pricing Theorem It turns out that the specific variance is the smaller component of the total variance, and a significant portion of the total variance is explained by the common factor variance. Note that key to the evaluation of the common factor variance is the knowledge of the covariance matrix of factor returns. How do we get a sample of past historic factor returns?

Arbitrage Pricing Theorem Factor Exposure Matrix : This is the matrix of exposure/sensitivity factors. If there are N stocks in our universe and k factors in the model, we can construct a N × k matrix with the exposures for each stock in a row.Let us denote this matrix as X. Factor Covariance Matrix : This is denoted as V. Specific Variance Matrix : This is the specific variance for each of the N stocks assembled in an N × N matrix with the specific variances on the diagonal. Because the specific variances are assumed to be uncorrelated , the non-diagonal elements are zero. This matrix is denoted as Δ.

The Covariance Matrix The covariance matrix : A key role in the determination of the risk. A square matrix. In a model with k factors, the dimensions of the covariance matrix is k × k. The diagonal elements form the variance of the individual factors, and the non-diagonal elements are the covariances and may have nonzero values. The returns of two explanatory factors share some correlation.

The Covariance Matrix The matrix is symmetric. ∵𝐶𝑜𝑣 𝑟 𝑖 , 𝑟 𝑗 =𝐶𝑜𝑣 𝑟 𝑗 , 𝑟 𝑖 ∀ 𝑖≠𝑗 The matrix is positive-definite. ∃ 𝐵 ⋺𝑉= 𝐵 2 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑉 , 𝐵 𝑖𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑥. This means that the matrix has a square root. We are required to evaluate the covariance between the returns of securities A and B. 𝐿𝑒𝑡 𝑒 𝐴 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑒 𝐵 𝑏𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑣𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑡𝑤𝑜 𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑘𝑠. 𝐶𝑜𝑣 𝑅 𝐴 , 𝑅 𝐵 = 𝑒 𝐴 𝑉 𝑒 𝐵 𝑇 →This matrix would come in handy to evaluate correlations between securities. The full and complete covariance matrix for all the stocks in the universe is given by 𝐶𝑜𝑣𝑀𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑥=𝑋𝑉 𝑋 𝑇 .

The Covariance Matrix Example : Factor exposure for stock A in two-factor model = (0.5 , 0.75) The specific variance on stock A = 0.0123 ( Var 𝑟 𝑒 = 𝜎 𝑒 2 =0.0123 ) The factor covariance matrix for the two-factor model is = .0625 .0225 .0225 .1024 The variance of return for stock A is 𝑉𝑎𝑟 𝑅 𝐴 = 𝜎 𝐴 2 = 0.5 0.75 .0625 .0225 .0225 .1024 0.5 0.75 +0.0123 =.1024 The square root of the variance is the standard deviation = .32, or 32%. Thus, stock A has a volatility value of 32%. Factor exposures for stock B in the two-factor model = (0.75, 0.5) Covariance between stocks A and B is 0.5 0.75 .0625 .0225 .0225 .1024 0.75 0.5 =0.0801

Application: Calculating the risk on a portfolio Let us consider a portfolio composed of two securities, A and B, with exposure vectors given by 𝑒 𝐴 and 𝑒 𝐵 . Let the weights of the two securities in the portfolio be 𝑤 𝐴 and 𝑤 𝐵 , respectively. The exposure vector of the portfolio is given as 𝑒 𝑝 = 𝑤 𝐴 𝑒 𝐴 + 𝑤 𝐵 𝑒 𝐵 Assuming a two-factor model and writing out the formula in matrix form,we have 𝑒 𝑝 = 𝑤 𝐴 𝑤 𝐵 𝛽 𝐴,1 𝛽 𝐴,2 𝛽 𝐵,1 𝛽 𝐵,2 =𝑊𝑋 By formula of P.4 , 𝜎 𝑐𝑓 2 = 𝑒 𝑝 𝑉 𝑒 𝑝 𝑇 = 𝑊𝑋 𝑉 (𝑊𝑋) 𝑇 =𝑊𝑋𝑉 𝑋 𝑇 𝑊 𝑇 Note that by model assumptions the specific returns of the securities are uncorrelated with each other. 𝜎 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐 2 = 𝑤 𝐴 2 ∗𝑉𝑎𝑟 𝑟 𝑒,𝐴 + 𝑤 𝐵 2 ∗𝑉𝑎𝑟 𝑟 𝑒,𝐵 = 𝑤 𝐴 𝑤 𝐵 𝑉𝑎𝑟 𝑟 𝑒,𝐴 0 0 𝑉𝑎𝑟 𝑟 𝑒,𝐵 𝑤 𝐴 𝑤 𝐵 =𝑊∆ 𝑊 𝑇

Application: Calculating the risk on a portfolio 𝜎 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑓𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑜 2 = 𝜎 𝑐𝑓 2 + 𝜎 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐 2 =𝑊𝑋𝑉 𝑋 𝑇 𝑊 𝑇 +𝑊∆ 𝑊 𝑇 The formula to evaluate the variance may be easily adapted to evaluate the covariance between two portfolios Y and Z 𝐶𝑜𝑣 𝑅 𝑌 , 𝑅 𝑍 = 𝑊 𝑌 𝑋𝑉 𝑋 𝑇 𝑊 𝑍 𝑇 + 𝑊 𝑌 ∆ 𝑊 𝑍 𝑇 In any case, the formula for variance can be used to calculate the risk in a portfolio.

