UIA FLORENCE October 31st, 2014 LITIGATION COMMITTEE THE ROLE OF LAYMEN Marie-Christine Cimadevilla CIMADEVILLA LAW

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ch. 18 Guided Reading and Review answers
Advertisements

The German Experience: Patent litigation and nullification cases
CHAPTER 3 Court Systems 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution
Magruder’s American Government
Chapter 18 – The Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branch. Court Systems & Jurisdictions.
Objective 1.02 Understand Court Systems and Trial Procedures
Chapter 7: The Judicial Branch
THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION.  Established in 1952  The judicial authority of the EU  Cooperates with the courts and tribunals of the.
December Duality of the Justice system Judicial stream Administrative stream Court of conflicts.
Unit A-Business Law Essential Standard 1.00
8-th CIS Local Counsel Forum Kiev-Odessa, June 2013 Recognition and Enforcement of EU Countries Court Decisions in European Union: Illustration –
Alternative Dispute Resolution. Introduction Alternative dispute resolution is often referred to as ADR. It describes the ways that parties can settle.
Courts, Jurisdiction, and Administrative Agencies
Lower Federal Courts Section 2 The Federal Courts and the Judicial Branch Chapter 8.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 23 FRENCH COURT STRUCTURE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL COURTS March 11, 2002.
1 China-EU Forum Beijing, 9 – 10 July, 2010 The protection of employees Forth section.
The Federal Court System
Comparative Law Spring 2003 Professor Susanna Fischer FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 20, 2003.
The Court System Chapter 5.
1 AN OVERVIEW OF THE FRENCH PUBLIC OVERSIGHT SYSTEM Vienna, 15 March 2006.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer
The Federal Court System
Comparative Law Spring 2003 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 13 FRENCH COURT STRUCTURE ADMINISTRATIVE AND MISCELLANEOUSCOURTS March 13, 2003.
The Judiciary Chapter 10- The Judiciary. Federal Judiciary Act of 1789 O Established the basic 3 step federal court system. 3. Supreme Court 2. Appellate.
Institut der beim Europäischen Patentamt zugelassenen Vertreter Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office Institut des.
Presentation Pro © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Magruder’s American Government The Federal Court System.
The Federal Court System Chapter 18. Section 1: The National Judiciary The Creation of a National Judiciary Articles of Confederation  no national courts.
The Judicial Branch The main job of the Judicial Branch is to interpret the laws!
Why is the power of judicial review key to the system of checks and balances? Because the power of judicial review can declare that laws and actions of.
The Judicial Branch Unit 5. Court Systems & Jurisdictions.
Presentation Pro © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Magruder’s American Government C H A P T E R 18 The Federal Court System.
A Dual Court System Business Law. Previously…  Explain the need for laws.  Compare the different sources of law.  Examine the constitutional basis.
Criminal Law Lecture 3 Cyprus Judicial System  Supreme Court  District Court  Assize Court  Family Court  Rent Control Tribunals  Industrial Tribunals.
TRIAL PROCEDURE Dr. KAROLINA KREMENS, LL.M. (Ottawa) International Criminal Procedure.
Chapter 7: The Judicial Branch. “The Federal Court System & How Federal Courts Are Organized”
Chapter 5 – The Court System. Trial Courts  Trial Courts – listen to testimony, consider evidence, and decide the facts in disputed situations  Plaintiff.
Comparative Law Spring 2003 Professor Susanna Fischer FRENCH ADMINISTRATIVE/MISCELLANEOUS COURTS FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 18, 2003.
1 Chapter 5: The Court System. 2 Trial Courts Trial courts listen to testimony, consider evidence, and decide the facts in disputes. There are 2 parties.
Judicial Branch preAP. Jurisdiction Jurisdiction –the authority to hear certain cases. The United States is a DUAL system: State courts have jurisdiction.
The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: 25 Years 4 June 2010 “The Influence of the UNCITRAL Model Law in Hong Kong and China”
THE COURT SYSTEMS Chapter 18. The Dual Court System ■In the United States there are two types of court systems under which every court in the nation can.
The Court System Chapter 5. Courts  Trial Courts- two parties Plaintiff- in civil trial is the person bringing the legal action Prosecutor- in criminal.
Prosecution and investigative authorities in Romania Current status and future reforms Monica Otava Prosecutor Prosecutor’s Office Attached to the High.
The Courts AP US Government. Some Basic Legal Terms Litigant – Someone involved in a lawsuit. This includes both plaintiff (one bringing the charge) and.
Chapter 11.2 LOWER FEDERAL COURTS Objective; Define the kinds of lower federal courts in the United States.
North Carolina Courts. The Role of the Courts North Carolina courts resolve disputes, including lawsuits involving private disagreements, as well as criminal.
Chapter 18 The Federal Court System. Section 1, The National Judiciary Objectives: Objectives: 1. Explain why the Constitution created a national judiciary,
Article III: The Judicial Branch Chapters: 11,12
Chapter 10- The Judiciary
CHAPTER 3 Court Systems 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution
Magruder’s American Government
Government Governments are created to provide safety, order, and to serve the people. They depend on citizens taking active, responsible roles.
Early Systems of Law Law in democratic societies resolves conflict, defines criminal acts, and sets their punishments. The Code of Hammurabi used categories.
The Judical Branch The federal Court System
Magruder’s American Government
Court of Justice of the European Communities
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in Russia Roman Zaitsev, PhD, Partner 05/09/2018.
How does a case move from local courts to the U.S. Supreme Court?
Process of Law.
Hierarchy of courts Exercises.
Magruder’s American Government
The Federal Court System (ch.18)
Magruder’s American Government
Business Law Essential Standard 1.00 Objective 1.02
The Courts AP US Government.
Business Law Essential Standard 1.00 Objective 1.02
Business Law Essential Standard 1.00 Objective 1.02
LECTURE No 6 - THE EUROPEAN UNION’s JUDICIAL SYSTEM I (courts)
Chapter 3 Court Systems.
Presentation transcript:

