The Quantification of Drought: An Evaluation of State and Local Drought Triggers Hope Mizzell, Greg Carbone, Jason Caldwell South Carolina Department of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Land-use Framework Provincial leadership
Advertisements

In this chapter, look for the answers to these questions:
Reducing Vulnerability to Drought through Mitigation and Preparedness Report to the Inter-Agency Task Force for Disaster Reduction Sixth Meeting Geneva,
High Resolution Regional Drought Monitor for the Carolinas USC Greg Carbone, USC-Regional Integrated Sciences Assessment Hope Mizzell, SC State Climate.
A Presentation of the Colorado Health Institute 1576 Sherman Street, Suite 300 Denver, Colorado Monitoring the.
Municipalities & Designated Growth Areas. 6- & 8-Digit Watershed Boundaries.
Ontario Low Water Response (OLWR)
Government Policies That Alter the Private Market Outcome
Operations Management For Competitive Advantage © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2001 C HASE A QUILANO J ACOBS ninth edition 1 Strategic Capacity Management.
WATER FOR THE 21 st CENTURY ECONOMY AND ENVIRONMENT Santa Ana River Watershed Conference April 11, 2013.
Challenges in Finding and Connecting New Water Sources J. Tupling, P.Eng. June 22, 2009.
Regional Water Planning Senate Bill 1 Introduction and Status as of August 01, 1999.
Water Distribution Systems – Part 1
Water Planning 101 Lower Colorado Regional Planning Group-Region K January 9, 2013 W. David Meesey, O.W.P. (Old Water Planner) 1.
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Community Water Supply Plan Update Public Meeting Monticello High School September 21, :00 pm.
2008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Town of Sullivans Island, South Carolina Draft Plan recommended by Planning Commission to Town Council on December 10, 2008 January.
In this chapter, look for the answers to these questions:
Zone 7 Water Agency Zone 7’s Salt Management Plan Past, Present & Future May 9, 2012 Kurt Arends, P.E. AGM Engineering and Operations Zone 7 Water Agency.
Hazard Mitigation Planning I Session Name: Hazard Mitigation Planning I Coastal Hazards Management Course Signed by the President on October 30, 2000 Amends.
FEMA PROGRAMS II Session Name: FEMA Programs II Coastal Hazards Management Course Amends the Stafford Act Establishes a Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program.
Potential Climate Change Impacts to the NW Hydroelectric System NW Hydroelectric Association Conference February 20, 2013.
Droughts in Ohio: Shall We be Worried? Tiao J. Chang Department of Civil Engineering Russ College of Engineering, Ohio University Athens, Ohio Prepared.
University of Nebraska  Lincoln R School of Natural Resources Breaking the Hydro-illogical Cycle: Are we making progress? Donald A. Wilhite, Director.
Andrew Benjamin University of Delaware.  Goals: ◦ To investigate Drought Monitoring plans of states along the coastal plain. ◦ Review literature and.
Governor’s State Water Law Review Committee Recommendations 1982: Implementation Update David G. Baize Bureau of Water.
1 NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center ESIP Federation Winter Meeting 2009 Washington, DC The NIDIS U.S. Drought Portal: An Update Mike.
"Drought Impacts and Vulnerability in South Carolina" Hope Mizzell State Climatologist SC Department of Natural Resources.
Defining the Status Quo. Definition of Status Quo The “Status Quo” describes existing or anticipated conditions of a water resources system if policies,
Carly Jerla Bureau of Reclamation Michael Hayes National Drought Mitigation Center University of Nebraska-Lincoln Risk Assessment Scoping Workshop for.
California and Nevada Drought is extreme to exceptional.
State Water Planning Methodology of Texas Michelle Buckholtz Rebecca Cesa Wyatt Ellertson.
Las Virgenes Municipal Water District Water Supply and Drought Response: Getting Serious about Water Use Westhills HOA June 17, 2015.
IWRM as a Tool for Adaptation to Climate Change
Managing Drought: A Roadmap for Change in the United States
Brooten Area Water Use June 19, Brooten – Initial Conflict Study Area.
Columbia River Water Management Program (CRWMP) Review of Year One Upper Crab Creek Planning Unit Meeting April 17, 2007.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Senate Enrolled Act No. 369 Update Indiana’s Water Shortage Plan.
Analysis of Raleigh’s Drought Triggers May 8, 2013 and.
South Carolina Drought Forecasting Greg Carbone and Kirstin Dow Department of Geography University of South Carolina.
HEA 1738 IC as amended Water Resource Allocation and Distribution in Indiana IDNR Division of Water.
Drought Monitoring: Challenges in the Western United States
Collaborative climate impacts work in the Carolinas Greg Carbone Dept. of Geography University of South Carolina Shenandoah Valley.
1 1 Pennsylvania’s Drought Update January 28, 2002.
Hope Mizzell, Ph.D. SC State Climatologist South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Carolinas and Virginia Climate Conference Improving Drought Detection.
Urban Water Institute August 27, 2015 Managing the Colorado River during Drought.
Drought Response Plan Clarke County, Virginia Saving Water/Saving Money: Water Conservation in the Shenandoah Valley March 11, 2009 Alison Teetor Natural.
Preparing For Drought Alexander Hinz Daniel Rice Dorothy Young ________________ Water Supply Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality 2015 TCEQ.
Drought and Water Supply Issues in. Water Supply Concerns Reduced supply - droughtIncreasing demand.
Time Frame. Opportunities To Comment Today October 15 th - Urban Stakeholders Committee November 9 th – California Water Commission Formal Rulemaking.
The U.S. Drought Monitor and Beyond
University of Nebraska  Lincoln R School of Natural Resources Donald A. Wilhite, Director School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska The U.S.
ERCOT Generation Drought Best Practices Workshop Water Conservation Practices for Texas Generators February 27, 2012.
Alabama Water Resources Conference Perdido Beach, Alabama Mac Underwood, General Manager BWWB BIRMINGHAM WATER WORKS BOARD Sustainability of Water Supply.
Colorado River Basin: Overview of Determining Lake Powell and Lake Mead Annual Operational Tiers WSWC Seasonal Precipitation Forecast Workshop December.
Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) City of Patterson’s April 19, 2016.
June 2009: How severe is the current drought in the Hill Country?
An Overview of Coastal Management Issues Overview and Scrutiny Co-ordinating and Call-in Committee, 10 March Andrew Wainwright, Environmental Health.
Climate Change Threat Reduced Snowpack 1. Potential Impacts Related to Reduced Snowpack How might our community be impacted by reduced snowpack? 2.
Raw Water Availability in the Integrated Vaal River System Presented to:WSF Presented by:Kobie Mare Date:25 May
The Future of the Colorado River – Business as Usual or ???
Scoping Workshop for the Upper Colorado River Basin
Department of Environmental Quality
Changing Water laws and policies
PUBLIC HEARING: ESTABLISH A 20% WATER CONSERVATION TARGET AND IMPLEMENT LEVEL 1 WATER SUPPLY SHORTAGE PLAN March 27, 2017 Item 9.
2018 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment
Drought in Oregon George H. Taylor October, 2007.
June 2009: How severe is the current drought in the Hill Country?
Greater Kaweah GSA Board Meeting
DROUGHT MANAGEMENT PLANS IN SPAIN Drought indicators Rome, 7 Dicember 2006 Teodoro Estrela Deputy Water Director Spanish Ministry of Environment.
Presentation transcript:

The Quantification of Drought: An Evaluation of State and Local Drought Triggers Hope Mizzell, Greg Carbone, Jason Caldwell South Carolina Department of Natural Resources

WHY PLAN?

NOAA Paleoclimatology Program Dr. Edward Cook, Dr. David Meko, Dr. David Stahle Dr. Malcolm Cleaveland

Hydro-Illogical Cycle

Population 1 Dot = 10,000 People

South Carolina Drought Response Act Established procedures for monitoring, managing, and conserving water resources during periods of drought SC Department of Natural Resources – Land,Water & Conservation Division serves as primary agency Monitor drought conditions Coordinate States response

Local Drought Committee Local Drought Plans and Ordinances State Drought Program State Agency Drought Committee Drought Act and Regulations

Chairs D.R.C. & provides support SC State & Local Drought Committee SCDNR Coordinate response Issue Drought Declarations Consult with stakeholders Issue nonessential water curtailment declaration Review request for variance Curtail nonessential water use during severe and extreme droughts Health & safety threatened - Report conditions & recommend actions to Governor Mediate disputes Governor may declare drought emergency and issue emergency water curtailment regulations Water Systems implement drought response ordinances or plans

South Carolina Model Drought Mitigation Ordinance/Plan SCDNR, in cooperation with SC Water Utility Council and SCDHEC developed a model drought response ordinance/plan for water systems Reviewed by Municipal Association and SC Drought Response Committee SC Drought Response Act of 2000 requires that all municipalities, counties, public service districts, special purpose districts, and commissions of public works engaged in business or activity of supplying water for any purpose develop and implement drought response ordinances or plans.

Model Drought Management Plan and Response Ordinance Model Drought Management Plan and Response Ordinance Section I: Declaration of Purpose and Intent Section II: Definition of Terms Section III: Drought Management Plan A. Introduction B. Designation of Water System Drought Response Representative C. Description of Water System Layout, Water Sources, Capacities and Yields D. Identification of Water System Specific Drought or Water Shortage Indicators E. Cooperative Agreements and Alternative Water Supply Sources F. Description of Pre-Drought Planning Efforts G. Description of Capital Planning and Investment for System Reliability and Demand Forecasting

Drought Response Ordinance (or Resolution) A. Declaration of Policy and Authority B. Moderate Drought Phase C. Severe Drought Phase D. Extreme Drought Phase E. Rationing F. Enforcement of Restrictions G. Variances H. Status of the Ordinance Resolution of Adoption Resolution of Adoption

Importance of State and Local Drought Triggers 4 phases of drought established by regulation Incipient PDSI to -1.49CMI 0.00 to -1.49SPI 0.00 to KBDI 300 to 399DM D0 Avg daily streamflow 111%-120% of minimum flow for 2 consecutive weeks Static water level in aquifer is feet above trigger level for 2 cons. months Moderate PDSI to -2.99CMI to -2.99SPI to KBDI 400 to 499DM D1 Avg daily streamflow 101%-110% of minimum flow for 2 consecutive weeks Static water level in aquifer is 1-10 feet above trigger level for 2 cons. months Severe PDSI to -3.99CMI to -3.99SPI to KDBI 500 to 699DM D2 Avg daily streamflow is between minimum flow and 90% of minimum for 2 cons. weeks Static water level in aquifer is between trigger level and 10 feet below for 2 cons. months Extreme PDSI and belowCMI and belowSPI and below KBDI exceeds 700DM D3 or higher Avg daily streamflow less than 90% of minimum for 2 consecutive weeks Static water level in aquifer is more than 10 feet below trigger level for 2 consecutive months

Importance of State and Local Drought Triggers Water System Specific Triggers Moderate/Severe/Extreme Drought Phases 1. Reservoirs ________ full 2. Storage falls below ____ percentage of capacity 3. Stream-flow less than ______ cubic feet per second 4. Aquifer levels less than ______________ 5. ____________number of days of supply remaining 6. Average daily use greater than _____mgd for _____ consecutive days 7. Others: ______________________________________________

SJWD Water System

Percentage of Storage Volume Lyman Lake Drought Operating Curves

Drought Stage Thresholds Lyman Lake Drought Operating Curves

Operating Curve Performance (50-year Simulated Record)

Frequency of Drought Phase Indication (14.1 mgd Withdrawal) Drought Phase Percent of 54- year Historical Record for Lake Lyman Number of Weeks During 54-year Record Public Notices During 54-year Record Normal90.1%2544N/A Incipient Drought (Phase 1)1.1%3215 Moderate Drought (Phase 2)2.1%5915 Severe Drought (Phase 3)3.4%9714 Extreme Drought (Phase4)3.3%925 Frequency of Drought Phase Indication

Comparison of Lake Lyman Elevation, PDSI and 3 month SPI

Comparison of Lake Lyman Elevation, PDSI and 3 month SPI:

Frequency of Drought Phase Indication Drought Phase Percent of 54- year Historical Record for Lake Lyman Percent of 54- year Historical Record for SPI Percent of 54- year Historical Record for PDSI Normal 90.1%53.5%56% Incipient Drought (Phase 1) 1.1%31.5%13.2% Moderate Drought (Phase 2) 2.1%9.2%24.1% Severe Drought (Phase 3) 3.4%2.9%5.3% Extreme Drought (Phase4) 3.3%2.9% 1.2% Frequency of Drought Phase Indication

National Drought Preparedness Act of 2003 June 21, 2004, Western Governors, Creating a Drought Early Warning System for the 21st Century: The National Integrated Drought Information System (NIDIS) One Goal of NIDIS Create a drought early warning system capable of providing accurate, timely and integrated information on drought conditions at the relevant spatial scale to facilitate proactive decisions aimed at minimizing the economic, social and ecosystem losses associated with drought;

Future Work Compare additional state drought indices such as KBDI, Streamflow, Groundwater with several Local Water System Triggers such as those using wells Evaluate drought strength, frequency, mean and maximum duration of droughts of a given intensity, and trend in drought incidence as indicated by the local and State triggers