The National Agenda: Challenges and Opportunities for 2000 Kathleen M. Huebner, Ph.D. Pennsylvania College of Optometry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In its 2001 strategic plan, The College of Osteopathic Medicine called for the development of a medical education unit. In the spring of 2003 a group of.
Advertisements

Program Evaluation in Gifted Education Rebecca Mann EDPS 540.
The National Agenda for Children and Youths with Visual Impairments, Including those with Multiple Disabilities Anne L. Corn Vanderbilt University.
MASFAA Strategic Plan Mission Statement The Massachusetts Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators empowers its members to be educated,
Purpose of Instruction
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
Elementary School Counselor
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Special Education Administration at a Crossroads: Training Special and General Education Administrators to Provide Educational Programming for All Students.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Act 117: “Every Child A Learner” Presented by: Vermont Department of Education Vermont School Boards Association.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Implementing the new Australian Medical Council standards: The focus on Indigenous health Professor Michael Field Chair, Medical School Accreditation Committee,
Oral Health in Maryland Florida Oral Health Conference The Nuts and Bolts of Coalitions August 23, 2012 Penny Anderson, M.S.W. Executive Director.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
A Charge to Collaborate: IT’S NOT JUST ABOUT WHAT WE DO… IT’S ABOUT HOW WE DO IT…
Shelley Ardis Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind Outreach Services: 30 Years of Successful Services.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Standards for Education and Rehabilitation of Students who are Blind and Visually Impaired A general overview of accepted standards for Teachers of the.
Parent Leadership Lisa Brown and Lisa Conlan Family Resource Specialists Technical Assistance Partnership.
Working with Families Chapter 2. Background In 1997, the amendments to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) strengthened the role of.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
NIMAS Implementation Strategies Where Do You Begin? National Association of State Directors of Special Education Minneapolis, Minnesota American Foundation.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Lisa Pion-Berlin, PhD President and Chief Executive Officer Parents Anonymous ® Inc. Leah Davis, California State Parent Team Achieving Shared Leadership®
Enriching Doctoral Preparation: The National Leadership Consortium in Sensory Disabilities Brooke Smith, Ph.D., COMS, Salus University Lou Tutt, Executive.
United We Ride: Where are we Going? December 11, 2013 Rik Opstelten United We Ride Program Analyst.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
Coalition 101. RESPECT AND VALUE “The group respects my opinion and provides positive ways for me to contribute.” EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS “The roles.
Janet M. Sloand, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network (PaTTAN)
The National Center for Special Education Personnel and Related Service Providers Phoebe Gillespie, Ph.D. Project NASDSE.
National Leadership Consortium for Sensory Disabilities Kathleen Mary Huebner, NLCSD Director Brooke Smith, NLCSD Coordinator NLCSD
Community Board Orientation 6- Community Board Orientation 6-1.
Professionalizing Mobility Management: Developing Standards and Competencies Julie Dupree, Easter Seals Association of Travel Instruction Conference August.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
The Community Collaboration Coaches Roles, Strategies, and Tools.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Parents as Teachers © (PAT)  Vision All children will learn, grow and develop to realize their full potential.  Mission To provide the information,
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Working Toward Statewide Standards of Practice (Operationalizing the Strategic Plan) IESBVI Iowa Educational Services for the Blind and Visually Impaired.
CEC’s NEW “RED BOOK”: What Every Special Educator Must Know
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Specialized Personnel Working with Children Who Have Deaf Blindness.
1 Essential Components of an Effective Educational Program Overview Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
Building Awareness of Teacher Leadership. Why Teacher Leadership?
The Eugene T. Moore School of Education Working together to promote the growth, education, and social development of children and youth David E. Barrett.
Time for Change: Examining Utah Data Relating to Student Performance
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
The Mentoring Process Martha Majors.
Building a National Collaborative Network for Deaf-Blind Services
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Educare Policy and Advocacy
Family Engagement and Leadership: Partnering Together in an Ever Changing World Clara.
OSEP “Hot Topics in Early Childhood” Meeting
February 21-22, 2018.
No Two Shortages Are The Same: Using Educator Data To Target Efforts
Presentation transcript:

The National Agenda: Challenges and Opportunities for 2000 Kathleen M. Huebner, Ph.D. Pennsylvania College of Optometry

KMH/PCO National Agenda What is the National Agenda ? QUALITY QUANTITY n A set of common goals designed to improve the QUALITY and QUANTITY of educational opportunities for children who are blind or visually impaired including those with multiple disabilities.