UIA FLORENCE October 31st, 2014 LITIGATION COMMITTEE THE ROLE OF LAYMEN Marie-Christine Cimadevilla CIMADEVILLA LAW

1. LAY JUDGES IN FRANCE

COURTS EXCLUSIVELY COMPOSED OF LAY JUDGES Commercial Courts Elected by tradesmen from lists established by the chambers of commerce. First instance Labor Courts Half of the judges elected by the employers and half by the employees. Half of the judges elected by the employers and half by the employees. Proximity judges Designated among legal practitioners for 7 years. Jurisdiction in civil matters if value of the dispute does not exceed Euros - and criminal matters for minor offenses

COURTS PARTLY COMPOSED OF LAY JUDGES One Juvenile judge and two lay judges chosen by the Minister for Justice among particularly competent persons from lists established by the Presidents of the Courts of Appeal. Juvenile Court (Tribunal pour enfants) : One Juvenile judge and two lay judges chosen by the Minister for Justice among particularly competent persons from lists established by the Presidents of the Courts of Appeal. Three professional judges, one of which presides the Court, and six citizen (nine in the Court of Appeal) drawn by lot. Jury of Assize Court (jurisdiction over felonies) : Three professional judges, one of which presides the Court, and six citizen (nine in the Court of Appeal) drawn by lot. Presided by a judge of the Regional Court (Tribunal de Grande Instance) or a honorary magistrate. Two lay judges : one representing the social security funds chosen by them, one representing those entitled to social security chosen by the representative trade unions. The Social Security Tribunal : Presided by a judge of the Regional Court (Tribunal de Grande Instance) or a honorary magistrate. Two lay judges : one representing the social security funds chosen by them, one representing those entitled to social security chosen by the representative trade unions. Presided by a District Court Judge (Tribunal d’instance). One judge represents the owner farmers and one the tenant farmers Agricultural Rent Court (Tribunal paritaire des baux ruraux) : Presided by a District Court Judge (Tribunal d’instance). One judge represents the owner farmers and one the tenant farmers One professional judge and two lay judges chosen for two years among persons presenting guarantees of competence and impartiality. In New Caledonia, First Instance Tribunal : One professional judge and two lay judges chosen for two years among persons presenting guarantees of competence and impartiality.

2. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMERCIAL COURTS

JURISDICTION OF THE COMMERCIAL COURTS Insolvency proceedings Commitments Commercial companies Commercial transactions French Commercial Courts are 1 st instance jurisdictions composed of lay judges (art. L French Commercial Code) having jurisdiction over : Insolvency proceedings concerning any person exercising a commercial activity, and any actions connected with (article L French Commercial Code). Commitments and transactions between tradesmen Commercial companies Commercial transactions between all persons (art. L French Commercial Code)

PERSONAL COMPETENCE  If claimant is not a tradesman, he can choose between the competent civil court (proximity judge / district court / Regional court) and the Commercial court.  If the defendant is not a salesman, the claimant must bring his claim before the competent civil court.

TERRITORIAL COMPETENCE In principle, there is at least one commercial court in each département. General rule the competent Commercial Court is that of the domicile of the defendant. Exceptions   Contractual matters, the jurisdiction of the place of effective delivery of the good or the place where the services have been provided.   Matters of tort : the jurisdiction of the place of the damaging event or the place where the damage has happened (Art. 46 French Civil Procedure Code).   Insolvency proceedings, the court of the registered office of the insolvent company.   If the litigating salesmen agree to submit the dispute to a jurisdiction which otherwise has no territorial competence (Art. 48 French Civil Procedure Code).