Application: Calculating portfolio beta If we are looking to hedge our portfolio with the market portfolio, then the hedge ratio that provides the best possible hedge is given by the beta of the portfolio. Consider the linear combination of the two portfolios in the ratio 1 : λ . The return of the linear combination is given by 𝑟 𝑝 −𝜆 𝑟 𝑚 where 𝑟 𝑝 is the return on the portfolio and 𝑟 𝑚 is the return on the market. ( 𝑟 𝑝 −𝜆 𝑟 𝑚 ) 2 = 𝑟 𝑝 2 + 𝜆 2 𝑟 𝑚 2 −2𝜆 𝑟 𝑝 𝑟 𝑚 𝑉𝑎𝑟 𝑟 𝑝 −𝜆 𝑟 𝑚 =𝑉𝑎𝑟 𝑟 𝑝 + 𝜆 2 𝑉𝑎𝑟 𝑟 𝑚 −2𝜆𝐶𝑜𝑣( 𝑟 𝑝 , 𝑟 𝑚 ) To find the value for 𝜆 that minimizes the variance, we differentiate with respect to 𝜆 and equate the differential to zero. 𝜆= 𝐶𝑜𝑣( 𝑟 𝑝 , 𝑟 𝑚 ) 𝑉𝑎𝑟 𝑟 𝑚 = 𝑒 𝑝 𝑉 𝑒 𝑚 𝑇 + 𝑤 𝑝 ∆ 𝑤 𝑚 𝑇 𝑒 𝑚 𝑉 𝑒 𝑚 𝑇 + 𝑤 𝑚 ∆ 𝑤 𝑚 𝑇 APT framework

Application: Tracking basket design A tracking basket is a basket of stocks that tracks an index. If the tracking basket is composed of fewer stocks than the index , then there is likely to be tracking error; that is, the returns for the tracking basket are not exactly the same as the returns for the index. So, what is tracking error? We assume that mean value of the difference in the return between the tracking basket and the index. 𝑖.𝑒. 𝐸 𝑟 𝑝 − 𝑟 𝑚 =0 The tracking error means the standard deviation of the difference in the return between the tracking basket and the index. 𝑖.𝑒 𝜎 𝑟 𝑝 − 𝑟 𝑚 = 𝑉𝑎𝑟( 𝑟 𝑝 − 𝑟 𝑚 ) = 𝐸 ( 𝑟 𝑝 − 𝑟 𝑚 ) 2 − [𝐸( 𝑟 𝑝 − 𝑟 𝑚 )] 2 = 𝐸 ( 𝑟 𝑝 − 𝑟 𝑚 ) 2

Application: Tracking basket design Let us consider a long–short portfolio where we are long the index and short the tracking basket: Total return= 𝑟 𝑚 − 𝑟 𝑝 The expectation is that the return on the index and tracking basket is the same. So, the expected value of total return on the portfolio is zero.(But true value may not be zero). The extent of this variation from zero is captured by the standard deviation of returns of the long–short portfolio and forms a measure of the tracking error. By (1) (2) , we can say that : -𝐸 𝑟 𝑚 − 𝑟 𝑝 =0, -The tracking error of this portfolio is 𝐸 ( 𝑟 𝑚 − 𝑟 𝑝 ) 2 The design of a tracking basket involves designing a portfolio such that it minimizes the tracking error.

Application: Tracking basket design Minimize the tracking error: It is equivalent to minimize 𝐸 ( 𝑟 𝑚 − 𝑟 𝑝 ) 2 , ⇒𝑀𝑖𝑛 : 𝐸 ( 𝑟 𝑚 − 𝑟 𝑝 ) 2 =𝐸 ( 𝑟 𝑚 − 𝑟 𝑝 ) 2 − 𝐸 𝑟 𝑚 − 𝑟 𝑝 2 = 𝑉𝑎𝑟( 𝑟 𝑚 − 𝑟 𝑝 ) =𝑉𝑎𝑟 𝑟 𝑚 +𝑉𝑎𝑟 𝑟 𝑝 −2𝐶𝑜𝑣 𝑟 𝑚 , 𝑟 𝑝 ⇒𝑀𝑖𝑛 : 𝑊 𝑚 𝑋𝑉 𝑋 𝑇 𝑊 𝑚 𝑇 + 𝑊 𝑚 ∆ 𝑊 𝑚 𝑇 + 𝑊 𝑝 𝑋𝑉 𝑋 𝑇 𝑊 𝑝 𝑇 + 𝑊 𝑝 ∆ 𝑊 𝑝 𝑇 − 2[ 𝑊 𝑚 𝑋𝑉 𝑋 𝑇 𝑊 𝑝 𝑇 + 𝑊 𝑚 ∆ 𝑊 𝑝 𝑇 ] There are some constraints on the values of 𝑊 𝑝 ; some of them are forced to have zero values even though they are part of the index. The variance of the market portfolio is not at all affected by changing the composition of the tracking basket. So , the purple term is not change, minimizing the tracking error is equivalent to minimizing the sum of the green and blue terms.

Application: Tracking basket design The error variance may also be viewed as a sum of a common factor component and a specific component. 𝜎 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 2 = 𝜎 𝑐𝑓 2 + 𝜎 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐 2 𝜎 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 2 = 0 + 𝜎 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐 2 , 𝜎 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐 2 very small ∵ 𝜎 𝑐𝑓 2 ≫ 𝜎 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐 2 Tracking basket ‘s factor match the factor of the index The two portfolios are highly diversified , 𝐸 𝑟 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐 =0 The tracking error contribution is solely due to the different specific returns in the portfolios.

Sensitivity Analysis