CBP BMP Verification Program Development: Progress to Date and Forthcoming Issues CBP Management Board Briefing May 9, 2012 Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Progress with Due Diligence Activities in Panama Participants Committee Meeting (FCPF PC5) La Lopé National Park, Gabon.
Advertisements

Frank J. Coale Mark P. Dubin Chesapeake Bay Program Partnerships Agriculture Workgroup BMP Verification Review Panel Meeting Annapolis, Maryland December.
CBP BMP Verification Program Development: Requests for Decisions on Panel Membership and Revised Schedule CBP Partnership Management Board September 13,
Methods Board Report National Water Quality Monitoring Council July 28, 2005.
CBP Partnership Proposal for Ensuring Full Accountability of Best Practices and Technologies Implemented CBP WQGIT Wastewater Treatment Workgroup Briefing.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Independent Evaluator Chesapeake Bay Partner’s Response to the National Research Council’s Report Management Board, November 1, 2011 ~ 9-11 AM.
Overview of Operation Health Protection: Activities to Date alPHa All-Members Meeting April 22nd, 2005.
Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office (EPA) 1 CBP Program Update Local Government Advisory Committee March 14, 2014.
CBP Partnership’s BMP Verification Review Panel’s Findings and Recommendations to Date CBP Citizens Advisory Committee December 6, 2013 Meeting Rich Batiuk,
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program (EPA) 1 CBP Program Update Citizens Advisory Committee February 27, 2014.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
CBP Partnership’s BMP Verification Review Panel’s Findings and Recommendations to Date CBP Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee December 3, 2013.
Forestry BMP Review Process Mark Sievers, Tetra Tech Forestry Workgroup (FWG) Conference Call—February 1, 2012.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework Briefing CBP Partnership’s Communications Workgroup July 10, 2014.
CBP Partnership Approach for Ensuring Full Accountability of Best Practices and Technologies Implemented Jim Edward, CBPO Deputy Director CBP Citizen Advisory.
CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17, 2013 Draft 4/1/13 for GIT 6 Review.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Delaware.
Options for CBP Agreement and EC Membership For Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March, 2013.
Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.
Chesapeake Bay Executive Council Meeting May 12, 2009 Mount Vernon, Virginia Jeff Corbin, Virginia Assistant Secretary of Natural Resources.
James Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Environmental Protection Agency The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next The New.
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program, EPA 1 CBP Program Update on Bay Agreement Comments, Final Draft, and 2-Year Milestone Status Citizens.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Changing... Leading... Learning... ORGANIZATIONAL INTERVENTION SAN FRANCISCO-BAY AREA 1.
Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. September 16, 2015 How can we make sure the Chesapeake Bay Restoration really works?
FY2012 ChesapeakeStat Development Team Enhancements – content, design, function 1.Redesign Goal Overview Pages Objective: Communicate the mission and vision.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Maryland.
Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup (TMAW) Meeting February 7, 2013 Annapolis, MD Katie Foreman and Liza Hernandez University of Maryland Center for.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Program Developments Briefing to the Water Resources Technical Committee October 9, 2009 (revised) Briefing to the Water Resources.
Citizen Stewardship Outcome Kick Off Meeting 11/18/2014.
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plans: Why, What, and When Katherine Antos U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office MACo Winter Conference January.
Key Functions & Responsibilities (from the old governance document) – Coordinates the program-level adaptive management system and assists the GITs in.
Nicholas DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Environmental Protection Agency The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next The New.
Katherine Antos, Water Quality Team Leader Water Quality Goal Implementation Team Coordinator U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Chesapeake Bay Program.
State of the Chesapeake Bay Program Nick DiPasquale, CBP Director, EPA Executive Council Annual Meeting June 16,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Ensuring Full Access to Federal Cost Shared Conservation Practices W. Dean Hively, Ph.D. U.S. Geological.
Proposed Workplan for Completing the Alignment of the Partnership Management Board Meeting 9/13/12 Carin Bisland.
Verification Requests Citizen Advisory Committee –Repeated requests for BMP verification Chesapeake Executive Order Strategy –USDA and EPA commitment to.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
Project Parkway Timeline to 2011 April 1, 2010 Town Hall Meeting Steering Committee Schools February 2009 May 18, 2009 Project Parkway Community Kick-
Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and.
Chesapeake Bay Program Independent Evaluator – GIT 6 Review & Next Steps.
Membership & Professional Standards Committee (MPSC)
Proposed Bay TMDL Schedule
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Citizens Advisory Committee
Chesapeake Bay Program
2025 Chesapeake Bay Climate Change Load Projections
Chesapeake Bay Program Principals’ Staff Committee December 20, 2017
The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next
Student Assignment Review Advisory Committee
2017 Midpoint Assessment: Year of Decision October 5, 2017 Local Government Advisory Committee Meeting.
Communicating Credit Where Credit is Due
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
CBP Citizen Advisory Committee Briefing February 22, 2013 Meeting
CBP Principals’ Staff Committee Briefing May 14, 2012 Meeting
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Architecture
Proposed Workplan for Completing the Alignment of the Partnership
Session 4: Finalize Project Working Arrangements
Citizens Advisory Committee Discussion & Program Update Dana Aunkst Director USEPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 22,2019 Baltimore, MD.
Student Assignment Review Advisory Committee
2018 BMP Verification Assessment
Citizens Advisory Committee EPA/CBP Program Update Jim Edward Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office February 20-21,2019 Williamsburg, VA.
Presentation transcript:

CBP BMP Verification Program Development: Progress to Date and Forthcoming Issues CBP Management Board Briefing May 9, 2012 Meeting

Progress to Date All source sector workgroups actively developing verification protocols BMP Verification Committee has draft set of revised verification principles about ready to share with the WQGIT and source workgroups BMP Verification Committee has a working draft Verification Review Panel charge and membership ready for a second round of review at its mid-May conference call 2

Forthcoming Issues Addressing practices which are not functionally equivalent to established standards or CBP partnership approved practices Knowing when we have established verification protocols providing assurance of effective implementation across source sectors, funding sources, and jurisdictions What are the ‘bounds’ on supporting adaptability across jurisdictions 3

Forthcoming Issues (Con’t) Not pitting resources for on-the-ground implementation vs. BMP verification as though it was an either/or situation Commitment to effectively communicating the importance of verification as an integral component of program implementation, not an undesired add- on/requirement Addressing concerns about the request for historical data clean-ups and the resources required 4

Revised Schedule June: initial review of all the elements of the partnership’s verification program—principles, protocols, and panel—to determine what fits, what doesn’t (late March) July: reviewing the backbone of the basinwide verification program—the states’ existing tracking and reporting systems Sept: review of all the revised elements and ask the question—are we ready to move the proposed verification program up the partnership management structure? (April) 5

Revised Schedule (Con’t) Oct: WQGIT review/approval (April) Nov: MB review/approval (May/June) Dec: PSC review/approval (Summer 2012) Winter 2012/2013: PSC communication of the Partnership’s BMP Verification Program to partners/stakeholders through some formal agreement mechanism (Fall 2012) Spring 2013: BMP Verification Review Panel reviews states’ proposed verification programs (Starting fall 2012) 6

Requests for Action Requested Action: Commitment to give further thought to how to go about addressing the forthcoming issues. Requested Action: Approval to proceed forward with the revised (reality checked) schedule. 7

8 Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD (office) (cell)