Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement P. Peylin, C. Bacour, P. Ciais, H. Verbeek, P. Rayner Flux data to highlight model deficiencies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
J. Ogée – N. Viovy – P. Friedlingstein – P. Ciais G. Krinner – N. deNoblet J. Polcher (IPSL) Evaluation of the global biospheric model ORCHIDEE against.
Advertisements

Changes in the seasonal activity of temperate and boreal vegetation The critical role of Autumn temperatures. Shilong Piao, Philippe Ciais, Pierre Friedlingstein,
Land Surface Evaporation 1. Key research issues 2. What we learnt from OASIS 3. Land surface evaporation using remote sensing 4. Data requirements Helen.
Main features of the Biome-BGC MuSo model Zoltán BARCZA, Dóra HIDY Training Workshop for Ecosystem Modelling studies Budapest, May 2014.
Reducing Canada's vulnerability to climate change - ESS Variation of land surface albedo and its simulation Shusen Wang Andrew Davidson Canada Centre for.
The C budget of Japan: Ecosystem Model (TsuBiMo) Y. YAMAGATA and G. ALEXANDROV Climate Change Research Project, National Institute for Environmental Studies,
Monitoring Effects of Interannual Variation in Climate and Fire Regime on Regional Net Ecosystem Production with Remote Sensing and Modeling D.P. Turner.
Exploitation of MODIS and MISR Surface Albedos in Support of SVAT Models LANDFLUX meeting, Toulouse, May 28-31, 2007 JRC – Ispra Bernard Pinty, T. Lavergne,
Some Approaches and Issues related to ISCCP-based Land Fluxes Eric F Wood Princeton University.
03/06/2015 Modelling of regional CO2 balance Tiina Markkanen with Tuula Aalto, Tea Thum, Jouni Susiluoto and Niina Puttonen.
Estimation of daily CO 2 fluxes over Europe by inversion of atmospheric continuous data C. Carouge and P. Peylin ; P. Bousquet ; P. Ciais ; P. Rayner Laboratoire.
Princeton University Global Evaluation of a MODIS based Evapotranspiration Product Eric Wood Hongbo Su Matthew McCabe.
Surface Skin Temperatures Observed from IR and Microwave Satellite Measurements Catherine Prigent, CNRS, LERMA, Observatoire de Paris, France Filipe Aires,
NOCES meeting Plymouth, 2005 June Top-down v.s. bottom-up estimates of air-sea CO 2 fluxes : No winner so far … P. Bousquet, A. Idelkadi, C. Carouge,
Inversion of continuous data over Europe : a pseudo-data analysis. C. Carouge and P. Peylin ; P. Bousquet ; P. Ciais ; P. Rayner Laboratoire des Sciences.
CSIRO LAND and WATER Estimation of Spatial Actual Evapotranspiration to Close Water Balance in Irrigation Systems 1- Key Research Issues 2- Evapotranspiration.
Global Carbon Cycle Feedbacks: From pattern to process Dave Schimel NEON inc.
Trade-offs between sequestration and bioenergy benefits Nicolas VUICHARD (1,2) Philippe CIAIS (2) Luca BELELLI (3) Riccardo VALENTINI (3) (1)CIRED – Nogent.
The observed responses of ecosystem CO2 exchange to climate variation from diurnal to annual time scale in the northern America. C. Yi, K.J. Davis, The.
Remote Sensing Data Assimilation for a Prognostic Phenology Model How to define global-scale empirical parameters? Reto Stöckli 1,2
Optimising ORCHIDEE simulations at tropical sites Hans Verbeeck LSM/FLUXNET meeting June 2008, Edinburgh LSCE, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de.
Paul R. Moorcroft David Medvigy, Stephen Wofsy, J. William Munger, M. Dietze Harvard University Developing a predictive science of the biosphere.
BOREAS in 1997: Experiment overview, scientific results, and future directions Sellers, P.J., et al. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 102, No. D24,
Christian Beer, CE-IP Crete 2006 Mean annual GPP of Europe derived from its water balance Christian Beer 1, Markus Reichstein 1, Philippe Ciais 2, Graham.
Data assimilation in land surface schemes Mathew Williams University of Edinburgh.
1 A Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System at LSCE using multiple data streams (CARBONES / GEOCARBON EU-project ) Philippe Peylin, Natasha MacBean, Cédric.
Changes and Feedbacks of Land-use and Land-cover under Global Change Mingjie Shi Physical Climatology Course, 387H The University of Texas at Austin, Austin,
Summary of Research on Climate Change Feedbacks in the Arctic Erica Betts April 01, 2008.
A process-based, terrestrial biosphere model of ecosystem dynamics (Hybrid v. 3.0) A. D. Friend, A.K. Stevens, R.G. Knox, M.G.R. Cannell. Ecological Modelling.
BIOME-BGC estimates fluxes and storage of energy, water, carbon, and nitrogen for the vegetation and soil components of terrestrial ecosystems. Model algorithms.
Results from the Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) 3 FastOpt 4 2 Marko Scholze 1, Peter Rayner 2, Wolfgang Knorr 1 Heinrich Widmann 3, Thomas.
