Birmingham Community Charter High School. New Law as of January 1, 2013  Senate Bill 1290 (“SB1290”) amends Ed Code sections 47605, 47605.6 and 47607,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
S PECIAL E DUCATION N.J.A.C. 6A:14. E DUCATION T RANSFORMATION T ASK F ORCE : P ROBLEMS WITH E XCESSIVE R EGULATION Stifles innovation – educators need.
Advertisements

Contracts (Charter School/Sponsor and Charter School/EMO) Dana C. Reed, Director of Compliance, South Carolina Public Charter School District.
Purchasing Updates Faculty and Staff Presentation Fall Semester, 2010.
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
Corporate Governance Chapter 2.
The Florida College System House Bill 7135: Relating to Postsecondary Education Julie Alexander & Carrie Henderson April 20,
Academic Senate 101 You Make It Happen! Catherine Cox President Mission College Academic Senate August, 2007 Adapted from ASCCC 101, presented at the ASCCC.
Rejected! Rebounding From and Moving Forward Following a Monitoring Report Requirement.
IE 2, CHARTER, AND STATUS QUO SCHOOL SYSTEMS Flexibility Options Comparison F EBRUARY 26, 2015 Ken Thompson Chief Financial Officer.
TITLE 5 REVISIONS—PART 2 UPDATE Michelle Pilati (ASCCC) Randy Lawson (CCCIO) System Advisory Committee on Curriculum (SACC) Co-Chairs.
Chapter 43 An Act Relative to Improving Accountability and Oversight of Education Collaboratives Presentation to Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Everyone has been trained on the development of the SIP First draft of the SIP should be entered on the state website,
PCTIA Accreditation WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE APPLYING FOR ACCREDITATION.
Form of Government 1 Responsibilities of the Strong Mayor drafted by the City Attorney’s Office December 2010.
Information Competency: an overview Prepared by: Erlinda Estrada Judie Smith Mission College Library Santa Clara, CA.
Purchasing Updates Faculty and Staff Presentation Fall, 2010
Charter, Contract, Laws, Policies, Regulations, and Statutes.
Los Angeles County Office of Education Division for School Improvement School Site Council (SSC) Training September 9 th 2008 Anna Carrasco From presentation.
Bylaws, Rules, and Periodic Review – Updates from Standards and Practices Julie Adams, ASCCC Executive Director Craig Rutan, ASCCC South Representative.
Where is it Written? Ed. Code, Title 5, and Local Senates Dolores Davison, ASCCC Area B Representative Ginni May, ASCCC North Representative Faculty Leadership.
SOCIAL SCIENCES STANDARDS REVIEW AND REVISION February 2009-June 2011 PRESENTATION TO THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION.
Michelle Grimes-Hillman, South Representative Cynthia Rico, South Representative FACULTY LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE JUNE 11-13, 2015 SAN JOSE Empowering Local.
September 9, 2015 Framework for Evaluation and Oversight of Charter Schools in Philadelphia School District of Philadelphia, Charter Schools Office.
Faculty Senate Orientation October 10, 2011 Faculty Senate.
2005 Continuity Planning where the rubber meets the road.
SCHOOL ADVISORY COUNCIL TRAINING  A group intended to represent the broad school community and those persons closest to the students who will.
10/12/20151 Fillmore Middle School Fillmore Unified School District School Site Council (SSC)
EMPOWERING LOCAL SENATES Kevin Bontenbal, South Representative Stephanie Dumont, Area D Representative.
The Life of a Policy Council Member
Fiscal Monitoring and Oversight Tecumseh Local School District January 8, 2013 Roger Hardin, Assistant Director Finance Program Services (614)