KMH/PCO National Agenda Why a National Agenda ? QUALITY QUANTITY n A realization that our children were not all receiving the QUALITY and QUANTITY of education services specific to their needs -- and that TOGETHER n Parents, Professionals and Persons with visual impairments TOGETHER have the power to create positive change

KMH/PCO National Agenda A Quick Review of the 8 Goals n REFERRAL n REFERRAL of appropriate program --30 days PARENTAL PARTICIPATION n Full PARENTAL PARTICIPATION and partnership PERSONNEL n Universities prepare sufficient specialized PERSONNEL n SERVICE DELIVERY n SERVICE DELIVERY-caseloads based on needs of students-on-going professional development PLACEMENT OPTIONS n Full array of service PLACEMENT OPTIONS n ASSESSMENT- n ASSESSMENT- with appropriate expertise n INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS n INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS available in appropriate media and at the same time as sighted peers n EXPANDED CORE CURRICULA

KMH/PCO National Agenda Relevant Publications 1 The National Agenda for the Education of Children and Youths with Visual Impairments, Including Those with Multiple Disabilities. Corn, Hatlen, Huebner, Ryan, & Siller, 1995, AFB Press. 2 The Report to the Nation, Corn & Huebner, (1998), AFB Press. 3 A Call to Action: Practical Suggestions for the Achievement of the National Agenda Goals, Stryker, Huebner, Hatlen, TSBVI

KMH/PCO National Agenda The National Agenda The National Agenda “little blue book” n Brief History of Development n The National Goal Statements n Importance of Statements n Strategies for Achievement n National Committees and Endorsements

KMH/PCO National Agenda The Report to the Nation The Report to the Nation “bigger blue book” n National baseline data on each goal n Reports of 28 state-level activities n Vehicle for communicating about the status as of 1997 n Appendices on caseload policies n Resource information n OSERS Policy Statement

KMH/PCO National Agenda A Call to Action A Call to Action A Dynamic Document n For each goal the following is presented: –Major issues –How to determine current status –How to develop a plan of action for your state “WWW. TSBVI.EDU” –Locate it on the “WWW. TSBVI.EDU”

KMH/PCO National Agenda National Agenda Replications n NA in Australia, New Zealand, and England n National Agenda on Vision and Aging

KMH/PCO National Agenda Significant National Off-Shoot Activities n NTPT - National Plan for Training Personnel to Serve Children with Blindness and Low Vision, 2000,Council for Exceptional Children. n NASDE Guidelines - Blind and Visually Impaired Students Educational Service Guidelines, Pugh, & Erin, Perkins School for the Blind. n Textbook and Instructional Materials Forum or or

KMH/PCO National Agenda National Plan for Training Personnel to Serve Children with Blindness and Low Vision--NTPT n 3 Goals –Personnel Preparation and Development –Leadership Development –Recruitment and Retention n Cross-Goal –National Personnel Preparation Coordinating Council

KMH/PCO National Agenda Personnel Preparation/Development n Establish a Personnel Preparation Technical Assistance Network (PPTAN) –to facilitate and support collaboration –facilitate the application of national program standards –provide technical assistance to new and existing programs n Extend OSEP program support –5 years –increase the award size

KMH/PCO National Agenda Leadership Development n Establish a Leadership Development Institute –Doctorates n Establish a Research to Practice Institute –design, collect, analyze, and disseminate data affecting personnel needs in blindness and visual impairment –validate practices –conduct outcome studies –collect accurate counts of children and service providers

KMH/PCO National Agenda Recruitment and Retention n Establish a Recruitment and Retention Project n We all need to recruit

KMH/PCO National Agenda Cross-Goal National Personnel Preparation Coordinating Council n Comprised of representatives of each of other components and other stakeholders n Mission is to guide and provide formative evaluation to facilitate implementation and outcomes of the National Plan

KMH/PCO National Agenda NTPT and NA Goals n Addresses Goals »2 Parent Participation »3 Personnel Preparation »4 Caseloads-Recommends 8 :1 Student:Teacher Ratio »5 Full-Array of Service Options »6 Assessment »8 Expanded Core Curriculum

KMH/PCO National Agenda NASDE Guidelines n Over 70 stakeholders including parents involved n 13 Participating organizations, including professionals, parents and consumers n Intention: Present best practices without value judgements of existing programs or personnel

KMH/PCO National Agenda NASDE Guidelines Content n 5 Chapters -Foundations -Supportive Structure and Administration -Assessment -Program Requirements and Placement Options -Personnel

KMH/PCO National Agenda NASDE Guidelines-Chapter Structure –Foundations »10 unique needs, policy/legislation, philosophies, array of options, diversity, multiple disabilities –Supportive Structure and Administration »8 roles of personnel and supportive LEA/SEA administration –Assessment »6 comprehensive, formal, informal, clinical, expanded core –Program Requirements and Placement Options »11 families, options, mentors, extracurricular, equal access, technology, multiple disabilities –Personnel »12 specialized training, parent-professional relationships, diversity, O&M, expanded core curricula, certifications

KMH/PCO National Agenda NASDE Guidelines and NA Goals n Addresses All Goals »1 Referral »2 Parent Participation »3 Personnel Preparation »4 Caseloads »5 Full-Array of Service Options »6 Assessment »7 Instructional Media »8 Expanded Core Curriculum

KMH/PCO National Agenda Textbook and Instructional Materials Forum n Addressing: –Lack of standardization of electronic file formats provided by textbook publishers –Inaccessibility of multimedia textbooks –Variation in sate textbook regulations –Inconsistent interpretation of copyright law –High expense of producing specialized materials and lack of fiscal incentives to develop new technologies –Shortage of qualified braille transcribers and production resources –Communication and collaboration barriers

KMH/PCO National Agenda Textbook and Instructional Materials Forum 5 Workgroups n Electronic Files n Legislation n Production n Training and Other Needs n Communication and Collaboration n or nfb.org or TSBVI.EDU/textbooks/afb

KMH/PCO National Agenda Solutions Forum and NA Goals n Addresses Goals –2 Parent Participation –3 Personnel Preparation –7 Instructional Media –8 Expanded Core Curriculum

KMH/PCO National Agenda NA Reported Challenges n Full Inclusion n Full Inclusion prevailing philosophy n Special schools/services threatened qualified staff n Too few qualified staff/emergency credentialling n Loss of staff n Loss of staff at all levels, state level leadership to direct service time n Lack of time outcome research n Lack of outcome research

KMH/PCO National Agenda NA REPORTED DeterrentsFacilitators n Loss of Personnel n Lack of mutual goals n Lack of information n Lack of funding n Lack of state adopted texts n Lack of leadership n Lack of planning n NA not on state conference agendas n LEA Control n Additional Personnel n Mutual goal setting n Widespread understanding n Financial support n Statewide textbook adoption n Strong leadership n Strong action planning n NA on conference agenda or special conferences n LEA Control

KMH/PCO National Agenda NA Reported Effective Strategies n Partnerships –Parents, Teachers, Administrators, Legislators n Infusion into many activities n Development of best practice guidelines n Grass roots infusion of philosophies and actions n Increase and/varied tools for communication n Adoption of new policies n Everyone thinking “expanded core curricula” n National backing opens doors/gives backbone to efforts

KMH/PCO National Agenda NA Predominant Positive Responses n Feeling of working on common goals-- across the country, within the state, within an LEA, within a special school n Feeling of HOPE for the future n Not alone n So many working on so many different aspects toward a common good n Family involvement growing n Encourages holistic view of our students/services

KMH/PCO National Agenda NA NEXT NATIONAL STEPS n Recognize need for more effective advocacy and tools –Spanish NA booklet (TSBVI) –Mentoring program between NGLs and State Coordinators –Parent document about NA by parents –Teacher document about NA by CEC- DVI –Data for State and local administrators- handy and persuasive

KMH/PCO National Agenda What Else Can YOU Do? n Commit yourself professionally to the philosophy and let it show in all of your efforts n Stay on top of what your state, your colleagues in state and in the nation are doing n Familiarize yourself and USE the NA and related materials such as Solutions Forum, NASDE guidelines n Be an active advocate and support your colleagues n Teach your students and help their parents become strong self-advocates n Believe in quality services and let that belief drive your actions n Take pride in what you and your students do n Recruit others into the field

KMH/PCO National Agenda …And Most of All n Believe and have high expectations for your students, their families and yourself!