Carbon, soil moisture and fAPAR assimilation Wolfgang Knorr Max-Planck Institute of Biogeochemistry Jena, Germany 1 Acknowledgments: Nadine Gobron 2, Marko.
Integrating Remote Sensing, Flux Measurements and Ecosystem Models Faith Ann Heinsch Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group (NTSG) University of Montana.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
Simulated Interactions of Soil Moisture, Drought Stress, and Regional Climate in the Amazon Basin Scott Denning 1, Jun Liu 1, Ian Baker 1, Maria Assun.
State-of-the-Art of the Simulation of Net Primary Production of Tropical Forest Ecosystems Marcos Heil Costa, Edson Luis Nunes, Monica C. A. Senna, Hewlley.
TURBULENT FLUX VARIABILITIES OVER THE ARA WATERSHED Moussa Doukouré, Sandrine Anquetin, Jean-Martial Cohard Laboratoire d’étude des Transferts en Hydrologie.
Integration of biosphere and atmosphere observations Yingping Wang 1, Gabriel Abramowitz 1, Rachel Law 1, Bernard Pak 1, Cathy Trudinger 1, Ian Enting.
Spatial Model-Data Comparison Project Conclusions Forward models are very different and do not agree on timing or spatial distribution of C sources/sinks.
Satellite data, ecosystem models and site data: contributions of the IGBP flux network to carbon cycle science David Schimel, Galina Churkina, Eva Falge,
Impacts of leaf phenology and water table on interannual variability of carbon fluxes in subboreal uplands and wetlands Implications for regional fluxes.
Application of the ORCHIDEE global vegetation model to evaluate biomass and soil carbon stocks of Qinghai-Tibetan grasslands Tan Kun.
Change in vegetation growth and C balance in the Tibetan Plateau
The PILPS-C1 experiment Results of the first phase of the project Complementary simulation to be done Proposition for the future.
CAMELS CCDAS A Bayesian approach and Metropolis Monte Carlo method to estimate parameters and uncertainties in ecosystem models from eddy-covariance data.
Investigating Land-Atmosphere CO 2 Exchange with a Coupled Biosphere-Atmosphere Model: SiB3-RAMS K.D. Corbin, A.S. Denning, I. Baker, N. Parazoo, A. Schuh,
Variations in Continental Terrestrial Primary Production, Evapotranspiration and Disturbance Faith Ann Heinsch, Maosheng Zhao, Qiaozhen Mu, David Mildrexler,
Biases in land surface models Yingping Wang CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research.
Goal: to understand carbon dynamics in montane forest regions by developing new methods for estimating carbon exchange at local to regional scales. Activities:
Mechanistic model for light-controlled phenology - its implication on the seasonality of water and carbon fluxes in the Amazon rainforests Yeonjoo Kim.
Xiangming Xiao Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and Space University of New Hampshire, USA The third LBA Science Conference, July 27, 2004, Brasilia,
Dynamic Global Vegetation Model ORCHIDEE Simulates the Energy, Water and Carbon balance Land component of the IPSL Earth System Model.
Dr. Monia Santini University of Tuscia and CMCC CMCC Annual Meeting
FastOpt CAMELS A prototype Global Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) Wolfgang Knorr 1, Marko Scholze 2, Peter Rayner 3,Thomas Kaminski 4, Ralf.
Geogg124: Data assimilation P. Lewis. What is Data Assimilation? Optimal merging of models and data Models Expression of current understanding about process.
Phenology Phenology is the study of living organisms’ response to seasonal and climatic changes in their environment. Seasonal changes include variations.
Data assimilation in C cycle science Strand 2 Team.
Simulation of atmospheric CO 2 variability with the mesoscale model TerrSysMP Markus Übel and Andreas Bott University of Bonn Transregional Collaborative.
Arctic RIMS & WALE (Regional, Integrated Hydrological Monitoring System & Western Arctic Linkage Experiment) John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running.
The Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS)
Influence of tree crown parameters on the seasonal CO2-exchange of a pine forest in Brasschaat, Belgium. Jelle Hofman Promotor: Dr. Sebastiaan Luyssaert.
Comparison of GPP from Terra-MODIS and AmeriFlux Network Towers
CO2 sources and sinks in China as seen from the global atmosphere
Community Land Model (CLM)
Marcos Heil Costa Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Ecosystem Demography model version 2 (ED2)
Proposition for a future phase of the project:
Coherence of parameters governing NEE variability in eastern U. S
VALIDATION OF FINE RESOLUTION LAND-SURFACE ENERGY FLUXES DERIVED WITH COMBINED SENTINEL-2 AND SENTINEL-3 OBSERVATIONS IGARSS 2018 – Radoslaw.
Presentation transcript:

Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement P. Peylin, C. Bacour, P. Ciais, H. Verbeek, P. Rayner Flux data to highlight model deficiencies & The use of satellite data and flux data to optimize ecosystem model parameters

Variational assimilation scheme to improve ORCHIDEE model Data at the site level NEE, H, and LE, fluxes fAPAR time series (SPOT – 40m and MERIS – 1 km)‏ Optimization of the ORCHIDEE vegetation model Scientific issues What do we learn from the optimisation process ? Can we combine flux data and satellite fAPAR at the site level ? objectives

LMDZ-GCM «on-line» anthropogenic effects STOMATE SECHIBA Energy balance Water balance Photosynthesis Carbon balance Nutrient balances phenology, roughness, albedo stomatal conductance, soil temperature and water profiles precipitation, temperature, radiation,... sensible and latent heat fluxes, CO 2 flux, albedo, roughness, surface and soil temperature NPP, biomass, litter,... Biosphere Atmosphere daily ½ h yearly Vegetation structure LAI, Vegetation type, biomass prescribedDynamic (LPJ)‏ Climate data « off line » The ORCHIDEE vegetation model

Optimizer BFGS J(X) and dJ(X)/X Variational assimilation system flux tower measurements PFT composition ecosystem parameters initial conditions parameters ( X )‏  J(X)‏ M(X)‏M(X)‏ Y flux satellite fAPAR Y fAPAR J(X)‏ climate NEE, H, LE Governing processes and parameters to optimize Carbon assimilation Autotrophic respiration Heterotrophic respiration Plant phenology Energy balance Hydrology Kvmax, Gsslope, LAIMAX, SLA, ThetaLeaf frac_resp_growth, respm_T_slope, respm_T_ord Q10, Hc, Kresph Kgdd, Tsen, Leafage albedo, capasoil, r_aero depth_soil_res

J(X)= (Y flux daily -M(X)) T R season -1 (Y flux daily -M(X)) + (Y flux diurnal -M(X)) T R diurnal -1 (Y flux diurnal -M(X)) + (Y fAPAR -M(X)) T R fAPAR -1 (Y fAPAR -M(X)) + (X-X 0 ) T P -1 (X-X 0 )‏ Bayesian misfit function Few technical aspects Gradient of J(X) computed by finite differences ! (adjoint under completion) How to account for ½ hourly data/model error correlations ? Relative weight between H, LE, FCO2, Rn ? How to treat thresholds linked to phenology ? (i.e. GDD,…) Technical difficulties daily means diurnal cycle fAPAR prior information

Model – data fit for several forest ecosystems  Highlight of model deficiencies ! Temperate deciduous forest: HE (96-99), HV (92-96), VI (96-98), WB (95-98) Temperate conifers forest: AB (97-98), BX (97-98), TH (96-00), WE (96-99) Boreal conifers forest: FL (96-98), HY (96-00), NB (94-98), NO (96-98)