LEGAL REMEDIES The Commercial Courts decide in first and last instance when the value of the dispute does not exceed 4000 Euros. It is not possible then to lodge an appeal before the Court of Appeal. The only remedy left is the appeal before the Cour de cassation.

MATTERS BEYOND THE JURISDICTION OF THE COMMERCIAL COURTS Regional Courts (Tribunaux de grande instance) have jurisdiction over :  Commercial leases  Disputes concerning the sale of inmovable property  Liability of court appointed agents or liquidators (mandataires judiciaires - liquidateurs)  Insolvency proceedings of civil companies, economic interest groupings and european interest groupings (GIE, GEIE)  Actions concerning Patents, Designs and Models and Trademarks (only certain Regional Courts are competent : Paris, Lyon, etc.) The Regional Court has also jurisdiction in matters of unfair competition deriving from the use of trademarks (Cour de cassation, May 28 th 2013, Nr )

PROCEDURAL RULES   The proceedings are oral : the parties are not required to submit their arguments and demands in writing   Representation by lawyer is not required   The Public Prosecutor (“Procureur de la République”) has an office in each Commercial Court. He is present during the insolvency proceedings In other proceedings, the Parties may request his presence in Court

3. ACTUAL DISCUSSION : SHOULD WE MAINTAIN THE COMMERCIAL COURTS ? Attempts to reform the Courts are undertaken nearly every ten years. Working groups have been established on March 5 th 2013 on the improvement of commercial justice.

In favor : Allows to unite in the same court both legal and economical expertise (Marshall Report). Mixed : the combination would guarantee a greater impartiality, but is costly, requires cooperation from the lay judges (Judges Union – USM). Against :  The professional judges are not sufficiently trained / show no interest for economical and financial questions (Employers Union – MEDEF).  The Courts are already efficient. This measure would not be usefull (ACE National Confederation of lawyers – CNA, Cercle Montesquieu).  The combination should not be introduced before the Court of Appeal, where mainly legal questions are examined for which professional judges are better suited (Judge’s Union – USM). THE COMBINATION OF PROFESSIONAL AND LAY JUDGES

TRAINING OF THE LAY JUDGES Consensus in favor :  Initial training before the lay judges take office, continuing education in civil law, commercial law and in professional ethics are necessary (Judges Union – USM).  Training the lay judges would improve the quality of their decisions (Marshall Report, Employers Union - MEDEF, Cercle Montesquieu, National Confederation of Lawyers – CNA.

SPECIALIZATION OF CERTAIN COMMERCIAL JURISDICTIONS Mixed: The Commercial Courts are already specialized due to their localization. The smaller Courts rarely deal with important insolvencies. Insolvency prevention requires the commitment of the president of the Court. The institution of prevention chambers is useless (Employers Union – MEDEF) Against : The Courts are already efficient. This measure would not be usefull (Cercle Montesquieu).

INTERVENTION OF THE PROSECUTION In favor : The presence of the prosecution in Court reminds the parties of the general interest. In order to fully exercise its mission, the prosecution must be more specialized. Adequate training of the prosecutors is required to give them an economic culture. Specialized functions in the prosecution should be created (Judges Union – USM). Against : Intervention of prosecution in prevention of insolvency proceedings could discourage business managers to go into prevention and is contrary to the contractual nature of this procedure (Employers Union – MEDEF).

4. OPINION OF A PRACTITIONER

STRONG LOCAL TIES Many Commercial Courts are firmly attached to the city and region where they are established. Litigating parties not belonging who do not belong to that region may find it difficult to be make themselves heard.

COMMERCIAL COURTS ALLOW ACCESS TO HIGH LEVEL BUSINESS PRACTITIONERS WHO RECEIVE NO SALARY IN RETURN   In Paris, the proceedings are held in small offices to allow conciliation between the parties. The hearings are almost confidential.   Conciliation is facilitated : one party submits a request for conciliation to the President of the Commercial Court, who designates a conciliator to help the parties find a mutual agreement. In case of success, the agreement will be confirmed by the Court. This procedure allowed in September 2014 to settle the dispute between LVMH and HERMES which lasted since October 2010 and threatened to harm both companies.

  Due to their experience, some judges have an accute understanding of transnational dealings and speak various languages.   Creation in 2011 by the Commercial Court of Paris of the International Chamber in which parties are allowed to assess evidence in a foreign language (English, German and Spanish). UNDERSTANDING OF INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS