Rules Overview: Why Do We Do What We Do Alisa Max, P.E. Harris County Alisa Max, P.E. Harris County.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BAT Work Group. BAT Work Group Goals Develop a procedure for identifying technologies eligible for funding Propose policies and regulation necessary to.
Advertisements

Water Pollution. Definitions Impaired Waters Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires states to develop lists of impaired waters, those that do.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
O Adopted in 1972, the CWA is known mostly to the public by its mandate for “swimmable and fishable” waterways. o With the CWA, states evaluate all of.
Clean Water Act SAFE 210. History/Amendments Recent major amendments were enacted in 1972, 1977, and – Established the National Pollutant Discharge.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
PENNSYLVANIA CODE Title 25.Environmental Protection Chapter 102 Erosion and Sediment Control Clean Streams Law-Act 394 of To preserve and improve.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
On-site Sewage Facility (OSSF) Trends in Texas
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
Upper Providence Township Stormwater Management MS4 Program.
The Clean Water Act Objective: To restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation’s waters PHOTO OF 2007 OUTFALL AT.
California’s New Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Policy Richard Sanchez, REHS, MPH President California Conference of Directors of Environmental Health.
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
3rd Annual Harris County On-site Wastewater Seminar
By: John R. Blount, PE, LEED AP Director Harris County Architecture & Engineering Division.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Design Considerations for High Strength Wastewater
Protecting Water Resources: The U.S. Legal Framework Babette J. Neuberger, JD, MPH Associate Dean for Academic Affairs University of Illinois at Chicago.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality A TMDL Training Program for Local Government Leaders and Other Water Resource.
Failing Septic Systems: Problems and Solutions Protect Our Waters 2003 Legislative Session Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy Minnesota Environmental.
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Rogue Basin Water Quality Implementation Plans Greg Stabach, Natural Resources Project Manager Rogue Valley Council of Governments.
Water Pollution.
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
How to prepare for an Authorized Agent Compliance Review Ronald Hebert Water Section Manager Region 10/ Beaumont (409)
1 Onsite Systems, Nutrients, and the Wakulla Springshed By Eberhard Roeder, Ph.D., P.E. Bureau of Onsite Sewage Programs FL Dept. of Health, Division of.
Implementation Procedures (IPs) Brittany Lee Standards Implementation Team
Teresa Marks Director 1. o The Clean Water Act of 1972 requires states to establish water quality standards (WQS) for all waterbodies within the state.
The Water Framework Directive Farming Responding to the Challenge Thomas Ryan, Environment & Infrastructure Executive Tuesday, 2 nd September 2008.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Eric Agnew Environmental Regulations February 15, 2006.
Nitrogen Problem Excessive nitrogen (N) from a variety of sources has led to decreases in the environmental quality of coastal rivers, ponds, and harbors.
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
Changes to § Application of Standards and §307.9-Determination of Standards Attainment Gregg Easley Water Quality Standards Team Texas Commission.
76. The central U.S. law regulating water quality is the Clean Water Act (CWA), adopted in The Act initially focused on point sources, which it.
Water Quality Investigations How Does Land-Use Impact Water Quality? Mitigating Water Quality – Current Issues July 9, 2015 Jim Kipp, Associate Director.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
1.Submit your Creek Survey if you haven’t already done so. 2.Which part of the water cycle is MOST responsible for polluting surface water? 3.Municipalities.
The Clean Water Act (1977, 1981, 1987) By: Jonas Szajowitz.
Prepared By: Amaliyar Kamleshkumar ( ) Rathod Nikunj ( ) Parmar mukesh ( ) Patel Raj ( ) Ode Kiran ( )
What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.
IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE Rice County Local Water Management Plan BOARD PRESENTATION JUNE 16, 2015.
1 Staff Public Workshops Fall 2011 Policy for Siting, Design, Operation and Management of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems San Luis Obispo: October.
Ordinance 480-YYY Modifications to Zoning Ordinance 480 regarding On-Site Sewage Facilities (OSSF)
Integrated Watershed Management
Water Pollution: Pollutant Transport Mechanisms
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Warm Up p65 Which part of the water cycle is MOST responsible for polluting surface water? Municipalities (towns) get drinking water from which two sources?
Water Pollution.
Water Pollution.
Total Maximum Daily Load Program
Warm Up p65 Which part of the water cycle is MOST responsible for polluting surface water? Municipalities (towns) get drinking water from which two sources?
Chapter 21 Water Pollution and Treatment
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
BAT Work Group.
Water Pollution.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Managing urban watersheds
Water Quality What is water quality?
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
USES OF DOMESTIC RECLAIMED WATER
2019 Environmental Trade Fair & Conference Monica Vallin-Baez
Presentation transcript:

Rules Overview: Why Do We Do What We Do Alisa Max, P.E. Harris County Alisa Max, P.E. Harris County

Topics to be discussed today Rules overview Big Picture TMDL’s And Their Impact Closing Thoughts

Overview OSSF’s Governed By: Texas Health & Safety Code, Chapter 366 Texas Water Code, Chapters 7 & TAC 285 Local Regulations

Texas Health & Safety Code Chapter 366 Health & Safety Code, Title 5. Sanitation and Environmental Quality, Subtitle B. Solid Waste, Toxic Chemicals, Sewage, Litter, and Water, Chapter 366. On-Site Sewage Disposal Systems Delegates powers to TCEQ & Provides for Authorized Agents /Docs/HS/htm/HS.366.htm

Texas Water Code, Chapter 7 Water Code, Title 2. Water Administration, Subtitle A. Executive Agencies, Chapter 7. Enforcement Defines Enforcement Protocols for TCEQ Docs/WA/htm/WA.7.htm

Texas Water Code, Chapter 37 Water Code, Title 2. Water Administration, Subtitle F. Occupational Licensing and Registration, Chapter 37. Occupational Licensing and Registration Discusses Licensing and Registration Requirements Docs/WA/htm/WA.37.htm

30 TAC 285 Texas Administrative Code Title 30. Environmental Quality, Part 1. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Chapter 285. On-Site Sewage Facilities The TCEQ’s Rules to implement the program that has been delegated to them through the Texas Health & Safety Code & the Texas Water Code TAC?tac_view=4&ti=30&pt=1&ch=285

Local Regulations 30 TAC 285.B allows for delegation of the administration of an OSSF Program to local entity known as an Authorized Agent of the State. The Authorized Agent must enforce 30 TAC 285 and the Texas Health & Safety Code Chapter 366. The Authorized Agent may also proposed more stringent standards than the State provided the TCEQ approves those provisions.

So Why Should I Care?

Environmental Stewardship It’s your backyard!

Not doing it for you? How about Health? It could be your drinking water supply that you’re protecting

Or the child playing near the sewage leak or in receiving waters

Still Not Doing It For You? It’s the law!

The Big Picture We’re here to protect: Human Health The Environment

Rules primarily target the following 3 objectives: The ability of the system to meet wastewater treatment objectives The ability to maintain the system Protect neighbors, self & the environment

To what levels do we protect the public and the environment? It depends on how the effluent is disposed of. –Standards for subsurface disposal is set in rules. It’s assumed soils do much of the work. –Standards for surface disposal is set in rules also, but is influenced by the Clean Water Act and the Texas Water Code as the flow could end up in a bayou or stream.

To what levels do we protect the public and the environment? The EPA & TCEQ define standards for our streams that they believe are the minimum amounts to protect the public & the environment. They’ve developed Water Quality Standards. /compliance/monops/water/10twqi/201 0_guidance.pdf

Water Quality Standards- examples Dissolved Oxygen, toxicity in water & sediment (12 metals & 26 organic substances for water; additional for sediments), macrobenthic & fish communities Aquatic Life Use [How are the Fish & other critters? Is the fishing good? Is your habitat good?]:

Water Quality Standards- examples Recreation Use: [Want to go swimming? Boating? Play in or near the water? Touch the water without getting a stomach ache?]: Bacteria

Water Quality Standards- examples Water temperature, pH (high or low), Chloride, sulfate, & total dissolved solids, nutrients, altered color (or turbidity) General Use [Affects everything. Makes other things go wrong if these are wrong.]:

TCEQ’s General Process to determine if your streams are OK, & what they do if they aren’t

Monitor & Sample the Streams– The Clean River Program (H-GAC with TCEQ funds) Compare results with the State’s Water Quality Standards. Determine which streams are impaired. Why are those streams impaired? Create a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) equation to determine sources and give them each an allocation to bring the stream back into compliance

TCEQ’s General Process to determine if your streams are OK, & what they do if they aren’t Create an Implementation Plan & implement it. Keep on monitoring. Did the plan work? If not, modify the plan. Try new things out. Keep trying until you find a plan that works. Meanwhile, the rules keep changing to bring streams into compliance!

DON’T SHOOT THE MESSENGER! When Assigning Causes of Impairments: EPA’s Cause Code # 92: On-Site Treatment Systems (Septic Systems and Similar Decentralized Systems) [From Table 4.2: List of EPA Source Codes and Source Categories]

Buffalo & White Oak Bayou Bacteria TMDL Project “Onsite sewage facilities (OSSF’s) can be a source of indicator bacteria to streams and rivers. Indicator bacteria loading from failing OSSF’s can be transported to streams in a variety of ways, including runoff from surface drainage to the receiving waters or from transport by storm water runoff.” (pg 53) OSSF’s contributed 145 billion MPN/day E. coli to parts of the watershed. (Table 25) All loads from OSSF’s will need to be reduced from 59% % (depending upon location) (Tables 31-32) Source: “Eighteen TMDLs for Bacteria in Buffalo and Whiteoak Bayous and Tributaries”, dated April 8, 2009, and prepared by University of Houston for Total Maximum Daily Load Program, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

So what are we doing about bacteria now? Harris County’s Local Order, Section 10.Y: In watersheds where one or more stream segments are listed as impaired for bacteria on the EPA 303(d) list the following additional requirements apply: 1)Electronic monitoring as outlined in amendment M(4) shall be required for all new and replacement on-site sewage facilities. 2)All on-site sewage facilities must use secondary treatment meeting a 30 day average CBOD of 10 mg/L and TSS of 10 mg/L. On NSF Standard 40 units this must be demonstrated by test results. On engineered one of a kind systems, a design parameter of 5 mg/L CBOD and 5 mg/L TSS shall be used. 3)Pump tanks shall be equipped such that when pumping a portion of the effluent is returned below static water level to insure scour of the pump tank bottom.

So what are we doing about bacteria now? Bacteria Implementation Group’s Implementation Plan (approved by Group; pending TCEQ approval): Created by a 31 member stakeholder group and has 11 major implementation strategies included, one of which is addressing OSSF’s. Specific implementation activities for OSSF’s recommended are: 1)Identify and address failing systems: includes items such as increased enforcement, owner education, and repair/replace failing systems or sewer failing systems. 2)Address inadequate maintenance of OSSF’s: increase homeowner education, encourage repair & pumpout logs be maintained & consider information passed from seller to buyer at real estate transactions, coordinate with real estate industry, & act to increase maintenance of OSSF’s via measures like increased inspections.

So what are we doing about bacteria now? Bacteria Implementation Group’s Implementation Plan (approved by Group; pending TCEQ approval): 3)Legislative or other regulatory actions: increase Texas On-site Wastewater Treatment Research Council fee by $10 to help our area, Create model orders, ordinances & resolutions, ask for greater TCEQ funding support for OSSF’s Plan_for_Formal_Support%20_Website.pdf

Implication: New treatment technologies that better address bacteria, nutrients and solids will likely have a greater appeal in the near future!

Be prepared for Changes Changes are likely in the way that on-site systems will be designed, permitted, installed and maintained in areas where bacteria or other pollutants is a problem.

One last thing….

And why do so many people in the OSSF industry need licenses and continuing education? You are professionals! You should be treated as such and licensed as such. The OSSF profession keeps changing and evolving. Continuing education makes sense to keep one’s knowledge current.

Questions?