1 year AB (97-98) BX (97-98) TH (98-99) WE (98-99) F CO2 (gC/m 2 /Jour) F H2O (W/m 2 ) a priori model Optimized model Observations Seasonal cycle fit: temperate conifers

Diurnal Cycle a priori model Optimized model Observations AB (97-98) BX (97-98) TH (98-99) WE (98-99) F CO2 F SENS (μmol/m 2 /s) (W/m 2 ) F H2O Diurnal cycle fit: temperate conifers Diurnal Cycle

AB (97-98) BX (97-98) TH (98-99) WE (98-99) F CO2 F SENS (μmol/m 2 /s) (W/m 2 ) Overestimation of the sensible heat flux during the night Delay between model and observed F CO2 F H2O Diurnal Cycle a priori model Optimized model Observations Diurnal cycle fit: temperate conifers

1 year HE (97-98) HV (94-95) VI (97-98) WB (95-96) F CO2 (gC/m 2 /Jour) F H2O (W/m 2 ) Onset of the growing season not fully captured ! a priori model Optimized model Observations Seasonal cycle fit: temperate deciduous

1 year FL (97-98) HY (98-99) NB (96-97) NO (96-97) F CO2 (gC/m 2 /Jour) F H2O (W/m 2 ) a priori model Optimized model Observations Instabilities because of snow falls Seasonal cycle fit: boreal conifers

Complementarity between fAPAR and flux data ?  First test for the Fontainebleau “OAK” forest

Data at the Fontainebleau forest site gap-filled half-hourly measurements (LE, H, FCO2) year 2006 Flux tower measurements Neural Network estimation algorithm SPOT- 40m: temporal interpolation with a 2- sigmoid model MERIS - 1km: Remotely sensed fAPAR Deciduous Broadleaf forest (Oak )‏ SPOTMERIS

RMSE = 0.17 RMSE = 0.31 RMSE = RMSE = RMSE = ORCHIDEE simulations 80% Temperate Broadleaf Summergreen 20% C3G local meteorological (30’ time step) previous spinup of the soil carbon pools SPOTMERIS obs prior Data at the Fontainebleau forest site

diurnal cycles (July)‏ daily data improvement of the seasonal fit obs prior posterior Assimilation of flux data only

SPOT-fAPAR Assimilation of fAPAR data only potential unconsistency of the phasing between NEE flux and fAPAR observations obs prior posterior

SPOT-fAPAR only fluxes & SPOT-fAPAR Assimilation of flux data + fAPAR data obs prior posterior

Estimated ORCHIDEE parameters flux only flux + SPOT flux + MERIS Are the differences on the retrieved parameters induced by the use of SPOT or MERIS fAPARs significant? Still need to quantify the uncertainties on the parameters!

Conclusion Results ORCHIDEE simulates quite well the seasonal, synoptic, and diurnal flux variations at Fontainebleau; this is even better after assimilation! Lesser agreement with remotely sensed fAPAR We learned on deficiencies of the model: spatial heterogeneity leads to smooth increase of observed fAPAR unconsistency between NEE and fAPAR timing ? need for high temporal resolution / high resolution fAPAR data to conclude on potential deficiencies of ORCHIDEE Perspectives Technical improvements: improve the convergence performances thanks to ORCHIDEE adjoint model analyze the posterior on the estimated parameters Application to other sites!

Experimental Validation K vmax Leaves Age Observations (Porté et al., 98) Vc,jmax optimized Vc,jmax a priori V cmax ( μmol m -2 s -1 ) V jmax ( μmol m -2 s -1 ) Dependency of the carboxylation rates wrt leaves age

Optimized values: variabilities K vmax β K HR K Csol ABBXTHWEHEHVVIWBFLHYNBNO Temperate conifers Temperate deciduous Boreal conifers Parameters optimized every year Optimized Values strongly variable amongst: 1) the different years of a same site. 2) between sites of a same PFT Constant parameters : Optimized values follow the same trends amongst the different sites and PFT.

Mean uncertainties a posteriori uncertainties β K vmax K Topt K Tmin K Tmax K MR Q MR F Rc K HR Q 10 K ra K z0 K alb K Csol SLA Age f Temperate conifers Temperate deciduous Boreal conifers