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Draft Transition Plan for the Transfer of the Drug Medi-Cal Treatment Program Fourth Series: Stakeholder Meetings Department of Health Care Services Department.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Career Technical Education Model Standards Update.
FRYSC Advisory Councils Partners in Progress
1 BCC Work Session Local Code of Ethics & Specific Project Expenditure Report Presented by Dana Crosby, Assistant County Attorney December 2, 2008.
How to Start a Charter School California Charter Schools Association Lisa Berlanga Steven Holguin Convert To ˅ Transforming Your School.
Faculty Senate Proposal Ad Hoc Committee on College Rules.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction January 2015 Jenny Singh, Administrator Academic Accountability.
Local Leadership: Do You Know How to Hire Effectively? Academic Senate for California Community Colleges Leadership Institute.
AB Miller High School Community Meeting April 13, 2010.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Amendment of Orange County Emergency and Non- Emergency Medical Care and Transportation Ordinance Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing January.
Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) & Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) School Board Meeting, March 20,
Local Control Accountability Plan Update, Renewal, Review Santa Barbara Unified School District
Board of Education Public Charter School Application Review Process Virginia Board of Education April 21, 2010.
1 SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL. 2 Purpose: School Site Council The organization by which the school community comes together to chart the school’s path to improvement.
Excellent Public Schools Act of 2013 Instructional Collaboration Day II January 3, 2014.
1 Senate Bill 130 Innovation Schools Act of 2008.
Summer Summit June 30 – July 1, We needed another acronym in education? TOP REASONS FOR A CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK 4. Our assessment.
Governance: The process by which PathStone Volunteer Leadership - governing bodies, Executive Staff and Staff Liaisons share decision-making and responsibility.
12 Essential Practices O Sign a contract with each school O Have established, documented criteria for the evaluation of charter applications O Publish.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CISC General Membership Meeting March (Excerpted version.
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Division of Educational Services November 21, 2014.
One System…One Mission Edison State College Randy Hanna Chancellor Florida College System.
Opening a Quality Charter School in the Los Angeles Unified School District Charter Schools Division February 27, 2008.
1 © 2016 Dannis Woliver Kelley SAN FRANCISCO | LONG BEACH | SAN DIEGO | NOVATO | CHICO | SACRAMENTO | SAN LUIS OBISPO This.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
California Career Technical Education Incentive Grant Program (CTEIG)
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
School Site Councils & Site Governance Teams
January 2015 Jenny Singh, Administrator Academic Accountability Unit
Navigating the Charter Renewal Process: Start to Finish
Navigating the Charter Renewal Process: Start to Finish
Governance at the University of Regina Glenys Sylvestre
Step-by-Step Guide to Adopting a Classified 9+1
2019 Local School District Charter Application Process
Roles and Responsibilities
District of Innovation
Fort Valley State University
Presentation transcript:

Birmingham Community Charter High School

New Law as of January 1, 2013  Senate Bill 1290 (“SB1290”) amends Ed Code sections 47605, and 47607, resulting in important changes to the charter school petitioning, renewal and revocation process.  Under SB1290, the revised Section requires the authorizing entity to consider increases in pupil academic achievement for all groups of pupils served by the charter school as the most important factor in determining whether to grant a charter renewal

According to LAUSD, data includes:  California Department of Education API; AYP; AMAO;STAR Tests- CST, CAHSEE, CELDT; Graduation Rate  LAUSD SPF; AGT  Charter School Division Oversight Findings Holistic View on: ○ Student Achievement and Educational Performance ○ Governance and Organizational Management ○ Fiscal Operations ○ Fulfillment of the Charter’s Educational Program

Recent Charter Renewals (2013)  Recently Approved Affiliated Charter High Schools: Chatsworth, Cleveland, Taft  Recently Approved Independent Charter High Schools: Camino Nuevo Charter Academy Executive Prep Academy of Finance Math and Science College Prep Student Empowerment Academy Valor Academy Charter High  Up for renewal this coming year: BCCHS and GHCHS  Non-renewed: Anahuacalmecac International University Prep HS See article : charter-renewal-denied/ charter-renewal-denied/

BCCHS Charter Renewal Process Thus far  January – Bill ed everyone and invited all interested parties to come to an info meeting and sit on one of three committees to give input to revised charter petition (Instruction, Governance, and Compliance)  Committees met, revised school mission statement, reviewed sections, revised as able through March-April  Lead writer met with committee leaders, reviewed suggested changes from committees and began revision process for charter petition document  April 26, Bill and lead writer attended a CSD Orientation to Renewal Process  May - July: Lead writer revised the document with input and data from various constituents and with input from Board regarding governance and as a result of the response to revocation process that we underwent last year

LAUSD Process for Renewal Read complete Administrative Procedures for Charter School Authorizing on our website at

Major Changes by Element

Element 1 – Instructional Program  Mission Statement: “Preparing students for college and careers with a comprehensive educational program that provides an innovative learning experience”  Overhaul of this element – please read it; includes achievement data over past five years, new program descriptions (Advisory, SAS, Instructional Rounds, CTE, RTI, etc)

Element 2 – Measurable Student Outcomes New Outcomes for :  Increase API to 825 (~15 pts/year)  Increase CAHSEE double pass rate by 5%  All other outcomes are the same

Element 3 – Methods of Assessing Student Outcomes  Addition of Common Core State Standards as assessment measure

Element 4 - Governance  Addition of clarifying language regarding roles and functions of Board, election procedures, communication with Board, qualifications, selection procedures, and terms  Addition of clarifying language regarding succession of CEO  Addition of clarifying language regarding Advisory Council and standing committees functions and responsibilities, terms, elections procedures, etc

Composition of Board Change from 15 members (4 certificated, 1 classified, 1 parent, 9 community reps) to Number will be 7 or 9 - WILL REMAIN as close to 49% employees: 51% non- employees.  3 or 4 interested parties (employees) 2 or 3 required to be certificated, 1 classified  1 parent  3 or 4 community representatives

Why the change?  Revocation process in  Comparable schools and non-profits  Law states no more than 50% are interested parties

Element 5 – Employee Qualifications  Removal of job descriptions to Appendix  Addition of HR hiring procedures

Element 6 – Health and Safety Element 7 – Racial and Ethnic Balance Element 8 – Admission Requirements Element 9 – Financial and Programmatic Audit  Boilerplate language – small formatting changes; date changes; minor edits

Element 10 – Suspension and Expulsion Procedures  No change as required by revocation process with LAUSD in

Element 11 – Retirement Benefits  Language changed to remove requirement to match LAUSD benefits and instead provide “competitive” salary and benefits packages

Why the change?  The specifics of benefits should be identified in UTLA contract not the charter petition  Failure to meet requirements as written in charter are grounds for revocation as is failing to sustain a financially viable school organization

Element 12 – Public School Attendance Alternatives  No change – boilerplate language

Element 13 – Employee Rights  Delineation between employees with returns rights to LAUSD and those without  Addition of language outlining reduction in force and whistle blower protection

Element 14 – Dispute Resolution Process Element 15 – Exclusive Public School Employer Element 16 – Charter School Closing  Changes according to LAUSD required boilerplate language

What’s next in the process?  August-September – final revisions to petition, submit to CCSA and attorneys for feedback, revise again, submit to BCCHS Board for approval  September /October – Submit to LAUSD  60 day turnaround for comments, revisions, etc  CSD will make a recommendation (for renewal or non-renewal) to board in December

What can you do to help?  Unite as a faculty and with community stakeholders behind the mission of the school (Be POSITIVE!!)  Galvanize community support – parents, students, other schools, neighbors, board members, community organizations, neighborhood councils, etc  Talk up the great things happening at BCCHS with everyone you know!

Questions and Answers  Please write your questions on a card with your name and address.  If we can’t answer your question, we will get back to you with an answer as soon as possible

Lindsey’s Contact Info   Cell  Please call me/ me anytime to discuss your questions, concerns, ideas, suggested revisions, etc.